 | Jun 14 2009 |
JFM It is important to know that URL Manager Pro does NO LONGER WORK WITH SAFARI 4. It cannot export to Safari 4 and actually deletes the existing bookmarks from Safari 4. Be warned, and let's hope that the developer will issue a new version soon. For the time being, I have found the following trick for exporting from URL Manager Pro to Safari 4: 1) export to Camino (one of the few browsers for which the export still seems to work fine); 2) then use BookIt (or buy it, in case you do not have it already); 3) use BookIt for exporting from Camino to Safari. It works - at least a temporary substitute... (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 26 2008 |
SALPARADISE I've been using URL Manager Pro for more than a decade and it has been excellent. Sad to say that it's time to look for something 21st century. This app is still not universal- runs under Rosetta. It needs a modern interface, tagging and smart folders and sophisticated searching. I think the most significant improvement is that he finally got tired of having to support difficulties of password expiration, which i never understood. The problem with it is that it relies on a conventional folder structure and remembering where a bookmark is located. What worked with a few hundred bookmarks just doesn't work when the number increase exponentially. Drilling down through a folder structure, guessing where i might have place a bookmark in order to locate it is a pre OS X strategy that has been replaced the modern environment with multi-level search using smart folders tagging and multiple search criteria with a quick, intuitive interface. If Alco would just redesign UMP so that it's as effective in today's context as it was in the previous millennium i'd buy it again. But for now i just have to get away from conventional folder structures, mousing to place and retrieve and relying on my own memory to make such a system effective. and, UMP doesn't generate valid .xbel files that will import into other bookmark apps (they aren't valid, have errors). portability of data is essential. I really wish I could just pay Alco for a good update rather than having to search for something new. (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 31 2009 |
RUBI4U hi (Version 3.5b10) | |
 | Mar 6 2008 |
HMAC Is anyone else having trouble downloading this app? i can't get thru to the ftp in any way, shape or form (tried diff ftp clients, no luck). assume there is a demo/trial, yes? Is there an http download connection by any chance? thank you (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 6 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Just downloaded it to check, downloaded just fine. Make sure you have passive FTp enabled in System Preferences/Network/Proxies. (Version 3.5b10) | |
 | Mar 6 2008 |
HMAC thanks for the suggestions; will check/try again! (Version 3.5b10) | |
 | Feb 20 2008 |
XANTHIPPE I have been using this almost as long as I have been on the internet. i.e. for more than 10 years. It has never let me down. Of course I have been wondering why no updates have appeared (apart from those that made it compatible with the latest OS and browser versions) - but then: it didn't really need improving. It has always done all I wanted it to do. I've always had all my bookmarks in all my browsers - and as a web developer I have plenty. (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 18 2008 |
RONL I think it's unfair for some reviewers to complain because this hasn't been updated. How many apps can you think of that would have worked fine through all of the OS X updates? NONE! Thanks Alco! And WebConfidential also is working fine. (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 18 2008 |
ESPIRIDION I don't like rating beta versions, but given the previous review I'll add my rating. I've used this software for years. Right now I'm using 3.4.4 which is from late 2005. Beta versions for URL manager Pro 3.5 have been around at least since May of 2006 (3.5b2). Version 3.5 is a FREE UPGRADE for URL Manager Pro 3.x users, btw. 3.4.4 works fine for my needs, along with WebConfidential. I do have other similar programs (e.g., Bookdog, 1Password) but URL Manger Pro and WebConfidential have never let me down. 3.5b10 was released on Feb 7, 2008. The previous beta version is from January 10, 2008. The three years between this beta and the previous beta look more like one month to me. On the rare occasion when I have needed support, it was as simple as emailing Alco. I have other programs that get updated very frequently, sometimes on a monthly or weekly basis. I'm actually glad that URL MP has worked as expected since I purchased it, and I have not needed any update to make it work for me. And again, if I needed something or had an issue with the software, the solution is as easy as contacting Alco. The previous 2-star rating and the weak argument presented should not prevent users from giving this a try. It's actually pretty good software. (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 18 2008 |
GRYPHONENT Too little too late. I cannot believe that after almost 3 years the developer releases a beta that picks up where the other beta left so long ago. I'm disappointed and have moved on to BookIt, which I can wholeheartedly recommend. WebConfidential and URLManagerPro have gone the way of the Dodo. (Version 3.5b10) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 29 2007 |
BRENTB It's disappointing to me; I used this software for years. That is, up until I paid for Bookit yesterday. Updates and information used to come out regularly, but then one day it's as if everything related to URLMP just froze. Is Alco OK? (I ask that without sarcasm.) I agree with the previous posts that just a quick update would go a long way. It might have kept me from switching. While I might be using other software (for now), I don't want to see URLMP abandoned, but instead revived and improved. (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 29 2007 |
ESPIRIDION Thanks for your comment about my TR2 review :) URLMP is still being developed by Alco. You can email him with feedback and suggestions. There's a beta 3.5 which I believe will be a free upgrade for 3.X users. I think the current beta is b7. http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/urlmanagerpro/ Although URLMP has not been updated in a long time, it's still the one I use everyday, along with Web Confidential. (Version 3.4.4) | |
 | Jan 1 2008 |
BRENTB You're welcome; I appreciate reviews that are more than just your typical "great software!" or "beware! This crashed my computer!" I'm glad to hear Alco is OK, and that he's got updates for URLMP in the works. Thanks for the update! (Version 3.4.4) | |
 | Oct 20 2007 |
STONEMAN Yes, developers like this really need to get it together and add a blog to their sites, so that we know what's up. (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 21 2006 |
IAMDORIAN I am probably not alone in wishing that this developer let us all know if development will ever be continued on this great program, or not. It's starting to look like the next alternative is going to be Bookdog (curently at v3.11.23), which is sad considering the potential shown by this application. So, how's about some good news for 2007? (disheartened user) (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 29 2006 |
COGITOERGOMAC I love URLMP. Even with its antiquated look, it still blows the other bookmark managers away. I tried iURL and WebnoteHappy [which is pretty good, but is too tied to del.icio.us and might have the world's dumbest name for an app], and while each has something to commend it, they still do not match URLMP. The good news is that there is a new beta in the works, and it is pretty nice. Here is what I think it needs: 1. stable menu bar controller; this is one of its greatest advantages; with the menu controller, URLMP feels like it is part of every app rather than a separate app; 2. automated sync/backup with .Mac and del.icio.us and Amazon web storage and anything else people might want, but not just one service 3. Quicksilver integration [this would rock]; 4. newer interface like WebnoteHappy, or other Mail imitators, or even mimic Quicksilver (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 30 2006 |
MACLOVER1.1 This used to be THE.., er "Graphic Converter" (yeah u know was around way back in the cave age) of the URL world. But sadly it has sort of taken a sabbatical smthg or other. I wish it'd come back, add support for DEVONAgent (my new find :-))) and NOT touch Unsanity's Haxies with a ten-foot pole for the little extramenu trick. Revamp the interface a tad and return to the spotlight where it should always have remained !!!!!!!! Hello wake up developper... You can return at numero UNO. (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 26 2006 |
GRYPHONENT This used to be a âmust-have application.â However, it has not been updated for a while and definitely needs updating. Not only does it look and feel old, it also is somewhat antiquated in its usability and level of integration with other applications. Written to developer Alco Blom at least twice with no reply. Alco used to fast and reliable in updating his apps... but whatever happened to him, I fear both URL-Manager and Web Confidential are dead in the water. Personally, I have started looking for alternatives such as BareBonesâ excellent Yojimbo. (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 28 2006 |
KAMAFERRO which other type of application similar to this is better | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 13 2005 |
ANONYMOUS FOR GOD SAKE WHEN WILL YOU SUPPORT UNICODE ? Obsolescence App! (Version 3.4.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 21 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Tuesday, June 21, 2005 ~ 3:07:44 AM URL Manager Pro X 3.4.2 does not fully support TSM (Text Services Manager) and Input Methods used by TypeIt4Me. Email sent developer ignored. (Version 3.4.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 28 2005 |
ANONYMOUS URL Manager Pro is very much needed software, and Alco Blom deserves thanks from the entire Macintosh community for providing & developing it over the years! I've purchased both a Mac OS 9 and also a Mac OS X version during the past 5 or so years, & try using it frequently. But I have trouble understanding all the terms: things like "Shared Menus", Bookmark Menu Extras", etc. Whether that's my main problem is anyone's guess. Could the word usages of the terms in the manual be improved? I find the PDF manual only partly helpful. In the first place it seems way too long. And in the 2nd place, some definitions of terms are not entirely clear for me in places. I even tried re-editing the manual, just for myself, but other jobs take too much time, (Version 3.4.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 29 2005 |
GARBAGE Now redundant on MacOS 10.4 (Tiger) (Version 3.4.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 30 2005 |
STEVE Why would this be redundant under Tiger? (Version 3.4.2) | |
 | Apr 15 2005 |
CLYTIE SIDDALL An indispensable time-saver on any Mac, yet improves even more with each version. Best of breed. from Clytie (Version 3.4.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS It still lacks Column view, its UI is cluttered with confusing options and seemingly unnecessary features, and worst of all, it uses Haxie in order to do Safari bookmark menu, which is a big no-no if you want a stable system. It doesn't work with iSync to do automatic synching with .Mac. It doesn't even automate synching among multiple browsers. If I have to do it manually I might as well just use import/export function built into most browsers. Lack of true Unicode support has been a major annoyance for many years now, yet the developer of this application has been utterly unable to address the issue. It's not good enough to have an application in several different language versions. Many international users use at least two languages, and in many cases they want to operate in English environment while also being able to use non-English characters in that environment, or visa versa. OS X itself does that very nicely, why shouldn't this application do the same? It doesn't take a miracle to do it if the base code is written properly. Overall, strongly recommended to avoid it at all cost. (Version 3.4.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 28 2005 |
GEORGE I have problems with it too, but please suggest better alternative software that's still fully compatible with multiple browsers. | |
 | Dec 29 2004 |
DAVID S SHAPPIRIO I'm a longtime user of Alco's bookmark manager software, and would like to ask him a question about the documen-tation. To verify his e-mail address, I tried going to www.url-manager.com several days ago. The page would not load. Same result several times more recently. I'd be grateful to know his e-mail address. (Version 3.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 23 2004 |
JFM Significant improvement, since it is now possible to put folders at the top for sorting: this provides much more clarity. Excellent! I hope that the next improvement will be an arrangement closer to Windows Explorer than to Apple's bookmarks, which would allow to navigate and move bookmarks from one category to another much more easily. This is what LinkStash has done (as a standalone bookmark manager) for PC users, and having used it during two years before switching to the Mac, I can say that it is definitely more convenient. Anyway, what is nice is to see how the developer of URL Manager Pro is constantly attempting to improve the product: thank you! (Version 3.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS The best bookmark manager! (Version 3.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2004 |
KCTIPTON Been happy with it for a very long time. My biggest gripe is how it doesn't easily deal with exporting to or importing from various Mozilla-type browsers. It's not clear to me that it's keeping up with the latest changes. (Version 3.4b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 9 2004 |
JONSTUCK I have used URL manager Pro since version 1.x. There is nothing better and the support is just as good. Please keep up the geat work. (Version 3.3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 12 2004 |
DOUGLAS ENGELBART "Nothing better"? So what about "Butler"? (Version 3.4b6) | |
 | Jul 7 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I've been trying URLMP in successive versions under Mac OS 9 and X, and, for the life of me, have barely been able to understand how to make it work for me. | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 11 2004 |
MAC2ALL In OSX it works with the APE (Application Enhancer) to make a tight integration with your browser/s. But since i do not want to use APE because it makes the mac unstable, i just open URLMP and add bookmarks manually into it. It is a bit work, but i think this is cheap prize for a stable system. In OS9 it worked very well, the integration with the browsers, and could bookmark directly from within the browser/s. (Version 3.4b6) | |
 | Dec 11 2004 |
MAC2ALL The problem with integration in OSX, is due to Apple not wanting other developers to have access to the menu line. Therefore third party developers use the Unsanity app APE. Many users do not have troubles with the APE, so you may try use the "Shared Menus Enhancer Installer 1.2.2". No big problems if it gets unstable. Just the Finder, or the Dock that crashes and relaunches automatic. And if so, and you don´t want this, just use the uninstall option of the "Shared Menus Enhancer Installer 1.2.2" Check here for more info about SME: http://www.url-manager.com/sme.html (Version 3.4b6) | |
 | Dec 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS You can use the Global Menu. It does similar to the Shared Menu. (Version 3.4) | |
 | Jun 23 2004 |
PATRIK I've used URL Manager Pro for a year or so and I love it, it does everything I needed and looked for a long time to organize and quickly access my ever expanding lists of bookmarks. No matter which browser I used my bookmarks end up in URL Manager Pro. No more trying to managed and sync bookmarks and favorites lists in between differents browsers or trying to remember where a specific URL was saved. With URL Manager Pro thanks to the Search function it 's easy to find quickly a specific URL among a thousand bookmarks. All URL are saved on a file making it easy to backup on an external drive or Zip. URL lists are easy to organize in folders and sub folders, copy, delete, add notes and access from the Dock or the Menu. Also updates with improvements and added features are frequently available. If you need to make your life easy managing all your bookmarks, this is it ! (Version 3.3b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 22 2004 |
ANONYMOUS You can go into all the yada, yada features, but basically it does what I need to get done. If you need to manage (beyond casual use) bookmarks, this is the application to use and support. It will get even better in time. Adventures in time: http://homepage.mac.com/bobembry/free/invites/index.html (Version 3.3b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 22 2004 |
KONNERSMAN I've been using URL Manager Pro for a couple of years and am completely satisfied. It does everything I need and has never caused any problems. (Version 3.3b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 22 2004 |
PALE RIDER I have tried, and paid for, just about every URL manager utility I have found over the last two years, looking for that perfect "cross-browser-central-repository-auto-updating-do-everything" URL manager. I haven't found the perfect one yet, but nothing else comes close to URLMP. BookIt? Please. BookIt doesn't manage anything, instead requiring you to do all the work. On top of that, it hasn't been kept up to date, while Alco has been releasing steady improvements to URLMP. I paid for BookIt early on, but every single time I add a bookmark in one browser, I have to go through the update process. Just plain dumb. Not with URLMP. Add a bookmark once, it is there for all of them. Improvements? Sure, it could use some UI improvements, and some of its power is obscured by complexity. Launchbar? Absolutely divine. But it doesn't replace a bookmark manager. It just makes it that much better. (Version 3.3b4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 5 2004 |
ANONYMOUS No column view support. HORRIBLE Find function. Clumsy UI. Not worth paying for. (Version 3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 18 2004 |
PETE Anybody know how to disable this utility from opening in time when actual browser was activated? I ma trying hopelessly to disable it but NO luck! I am getting suicidal now about this issue. Otherwise application is great but this disable future, seams to NOT work. (Version 3.2) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 20 2004 |
EX-CUSTOMER This, along with flawed Shared Menu, is one of many reasons I gave up on this application. URL Manager is NOT a quality software. Don't fight with it. It's not worth your time. Look elsewhere. LaunchBar is better. (Version 3.2) | |
 | May 21 2004 |
ALCO BLOM Please choose Preferences from the Shared URL Manager Pro Icon menu to control startup of URL Manager Pro. Click the At Startup tab. You can also deinstall Shared Menus via Preferences. (Version 3.2) | |
 | May 17 2004 |
UNICODE have a look at bookit shareware $12 supports multibyte characters, I am still waiting for isync style book mark manager however. (Version 3.2) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 20 2004 |
ANONYMOUS i agree with you. bookit is the tool i use now after years of waiting for the author to update his apps to handle unicode along with other much needed fixes (shared menu not refreshing reliably, the app keeps losing my reg code, etc.) you cant get this author work. dont count on him. (Version 3.2) | |
 | May 8 2004 |
HAVEL I agree about the need for additional language support. I have bookmarks with titles in Japanese that get "garbaged" when imported to UMP. I'll wait for a version that works. (Version 3.2b12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 15 2004 |
DTP Listen " Asian Mac User" are you on drugs or what? Are you telling me, that every developer should speak 450 world languages? Or you do know them all! This small utility coming from small developer is absolutely awesome which make your comment absolutely idiotic!!! Again, this utility is completely indispensable for those who knows! (Version 3.2b12) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 15 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I'm not Asian, but fail to understand your anger at Mac users who want Unicode support. It has nothing to do with providing localization in 450 languages, but rather support for Unicode. (Version 3.2b12) | |
 | Apr 23 2004 |
SWEDE It's of course everyones rights to ask for Unicode support, but completely bashing this software and giving the lowest possible rating in all categorys i very childish. This software is useless to some, obviously, but certainly not to all mac users. (Version 3.2b12) | |
 | Jan 27 2005 |
ANONYMOUS "Useful to some" alone does NOT deserve 5 star rating. Many many international users have been complaining about the lack of true Unicode support for a few years now, yet this developer has been utterly unable to come up with a remedy. It's not good enough to have an application in several different language versions. Many international users use at least two languages, and in many cases they want to operate in English environment while also being able to use non-English characters in that environment, or visa versa. OS X itself does that very nicely, why shouldn't this application do the same? It doesn't take a miracle to do it if the base code is written properly. (Version 3.4.1) | |
 | Feb 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I like the lack of multiple language support. I am a registered user since OS 9, and highly recommend this application to anybody that has lots of bookmarks to manage. (Version 3.2b9) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 22 2004 |
HEH 'anybody', as long as they want the app in English. (Version 3.2b9) | |
 | Feb 20 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Still no support for mutilanguage. I won't doubt URL Manager Pro is a feature rich application. But I'm talking about INTERNATIONAL network users for god sake. Don't forget there are more then 1/5 among the world population who speaks Chinese. And Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese are TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE. Why do you Westen people believe that every should English ? Why can't I learn and use more then two language ? Do you feel superior then the Asians when you offer the localized version ? Or you do not have the ability to deal with the language programming skill which you never cared before ? If I'm talking about some scientific applications, fine-arts applications, musical applications, I won't judge it with the same standard. But without multiple-language support, it is only a junk. (Version 3.2b9) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 21 2004 |
JIMW This person either did not read my previous reply, chose to ignore it, or choses to demonstrate to the rest of the world the level of intelligence that they posses. In any case, they need to get a life and grind their axe somewhere else. (Version 3.2b9) | |
 | Feb 21 2004 |
JIMW Since some of the comments and replies to the thread of the reviews by anonymous have been edited out the thread of my previous comment is somewhat broken. Here is a summary of what it contained: - MacUpdate in my opinion is not the proper forum to discuss the pros and cons of what languages a developer should be writing their application in. - A product should not be downgraded to a single star at all levels because of the lack of a single feature, even though that feature is important to the reviewer. The review should be taken in context of the entire Mac community - If a reviewer cites a strong opinion, they should take responsibility for it by creating a user id, not signing on as as anonymous as this review has, using this developer as a "poster child" for their personal protest regarding Asian language software development. The developer of URL Manager does not work for this individual. Certainly this individual has a right and in fact should ask the developer to consider Asian language language support as a future feature if this person so desires. But it is not this persons product. It is up to the developer to choose or not to choose to do this. If this person does not like it, they can choose not to use the product, attempt to contract to the developer to incorporate it into the product, write a bookmark program on their own with similar features with Asian language support, or pay someone else to write a program for them. Like it or not, the developer is not under any obligation to respond to this or any request and in my opinion this is a fine program just the way it is. FYI: I am a registered user of the product and my only contact with the developer was to send him an email requesting information about beta versions. My interest in this is that I just like to see all people treated fairly and I feel that the developer, who in my opinion, has done a good job, is getting abused and the "short end of the stick" on this one. (Version 3.2b9) | |
 | Feb 21 2004 |
ANONYMOUS This man is obviously an English-speaking person. Who isn't, and won't understand the importance of the language issue in the other half of this small planet. This single feature is somewhat a extraordinary present for you, but it is critical for the rest. 1. URL Manager is designed and selled as internet utility, 2. and it does not support multiple language. An internet utility which failed to display multiple language is complete useless. It is overpriced even if it only charges 1 cent ! What would you judge Internet Explorer if it charges you for 10 bucks, and it can only see Japaness, Russians, Korean and fail to display the European characters ? Before I began this axing action, I've post dozens of comments and emails to staffs of URL Manager since the first release of Mac OS X version. It has been two years and they continued choosing to ignore me. So I'll continue my not-support-multilanguage bashing action, till they notice this tiny little threat. And I said this again: WITHOUT MULTIPLE LANGUAGE SUPPORT, URL MANAGER IS A JUNK! (Version 3.2b9) | |
 | Feb 22 2004 |
ANONYMOUS JimW Macupdate is the ideal place to comment on the features of a program, which is precisely what the anonymous review is doing. Lack of Unicode support is a missing feature. If it's the most important feature for that user, then he has the freedom to give the whole program 1 star. I find it highly annoying that an otherwise fine product gives me a line of questionmarks whenever I bookmark a Japanese-language site. Support for Unicode, particularly under system X and for an Internet application, should be a standard feature. (Version 3.2b9) | |
 | May 17 2004 |
Your shouting and xenophobia reveal the underbelly of your personality. Your message suffers as a result. (Version 3.2) | |
 | Feb 20 2004 |
JIMW This is one of the best bookmark managers available in my opinion. I have tried manually managing my bookmarks, using some of the free stuff, etc. I have tried Filemaker DB's, but always they were to limited, to cumbersome, to limited or lacked some of the features I desired. This produce has almost all that I want or need. It also has things that I didn't know I wanted or needed and things that I probably will never use. Warning: If you only keep a few dozen to 50 - 100 or so bookmarks, you do not need this product. This product is for those of us who have accumulated hundreds or thousands of bookmarks and are anal enough to want to keep them validated and organized. For us, this product "worth its weight in gold." It now integrates with the two most popular Mac browsers, IE, and Safari, along with Mail and Entourage. It also works with many other browsers and mail programs. It sorts, organizers, libraries, indexes, validates, edits, and maintains bookmarks. It also does it easier and faster than most of the browsers and allows you to use a single set of bookmarks among multiple browsers. This is a product you do want to read the instructions on so that you don't miss out on the many features of it. It is loaded. You can use it without the manual but you will be "kicking yourself" for what you missed later. Support is good. Betas are not announced as the developer treats betas as true trial software. So if you want to try out new interim releases, you need to check MacUpdate or the website. A Bookmark librarian is a difficult product to write since everyone has their own idea what it should do, what features it should have, and how it should work. It also has to be compatible with a number of different products, given the variety of browsers in the marketplace. While not perfect, I believe URL Manager Pro is the standout product in its category. (Version 3.2b9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 2 2003 |
ANCIENT I concur with reviewer above, that this software is not even a time limited demo(shareware ?), you spend time downloading
to discover the only thing you can actually do is try out their tutorial file. Without registration first you cannot import a single bookmark. The software looks like it might be the best of show, but you have to pay $25.00 to be sure. One hinderance with these utilitys is they sometimes get to big for there boots, in the sense this thing has more options than ayone would ever really need to use, ie
what should be a small utility, is attempting to be a full on application. When all i'm looking for is utility that provides me with a menu that has one selection that sais "sync all browser bookmarks". I guess you couldnt charge $25.00 for that though. Oh well i'll keep looking. (Version 3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 14 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Good Idea - Maybe you never really needed a bookmark manager (Version 3.2b12) | |
 | Oct 21 2003 |
CHARLEY PARKER As a web site designer, I'm constantly switching from one browser to another. URL Manager has become indispensable over the years I've been using it. It lets me handle and organize my (way too huge) bookmark list with relative ease. I like the ability to color-code and annotate the bookmarks and folders. My only suggestion would be to add the ability to open sub-folders as separate windows to make dragging from one to the other easier when organizing. (Version 3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 12 2003 |
KARENZ. Alco, please consider Charley's suggestion; it would be so much easier to move bookmarks from one folder to another if they could be opened as separate windows. Other than that minor inconvenience, URL Manager is outstanding; a bargain at $25. (Version 3.1.1) | |
 | Jun 8 2003 |
RON WEST Nothing but GREAT! Pay the shareware and ENJOY a great application! (Version 3.0.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 21 2003 |
RICHARD LIU The best bookmark management tool I've ever tried in MacOS 9. But in MacOS X that is not so good. I can't use foreign language unless I switch my whole system to that language. That's unacceptable. It's age of MacOS X now! People are using Unicode! So I switched to Bookmark Tool, which use Unicode. (Version 3.0.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 14 2003 |
DAVE Not sure why this is called shareware! Not even a functioning demo - How can it be evaluated if bookmarks cannot be imported! More like crippleware. May be a good program but I am not going to pay $25 to find out! (Version 3.0.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 15 2002 |
KOXINGA JEndhal: You will be happy to know that the latest nightly build of Chimera has added support (or at least partial support) for shared menus. They are working on it! (Version 3.0.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 22 2002 |
JENDAHL I'm also a long-time user, have found this to be the best URL manager available, and well worth the fee. Upgrades occur often and the product is stable. I'm *very happy* to see future support for Chimera in the list! Too bad more developers don't support the shared menus standard. (Version 3.0.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 31 2002 |
NCHAPMAN I've been using this since version 1. I couldn't get along without it. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 11 2001 |
CYBERBRENT The best internet application you will ever download. I have been using it for over two years and is a rock solid extremely stable program. I could not live without it !!! (Version 3.0b18) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 28 2001 |
IRNBRU001 Not all that fond of this app. Has is good points has it's bad ones. Would be a lot cooler if it was free. (Version 3.0b18) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 25 2001 |
JOHN II URL Manager Pro is an indispensable part of any browsing experience. (Version 3.0b18) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|