And the Bohdan Khmelnytsky Award for relentless cyberstalking of anyone daring to voice a negative opinion of MacKeeper goes to . . . Sanapaul. His main weapon: endless smarmy cookie-cutter responses which serve only to impede the lively exchange of information and ideas. A less flawed product and marketing strategy would have no need of such diversionary tactics.
I'm surprised MacUpdate supports the cheesy self-promotion of the developer "poll" or that the developer stoops to it. Why-do-you-think-our-product-is-wonderful "polls" are nothing more than advertising devices; a genuinely interested developer would query existing users directly. This demeans the product and, more importantly, polling in general, desensitizing us to its valid impartial use. MacUpdate itself is all the poll we need here.
For those many of us who deplore the piling-on of unwanted "features" which send us out foraging for undocumented methods of removal or undoing, it's time to pool our voices to outshout Steve Jobs' tin inner ear. Apple's cross-advertising within the app itself is more Windoze- than Apple-like. I want to *use* iTunes, not be marketed to by it. Perhaps enough complaints in public for a will have some effect. Probably not, but it's worth the try. I really would hate to find a replacement app and, as others have pointed out, replacing iTunes is not even a possibility for many.
On its own terms, this modest incremental upgrade warrants neither a full version bump nor an upgrade fee of nearly a third of the original price. I prefer to think of this as a subscription fee to help ensure that the engaged developer remains so. As such, it's worth giving in to the gentle extortion.
I choose my words carefully in this, my first negative review in years of MacUpdate readership.
The original e-mail receipt (dated November 13, 2003) states that "Once registered, the application will never expire and the MultiSync feature will be unlocked to sync all its items. No upgrade fee will never be asked to you, so any future release can be downloaded and used for free . . . " The no-upgrade-fee-ever policy counterbalanced a relatively high purchase price and seemed a good deal both for the purchaser and the developer.
iSynCal 5.6, however, requires an upgrade fee nearly as high as the original purchase price. While it is not unreasonable to charge for upgrades to support continued development, it *is* unreasonable/dishonest/sleazy to charge after explicitly guaranteeing that there never would be such a charge. E-mail to the developer has been ignored. I'd urge potential purchasers to consider the character of the developer before throwing good money after the bad.
[Version 5.6]
There are currently no troubleshooting comments by this member.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
+1
MacKeeper
Ashkenaz reviewed on 29 Jul 2011
Things
Ashkenaz rated on 05 Mar 2011
[Version 1.4.4]
+3
Path Finder
+4
Apple iTunes
Ashkenaz reviewed on 27 Sep 2010
+5
Bookends
iSynCal
ashkenaz reviewed on 09 Dec 2006
The original e-mail receipt (dated November 13, 2003) states that "Once registered, the application will never expire and the MultiSync feature will be unlocked to sync all its items. No upgrade fee will never be asked to you, so any future release can be downloaded and used for free . . . " The no-upgrade-fee-ever policy counterbalanced a relatively high purchase price and seemed a good deal both for the purchaser and the developer.
iSynCal 5.6, however, requires an upgrade fee nearly as high as the original purchase price. While it is not unreasonable to charge for upgrades to support continued development, it *is* unreasonable/dishonest/sleazy to charge after explicitly guaranteeing that there never would be such a charge. E-mail to the developer has been ignored. I'd urge potential purchasers to consider the character of the developer before throwing good money after the bad.