One of the best pieces of software in years. The startup time of (new) music is quicker than iTunes. To underline that point, Spotify can play uncached music faster from the Internet than iTunes can from files on your own machine.
The sharing features - drop tunes on your friends and they will appear in their inbox, and collaborative playlists - are a cracking way to find new music.
1. it allows me to track projects and invoice my clients.
2. Server syncing.
3. Templates for invoices.
Dislikes:
1. the UI. It's Difficult to understand. Rubbish.
2. Overcomplicated. Too many features all on screen at the same time.
3. Expensive.
4. Hard to use. UI not withstanding, some things, like template design, are difficult to work with.
5. No copy-paste of items, such as work items. When you have a lot to create, right-clicking -> move mouse -> Duplicate is tedious.
In short, buy only if, after an EXHAUSTIVE search, nothing else suits your needs. This could have been brilliant, this program, but it does too much, and none of it really well.
Tower is a well-designed product with excellent usability and a very attractive interface. It's easy to set up projects, clone them, do all the usual stuff, but it offers nothing over the command line, especially for the rather high price. I can't see a way for any developers to justify these prices unless they start adding features that actually improve and aid the workflow. A good start would be to, say, add git-flow support.
Money aside, this is a fine program and the developers were quite responsive during the beta. I am reverting, however, to SmartGit.
Further to that comment, I decided to buy the app while I could still get a discount, on the basis that their responsiveness means that I might be able to persuade them to support a git-flow workflow right in Tower.
Have been using it for quite some time and it's wonderful. I've tried GitX, Gity, Gitbox and an extended beta test of Tower (which was excellent, but bloody expensive) and SmartGit wins. The default layouts are sensible, the speed of working with it is excellent, and it's solid and stable.
Anyone who overlooks this because it's a non-cocoa client should give it another chance, you're only losing out yourself.
MacGPG2 is superbly integrated with OS X, the developers have done a fine job.
There is a minor issue (which is not their fault) which is related to updating or overriding the local libiconv library. Using Homebrew, installing and linking a new libiconv library in order to satisfy a Nokogiri dependency breaks MacGPG2.
Little Snitch shows me all the outgoing requests on my system and lets me allow or deny them as I deem fit. Applications are quite chatty these days and I don't necessarily like (a) bandwidth hogs or (b) apps doing things behind my back, like downloading updates, or sending statistics, unless I trust them.
This app is a bargain, and there have been consistent improvements all through the years.
Modern games leave very little to your imagination: there's usually a set goal, one or few set ways to reaching it, and heavily detailed graphics that show you exactly what the game developers want you to see.
Angband and all the rogue-like variants are not about this. The graphics are non-existent or limited to tiles, the gameplay is entirely open, and your goals may be different: you might want to collect magical weapons, or learn all the spells, or whatever, but it's a rich, rich world down there, and we're all the richer for it. It may take a little getting used to if you're coming from Doom III or Half-Life 2, but if you love gaming, love fantasy, then you may find something new and brilliant here.
There's nothing like a little frustration and disappointment (carting unknown weapons and armour; finding out they're rubbish) to make the triumphs (finding a Holy Avenger; killing a Multi-Hued Dragon) even sweeter.
This is a swiss army knife for serious writing. But, this isn't an application to try out for an afternoon and then discard. You'll be doing both the app and yourself a disservice.
I use Scrivener for two things: contributing write-ups for a online magazine, and writing academic papers for my MA.
The write-ups are short, but require lots of info and shuffling around, while the academic essays are obviously longer, require references and the like. All these papers are output through LaTEX, anyhow, so I require a program that works well with LaTEX.
Scrivener does compile the draft out to LaTEX, but I've not found it particularly good, and as I keep my references in Scrivener as actual BibTEX/LaTEX markup, the compile tends to mess these up. Scrivener does open BibDesk up so I copy references straight in, so that's fantastic.
If I had any time to spend with the LaTEX templates in Scrivener, I could probably figure out how to make it all work. I'll bet it can be done.
The whole process of writing is different to what one might expect from Microsoft Word or the like, and one should follow the tutorial videos to understand how the folder/editor/notes system works, and then how best to make it all work for you.
The developer and the community are excellent, the app has never once crashed on me and it's a veritable bargain.
[Version 1.5b3]
There are currently no troubleshooting comments by this member.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
-1
Spotify
Londonskater reviewed on 14 Jul 2011
The sharing features - drop tunes on your friends and they will appear in their inbox, and collaborative playlists - are a cracking way to find new music.
An absolute must.
Studiometry
Londonskater reviewed on 08 Jul 2011
Likes:
1. it allows me to track projects and invoice my clients.
2. Server syncing.
3. Templates for invoices.
Dislikes:
1. the UI. It's Difficult to understand. Rubbish.
2. Overcomplicated. Too many features all on screen at the same time.
3. Expensive.
4. Hard to use. UI not withstanding, some things, like template design, are difficult to work with.
5. No copy-paste of items, such as work items. When you have a lot to create, right-clicking -> move mouse -> Duplicate is tedious.
In short, buy only if, after an EXHAUSTIVE search, nothing else suits your needs. This could have been brilliant, this program, but it does too much, and none of it really well.
+1
Tower
Londonskater reviewed on 04 Mar 2011
Money aside, this is a fine program and the developers were quite responsive during the beta. I am reverting, however, to SmartGit.
+1
+17
+1
SmartGit
Londonskater reviewed on 04 Mar 2011
Anyone who overlooks this because it's a non-cocoa client should give it another chance, you're only losing out yourself.
MacGPG2
Londonskater reviewed on 25 Feb 2011
There is a minor issue (which is not their fault) which is related to updating or overriding the local libiconv library. Using Homebrew, installing and linking a new libiconv library in order to satisfy a Nokogiri dependency breaks MacGPG2.
Beware if using Nokogiri.
VueScan
Londonskater rated on 01 Dec 2010
[Version 9.0.r1]
+5
Little Snitch
Londonskater reviewed on 24 Nov 2010
This app is a bargain, and there have been consistent improvements all through the years.
Angband
Londonskater reviewed on 20 Feb 2010
Angband and all the rogue-like variants are not about this. The graphics are non-existent or limited to tiles, the gameplay is entirely open, and your goals may be different: you might want to collect magical weapons, or learn all the spells, or whatever, but it's a rich, rich world down there, and we're all the richer for it. It may take a little getting used to if you're coming from Doom III or Half-Life 2, but if you love gaming, love fantasy, then you may find something new and brilliant here.
There's nothing like a little frustration and disappointment (carting unknown weapons and armour; finding out they're rubbish) to make the triumphs (finding a Holy Avenger; killing a Multi-Hued Dragon) even sweeter.
Try it, you'll like it :D
svnX
Londonskater reviewed on 15 Apr 2009
+7
Scrivener
Londonskater reviewed on 23 Jan 2009
I use Scrivener for two things: contributing write-ups for a online magazine, and writing academic papers for my MA.
The write-ups are short, but require lots of info and shuffling around, while the academic essays are obviously longer, require references and the like. All these papers are output through LaTEX, anyhow, so I require a program that works well with LaTEX.
Scrivener does compile the draft out to LaTEX, but I've not found it particularly good, and as I keep my references in Scrivener as actual BibTEX/LaTEX markup, the compile tends to mess these up. Scrivener does open BibDesk up so I copy references straight in, so that's fantastic.
If I had any time to spend with the LaTEX templates in Scrivener, I could probably figure out how to make it all work. I'll bet it can be done.
The whole process of writing is different to what one might expect from Microsoft Word or the like, and one should follow the tutorial videos to understand how the folder/editor/notes system works, and then how best to make it all work for you.
The developer and the community are excellent, the app has never once crashed on me and it's a veritable bargain.