I have been trying out a bunch of auto tagging tools, and it's been a frustrating experience to say the least. Most of them are massively overpriced, slow with larger libraries, and have a lot of features that don't all necessarily work.

MPFreaker has a reasonable price, a good feature set, and an interface that is easy to use. I am mainly using it to add artwork and lyrics. It's not the quickest tool (though quicker than some others I tried) but it seems to be accurate.

The interface is beautiful, and it has a huge edge over other invoice software in that regard. But what makes the application useless for my needs (and judging by their forums a lot of others) is the complete lack of flexibility for numbering invoices.

Very basic application, but works exactly as described. I like how it has the option to organize shows into folders. I have no complaints.

I have been playing around with Rapidweaver (had tried previous versions) and thought I would post my input. I used Golive in the past and use Coda, Text Wrangler and other apps. I just never 'took' to Dreamweaver and am always looking for alternatives. I am not a full on 'professional', but can find my way around code. I like a WYSIWYG app to work out ideas, then I generally tweak code from there. So I personally am looking for applications that suit that, and my review is from that perspective.

I find some of the reviews very interesting. A lot of them are based on what people find intuitive. One user mentions Freeway, which I personally do not find intuitive at all. Maybe as a desktop publisher or graphic artist, but not as a web designer. I won't disagree that Rapidweaver takes getting used to… but so does learning any new application when you are used to one particular application. Personally, I found Rapidweaver pretty easy to learn. ANd if you have some CSS/HTML knowledge, it's surprising how much you can do with the program, even without a lot of add-ons.

One thing I'd like to see is for Rapidweaver to incorporate some of the plug-ins into it's standard feature set. EG, if they incorporated Stacks and Blocks into it, I would gladly pay a bit more, and could give it a 5 star review with no problems. Those add-ons take the program to another level, and put it above any of the competition IMO.

It's a nice application though that has improved in leaps and bounds since I first tried it. At this point I more optimistic of the direction it's going, and it's support/community structure than I am of a lot of other similar applications I have been testing.

It's not for everyone, and people would likely be best reading through reviews and finding ones where people use the application for needs similar to what they are looking for. As you see, the reviews will really vary based on that.

Great app, but needs more options in the quality preferences. You should be able to select different file sizes/settings for different files somehow. EG a 1/2 show at 350 MB is good quality. And hour show at the same file size is not. The general categories of "normal, high, very high' are just too vague when you are downloading a bunch of different length shows.