 | Nov 1 2009 |
MICG I've used the MacScan demo and it worked surprisingly well. It found tracking cookies, no trojans or anything else (fortunately). I just ordered the full version and will write a review of my use of MacScan soon. I was really impressed by one or more times reading forums and a MacScan Dev or Rep would chime in and give their e-mail and more than kindly offer full support to the poster with some sort of malware on their Mac. I've ordered it because there is a lot of identity theft out there and most of the time cookies need to be enabled. Who doesn't download all sorts of files? (Version 2.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 11 2009 |
TRANCE this app is rubbish. i agree with the negative comments. it takes forever to scan a drive and finds nothing, whereas iantivirus found the problem trojan quickly. (Version 2.7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 12 2009 |
NATHANCOLLINGS I really want to know what this tool is scanning for. imo this is a hoax. If you really need a tool to scan for real trojans there are free alternatives. No recommended (Version 2.7) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 13 2009 |
SECUREMAC NATHANCOLLINGS, Thank you for your comments about MacScan. I hope this response will help clear up your misunderstand of what MacScan does and what other tools are offered. A list of the spyware that MacScan scans for is available on our website. MacScan has been the leader in anti-malware protection offering solutions for spyware removal since 2002 and 2005 for Mac OS X. Other tools are available to remove spyware from the Mac including two free utilities released by our company SecureMac.com. These tools target specific threats whereas MacScan scans for thousands of security and privacy threats including trojan horses, keystroke loggers, dialer applications, and tracking cookies. We keep on top of the latest security threats updating our definitions in a timely manner whereas free alternatives are often out of date and miss serious security threats. Downloading the trial version of MacScan allows you to use the program for 30 days for free allowing you to detect and remove malware found. We look forward to your continued support and are happy to answer anymore of your questions, our e-mail address is macsec@securemac.com (Version 2.7) | |
 | Sep 14 2009 |
NATHANCOLLINGS Thanks for replying. I gave this a low rating because: - It installed a lot of files every where. This is not Windows remember ! - It did not find Jahlav on my setup while DNS changer remover did - It smells like a hoax to me. A highly pushed commercial program that does not work good. Again, there are other working AND free tools around. Hopes this clarify my rating. (Version 2.7) | |
 | Sep 14 2009 |
NATHANCOLLINGS Even more strange. The DNSChanger remover is your own product. It removed the trojan but your software to pay for did not find it. Figures.. .. (Version 2.7) | |
 | Sep 14 2009 |
SECUREMAC NATHANCOLLINGS, It is important to update the definitions for MacScan before performing a scan to detect the latest threats, once MacScan has detected the items they will be isolated in a folder to your desktop for you to inspect, from there simply drag the folder to the trash. MacScan will detect and remove if running the latest version. If you feel that it did not, simply contact us for further support and our team would be happy to assist you. We thank you for your feedback and look forward to working with you! (Version 2.7) | |
 | Sep 9 2009 |
DSW1958 I purchased MacScan through MacPromo and am still wondering why. All it ever finds is a few tracking cookies which I guess is good but I feel that it is not worth the price of admission. Version 2.7 came out and I thought I would see if anything was new or different but have been unable to get the update due to a consistent server error. Another annoying thing about updating is the process of having to go through a checkout process which is totally lame. (Version 2.7) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 10 2009 |
Thank you for your comments. The MacScan update process requires an internet connection and access to check and download the file without being obstructed by third party security and firewall software. If you have any software running temporarily disable or allow access to MacScan while checking for updates and let us know if this fixes the situation by e-mailing macsec@securemac.com. You may always download the latest binary directly from http://macscan.securemac.com/files/MacScanInstaller.dmg (Version 2.7) | |
 | Aug 19 2009 |
CAESARV I purchased this antispyware back in 2008. I am still asking myself what it actually does. The fact that it asks your password makes it very suspicious. I decided to use it only for checking tracking cookies, since it is silly to scan all files each time just to find .. nothing. Big surprise: MacScan always finds the same tracking cookies. I eliminate them, run MacScan again immediately thereafter and, miracle, it detects anew the same cookies that were eliminated one minute before. In the meantime I have found a way to eliminate those tracking cookies for real: go to the browser, check preferences/cookies and delete them yourself. Of course it is quite cumbersome and does not justify the price payed for MacScan. About detecting troyans, my feeling is very negative, suffices to check the list of them in the .plist file. Many programs in the list are no troyans at all. To become a really good proagram, MacScan has a long way to go. (Version 2.6.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 19 2009 |
SECUREMAC CaesarV, Thank you for your comments. MacScan does not require authentication unless you want to run in authenticated mode as the dialog displays. MacScan can run fine scanning files owned by the user perfectly fine under non-authenticated mode. However accessing files your account does not have permission to access requires authentication. As far as the cookie issue is concerned, it sounds like your cookie file is corrupt and we can assist with fixing that. Feel free to e-mail macsec@securemac.com for further support. (Version 2.6.1) | |
 | Aug 19 2009 |
ADONSA Once you register, you have to put up with Esellerate. :( And, MacScan phones home (to esellerate), especially when you check for updates. Fortunately, Little Snitch detects the application's attempts to contact Esellerate, and the "phone home" attempts are preventable. (Version 2.6.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 19 2009 |
SECUREMAC Thank you for your comments. The only time MacScan communicates with the outside world is when you are checking for updates (optional, see preferences) and when activating the product. For more information on esellerate and activations please reference http://www.esellerate.net/activation_policy (Version 2.6.1) | |
 | Jul 30 2009 |
SYZZYGY I scanned my home folder and Macscan found some tracking cookies; where were they from? ad.yieldmanager.com. I got these cooties using Camino browser and accessing Yahoo.com and MacUpdate.com. Interestingly, I've gotten no tracking cookies using any of my other browsers....Safari, Firefox, Opera or iCab. Why Camino browser only.? And why when accessing MacUpdate??? I remedied the problem in Camino by opening Camino/Privacy/cookies exceptions list and where ad. yieldmanager.com is listed, configured Camino to deny cookies from ad.yieldmanager. Problem solved. I need MacUpdate cookies enabled to login to MacUpdate and post a review/comment/. But tracking cookies? I need them like a need lice. Fuq ad.yieldmanager and their kind! (Version 2.6.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 30 2009 |
MISHA Are you sure they came from us? The only chance of that happening is through some of the Google AdSense ads we serve... but I didn't think Google allows that. Regardless, browsers have an option to only accept cookies from sites you visit. I recommend surfing with that option. That will let cookies from macupdate.com go through fine, but it will prevent any other cookies that might some how be coming to you via MacUpdate (third party ad tracking cookies) from reaching you. (Version 2.6.1) | |
 | Jul 30 2009 |
SYZZYGY Am I sure tracking cookies came from Macupdate? Well, after deleting ad.yieldmanager tracking cookies via MacScan, I went to Macupdate ONLY and no other website., via Camino. I then ran MacScan and once again it found an ad.yieldmanager tracking cookie. I then went to my home folder/library/Application Support/Camino/cookies.txt and, sure enough, there was ad.yieldmanager tracking cookie sitting there like a fat little louse. I've always had all my browsers, including Camino, set to accept cookies only from sites that I visit; but I still got the little buggers when using Camino. (Version 2.6.1) | |
 | May 18 2009 |
GRYPHONENT Hi there. Already installed the latest version via direct download from your server. Im running OS 10.5.7. (Version 2.6.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 18 2009 |
ANONYMOUS MacScan 2.6.1 has been released. This is a free upgrade for existing users and available in a 30-day demo. We thank the you community for all the feedback and reports. We are available directly at macsec@securemac.com. MacScan 2.6.1 detects the latest spyware with included definitions. This version also adds interface changes and improvements as well as bug fixes and enhancements. (Version 2.6.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 18 2009 |
GRYPHONENT Thanks for the update and continued development. However, your internal update system does not work! Had to download the installer through MacUpdate separately as the eSellerate engine produced an error. Recommend switching to Sparkle! (Version 2.6.1) | |
 | May 18 2009 |
SECUREMAC Thanks for the quick feedback, it is possible you caught us while we were updating our files on the servers. If you wouldn't mind emailing us macsec@securemac.com with your version of Mac OS X we can further check into it. As always you can download the latest version directly from our website directly or through the mirror links here. (Version 2.6.1) | |
 | Apr 17 2009 |
THUS.SPAKE.Z I just selected three keyloggers from Macscan's detected spyware list, Backtrack, Keybag, and Keyboard Spy and installed them. I then ran my copy of macScan v.2.6 updated with the latest definitions version (as of 17th April 2009) 2009007). Macscan did not detect any of those three Spyware programs. I suggest that anyone counting on MacScan to detect installed spyware perform their own due diligence otherwise you may be using MacScan under a sense of false security. (Version 2.6) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 17 2009 |
SECUREMAC A new version of keyboard spy was released today. When new threats emerge we update the spyware definitions as soon as we have analyzed the threat. Macscan does detect all three of the listed spyware. Please feel free to contact macsec@securemac.com to further troubleshoot detection and to further advise you in proper detection and removal. We thank you for your feedback. (Version 2.6) | |
 | Mar 31 2009 |
A big shortcoming of MacScan is its apparent inability to detect spyware that uses Stealth/Invisability methods which is claimed to render the spyware undetectable. I tested MacScan with one of them (Aobo Keylogger) and MacScan didn't detect it. Unless SecureMac...MacScan's developer, is able to "sensitize" MacScan to the presence of such spyware, MacScan can't be considered totally reliable. There's at least one other spyware program out there that claims to be undetectable(Perfect Keylogger). SecureMac has been alerted to this issue. (Version 2.6) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 1 2009 |
SECUREMAC MacScan does indeed detect both of the programs mentioned. It is important to make sure you are running the latest version of MacScan and definitions available. To do so simply launch MacScan and click the MacScan menu and select 'Check for Updates'. Our staff is available to answer any questions you may have and if users find spyware not detected you may submit samples and information to macsec@securemac.com (Version 2.6) | |
 | Dec 30 2008 |
HELIOS9 I've been using MacScan since I purchased it for 12.95 at a MacUpdate promo about a year and a half ago. MacScan has been working smoothly and without issues. I run it about every 5-7 days and each time it has found 5-10 tracking cookies(I absolutely abominate them! as I resent and hate all invasions of my privacy) which, of course, I delete from my my Mac. If I hadn't already purchased it, I'd likely buy MacScan at it's going price of $30, considering that my privacy and browsing security are worth a lot more than that. (Version 2.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 19 2008 |
NATE HOULE Spyware outweighs virus threats for the Mac, and DNSChanger Trojan Horse is a perfect example of that. Its the widest reported threat to the Mac community, and the makers have been distributing new variants. MacScan is a proactive and enterprising utility for Mac OSX security. I've been using MacScan since 4/25/07 and haven't had any issues. The developers are consistently tweaking and improving it. Its obvious the developers at SecureMac take their jobs seriously and I wouldn't have this application on my computer if I didn't _know_ that. SecureMac is super responsive in regards to support/feedback and I believe they're genuinely concerned with betterment of this application. Keep up the good work! (Version 2.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 22 2008 |
JAN13 Expensive ! (Version 2.5.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 15 2008 |
SYHARRIS I've been using MacScan since I purchased it over a year ago as a MU promo for $12.95 and have had no problems whatsoever with it, no crashes nor even a hint of dyspepsia. MacScan has always run smoothly and easily for me. True, it's never found any cooties, but then I'm pretty careful about what cookies my browsers allow and have my browsers set to delete cookies at session's end. In Safari, I use PithHelmet to block all cookies from the likes of Doubleclick and all similar ilk. And then I purge all other cookies at session's end using Safari's "Reset" feature. At its current price of $30, though, I don't think that I'd purchase MacScan ....it is a bit steep imho. (Version 2.5.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 4 2008 |
RAY16 Macscan now crashes, might it be the lastest QT upgrade? Last time is was AOL! Just a thought (Version 2.5.2) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 4 2008 |
SECUREMAC Thank you for your feedback, if possible please e-mail the crashlog to macsec@securemac.com so that we can figure the bug out and assist you with getting the program running properly. (Version 2.5.2) | |
 | May 15 2008 |
HUGHMAC I have just upgraded to 2.5.2 and the damned thing crashes if I try to update the tracking cookies. On top of that, I no longer have a window opening where I can chose what scanning options I prefer. I just get the top bar and nothing else. | |
 | May 15 2008 |
What version of OS X are you running? Make sure MacScan is not running, then open your Hard Drive, then the Users folder, then the Shared folder, and then the MacScan folder, and delete the files SpywareDefinitions.plist and CookieBlacklist.plist. Run MacScan and check for definitions updates. If you are still experiencing problems with MacScan, please e-mail us at macsec@securemac.com for further support. (Version 2.5.2) | |
 | Dec 6 2007 |
DGOMBAU I have been trying it in demo mode, and it is nice and easy. I place a value on my time and don't want to have complex apps that have to be configured in conjunction. MacScan is simple and gets RID of those despicable tracking cookies. If that was all it did, it would be worth the cost for that alone. Tracking cookies are insidious invasions of privacy. How DARE they! It is like someone with a clipboard and video camera trailing you whenever you go shopping at a mall, and recording everything you look at or pick up, as well as everything you browse in a bookstore. (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 2 2007 |
SECUREMAC Thank you for your time in commenting on MacScan. MacScan is for your privacy and security, with MacScan you know that you are being protected against spyware for the Macintosh as well as given the ability to scan and remove tracking cookies. MacScan is a commercial application as well so you can be assured proper support and updates to the program and definition files. (Version 2.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 22 2007 |
JIMW Thank you very much but a combination of PithHelmet ($10 donation) and ClamXav is working fine for me. Both products are tested and proven products and have high reviewer ratings. If I am going to spend at least $25 on a product I would probably want a commercial one (Other than Virex or Norton) for a bit more that comes with regular updates and support. Spending $25 on a product that does less than the combo I am using just does not make sense to me, especially given the current frequency of Mac viruses, spyware and worms. In fact the main reason I run protection programs is to avoid the transfer of Windows viruses I get from others to other Windows friends. Pithhelmet, aside from cookie control also allow faster browsing and a more friendly web environment given all the ads, nasties and cookies it blocks. (Version 2.4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 26 2007 |
MACTICK MacScan crashes repeatedly when I run DEMO program. Crashes in both authenticated and unauthenticated modes. I only tried the QuickScan. It also crashed regardless of whether I had input managers installed. The crash reports for the 3 crashes were identical. Given the lack of Mac spyware and the frequency of users reporting crashes, this program seems to need a lot of work. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 26 2007 |
Thank you for trying out MacScan. We would like to work with you on the bug that is occuring for you. If you can contact us at macsec@securemac.com with a detailed report of your computer and at what point the program crashed we can help resolve the issue. I thank you for your time in working with us. | |
 | Apr 25 2007 |
JFM Well, I have used it for more than a year and, while I agree that there is little risk with viruses on Mac, MacScan has allowed me to identify and remove several times tracking cookies and other types of spyware. It has worked well, always been stable, and never caused any problem. I use it about once a month, and I a m glad to have it. Despite the relative lack of threats at this point, I am glad to see that there are people who pay attention and help us, Mac users, to be ready if some day suchg tools become really needed. In the meantime, I just want to say that, true, I could live without MacScan, but my experience with it has been positive. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 25 2007 |
PLASTERPYRUS Well like its others have said CRASHES, CRASHES, and CRASHES. Makes the whole evaluation thing a waste of time! (Version 2.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 26 2007 |
Thank you for trying out MacScan. We would like to work with you on the bug that is occuring for you. If you can contact us at macsec@securemac.com with a detailed report of your computer and at what point the program crashed we can help resolve the issue. I thank you for your time in working with us. | |
 | Apr 25 2007 |
F451 This works well in the situation that I have where my mother, who is lives in another state, has to rely on others to troubleshoot her iMac when I cannot do so over the telephone, via iSight, or when I am visiting. I have no clue what these people do to her iMac, although she is there watching them. It is a peace of mind that is worth it. So for those who continually lambast this app for whatever reason, maybe they should consider situations where this might actually be very advantageous? The developer is very helpful too. (Version 2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 20 2007 |
S P L A T ! to developer dude... "just for the records"... can you send us information or make a list of known troyans or viruses for OSX?? im a Mac user since 1994 and only viruses i was knowing are "macro-virii" for microsoft files!! (Version 2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 26 2007 |
MacScan detects against spyware such as trojan horses, keystroke loggers and dialers. We do not detect Viruses for the Macintosh. I can assure you that for Mac OS Classic (pre-os x days) there were quite a few viruses for the Mac (not the same in comparison as windows however). Mac OS X is another issue with viruses. My reference is: http://www.macvirus.org/database MacScan lists the spyware it detects on our website. We make sure to seperate in the scan and also the preferences the type of programs it detects. Such as if it is a keystroke logger or trojan horse it will be classified as so. If it is a remote administration application it will classify it as such (remote admin programs are not removed, just advised). Tracking cookies are from our list of blacklisted cookies that are updated like our definition files. These are seperated in the scan from the normal spyware files and can be scanned for seperately. I hope I have answered any questions you have and you give our program another try when you find the need. I thank you for your comments. | |
 | Jan 19 2007 |
SHOTGUNWEDDINGS Is the author of this software on crack or something? This lame program claims to be able to do alot of nothing. First off you must be high if you think that the eSellerate Engine this MacScan installer puts into your folder wouldn't count as spyware! I looked into the installer package with Pacifist and found the eSellerate Engine, no way will I ever install any software that included it. It's SPYWARE in my books! The very thing this lame tool claims to protect you from it install itself! Stick to Virex or ClamAV your better off! It's too bad the rating system here doesn't have 0's , it doesn't deserve the one's I was forced to use! (Version 2.3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 19 2007 |
SECUREMAC Thank you for your comments and time in checking out the software. To clarify a few things for you, eSellerate is the engine that deals with product activations and updates as well as purchasing. eSellerate information is available at eSellerate.net. Users have gone over their software and I aplaud you to do so also. MacScan allows you to perform updates to the software automatically or only when you choose, by default it is only when you choose to do so. This avoids the application automatically calling home to our servers to check the version to see if updates are available. It is important to take a proactive approach to security, anti-virus software titles do not detect spyware and anti-spyware products don't detect viruses. Hope I helped answer some of your questions and clarify a few things, we are always here for support. macsec@securemac.com (Version 2.3) | |
 | Jan 11 2008 |
WOLFEATSWORLD I can't believe your patience, especially in the face of such rudeness and stupidity. (unbelievable) (Version 2.5.1) | |
 | Jan 19 2007 |
WARLOCK7 Still no spyware or trojans that work on OS X, yet they put out another update to software that serves no purpose whatsoever. (Version 2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 19 2007 |
JEEPEE There is spyware and there are trojans, it's not much, but it exists. We do not have to be affraid, because it's allmost nothing and they're not in the wild. We are lucky that viruses, trojans and spyware is nothing compared to Windows. Lucky us. :o) (Version 2.3) | |
 | Jan 19 2007 |
MATHIAS i just tested the demo of MacScan and it counts tracking cookies and shows them as spyware ~switches Firefox Cookie Rules back on (Version 2.3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 26 2007 |
SECUREMAC MacScan has a seperate count for the cookies so that they are not counted with the actual applications. They are counted in the total amount of files found. Blacklist cookie scanning can be run optionally as well. (Version 2.4) | |
 | Jan 19 2007 |
MATHIAS HAhahahaha!!! lol!!! http://macscan.securemac.com/images/macscanscreenshot.gif ^nice photo!! is that from a Photoshop Tennis Match? | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 4 2006 |
THREEDEE912 There is only one or two 'spyware' apps out there. CarbonKeys keylogger and the legit SilverNetworks Spy app. They aren't even really spyware, as you have to manually install them. This could be useful in the future, but I doubt there will be any type of malware threat to Mac OS X any time soon. (Version 2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 3 2006 |
WARLOCK7 Still nothing out there and there's an update? What's the point? Stability issues? The software just has to pretty much sit there and look pretty and it has stability issues?! This product has come to the party far to early... (Version 2.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 22 2006 |
8OO8 Well, I've been using my Powerbook very heavily since I purchased it two years ago. Never had any spyware/malware protection. Been on the internet a lot, going everywhere, doing everything(well, almost). I decided to give MacScan a whirl, so I installed it and ran a scan. Results? Nothing found! No spyware, no trojans, no nothing! Ran it a second time, and still nothing found! So, what others have been saying about no threat from active spyware, trojans etc. out there for Macs must, indeed, be true. So I uninstalled MacScan and went on my merry way. Why would anyone really need this app? (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 18 2006 |
WARLOCK7 What's the point? There still aren't any out there. And still no list on the developers site... Gosh, I'm so glad people can develop useless software and charge money for it. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 18 2006 |
WARLOCK7 sorry, there is a list, of valid software, not spyware or trojans... Seems a little bit odd to provide a piece of software that monitors for legitimate software and calls it malware. (Version 2.1) | |
 | Apr 18 2006 |
SHADE Don't waste your money on this application. You can get a superior and free alternative in ClamXav. http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/15850 Sorry to the developer, but there's no real reason anyone should buy your software if there are bettere free alternatives available. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Feb 27 2009 |
MISSINGPERSONS First you have to learn to distinguish between spyware & trojans - and viruses. If You don't learn this now, you will in the future. Learn a little before blasting an app. I am in no way associated with SecureMac. I just don't like public ignorance. (Version 2.6) | |
 | Sep 26 2009 |
SANCHO Thank you for pointing out ClamXav (Version 2.7) | |
 | Apr 18 2006 |
ZWILLIAMS This thing is a SCAM. This thing is nothing more than a piece of junk aimed at fear mongering. None of that so called "malware" on their list is real. Try searching up any of the so called malware items and all you will get is a single back link to its own product page. What a load of crap. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 18 2006 |
JAMESKITTY wow. i thought this app was dead. (Version 2.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 1 2006 |
ROB Therefore: Does it contain spyware? What does it do- collect info? It says freeware but asking for registration? I am confused? (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2005 |
TOMIS Seams like vaporware for the paranoid to me. They say it removes [big list of security industry buzzwords] but don't actually say WHAT it removes or checks for. Their spyware list is empty, guess there's nothing to check for. Yet the program is a 2.5MB download. How does it determine something is a trojan application, by checking if the word "Microsoft" is in the title? Seriously, the best defense against "spyware" is to: 1) not instal it in the first place (ie, dont use pirated software) 2) use a user account that doesn't have admin access. that will keep your account sandboxed from the rest of the OS, if you suspect you have spyware you can just trash the account and start a new one without any worries 3) think before giving a program admin access when it requests it. Example: why is this solitaire game asking for my admin password? if it wont work without it, trash it. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 19 2005 |
JOHNNY ROCKET the description here says it's free, yet the readme file says "Demo will expire after 15 days" free? or demo? which is it? and it's out of beta and still no spyware list. hmmm... is there no spyware for mac? (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 20 2005 |
UMAROMC Dude, you're right. I clicked on the button to purchase it and saw the $24.95 price... Thanks for the heads up! (Version 2.0) | |
 | Nov 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Can the developer describe how this is different from or improves upon the command line tool Root Kit Hunter from www.rootkit.nl? | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS "An updated Spyware list will be released after beta testing." I guess this will be when there is something to put in the list (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Updated?!? The list is currently empty on the web page. So, this program either does NOTHING, or there is no known spyware out there... (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 9 2005 |
RAY To all Eggheads, this version works on 10.2.8, and to those who had problems, I always say keep your Drives in good working order. My main Mac is a G3 B&W running 10.2.8 worked fine and seems a bit faster. Apps also seem to open better. Most People say Macs are trouble free for the most part, but better safe then sorry. (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Are you implying that MacScan made your Mac run better/faster? If so, you are decidedly delusional. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 9 2005 |
RAY To Anon, Yes I did, what of it :) (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS You're delusional, as I stated previously. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS How about one single example of software that this will detect... How about the listed key loggers and remote administration tools that are available for OS X? Will it detect any of them? (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 8 2005 |
HEHHEH All I hear is crickets chirping. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Yeah, and for good reason too... "...it is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." - MacBeth, Act V Scene V (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
THOMAS Worked just fine for me under 10.3. Boss says I have to run some Spyware software so this works great. No spyware either. ;) (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS So, it didn't find anything. How do you know that it did anything? (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Jan 11 2008 |
WOLFEATSWORLD how do u know that it didn't (Version 2.5.1) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Good thing this is freeware because if it weren't then you could fairly call it MacScam. (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS What's the friggin' point? If there aren't any out there, what does this software do? Or is this just some 'clever' gimmick to get Mac users to install spyware on their machine? Get real... (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ALF WATT Wow, look at the long list of spyware this thing detects.... http://macscan.securemac.com/spywarelist.html I'd be much more willing to try this out if the threat it's going to protect me from was documented. Otherwise it's just wasting resources like virus scanners looking for nothing. Not to say there are no examples of OSX malware, just that there are no know vectors of infection besides downloading and running suspicious executables, even then there arent' any konwn privlidge escallation attacks so you would have to authorize the installation of a keylogger or remote admin tool. (Version 2.0b3) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Awwww... you're no fun! Come back when you've got your tinfoil hat on... | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS COWARD More FUD. Fear, uncertainty, and doubt to spread among the Mac faithful and recent converts from Windows. This application looks for things that don't exist on your Mac. Worse, their home page is loaded with all kinds of links to 'security' type Mac applications, as if the association to other worthy applications is sufficient. This application looks for spyware (there are none on Mac OSX), trojan horses (none on OS X), and keystroke loggers. Save your money. Read the reviews below. Read this review: http://www.mac360.com/index.php/mac360/comments/is_your_mac_secure_how_do_you_know/ Everyone reached the same conclusion. | |
| [ 10 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS There are trojan horses for OS X, as well as keyloggers. A quick search on google turned up these two, among others: CarbonKeys: (Description from the site listed below) CarbonKeys is an open-source server/client suite containing a trojan server that records keystrokes on the infected host and a client that is able to connect and communicate with the server to download keystroke logs as well as screen shots on command. http://firetech.cowfight.com/tech/x_carbonkeys.html MonitorerX Pro: (Description from the site listed below) MonitorerX Pro is the professional way to record all keystrokes and take screenshots secretly in the background. MonitorerX Pro allows you to monitor all users on one computer and view and organize all logs from within 1 single application, which makes MonitorerX Pro the best surveillance-tool around. http://www.burning-bytes.com/monitorerxpro.html Please do some basic research before claiming OS X is free of trojan horses and keyloggers. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
DPG4450GUY Uh, I'm not sure what you saw on a Google search, but, at this time, there are NO / NONE / ZERO / ZIP trojans or spyware for OS X !!!! (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Those keystroke loggers you mention, they have to be installed by the administrator of the computer or the network the computer is on. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Even if the programs have to be installed by an administrator, it still nullifies the claim that there are "no trojans or keyloggers for OS X." (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS But it is a lawful event, not random nor illegal nor destructive of your Mac or the data on it... you can't get a keylogger on your Mac from being on the internet or going to some dodgy site... Whoever installs the keylogger has a right to install it whether you or I like or not. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Who's to say that you gave someone permission. When a hacker gains access to your computer what do you call that? When an security vuln is found for the operating system that allows remote access or installation/execution without permission... what is that called. Mac OS X just had an issue with Widgets auto being installed by visiting a website, sure its fixed now but just as that was discovered so are other ways. Do you know who's been in your house while you're away, if your on a network or have a shared computer who has access to it. In office environments while you are out to lunch someone can install the file while you are away without your permission. And who is to say someone hasn't written special bundles to include any of the spyware? You quoted that there were 'no' spyware for Mac OS X yet some was just listed and now you try to spin it how it has to do with permissions.... Think... Just because Netbus doesnt exist for the Mac, oh wait it does... (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS First off, you are presumptuous if you think that you are responding to the same person. I've posted in this thread and I am not the original poster. From what I can tell there are/have been about four people contributing to this discussion. Secondly, in the classic sense of the words 'malware' and 'virus' and 'trojan', there simply are none. You are therefore using these terms in a fast and loose way. The fact is that it requires administrator privileges to install a keylogger on a Mac. Period. End of story. So, if you are a teenager who suspects that the parents have put a keylogger on your machine or if you are an employee that suspects your employer has put a keylogger on the Mac you use for work purposes, then this MacScan just might be for you. But in both cases they have a right to install the keylogger. And if you are an adult and personally own a Mac for your own personal use and you give anyone administrator access to your Mac then you deserve what you get. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS This is asinine!!! There are no known vulnerabilities to OS X which would allow unauthorized access to the machine aside from ignorant turds that give out their Administrator password to an untrustworthy individual. If they're that stupid to begin with then they get what they deserve. Anyone with enough expertise to create a keylogger or trojan for this OS isn't going to be stupid enough to not use a root kit and bypass your piddly little detection software. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Just for the record, I do use virus detection (ClamXav) because I know that while there is no virus for OS X I am also aware that OS X users can be a VECTOR to infect OTHER non-OS X computers by forwarding emails with infected attachments that the Mac user received from some non-OS X computer. No one can get into this PowerBook that I am using now, not in any way, not even the remotest chance. Because for anything/anyone to get onto/into this PowerBook, it would have to be me that allowed it. Ain't gonna happen. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Nov 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS You can hardly consider remote administration software to be a trojan. The same goes for legitimately used keystroke loggers. These are not TROJANS. Their use is the choice of the owner of the machine. Your examples are far from being valid. (Version 2.0b3) | |
 | Oct 27 2005 |
ZAR Perhaps some are too young to remember the commercial with the granny saying "Where's the beef?" It reminds me to ask as well, "for what purpose is this software?" For now, the only basis I can comprehend for this software is to perhaps perpetuate the poor and ignorant illusion the Mac platform is also subject to the all to numerous Windows afflictions, including spyware, trojan horses and viruses. I too desire to see the Mac platform remain spyware free (I own one pc and am constantly updating the anti-spyware programs) - I am crossing my fingers I'll never experience this affliction on my Mac. In fact fear of this happening on the Macintosh platform is why I even looked up spyware on the Mac portion of this site. I must do this from time to time - just to be certain. Thankfully to date I've found none from what I've read here or from vigilantly and dilligently reading all I can about potential Macintosh afflictions. To this point the question of "where are the spyware programs on the Mac?" remains one that is "thankfully" not answerable in the affirmative. IF or when I hear otherwise, I'll be back searching this site for solutions (Version 2.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 7 2005 |
NOAF Hi, I have been trying to run, install macscan but not able to. It says that this version has expired and suggest to go to http://macscan.securemac.com for an updated version. But even there i get the same problem.. any idea's what I can do.. (Version 2.0b2) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS I too have tried to install MacScan and get the same message. (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Oct 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS According to the forum on the developer's website, the current version is expired, and they are in the process of updating a new version. Why the download is still active on MacUpdate/the developer's site is another question... (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Oct 10 2005 |
MAC Yeah I was messing around for ages trying to get the updated version too.They should take it down and UPDATE their site.Anybody else know of good OSX security? (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Oct 10 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Since there are no, I repeat, no trojans or spyware (except for those which the administrator of the OS X installation must him/herself elect to install, such as keystroke loggers) for OS X all you are likely to need or want is: 1) Apple's built-in firewall 3) Little Snitch (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Sep 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Amazing product! My G4 iMac was so bogged down with viruses, I could barely even surf the internet; which was pointless to do anyway since all of the adware I had before running MacScan battered me with a barrage of pop up windows. I'm just glad I ran MacScan before my hard drive was deleted by a worm, like my old powerbook. A "must have" for any serious Mac user. (Version 2.0b2) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Could you please list a couple of those virus for those of us who think Mac's don't get virus's. Or were they word macro virus's? (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Sep 22 2005 |
DIMBULB? Original post was a joke... Please, tell me that you knew that... (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Sep 23 2005 |
ANONYMOUS LOL (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Apr 18 2006 |
JENNSEN "Amazing product! My G4 iMac was so bogged down with viruses, I could barely even surf the internet; which was pointless to do anyway since all of the adware I had before running MacScan battered me with a barrage of pop up windows. I'm just glad I ran MacScan before my hard drive was deleted by a worm, like my old powerbook. A "must have" for any serious Mac user. (9/22/2005, Version: 2.0b2)" Seriously, if you had a MAC that had virus problems like that, you are either lying or a waste of the world's oxygen. One way or another, I think you're full of it. Don't bother with this software, it really is as pointless as described by the other commentors. (Version 2.1) | |
 | Sep 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Reminds me of another joke: This guy is spreading powder on the street. Another guy comes up to him and asks him what he's doing. I'm spreading elephant powder! he proclaims. But there's no elephants around here! says the second guy, to which the first guy replies, Blooming good stuff, isn't it? Hey, wanna buy some? But hey, if you just arrived from Tellytubbyland, you're welcome to it! Features - would be a good idea. Ease of Use - seeing as its purpose is to search for malware, and it doesn't find itself, make up your own mind. Stability - considering there's a chance that any program can crash, and weighing that chance up against its usefulness, then Stability is also negative. (Version 2.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 13 2005 |
ANONYMOUS It crashes on 10.2.8 even though the link on the site says it should work. Jaguar users don't waste your time. Problem stems from openssl libraries on Jaguar. (Version 2.0b) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS The readme file clearly states OS 10.3 or later. They've obviously mislisted, probably by copying the info from the previous version. Sadly, I too have been looking forward to a new release for 10.2.8, and I can't afford to upgrade my OS for this alone. (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Sep 8 2005 |
STEELCUT Works.. on my mashine....iMac G3, OSX10.4 no probs, no trouble, does what it should... | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 22 2005 |
ANONYMOUS And what is that, pray? (Version 2.0b2) | |
 | Sep 8 2005 |
Where have you been MacScan your presence on the Mac platform has been sorely missed! Essential piece of software, keep up the good work! Good to know there are developers out there protecting the Macintosh community and not just people posting "There is no spyware for the Macintosh" | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 8 2005 |
JON they aren't protecting you, you goofball-- the reason people are writing there isn't spyware is because there isn't. you might as get a program that keeps your mac from turning into celery, because right now your computer is just as likely to turn to a vegetable as it is to be infected with spyware. (Version 2.0b) | |
 | Sep 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS "Sorely missed"?! Why? Did you find spyware on your Mac with MacScan?! I bet you didn't. The only spyware that I know of are some shareware and/or commercial applications that use the http port to send data to this or that developer (I won't name any of them here) from your computer. Otherwise, all unwanted outgoing connections can be blocked with Little Snitch. Unlike MacScan, that app is worth every single eurocent that its developer asks for it. (Version 2.0b) | |
 | Sep 9 2005 |
ANONYMOUS The thing that worries me is that this kind of software works by scanning for programs that are known to be spyware. If there isn't any spyware to search for, what is it looking for? Did they make something up? (Version 2.0b) | |
 | Sep 8 2005 |
JON first, THERE IS NO SPYWARE FOR MAC, there just isn't so this is useless. heck, look at their website, the "spyware list" is empty. it is also unethical to A) release a beta as freeware with plans to charge in the future (they are just looking for you to do their testing for free folks), and B) capitalize on people who are afraid of windows problems and don't know any better. If they want testers they should give them the product free so long as they report bugs or something like that, but the fact is no one should want this because it won't do anything for you. (Version 2.0b) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 8 2005 |
JONBOY there actually is adware for OSX, not alot of it but there is some! and howlong do you think OSX is going to stay Malware/Virus free? do you not think it is a good idea that an app like this is being developed for the day when the s**t hits the fan and your scrapping around looking for an app to get rid of your spyware/malware/viri!?????? (Version 2.0b) | |
 | Sep 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Well, there actually _are_ keyloggers for the Mac. Granted, it's not really possible for them to be installed without the system admin knowing they're there (unless the admin just enters the system password for every dialog without checking, or anything), and I don't even know if MacScan detects them, but at least one exists. (It can be found on MacUpdate, at that.) (Version 2.0b) | |
 | Sep 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Whatware? On a Mac? C'mon! Btw, it's free cuz it's beta. It'll expire in late September. Not on my iBook, though. (Version 2.0b) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 25 2005 |
DK0R Based on the most recent reviews, you wont catch me downloading this app. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 10 2005 |
MIKE THIS IS COMPLETE GARBAGE!! Downloaded it and it says it is expired and will not run. Come to find out this crap just puts all kinds of spyware ONTO your mac, beware! (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 8 2005 |
ANONYMOUS "...puts all kinds of spyware ONTO your mac?" Like what? Please elaborate... (Version 2.0b) | |
 | Mar 13 2005 |
NO NAME I have just found out that MacScan support DS_Store type adware when i was shredding it so don't download it. They say they will remove spyware when they are actually attaching it !!!!!!!!!! i hate spyware- if any1 knows any anti spyware software, please tell me the website and contact me on benniboy93@yahoo.co.uk (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 26 2005 |
ANONYMOUS What a piece of crap! (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 15 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Since there are none or very few harmless trogans, spyware etc on the Mac platform, and since the makers probably realise this and can't be asses updating the disabled download link, I'd say forget about it. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Sep 14 2004 |
ANONYMOUS It's been about six months of "download disabled" irritation. I say SecureMac needs to take their site down if they're not going to get their s*%#@ together and write some code already. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS MacScan has great potential! Keep up the good work Secure Mac! For those who can't get the program to work, set your Mac clocks back to 12/3/03 and relaunch the program. My only recommendation would be for Secure Mac to hurry up and fix current display bugs, and release MacScan under V1.0. Afterwards, the Mac community can provide feedback via Secure Mac's forum and later release the "utitlity" under V1.1. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 28 2004 |
HOLLY HUNT I did the "reset" time clock and it ran fine. Thanks for the advice or I'd be swearing a blue streak (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Jul 5 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Since the f'n thing doesn't work, I'd say it sucks. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 19 2004 |
IAN ORCHARD Downloaded from MacUpdate no problem, except that it turned out to be v b8. Went to web site: Download disabled. Ran it anyway, it asked for root access then promptly stalled due to 21Dec03 expiry date. This leaves me wondering if I've just INSTALLED a spyware with root access on my Pismo. Not a happy chappy at the moment. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 28 2004 |
ARPEGIO Just set the clock back to november 2003 and macscan runs fine. (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Mar 25 2004 |
ANONYMOUS I agree. I have been checking this site for months and same old story "download disabled". Why is there versions of this thing on the net if it is expired and cannot be used? This company has to do some serious re-thinking of its priorities. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 19 2004 |
ANONYMOUS Fully concurred. I have been checking for months now. "Download Disabled". Heck, it almost makes me wonder if SpyWare attacked it, and killed the developers out of anger, since there is hardly any SpyWare killers for Macintosh as opposed to PCs, lol. Ok, seriously now. They need to get moving or something. It's a bit rediculous. (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Mar 15 2004 |
LEO OF BORG At this point I think we can call this vaporware. There -is- no spyware on Mac anyway other than cookies that can't be taken care of via the use of Activity Viewer and Little Snitch. THOSE programs exist. This one? It's been 2+ months with no updates, and dead website. It's time to retire this vaporware and move on. Unless this thing is on par with Spybot Search and Destroy (much needed on Win32) I don't see what all the buzz is about. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 15 2004 |
LEO OF BORG Evidently all this thing does is look for processes from the following keystroke loggers: Keyboard and Mouse Recorder 2.0 Keystroke Recorder X 3.1.3 If you secure your PRIVATE Mac then it's not possible for someone to install these on your machine the way they could with OS9. I see nothing in here that deals with cookies, Alexia -type browser hacks, or Gator type hijack proggies that the Windows people have to deal with. Soooo, WHY do we need this? Again? (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Feb 24 2004 |
ROB B Once again there are individuals that send out a comment with the assumption that their problem is everyone else's problem. I used Macscan beta before it expired and it worked ok with no problems. Didn't mess up permissions, apps, system prefs in any way. But that's for me, one individual. Remember, this was beta. The whole point of beta is to identify problems/issues and feedback to the developer. Not to complain to the rest of th world. Yes, the last beta version of Macscan has expired and can no longer be downloaded as per the comment 'download disabled'. This is correct. Yes, the developers are somewhat slow to keep consumers up to date on progress, but be patient, a new release is due! Keep monitoring the Macscan forum. Little snippets do pop up now and again. (Ratings given are for the expired beta version). (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 4 2004 |
J Many new technological and systematic ways are being used to hack computers and it's not just "PC's". To give you an idea is sub7, it's been around but a new version is set up for Mac's. Now on to the main point of replying. I think the only thing at this time of writing this message is to say my mac is not protected against spyware and that if there was another alternative to macscam i'd take it. They earned there reputation by example. I don't have time to wait for, ah lets see, some time in the next year or two for the next update of macscan. If they can't keep to there claim the web sit and there links should be obliterated entirely. That's how I fill and not towards your posting. It's just hard to find the truth when every site edifies Mac Scan. In the mean time I will try for updates once a year. (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Jun 28 2004 |
ARPEGIO You probably have figured this out already, but just set the clock back to november 2003 and Macscan runs fine. (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Feb 10 2004 |
ANONYMOUS You can't even install this stinker from their website. It says "download disabled." This is probably one of those spyware removers that is actually spyware. (Version 1.0b8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 4 2004 |
JOE N. This software doesn't even work - regardless of it being beta! And DON'T even bother trying the beta!!! It doesn't work at all. You can even install it. It's already expired in it's compressed form. The developer must have written code into so it would be expired by a certain date, and unfortuantely - whatever date it was... it's come and gone. From the looks of the desert of comments from users and NONE from anyone at their site- the company has all but vanished or given up on it's potential customers. Don't waste your time or effort! MacScan beta is a BIG FAT waste | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 3 2003 |
BRILLIANTTREES I noticed some people have terrible problems, i have been using macscan since the 1st beta, even now with PB7 it seems to work fine, In OSX & Classic on my 17" super drive i-mac. even fine onmy old i-mac G3 333mghz. I did ask macscan about the added features, and why it does not dectect what i have experienced as an atack, They said that any trogan or real spy ware must be active during scan, i.e. when you visit a site or your yahoo or msn acounts you may find you are suddenly being monitored, But then will macscan only truley detect, this was in version PB5, I have'nt writen since i have been away, But they said the future versions and the final release Will have contiuious active scan, even while in background, which i think is excellant. i am glad we all get t test all these beta versions, and when it goes full for a price it will be worth it. join thier forum page and you'll find out from others what goodies lie ahead for mac;s & Macscan. Thanks Kev. (Version 1.0b7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 30 2003 |
APPLE CERTIFIED SYSTEM ADMIN Awful, awful, awful software. WARNING, do not use this software! It messed up my Apple Mail accounts and set the clock to 24 Hour time...but with AM and PM?!?! I must repeat, DO NOT USE THIS SOFTWARE! You have been warned. (Version 1.0b7) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 1 2003 |
COWICIDE That guy freaking out about his email must be a spyware producer, hahaha... (Version 1.0b8) | |
 | Jul 30 2003 |
SPRATT_ This software worked fine in OSX, and it does exactly what it's meant to do. It does not harm your computer, I have detected a lot of software while testing to see if it worked. So props to Nick, or Capt.Mac, lol. (Version 1.0b7) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 10 2003 |
TH Seems to only work for Classic, although the macupdate site says it is for OS X. It is unclear if it scanned only classic files...? Seemed to work great in Classic mode. (Version 1.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 28 2003 |
OSXSHARK4U Are you still trying to play developer Capt. Mac? Give it up. This is garbage and I hope you are happy about messing up people's computers judging from what I have read on that "other" software site also. Someone really should ban you. You're so-called software is dangerous. (Version 1.0b6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 11 2003 |
ANONYMOUS It still does that "resetting system preference" thing which is extremely annoying. You've got to be able to fix that!! (Version 1.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 11 2003 |
AZURA101 It worked really well, fast and stable. It took about 30 minutes to scan my entire hard drive, 800mhz G4 with 80gigs. Is lacking some features but does what its built to do. Also has a nice interface and good documentation. (Version 1.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 9 2003 |
ANONYMOUS downloded and it didn't work i got an corrupted program error when i clicked on the program (Version 1.0b5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 4 2003 |
PHILIP BECK Great improvement over first release! Now works easily. good stuff. thanks (Version 1.0b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 4 2003 |
SECUREMAC MacScan 1.0b3 released, this version adds bug fixes as well as the full administration scan. (Version 1.0b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 4 2003 |
IAN admittedly, i experienced a problem when attempting to run the carbon based programme - but on downloading the ppc classic beta release, the full scan (as advised) ran with no snags and detected no spyware. for sheer peace of mind for security conscious users, this free application does provide a degree of I also liked the cleanly designed interface. come on, give the guys a desrved break - it costs nothing and delivers as promised! (Version 1.0b3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jan 6 2003 |
HIREDGOON Ive just tried 1.0b2 and everything worked as id expect. the quick scan was exactly that, quick. and the full scan took approx 20mins to scan then entire contents of my hard drive. i dont know what the others are whinging about... (Version 1.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2002 |
SECUREMAC.COM PB, it will scan the hard drive. Please follow the readme for instructions. Because of file permissions your account does not have enough privledges to scan, we recommend until the next update dragging and dropping MacScan onto Brian Hills's Pseudo application to run it without trouble. See Readme for reasoning. (Version 1.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 18 2002 |
PB Revision provides mainly an explanation and change in the pop-up but no real change in the program - it still won't scan the HD and I am the only user. Needs work! (Version 1.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 17 2002 |
SECUREMAC.COM Everyone should download b2 it fixes the crash. (Version 1.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 16 2002 |
PB Good idea but lame implementation needs work. When asked to scan the whole hard drive it returns a "nil object" so each folder must be chosen individually and therefore it needs lots of babysitting.The "extensive education library" is nothing more than a couple of sentences defining what a trojan, etc is. Very overstated! With improvements this might be nice to have (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
DISGRUNTLED POSTAL WORKER Non-starter. (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
HUGH Application worked perfectly running iBook w/ Mac OS X 10.2. Too bad there isn't that many features right now. (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
BRIAN JACKSON What kind of "security" is THAT???? It freezes and die on my Pismo! (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
IAN WRIGHT Totally agree with Mickey - It sucks!! (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
MICKEY It dosen't matter if you wrote the software and felt you'd have to highrate it yourself - IT STILL STINKS!! (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
DAVID Runs very quick, I am clean. (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2002 |
MICKEY What a crappy piece of junk! Does absolutely nothing on my G4/500 - terminates itself after "exeption of class" message. Way to go - I feel SO much more secure now!! ;( (Version 1.0b1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|