It's abysmal that to install this patch improving core platforms functionality (e.g. ability to preview raw files in Finder), Apple requires to have one of the paid products (iLife or Aperture) to be installed. All of the Microsoft bashers don't have anything to say about it? If MS did something like this, it'd be all over forums.
You're contradicting yourself. Yes, Apple is only obligated to upgrade iPhoto and Aperture. But iPhoto is a part of the OS, is it not?
Again, imagine MS decided that to use the latest and greatest Win Media Player, you'd have to pay $100 (which is roughly the cost of iLife, afaik).
IMO, Apple can't have it both ways. If iPhoto is part of the OS, it should be upgraded to support new formats. If iPhoto is a standalone app, that somehow ends up bundled with the OS, where are all the people that wanted to sue MS for including the IE as part of the Win95?
There are currently no troubleshooting comments by this member.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
-1
Apple Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update
-1
-2
Again, imagine MS decided that to use the latest and greatest Win Media Player, you'd have to pay $100 (which is roughly the cost of iLife, afaik).
IMO, Apple can't have it both ways. If iPhoto is part of the OS, it should be upgraded to support new formats. If iPhoto is a standalone app, that somehow ends up bundled with the OS, where are all the people that wanted to sue MS for including the IE as part of the Win95?