Why always Rijndael (AES)? And "only" SHA-256 hashing? Why not Serpent and Twofish as an option? Or better, a Rijndael-Serpent-Twofish cascade (...future proof)? Why not SHA-512 and/or Whirlpool hashing?
But the app looks great! Cool graphics!
// From the Serpent homepage:
(www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/serpent.html):
"It was a finalist in the AES competition. The winner, Rijndael, got 86 votes at the last AES conference while Serpent got 59 votes, Twofish 31 votes, RC6 23 votes and MARS 13 votes. So NIST's choice of Rijndael as the AES was not surprising, and we had to content ourselves with silver in the `encryption olympics'. Serpent and Rijndael are somewhat similar; the main difference is that Rijndael is faster (having fewer rounds) but Serpent is more secure."
// From Wikipedia:
"...The XSL attack, if effective, would weaken Serpent (though not as much as it would weaken Rijndael, which became AES). However, many cryptanalysts believe that once implementation considerations are taken into account the XSL attack would be more expensive than a brute force attack."
1 of 3 utilities I can't life without: Clix, LaunchBar and SuperDuper!. I use Clix since 2004 (v. 1.0) and NEVER had a problem with it. And check out Xfile - Awesome!
@ RONL: Ha! I think Joel Barriere's OnyX is just made for u! With just one click u can render your system unbootable. ;-)
virex is still crap...! norton-av is a pure kernelpanic-app... intego's av solution is very fast... but useless, it only knows mac viruses... so, it's useless. clam-av is nice but it takes a day to scan 10GB! i use sophos anti-virus since 1½years . ...no crashes, no kernelpanics! Test it!
I am a Free member 
(10) 
USSD
a2295964 reviewed on 18 Oct 2008
-7
BIAS Peak Pro
a2295964 reviewed on 19 Jul 2008
-2
AllSecure
But the app looks great! Cool graphics!
// From the Serpent homepage:
(www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/serpent.html):
"It was a finalist in the AES competition. The winner, Rijndael, got 86 votes at the last AES conference while Serpent got 59 votes, Twofish 31 votes, RC6 23 votes and MARS 13 votes. So NIST's choice of Rijndael as the AES was not surprising, and we had to content ourselves with silver in the `encryption olympics'. Serpent and Rijndael are somewhat similar; the main difference is that Rijndael is faster (having fewer rounds) but Serpent is more secure."
// From Wikipedia:
"...The XSL attack, if effective, would weaken Serpent (though not as much as it would weaken Rijndael, which became AES). However, many cryptanalysts believe that once implementation considerations are taken into account the XSL attack would be more expensive than a brute force attack."
Apple Mac OS X
+1
Trash Compactor
a2295964 reviewed on 28 Jun 2008
-1
Christian News Widget
-5
CLIX
a2295964 reviewed on 17 Apr 2008
@ RONL: Ha! I think Joel Barriere's OnyX is just made for u! With just one click u can render your system unbootable. ;-)
Sophos Anti-Virus
a2295964 reviewed on 15 Jun 2006
LaunchBar
a2295964 reviewed on 13 Jun 2006