MacUpdate
Join MacUpdate
New Member

New Developer
Explore
MacUpdate Desktop
Hot Apps

Business
Dashboard
Development
Drivers
Education
MacUpdate Promo
Popular Apps

Games
Home & Personal
Internet
Multimedia & Design
Utilities
iPhone
Apps

Login
Member Login

Developer Login
About
Search Mac Apps

Search iPhone Apps

Advanced Search
Psychos
Downloads: 30
Posts: 88
Smile Score: +62
About Me
I am a Free member


Visit Stats
Last Visit: 10 days ago
Member Since: 06 Feb 2007
Profile Views: 1,422

Chromium 17.0.963.46
(Free)
Adobe Flash Player 11.2.202.197
(Free)
Chicken 2.2b2
(Free)
Ghostery Safari Exte... 1.2.0
(Free)
Apple Xcode 4.2.1
(Free)
coconutBattery 2.7.2
(Free)
CenterImages Safari... 5.0.4
(Free)
CenterImages Safari... 5.0.4
(Free)
Incognito Safari Ext... 1.5
(Free)
Cookie Stumbler 1.4.2
(Shareware)
Cookie 2.2.2
(Demo)
KeySearch 1.5.1
(Free)
Psychos's Posts
Average Rating from Psychos:
(15)

sort: smiles | time
burypromote
-1

Quicksilver

Psychos reviewed on 03 Feb 2012
Spotlight, I hardly knew ye. Honestly, I'd disable Spotlight indexing entirely, but Mail.app searches depend on it! (I have everything but /Users excluded, actually...)

I use the terminal heavily, which probably helps as far as not needing Spotlight; I rarely use the Finder, preferring to use the terminal to move files and such for the most part. Combine that with Quicksilver, and hey, I can do almost everything from the keyboard! Yay!

I think my favorite feature (hard to pick, from the thousands...) is the use of triggers to run scripts. I have a few f-key cobos bound to launch various terminals/ssh sessions/etc through the magic of Quicksilver triggers.

For the average user, it's still a great launcher at the VERY least, and I'm guessing most users will get more than that out of it. Even on a pretty recent system with an SSD, I find results pop up faster and better with Quicksilver than with Spotlight... No, it doesn't index random documents as well as Spotlight does, but it's not meant to do that. The two co-exist just fine. :)

The one negative is that for various features, you do need a good bit of advanced configuration. But, hey, it does a ton of stuff even without any advanced config. I've had several friends who used to be primarily GUI-happy but now use Quicksilver at least to launch stuff...and there are far more advanced features than that available, even to the novice. The iTunes, Address Book, etc, plug-ins are all worthwhile.

Oh yeah, and it's free. For one of the very first things I install on any new Mac, I can't complain about that!
[Version 64]



burypromote

AirPort Utility

Psychos reviewed on 31 Jan 2012
Most annoyingly, my old AirPort Express is now listed as "not supported by this version of Airport Utility. It's still displayed next to my supported AirPort Extreme, but the tooltip tells me to download 5.6. So I did that, and it works with both base stations fine. (This reeks of planned hardware obsolescence to me, since it's not like it'd be hard to support it...especially when they have a new version of the older 5.x utility just out as well.)

As others have noted, various configuration options have disappeared as well. No "advanced" options or anything; I'd have been fine if they were just made less accessible. But apparently Apple doesn't think we're smart enough to set up or use certain things anymore...

At least installing 5.6 leaves the new version alone, so both can co-exist. Though, I wonder if 5.6 will get automatic updates...
[Version 6.0]


1 Reply

burypromote
+1

+62
Psychos replied on 31 Jan 2012
I'd mark this down to a half-star rating now if I could. They ENTIRELY removed IPv6 configuration. We know the Internet needs to move to IPv6, and doing things to slow that down is asinine and irresponsible.

Maybe it supports a fully automatic/default configuration, but there are ZERO IPv6-related config options in 6.0. Not cool, Apple.
burypromote
+2

Browser
Psychos commented on 05 Jan 2012
"Browser" doesn't look very appealing, enough so that I don't feel like downloading and running it. (The name, to start with. And the overall look/feel of the description give me serious privacy concerns.)

But what caught my eye was "Porn Private Mode." Seriously? PORN Private Mode?

There are many uses for private mode other than looking at porn. (Not that there's anything wrong with using private mode for that either, but still...)
[Version 0.9]



burypromote

Cookie Stumbler Family
Psychos commented on 27 Nov 2011
"What's New" for v1.4 ends with:

"MACUPDATE Happy with Cookie Stumbler? Please take a moment and leave us a rating on Mac Update, it really means a lot to us."

I was under the impression that changelogs were for, well, listing out new features. "Please go leave us positive feedback" is not a "feature" of this product and should not be listed as such...
[Version 1.4]



burypromote
+1

Apple Xcode
Psychos commented on 17 Nov 2011
Ugh, a 1.8GB download for a few bugfixes. What ever happened to delta updates, Apple?

The App Store still doesn't display this under "Updates" for me, so I had to click install from the download list. I don't mind a large download when it's a real update, but this is a bug fix!
[Version 4.2.1]


1 Reply

burypromote
+2

+62
Psychos replied on 17 Nov 2011
Not even then...hit refresh a couple times on the "Updates" page.

Note that you still need to go run "Install Xcode.app" that this puts in /Applications to finish the update, even though the App Store app says "Installed." (Then delete the installer if you don't want it wasting almost 2GB!)
burypromote

Apple Xcode
Psychos commented on 13 Oct 2011
Doesn't show up in "Updates" in the App Store yet, even though it shows up under "Purchased."

I'd just download it from its regular page, but there are several reports of installation problems on the App Store comments, making me hesitant to update yet.
[Version 4.2]



burypromote

Apple Lion Recovery Update
Psychos commented on 13 Oct 2011
This update is stupidly large. I suspect it's just an image that your current recovery partition is replaced with... It was the same size from Software Update, so it's not just that the standalone is larger.

How about a proper delta update that's not over 400MB, Apple? Surely you didn't re-engineer the entire recovery setup from scratch.

I don't mind downloading 400MB for an update to a fairly minor component of my system, but I know there are a LOT of people who do.
[Version 1.0]


1 Reply

burypromote

+62
Psychos replied on 13 Oct 2011
Hmm, maybe it's because I have FileVault whole-partition encryption enabled. That might be a "confusing" enough partition scheme for it.

Still, I did do a fresh install, no custom partitioning, and used the Security prefpane to encrypt my disk in the first place...
burypromote
+2

Hash Code Cracker
Psychos commented on 08 Oct 2011
Thanks for writing something like this as a free tool, AND open source. I could see this being useful for stuff like testing customers' hashes. (Though I'm personally partial to command line utilities.) As a feature suggestion, it might be nice to be able to paste a list of hashes.

I'd say it's probably a very useful tool for the average user to test his or her own hashes, without any specialized knowledge.

Being open source is especially important, since if I did use this tool on a client's data, I'd want to audit the code first. So kudos for making a *proper* security product that I can verify if I want to! That's how it's done.
[Version 1.2]



burypromote
+4

Wake Up Light
Psychos commented on 21 Sep 2011
Sorry, but unless your computer is hooked up to a bank of full-spectrum bulbs, this is better described as an "alarm clock that simulates the moonrise on a cloudy." (And this software wouldn't control those, anyways.)

The minimal brightness levels produced by a computer screen vs the other light you receive from whatever source simply aren't enough to "increase cortisol."

Even if your computer screen was your primary light source, the pseudo-science behind it is still not very convincing for a paid app, especially one with no free demo available. Seriously, I'm sure SOME people would try it, have a placebo effect, and then happily pay! But more app store no-demo-ware for us.
[Version 1.0]



burypromote

Apple Security Update

Psychos reviewed on 10 Sep 2011
It shouldn't require a reboot to revoke certificates! Come on Apple, this is OS X.

Since it's possible to do it from the command line without a reboot, and just based on the nature of certificates, having to reboot for this is beyond stupid. If needed, apps like Safari can be required to be quit before the update.

At least Apple *finally* addressed the issue. Took long enough.

(The update does work correctly at least; both the regular and EV DigiNotar certs now seem to be revoked.)
[Version 2011-05]


2 Replies

burypromote

+62
Psychos replied on 18 Oct 2011
Yes, rebooting is certainly necessary in some cases; e.g., the 2011-06 update, which you might be referring to based on the date. That one has a ton of updates, including a new kernel, which alone requires a reboot. That's fine...

My complaint was about the 2011-05 update, which was solely to revoke the DigiNotar certs. I'm pretty sure you don't need to update boot caches and such to revoke certs. :)
burypromote

+62
Psychos replied on 25 Oct 2011
I use the Unix layer heavily. I do usually sleep my laptop at night, but often I still have things like random Python scripts running and paused during sleep...

That's what's wrong with rebooting. Unless Apple wants to tell me it's not a Unix-based OS anymore and stop providing Terminal.app, then I don't expect reboots for things like a certificate revocation.

I do expect more frequent reboots than a server OS, simply because this is a desktop OS...but not for silly things that don't NEED reboots.

And rebooting because it "clears out caches and stuff" is a silly reason. There are no real caches that are cleared by a reboot that won't shortly be filled back up again...

I personally find that the best fix for "acting dodgy" is to just quit and restart Safari, since it seems to leak a lot of memory.
burypromote
+1

Safari Cookies
Psychos had trouble on 16 Sep 2010
1.5.2 seems to be eating my cookies...when I restart Safari, almost all of my cookies are gone. I have Automatically Manage Cookies enabled and all 4 "Do not remove cookies from" options checked, but cookies for sites in my history and and bookmarks are nuked. I have a week of browser history and plenty of bookmarks for sites that should be retained; I don't actually have any favorites defined.

I was previously running 1.4.x with no such problems; history and bookmark-related cookies stuck around as desired. Using 64-bit x86 Safari 5.0.2 on 10.6.4.
[Version 1.5.2]


2 Replies

burypromote

+62
Psychos commented on 17 Sep 2010
I uninstalled and reinstalled 1.5.2 to no effect; cookies are still being eaten. Downgraded to 1.4.4 and everything is working properly again... History and bookmark site cookies are being retained, others are being nuked, as expected.
burypromote

+62
Psychos replied on 27 Sep 2010
Upgrading to 1.5.3 fixed my issue. Thanks!
burypromote

Safari Cookies
Psychos had trouble on 02 Dec 2009
I've found Safari Cookies to be a wonderful add-on, especially the auto-removal of cookies from sites that aren't in my history/bookmarks anymore.

However, Safari Cookies is now causing Safari to take massive amounts of RAM. I'm also running Glims and Safari AdBlocker, both 64-bit under 10.6. With just those two enabled, Safari tends to grow to around 300MB - 350MB of active RAM at the most and stay there long-term.

If I enable Safari Cookies, Safari keeps growing without bounds. When I finally decided to uninstall it, Safari was using 1.75GB of RAM, plus there was 1.5GB of swap in use that was freed when I quit Safari. With Glims and Safari AdBlocker, Safari doesn't eat into swap at all.

I've tried with Glims and Safari AdBlocker disabled, and the same behavior persists. I tried turning off auto-manage temporarily, but that didn't help. Any ideas?
[Version 1.3.1]



burypromote
+2

Letterbox
psychos had trouble on 16 Sep 2009
Letterbox allows sending anonymous data, which is okay with me. However, in the list of data to send, it shows a UUID.

So my question is whether this UUID is always the same for a given installation, or if it's uniquely generated for each anonymous data send. (I'm not okay with sending data if the UUID stays the same, because it's really not anonymous anymore at that point.)
[Version 0.24b4]



burypromote
+1

Saft
psychos had trouble on 13 May 2009
Safari 4 Beta 5528.17 that came out alongside 10.5.7 doesn't seem to work with the latest Saft. I have a feeling that the developer will quite likely fix this in the next few hours as usual (kudos to him for being so quick with updates!), but if anyone knows how to force it to load (if it will) that'd be useful. (Can't find the Safari version string in the Saft files, etc.)
[Version 11.0]



burypromote

Apple MacBook, MacBook Pro Keyboard Firmware
psychos had trouble on 20 Feb 2008
I only rarely had this problem before on my MacBook Pro, but I installed the update.

Now, in about 12 hours of usage, I've had a key get stuck repeating for 2 - 3 seconds. The keyboard and trackpad became unusable while the key was stuck repeating, and for about 2 seconds afterwards.

This is quite aggravating. This is a much more annoying problem than the previous issue.

Anyone else experiencing this?
[Version 1.0]


1 Reply

burypromote

+62
psychos commented on 20 Feb 2008
Typo: In those 12 hours of usage, I actually had the key repeat bug happen twice.
burypromote

SSHKeychain
psychos had trouble on 18 Jan 2008
I'd like SSHKeychain to not display itself at all in the dock or menu bar. This worked fine in 0.8.1 by setting it to Dock-only and setting LSUIElement to 1 in the Info.plist. However, in 0.8.2, LSUIElement reverts to 0 and the dock icon shows up anyways. Locking the Info.plist causes the app to quit after a few seconds.

Does anyone know how I might fully hide SSHKeychain without mucking with the source?

(I have to add, this is one of the most useful pieces of MacOS freeware out there!)
[Version 0.8.2]


1 Reply

burypromote

+62
psychos replied on 18 Jan 2008
Turns out I posted rather hastily. Checked my ~/src directory, and indeed I had modified the source for 0.8.1, to force it to set LSUIElement to 1 no matter what. Will do the same to 0.8.2.
burypromote

Tunnelblick
psychos had trouble on 12 Nov 2007
Tunnelblick unexpectedly quits for me sometimes. This seems to happen when changing network connections, but not always. (I'm semi-frequently switching between my Airport and an EV-DO card.) When it happens, it leaves behind a stray openvpn process that I have to manually kill before I can establish another VPN connection. Tunnelblick will actually establish a new connection successfully, but it will be unusable unless I've killed the old openvpn process first.

I'm running 10.5 on a MBP, clean install. Worked fine under 10.4.

Anyone else experiencing this under 10.5?
[Version 3.0b6]



burypromote
-2

MacBook Pro EFI Firmware Update
psychos had trouble on 28 Sep 2007
Applied the update. After my system had been up for about half an hour, all sound output stopped working. Any application that tried to output sound would freeze and require a manual kill. Couldn't even get to the Sound prefpane. I tried restarting coreaudiod, no effect. I slept and unslept the machine, no effect. I eventually rebooted, and the problem resolved.

I have never seen this happen before this update, so I suspect it may be linked since it happened right after I updated. Has anyone else had odd audio freezes like this?

I did zap my PRAM after the firmware update.
[Version 1.4]



burypromote

AirPort Base Station and Time Capsule Firmware Update
psychos had trouble on 29 Aug 2007
Upgraded from 7.1.1 to 7.2.1. All of a sudden, I couldn't connect to my wireless network. Checked config, did a hardware reset, no go. I get that "Try Again" message from my MBP.

I normally use 5GHz N-only mode. However, 2.4GHz mixed mode and 5GHz A/N mixed mode work fine!

I tried turning off authentication, with no help. I even reverted back to 7.1.1, and the same problems continued. Right now I'm running with A+N support to get the damned thing working at all.
[Version 7.2.1]


1 Reply

burypromote

+62
psychos commented on 17 Sep 2007
It turned out to be my own stupidity. I reinstalled my OS and didn't realize I had to re-run the Airport Extreme enabler as well, so I had no 802.11n support. Now if I could only get these throughput problems sorted out...
Displaying 1-10 of 38
< 1 2 3 4 >
Displaying 1-9 of 9
< 1 >
Please login or create a new
MacUpdate Member account
to use this feature
Add/Update Listing About MacUpdate Desktop Career Opportunities RSS Twitter Facebook Advertise Sitemap
Copyright © 2012 MacUpdate LLC


- -