What a great font manager: more elegant, more reliable and much easier to use than Suitcase and FontAgent. Save the money you would pay for these programs and buy some nice Linotype fonts instead.
The similarities between FontExplorer and iTunes are striking: FE uses the same interface metaphor, it's arguably the best program in its class, it's free but it has an iTunes-like integrated store to generate some revenue. I hope this works as well for Linotype as it did for Apple. It might actually bring the idea of buying fonts to the masses.
--
PS: I'm sure that the poster below who still prefers FontAgent makes valid points based on his professional experiende, but I can't agree with him. I had many problems with earlier versions of FA, and while I haven't used any of their latest releases, the simple fact that Linotype's font manager was usable right from the first public beta and has no discernable flaws in 1.0.1 has completely won me over and makes me very confident in the future of this program. Add the fact that $0 is quite a bit less than $100, and it becomes even harder to justify the purchase of one of its two competitors.
AmberV has a point: You can't ask for donations and then complain that people don't feel obligated to pay.
Peter Maurer, why don't you just sell your apps as shareware instead of handing them over to a distributor who adds his own hefty share to the price?
Is it because you think distributors like SmileOnMyMac are better at marketing? If they are, they have yet to prove it. I don't doubt that the people behind SOMM are dedicated to making their latest acquisition a success, but all they did so far with regard to marketing was slap a $30 price-tag on Textpander, which wasn't exactly a publicity stunt.
Text(ex)pander is a neat little utility, but it's simply not worth $30. For this price one can buy sophisticated productivity apps like CopyWrite or Hog Bay Notebook/Mori. It was the same story with the first app you sold to another company, MenuCalendar. As a convenient menu shortcut to iCal, it was nice, but was it worth the $19 the new owners decided to charge for it? I didn't think so.
Your apps are so handy and popular that they would be a healthy foundation for your own shareware business. I'd rather pay my money directly to you than to a company with no involvement in the original development process who just rename the app they acquired from you and make it an overpriced piece of nagware.
When it comes to spending money, I have a very simple set of rules: 1) I don't pay when I don't have to, and 2) I don't buy stuff that doesn't seem to be worth the price. Which means that 1) I didn't donate for Textpander, and 2) I won't buy it from SOMM for the price they want. Yet I spend hundreds of bucks on shareware and commercial software every year. Charge a reasonable price for your remaining apps or bundle them as "PM's great utilites pack", and I'll be your best customer.
The current situation is unsatisfying for both you and the users of your software: You think that you don't get enough money because the donations-based distribution system doesn't work, and users don't know if donations are obligatory or not. Maybe I should quickly PayPal you 5 bucks for Butler as a cheap insurance against the possibility that PainInMyA$$ Inc. acquires it tomorrow and resells it as Buttler for $50?
I'd rather base my purchase decisions on hard facts like: this app costs $20 and expires after 30 days but is obviously great value for the price, and my money will go to the guy who made this program. These are facts that prompt simpletons and cheapskates like me to get their credit card out. But when I'm confronted with free programs that are actually not free and could become very expensive all of a sudden, I don't look for my credit card but for a headache tablet.
It's a bold move to discontinue a popular application like Hog Bay Notebook and start from scratch. Mori has a lot of potential, but in its current state, it is a downgrade from HBN and a preview of things to come rather than a useful program. Some changes are for the better, some are for the worse.
Let's start with the good stuff:
- Jesse Grosjean, the developer, is probably the most responsive shareware developer on the planet. He has always been exceptionally open to suggestions and requests, and with Mori, he took his genuine interest in interacting with his users one step further: He set up a voting system on his website where you can submit feature requests, rate the suggestions of other users and directly influence the development of Mori. This is a great idea, and certainly something other developers can learn from.
- Mori's featue-set is extensible. You can write a plugin if you have the skills and share it with others.
- Mori has smart folders and supports Spotlight - a huge improvement over HBN.
Now for the bad stuff:
- The interface has become less customizable - no vertical split view, no folders drawer, no bookmarks list - and the Mail 2 interface (which I don't like at all) makes complex projects more difficult to navigate.
- There are so many features missing that I don't know where to start. There's no point listing all the details that make HBN a better program when Mori doesn't even have basic features like printing. You can't export the contents of a folder as a single continuous file, there are almost no preferences you can set, etc. Granted, these features will be added over the next few months (and years?), but it's impossible to use this program without them.
In summary, Mori is not ready to replace HBN. It's a technology preview, nothing more.
I still give it five stars in the Value category because your license is valid for both Mori and the last release of HBN. That's a great deal: For $28, you get the best notebook/organizer money can buy and a new software project with a lot of potential on top of it.
Quicksilver gets many recommendations as a free - and arguably more powerful - alternative to LaunchBar. I can only encourage you to try QS before buying LaunchBar - it's a fascinating program with many great features and a huge community of fans and plug-in developers.
Both programs share the same basic features, but in many ways, QS is the exact opposite of LaunchBar. QS is a geek tool, an application that demands attention and a willingness to explore its potential and tweak its settings. It is as much as time-waster as it is a time-saver, and that's why it appeals to geeks.
LauchBar, on the other hand, is just there. It just works. It is very customizable, but the default settings are good enough for most people. Install it, use it, and never think about it. Over the years it has been refined to a point where it's almost invisible, and that's a great achievement. If you install it, it will instantly become a natural and integral part of your system. It doesn't give you much to play with, and it's not much to look at either (no shiny bezel interface, no visual effects). It's just a file and program launcher in the most unobtrusive and efficient way possible. It has some nifty tricks up its sleeve, but it doesn't show them off.
I usually prefer freeware programs over shareware if they have a comparable set of features, but in this case I happily made an exception and paid the bucks. QS is great, but I found LaunchBar's "less is more" design more useful and more appealing.
Compared to QS and Butler (which, among many other things, is also a file launcher), LaunchBar also has the most intelligent and accurate shortcut algorithm. The only point where LaunchBar could need improvement is that it still takes too long to index newly added files, even if it is set to rescan the containing folders automatically. (Spotlight will find these files instantly.)
And then there's the major downside of becoming accustomed to LaunchBar: Macs that don't have it installed will drive you nuts.
Butler, Witch, CalenderClock, TextPander, and now this ... Is Peter Maurer really one guy or is it the alias of a collective of very clever developers? Every time a new app gets released under that name, you can be sure that it's something so useful that it will become an essential part of your Mac.
ServiceGrabber is no difference. It's not exactly a new invention (some years ago, the QuickSilver developer released a preference pane called Service Manager that did the same job), but it has a much better interface and a few extra features like customizable shortcuts and the option to restructure the Services menu.
Two suggestions:
- Like Witch and Textpander, this should be a preference pane, not an application.
- ServiceScrabber examines and displays the services on every available system. If you have an emergency system on a backup drive, ServiceScrabber shows duplicate Service entries. It should limit itself to the startup drive (or at least make it a preference).
It does what it says on the tin, and does it fast and well. The only problem is the astronomically high price. It's hard to believe, but this program costs $20 more than Toast Titanium 7, a complete CD/DVD authoring suite that can also compress and burn decrypted or un-encrypted DVDs. Now that Roxio has integrated Popcorn into Toast, Toast 7 does everything DVD2One does plus so much more that you would be out of your mind if you bought this one-trick pony for a higher price. Toast's compression algorithm produces excellent results; the quality of DVDs compressed with DVD2One is in no way superior.
If the developer lowered the price to $25 or less, DVD2One might still have a future as an efficient, low-budget DVD backup tool, but at $100, it simply has no right to exist. I'm really sorry to say that, I'd rather support an independent programmer than a company like Roxio. But the price is too far beyond reality.
Let's pause for a moment and admire this miracle. In 2003, this program was just an ugly, lame text editor - and now it's the most powerful word processor on the shareware market. It's hard to believe, but the only program that's still superior to Mellel is MS Word itself. I have never seen such rapid progress made in so little time, by a company of just two or three people. That's amazing, and an achievement to be very proud of.
The 1.9 update adds even more power (mainly to the handling of styles) and a very welcome option to replace the brushed-metal scrap with an Aqua interface. There are only two issues that need to be addressed in one of the next updates: first, creating and managing styles has become overly complex and cumbersome; and second, users are still trapped in Mellel's own proprietary format. RTF import and export is somewhat acceptable, but Mellel is still useless when it comes to importing or producing Word files. Compatibility, however, will be crucial to Mellel's success in the world of academical and technical writing. Mellel has set new standards in this market niche. Unfortunately, being compatible with existent standards isn't any less important.
In its earlier days, SD was advertised as a tool to accelerate download speed (hence the name), and there was much debate among users whether or not these claims were true. To put it short: SD does not accelerate your downloads, and it never has. So it's good to see that the dev has toned down his misleading sales pitch and is now marketing SD mainly as a program to _manage_ downloads.
Because that's what it is: a download manager, and a very sophisticated one. If you just want to grab a file from Macupdate one in a while, SD will be overkill and a waste of set-up time, but if you're a hardcore downloader/uploader, this is the smartest and most powerful program on the market. Nice interface, too, and a reasonable price. Definitely a product to be taken seriously. Who would have foreseen this evolution from scam to power tool back in the day when it claimed to give your 56K a DSL boost .. :)
Ironically, Real and their arch enemy in court and business, Microsoft, have one thing in common: they have been working hard to release decent software for OS X, but they will never get any respect from Mac users, at least not from the zealous ones. Some of the commentators here are so busy bashing the company that they forget to review the product itself. Or worse, they try to pass their company bashing off as a software review.
You can dislike Real for many reasons - for buggy releases in the past, for their corporate culture, or simply for their not being Apple. Whatever floats your boat. But this is a a place to rate software, and it doesn't make any sense to give a _free_ player a "Worst" rating in the value category just because you think that "Real as a company sucks".
That said, RP 10 is as good as it can get. Great interface, good audio/video stream quality, nice performance, timely security fixes, support for OS X technologies like Rendezvous and WebKit - what more can you ask for? Someone in a cubicle on Real's campus did a very good job, and I appreciate that.
Many people complain that Real makes it unnessarily tricky to get to the free download. I agree that this is a bad practice. But you know what, I'd rather go through some loops and sales pitches on a website and then be set with the free version once and for all than having to live with that obnoxious QuickTime nagware dialog that pops up every other day and tries to force me to go "Pro" for $40 to enable high-end features like, uh, full-screen view. In this case, Apple is much more obtrusive and Real-istic than Real in their worst days, and if my fellow Mac zealots were more objective and less biased, they would agree.
[Version 10.0.0.331]
There are currently no troubleshooting comments by this member.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
FontExplorer X Pro
macbeth reviewed on 10 Aug 2006
The similarities between FontExplorer and iTunes are striking: FE uses the same interface metaphor, it's arguably the best program in its class, it's free but it has an iTunes-like integrated store to generate some revenue. I hope this works as well for Linotype as it did for Apple. It might actually bring the idea of buying fonts to the masses.
--
PS: I'm sure that the poster below who still prefers FontAgent makes valid points based on his professional experiende, but I can't agree with him. I had many problems with earlier versions of FA, and while I haven't used any of their latest releases, the simple fact that Linotype's font manager was usable right from the first public beta and has no discernable flaws in 1.0.1 has completely won me over and makes me very confident in the future of this program. Add the fact that $0 is quite a bit less than $100, and it becomes even harder to justify the purchase of one of its two competitors.
TextExpander
Peter Maurer, why don't you just sell your apps as shareware instead of handing them over to a distributor who adds his own hefty share to the price?
Is it because you think distributors like SmileOnMyMac are better at marketing? If they are, they have yet to prove it. I don't doubt that the people behind SOMM are dedicated to making their latest acquisition a success, but all they did so far with regard to marketing was slap a $30 price-tag on Textpander, which wasn't exactly a publicity stunt.
Text(ex)pander is a neat little utility, but it's simply not worth $30. For this price one can buy sophisticated productivity apps like CopyWrite or Hog Bay Notebook/Mori. It was the same story with the first app you sold to another company, MenuCalendar. As a convenient menu shortcut to iCal, it was nice, but was it worth the $19 the new owners decided to charge for it? I didn't think so.
Your apps are so handy and popular that they would be a healthy foundation for your own shareware business. I'd rather pay my money directly to you than to a company with no involvement in the original development process who just rename the app they acquired from you and make it an overpriced piece of nagware.
When it comes to spending money, I have a very simple set of rules: 1) I don't pay when I don't have to, and 2) I don't buy stuff that doesn't seem to be worth the price. Which means that 1) I didn't donate for Textpander, and 2) I won't buy it from SOMM for the price they want. Yet I spend hundreds of bucks on shareware and commercial software every year. Charge a reasonable price for your remaining apps or bundle them as "PM's great utilites pack", and I'll be your best customer.
The current situation is unsatisfying for both you and the users of your software: You think that you don't get enough money because the donations-based distribution system doesn't work, and users don't know if donations are obligatory or not. Maybe I should quickly PayPal you 5 bucks for Butler as a cheap insurance against the possibility that PainInMyA$$ Inc. acquires it tomorrow and resells it as Buttler for $50?
I'd rather base my purchase decisions on hard facts like: this app costs $20 and expires after 30 days but is obviously great value for the price, and my money will go to the guy who made this program. These are facts that prompt simpletons and cheapskates like me to get their credit card out. But when I'm confronted with free programs that are actually not free and could become very expensive all of a sudden, I don't look for my credit card but for a headache tablet.
Mori
macbeth reviewed on 14 Feb 2006
Let's start with the good stuff:
- Jesse Grosjean, the developer, is probably the most responsive shareware developer on the planet. He has always been exceptionally open to suggestions and requests, and with Mori, he took his genuine interest in interacting with his users one step further: He set up a voting system on his website where you can submit feature requests, rate the suggestions of other users and directly influence the development of Mori. This is a great idea, and certainly something other developers can learn from.
- Mori's featue-set is extensible. You can write a plugin if you have the skills and share it with others.
- Mori has smart folders and supports Spotlight - a huge improvement over HBN.
Now for the bad stuff:
- The interface has become less customizable - no vertical split view, no folders drawer, no bookmarks list - and the Mail 2 interface (which I don't like at all) makes complex projects more difficult to navigate.
- There are so many features missing that I don't know where to start. There's no point listing all the details that make HBN a better program when Mori doesn't even have basic features like printing. You can't export the contents of a folder as a single continuous file, there are almost no preferences you can set, etc. Granted, these features will be added over the next few months (and years?), but it's impossible to use this program without them.
In summary, Mori is not ready to replace HBN. It's a technology preview, nothing more.
I still give it five stars in the Value category because your license is valid for both Mori and the last release of HBN. That's a great deal: For $28, you get the best notebook/organizer money can buy and a new software project with a lot of potential on top of it.
LaunchBar
macbeth reviewed on 02 Jan 2006
Both programs share the same basic features, but in many ways, QS is the exact opposite of LaunchBar. QS is a geek tool, an application that demands attention and a willingness to explore its potential and tweak its settings. It is as much as time-waster as it is a time-saver, and that's why it appeals to geeks.
LauchBar, on the other hand, is just there. It just works. It is very customizable, but the default settings are good enough for most people. Install it, use it, and never think about it. Over the years it has been refined to a point where it's almost invisible, and that's a great achievement. If you install it, it will instantly become a natural and integral part of your system. It doesn't give you much to play with, and it's not much to look at either (no shiny bezel interface, no visual effects). It's just a file and program launcher in the most unobtrusive and efficient way possible. It has some nifty tricks up its sleeve, but it doesn't show them off.
I usually prefer freeware programs over shareware if they have a comparable set of features, but in this case I happily made an exception and paid the bucks. QS is great, but I found LaunchBar's "less is more" design more useful and more appealing.
Compared to QS and Butler (which, among many other things, is also a file launcher), LaunchBar also has the most intelligent and accurate shortcut algorithm. The only point where LaunchBar could need improvement is that it still takes too long to index newly added files, even if it is set to rescan the containing folders automatically. (Spotlight will find these files instantly.)
And then there's the major downside of becoming accustomed to LaunchBar: Macs that don't have it installed will drive you nuts.
Service Scrubber
macbeth reviewed on 21 Dec 2005
ServiceGrabber is no difference. It's not exactly a new invention (some years ago, the QuickSilver developer released a preference pane called Service Manager that did the same job), but it has a much better interface and a few extra features like customizable shortcuts and the option to restructure the Services menu.
Two suggestions:
- Like Witch and Textpander, this should be a preference pane, not an application.
- ServiceScrabber examines and displays the services on every available system. If you have an emergency system on a backup drive, ServiceScrabber shows duplicate Service entries. It should limit itself to the startup drive (or at least make it a preference).
Thanks for another great utility.
(When will we be able to edit reviews?)
DVD2oneX
macbeth reviewed on 19 Dec 2005
If the developer lowered the price to $25 or less, DVD2One might still have a future as an efficient, low-budget DVD backup tool, but at $100, it simply has no right to exist. I'm really sorry to say that, I'd rather support an independent programmer than a company like Roxio. But the price is too far beyond reality.
Mellel
Macbeth reviewed on 07 Mar 2005
Let's pause for a moment and admire this miracle. In 2003, this program was just an ugly, lame text editor - and now it's the most powerful word processor on the shareware market. It's hard to believe, but the only program that's still superior to Mellel is MS Word itself. I have never seen such rapid progress made in so little time, by a company of just two or three people. That's amazing, and an achievement to be very proud of.
The 1.9 update adds even more power (mainly to the handling of styles) and a very welcome option to replace the brushed-metal scrap with an Aqua interface. There are only two issues that need to be addressed in one of the next updates: first, creating and managing styles has become overly complex and cumbersome; and second, users are still trapped in Mellel's own proprietary format. RTF import and export is somewhat acceptable, but Mellel is still useless when it comes to importing or producing Word files. Compatibility, however, will be crucial to Mellel's success in the world of academical and technical writing. Mellel has set new standards in this market niche. Unfortunately, being compatible with existent standards isn't any less important.
Speed Download
Macbeth reviewed on 06 Mar 2005
Because that's what it is: a download manager, and a very sophisticated one. If you just want to grab a file from Macupdate one in a while, SD will be overkill and a waste of set-up time, but if you're a hardcore downloader/uploader, this is the smartest and most powerful program on the market. Nice interface, too, and a reasonable price. Definitely a product to be taken seriously. Who would have foreseen this evolution from scam to power tool back in the day when it claimed to give your 56K a DSL boost .. :)
RealPlayer SP
Macbeth reviewed on 04 Mar 2005
You can dislike Real for many reasons - for buggy releases in the past, for their corporate culture, or simply for their not being Apple. Whatever floats your boat. But this is a a place to rate software, and it doesn't make any sense to give a _free_ player a "Worst" rating in the value category just because you think that "Real as a company sucks".
That said, RP 10 is as good as it can get. Great interface, good audio/video stream quality, nice performance, timely security fixes, support for OS X technologies like Rendezvous and WebKit - what more can you ask for? Someone in a cubicle on Real's campus did a very good job, and I appreciate that.
Many people complain that Real makes it unnessarily tricky to get to the free download. I agree that this is a bad practice. But you know what, I'd rather go through some loops and sales pitches on a website and then be set with the free version once and for all than having to live with that obnoxious QuickTime nagware dialog that pops up every other day and tries to force me to go "Pro" for $40 to enable high-end features like, uh, full-screen view. In this case, Apple is much more obtrusive and Real-istic than Real in their worst days, and if my fellow Mac zealots were more objective and less biased, they would agree.