Very nice and versatile software (I've been an iView 2.x user for years, and love the way you can throw everything on it - postscript, tiff, jpg, raws, pdf, pict).
Didn't know anything about the CaptureOne acquisition, until I tried running iView/ExpressionMedia under OSX Lion - it appears that they're not really compatible, and crash when generating a preview.
Didn't hesitate a bit getting the MediaPro version. To my mind, it is definitely worth the -modest- upgrade fee, although the changes in the UI (black) are rather superficial. Working with Lion is significant, though. Clearly, however, this could be a much better program if written from scratch, but that's my 0.02 worth.
Regarding Synchronize Pro's rival offerings (e.g. SuperDuper and the free --- oops, dirty word --- Carbon Copy Cloner): they are not really equivalent. To my mind, Synchronize Pro is more like a shell for RSync, and can be directed to backup and/or synchronize specific folders, disks, etc. For system backups, I've used SuperDuper, as it was designed for that purpose, I believe.
Regarding the upgrade policy: renewal fees of $100 every 2 years have to be factored in the storage equation (disks, RAID boxes, NASes, etc). To my mind, they represent a very small percentage of total cost, and I'm willing to accept that in order to maintain a stable workflow. In this respect, BTW, Synchronize Pro certainly delivers.
The one thing mentioned that bothers me, but I'm not sure if it's true, is the fact that a 2nd computer with the same license is crippled. This, I think, is a major flaw, that represents very bad practice. Can't help but feel that the authors don't trust me.
BTW, I haven't upgraded yet, so the stars reflect my rating for the previous version.
I'm puzzled. Dustin in on the Google code MacZFS project team, yet this "8.0" update does not appear on the official wiki page (http://code.google.com/p/maczfs/).
Very nice app, but with some gripes. It seems to be rock-solid (in my case the arrays survive a lot of mishaps, e.g. kernel panics) and very well-supported. My questions to the developer get answered immediately.
Still, I find a couple of things bothersome. First, the licensing policy: only one machine is allowed full functionality (in the past, SoftRaid could be installed liberally to any computers one owns). Second, the lack of some sort of knowledge base in their website. To me, this is a serious problem as storage setups become increasingly complex (FW, eSATA, PCI cards, etc) and some guidance would be very useful to the average home user.
Overall, however, this is good software (version 4.0.5).
Very nice app, but with some gripes. It seems to be rock-solid (in my case the arrays survive a lot of mishaps, e.g. kernel panics) and very well-supported. My questions to the developer get answered immediately.
Still, I find a couple of things bothersome. First, the licensing policy: only one machine is allowed full functionality (in the past, SoftRaid could be installed liberally to any computers one owns). Second, the lack of some sort of knowledge base in their website. To me, this is a serious problem as storage setups become increasingly complex (FW, eSATA, PCI cards, etc) and some guidance would be very useful to the average home user.
Overall, however, this is good software (version 4.0.5).
Very nice app, but with some gripes. It seems to be rock-solid (in my case the arrays survive a lot of mishaps, e.g. kernel panics) and very well-supported. My questions to the developer get answered immediately.
Still, I find a couple of things bothersome. First, the licensing policy: only one machine is allowed full functionality (in the past, SoftRaid could be installed liberally to any computers one owns). Second, the lack of some sort of knowledge base in their website. To me, this is a serious problem as storage setups become increasingly complex (FW, eSATA, PCI cards, etc) and some guidance would be very useful to the average home user.
I bought SoftRaid a few years back, and it was pretty obvious that this is industrial strength software. Never got to use it, except trying out its (nice) features.
Some time ago, I tried to install it on my 10.6.2 Hackintosh, and got kernel panics --- seems that this driver is pretty invasive, as my hack runs beautifuly otherwise.
There is no mention of using SoftRaid on OSx86 machines, and googling does not help (as it returns references to "software RAID implementations" in general, not this actual program.
Had zero problems upgrading from 10.2 (OS X 10.6.2). Although I expected problems importing bookmarks, there were none. This is a very nice browser.
I switched to Opera from Firefox (which is nice) and Safari (very nice), at the advice of (the now late) +fravia. Check his comments on http://www.searchlores.org/tuttiope.htm. Sure enough, it's an "alternative" browser, and has trouble with some sites - e.g. a MobileMe photo gallery (you have to "fit to width" to show).
Still, from a practical standpoint, I like it the best because you can have side panels, history, and everything easily accessible on its customizable toolbars.
-2
Media Pro
Xenophon reviewed on 21 Sep 2011
Didn't know anything about the CaptureOne acquisition, until I tried running iView/ExpressionMedia under OSX Lion - it appears that they're not really compatible, and crash when generating a preview.
Didn't hesitate a bit getting the MediaPro version. To my mind, it is definitely worth the -modest- upgrade fee, although the changes in the UI (black) are rather superficial. Working with Lion is significant, though. Clearly, however, this could be a much better program if written from scratch, but that's my 0.02 worth.
-1
Synchronize! Pro X
Xenophon reviewed on 13 Sep 2011
Regarding the upgrade policy: renewal fees of $100 every 2 years have to be factored in the storage equation (disks, RAID boxes, NASes, etc). To my mind, they represent a very small percentage of total cost, and I'm willing to accept that in order to maintain a stable workflow. In this respect, BTW, Synchronize Pro certainly delivers.
The one thing mentioned that bothers me, but I'm not sure if it's true, is the fact that a 2nd computer with the same license is crippled. This, I think, is a major flaw, that represents very bad practice. Can't help but feel that the authors don't trust me.
BTW, I haven't upgraded yet, so the stars reflect my rating for the previous version.
-1
MacZFS
Where exactly does this release fit in?
+4
SoftRAID
Xenophon reviewed on 11 May 2011
Still, I find a couple of things bothersome. First, the licensing policy: only one machine is allowed full functionality (in the past, SoftRaid could be installed liberally to any computers one owns). Second, the lack of some sort of knowledge base in their website. To me, this is a serious problem as storage setups become increasingly complex (FW, eSATA, PCI cards, etc) and some guidance would be very useful to the average home user.
Overall, however, this is good software (version 4.0.5).
-1
SoftRAID
Xenophon reviewed on 11 May 2011
Still, I find a couple of things bothersome. First, the licensing policy: only one machine is allowed full functionality (in the past, SoftRaid could be installed liberally to any computers one owns). Second, the lack of some sort of knowledge base in their website. To me, this is a serious problem as storage setups become increasingly complex (FW, eSATA, PCI cards, etc) and some guidance would be very useful to the average home user.
Overall, however, this is good software (version 4.0.5).
-1
SoftRAID
Xenophon reviewed on 11 May 2011
Still, I find a couple of things bothersome. First, the licensing policy: only one machine is allowed full functionality (in the past, SoftRaid could be installed liberally to any computers one owns). Second, the lack of some sort of knowledge base in their website. To me, this is a serious problem as storage setups become increasingly complex (FW, eSATA, PCI cards, etc) and some guidance would be very useful to the average home user.
Overall, however, this is good software.
-1
SoftRAID
Some time ago, I tried to install it on my 10.6.2 Hackintosh, and got kernel panics --- seems that this driver is pretty invasive, as my hack runs beautifuly otherwise.
There is no mention of using SoftRaid on OSx86 machines, and googling does not help (as it returns references to "software RAID implementations" in general, not this actual program.
Any experience out there?
+1
Opera
I switched to Opera from Firefox (which is nice) and Safari (very nice), at the advice of (the now late) +fravia. Check his comments on http://www.searchlores.org/tuttiope.htm. Sure enough, it's an "alternative" browser, and has trouble with some sites - e.g. a MobileMe photo gallery (you have to "fit to width" to show).
Still, from a practical standpoint, I like it the best because you can have side panels, history, and everything easily accessible on its customizable toolbars.
Just my 0.02.
-2
JollysFastVNC
With greetings from Athens.