About Me
I am a Free member
Gender: Male
I like Cocoa-Style, Objective-C. I don't like naiveness. Don't follow me. Don't trust me. Don't crucify me. Don't read my comments. They are written in bad English and are somewhat of childish.
Visit Stats
Last Visit: 3 years ago
Member Since: 21 May 2009
Profile Views: 517
No doubt, there is some true love in it and it has probably some potential.
I like the price - I really hate it when they charge 9.90$ just because it looks better. Congrats for that.
Ok, I don't care much about CPU- or RAM-usage (if its not to much) because my machine has enough of everything and I also like iTunes and I won't pay for anything involved with free apple-software (which involves constant updating), but that's just me and my iPod.
Just so you know: if you have launched the app once it creates a "Ecoute Helper" process which doesn't quit with the application (iTunes has also a "iTunes Helper" process which is launched when someone logs into an account).
Why I write this comment? Because someone said I'm rude which is probably true but sometimes you get the good things from rude people which don't care about "being polite".
A trustworthy application, well done. Very stable. I use it since two years or more.
29$ is a good price for this kind of backbone-quality.
It does the job in the most professional way. Thats why I bought it. I also remember we used Fetch in the office over 10 years ago.
Some of them RealBasic-Folks are completely out of their mind. See at the price. Ok, let's also see what you get: this application is created with RealBasic, which every kid can use to produce a window with some stuff in it. It's easier than creating a website with a form. So, why they always over-charge their snipped-together-product? - let's see: RB costs 100$ (99$). As a RB-owner you have probably to buy some plug-ins to refill RealBasic's lack of cool functionality, so you will probably invest additional 50 to 100$ for that. My very unkind conclusion: they think because they paid that much already - only to be able to program in basic and compile that stuff into an executable - it's also that much worth.
Because it does the main-job (downloading) so well, it deserves a rating of 4. If the automatic converter default-setting would work like it's labeled (or I need some English-lessons?), I would give a 5+. Well done.
Well designed and compact tool. You don't have actually to visit the site with the movie you want to catch/download, just drag the link from the index page (youtube and so on) to xVideoServiceThief instead of clicking it. It's perfect. It also converts a possibly cryptic filename to a real one.
Note: the default settings for the built-in video-converter aren't that satisfying: I switched converting off. Worth a try, but I don't think that the 'Output quality' Setting: "The Same quality as the original video" does fulfill that promising telling. I guess they have to rename or redesign this setting because the quality is really not the same...
It's a nice application to play movies. It's very fast and responsive. I tested it with various files. It also has a "Desktop Background" feature, but the icons on the desktop are un-clickable, so it's not so much fun to use it while working. I hope that will change. You can also setup the fullscreen-transition, so it can go instantly-, fade- or zoom- into fullscreen.
One feature I would really like to see is a "fullscreen-movie-wall" function, which would play 1...16 or more movies at once. This could provide some very artistic possibilities. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is no other player out with a feature like that, not even a commercial one(?). Killer-app-potential?
No need to crucify a funny yet informative comment (if you would think about it).
C'mon, people, 199$ and they can't afford to write one word about the cam's preferred physical environment? Or did I missed that in the specs? Yes, it says "indoor" use only. But, you know, does "indoor" specify the preferred environment in a long-term use? What about things like temperature, humidity and so on?
Besides, the price is (a bit) to high (for me) to order this cam without questioning.
I think also it would not fit the specs for a real security-cam in real life under real circumstances, so using it as a security-cam is just a neat side-effect. I would never use it as a baby-cam because of the radiation which every wireless device has and to spare the young one from that as good as I can. Just because something is invisible does not mean it does not exists and has no effect.
- if you don't want spend money for a task like this, why not use "Perian" with "MPEG Streamclip" to convert between these formats. This also works with wmvfiles, if "Flip4Mac" from Microsoft is installed.
- if you want to spend money and if you really need to convert flash-files to another format: buy "QuickTime Pro", install the (free) "Perian" and convert/export your flash-files with "QuickTime Pro". I tested it this week and it works (latest software). Costs are like 30$?
But... if you need a professional media-tool with presets you can choose from, "MediaCleaner" is/(was) the perfect solution. It's now "Autodesk Cleaner". It's very professional... and it costs also a professional price like 600$.
Sometimes, it's obvious, sometimes it's not. If you are a web-developer, you can use "Top-Sites" to present your own web-sites, it looks very good and I'm sure it will make a fantastic impression to your (future) client. You should also enable the "Developer"-menu and play with that. BTW., you can also ctrl-click a part on a website & choose "element-information" which shows you that "object" in the source-code.
It's written in basic. Don't waste your money for anything created with RealBasic. Also a funny fact: the developers of all the various tools created with RB n e v e r mention that they did it with RealBasic - that's how they are proud of it.
...but still refuses to execute bookmarks with javascript:-commands if the safari-window has a tab. This is the only bug (I hope it's not a feature) I saw (and annoys me just a bit enough to write it down here)
The javascript-bookmarks I use to resize the browser front window doesn't work anymore if you have a TAB in a window! This reminded me of "Netscape Communicator 4.x", because they had all the time such silly misbehavior. I wonder why this is happening with Safari, because it's top-software in a top-environment, so this makes no sense at all. I can't understand why the developers haven't fixed this yet. (Example: javascript:self.moveTo(0,0);self.resizeTo(800,screen.availHeight);)
[Version 4.0.1]
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
Ecoute
I like the price - I really hate it when they charge 9.90$ just because it looks better. Congrats for that.
Ok, I don't care much about CPU- or RAM-usage (if its not to much) because my machine has enough of everything and I also like iTunes and I won't pay for anything involved with free apple-software (which involves constant updating), but that's just me and my iPod.
Just so you know: if you have launched the app once it creates a "Ecoute Helper" process which doesn't quit with the application (iTunes has also a "iTunes Helper" process which is launched when someone logs into an account).
Why I write this comment? Because someone said I'm rude which is probably true but sometimes you get the good things from rude people which don't care about "being polite".
Fetch
eXorZist reviewed on 15 Jul 2009
29$ is a good price for this kind of backbone-quality.
It does the job in the most professional way. Thats why I bought it. I also remember we used Fetch in the office over 10 years ago.
Recommended.
Gest-L
xVideoServiceThief
eXorZist reviewed on 05 Jul 2009
-1
xVideoServiceThief
Note: the default settings for the built-in video-converter aren't that satisfying: I switched converting off. Worth a try, but I don't think that the 'Output quality' Setting: "The Same quality as the original video" does fulfill that promising telling. I guess they have to rename or redesign this setting because the quality is really not the same...
+1
Movist
One feature I would really like to see is a "fullscreen-movie-wall" function, which would play 1...16 or more movies at once. This could provide some very artistic possibilities. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is no other player out with a feature like that, not even a commercial one(?). Killer-app-potential?
-1
BT-1 Bluetooth Webcam
-33
C'mon, people, 199$ and they can't afford to write one word about the cam's preferred physical environment? Or did I missed that in the specs? Yes, it says "indoor" use only. But, you know, does "indoor" specify the preferred environment in a long-term use? What about things like temperature, humidity and so on?
Besides, the price is (a bit) to high (for me) to order this cam without questioning.
I think also it would not fit the specs for a real security-cam in real life under real circumstances, so using it as a security-cam is just a neat side-effect. I would never use it as a baby-cam because of the radiation which every wireless device has and to spare the young one from that as good as I can. Just because something is invisible does not mean it does not exists and has no effect.
+1
FlashVideo Converter
- if you want to spend money and if you really need to convert flash-files to another format: buy "QuickTime Pro", install the (free) "Perian" and convert/export your flash-files with "QuickTime Pro". I tested it this week and it works (latest software). Costs are like 30$?
But... if you need a professional media-tool with presets you can choose from, "MediaCleaner" is/(was) the perfect solution. It's now "Autodesk Cleaner". It's very professional... and it costs also a professional price like 600$.
-33
Apple Safari
-9
Poshier
-4
-33
Apple Safari
...but still refuses to execute bookmarks with javascript:-commands if the safari-window has a tab. This is the only bug (I hope it's not a feature) I saw (and annoys me just a bit enough to write it down here)
Apple Safari