MacUpdate
Join MacUpdate
New Member

New Developer
Explore
MacUpdate Desktop
Hot Apps

Business
Dashboard
Development
Drivers
Education
MacUpdate Promo
Popular Apps

Games
Home & Personal
Internet
Multimedia & Design
Utilities
iPhone
Apps

Login
Member Login

Developer Login
About
Search Mac Apps

Search iPhone Apps

Advanced Search
Rick Cross
Downloads: 379
Posts: 15
Smile Score: +11
About Me
I am a MacUpdate Desktop user
Gender: Male


Visit Stats
Last Visit: Today
Member Since: 01 Apr 2010
Profile Views: 923

MacOSaiX 2.1
(Free)
Friendly for Faceboo... 1.2
(Free)
cf/x photo mosaic 2.0.0
(Demo)
WineBottler 1.2.3
(Free)
Sparkbox 1.0.32
(Demo)
Z-Write 1.5.77
(Shareware)
XQuartz 2.7.1
(Free)
Xmarks for Safari 1.4.1
(Free)
XBMC 11.0
(Free)
WriteRoom 3.1
(Shareware)
VLC Media Player 2.0.1
(Free)
UltraEdit 3.1.0.1
(Shareware)
Rick Cross's Posts
Average Rating from Rick:
(9)

sort: smiles | time
burypromote

WineBottler

Lvwolfman reviewed on 27 May 2012
I'm fairly experience in using wine as well as Wineskin Winery, so I didn't come to WineBottler as a novice.

However, I was unable to get any programs to work with WineBottler even though they worked perfectly with Wineskin. The fact that they worked so easily with Wineskin tells me that it's not some obscure dependency that wasn't installed.

The author's idea is sound. Perhaps someday when I have lots of spare time to invest I'll get a program working with this. In the meantime I'll continue using what works, and works easily.
[Version 1.2.3]



burypromote

cf/x photo mosaic

Lvwolfman reviewed on 27 May 2012
I'm glad that I actually downloaded the demo version before I bought it on the MacUpdate deal.

Knowing that this wouldn't be something that I'd use a LOT, I thought that at the price it'd be a useful tool.

It works. The results weren't impressive. Maybe it's me. Maybe I didn't give it access to enough photos as I only have a few thousand in iPhoto. Either way, the results weren't anything that I'd want to share.

The best I can say is that it never crashed.
[Version 2.0.0]



burypromote

Friendly for Facebook
Lvwolfman commented on 27 May 2012
Just found a major bug.

When in sidebar mode and you bring up the notifications window and click say, where so-and-so commented on someone's status update, instead of going to that thread, Friendly takes you to your own profile page.

When in "normal" mode, it works as it is meant to.
[Version 1.2]



burypromote

Friendly for Facebook

Lvwolfman reviewed on 27 May 2012
I admit it, I spend far too much time on Facebook.

My favorite iPad Facebook app was Friendly. Was being that it has serious problems that haven't been fixed. It seems that the developer is more interested in the desktop version and a Pinterest app.

But I went ahead and gambled the US$4.99 and bought the mac desktop version.

In a nutshell, it is little more than a wrapper around an HTML browser, meaning that you get the same page you would if you'd used Safari.

The wrapper gives you a nice sidebar mode, the pictures zoom larger when you mouse over them, ads are slightly greyed out if you choose "Enhanced Browsing Mode" and you get drag and drop for photos and links. Basically $1 per feature. However these are mostly things that may be added to your web browser by free extensions.

Is it worth buying? That's up to you. The most useful feature is the side bar mode where it takes up maybe 20% of my screen on my 17" MBP.

Would I buy it again now that I've used it? Nope. That's probably why there's no "lite" version.
[Version 1.2]



burypromote

Friendly for Facebook
Lvwolfman commented on 27 May 2012
MacUpdate has the price wrong. It is US$4.99 not FREE.
[Version 1.2]



burypromote

iPlayer Downloader

Lvwolfman reviewed on 30 Jun 2011
When it worked... This and iPlayer Grabber both worked very well though I liked iPlayer Downloader a bit better. Grabber is now abandoned (though open source) and I get the same errors everyone else is reporting. :-(

However, the "Get iPlayer Automator" someone else mentioned worked perfectly!

If iPlayer Grabber gets updated and can again work with the BBC, I'll switch back as I like the interface better.
[Version 4.2]



burypromote
+3

JollysFastVNC

Lvwolfman reviewed on 09 Oct 2010
I needed a way to get to my Ubuntu 10.4LTS box at work. So I enabled Ubuntu's screen sharing (VNC). Then realized I didn't have Chicken of the Sea installed any longer. Teamviewer works excellent but I forgot to start it before leaving the office.

So I'd heard how fast JollyFastVNC is. Downloaded it, copied to my apps folder and ran it.

It immediately filled in the server list with my work machine. (I use Logmein hamachi so it is on my "local" network via vpn over DSL.)

Clicked the "connect" button, entered the password and BAM! there was my Ubuntu desktop!

Only one problem so far. The remote screen will NOT refresh. I have to close the connection and then reconnect to see the changes. All I see movement-wise are the mouse pointers. Yes, two. My local pointer and the one on the remote screen moving as a pair, just slightly offset.

So I tried cotvnc (Chicken of the VNC) 2.0b4. Much slower to display and no screen refresh on it either. So it's an issue with Ubuntu's server. BTW, Cotvnc saw the server automatically as well.

Oh well... Both work well enough I think to get TeamViewer started.

Bottom line, JollyFastVNC is noticeably faster than cotvnc. The question we each have to face is: Is active support and speed worth US$40?
[Version 1.12]


1 Reply

burypromote
+2

+11
Lvwolfman commented on 10 Oct 2010
BTW, after some research, I found the problem with the screen refresh/repaint (or lack thereof).

I had to go into the desktop settings (Appearance and then Video Features I think) in Ubuntu and turn off all animations. Seems to be a conflict between Compiz and the VNC clients I've tried.

In any case, both JollyFastVNC and COTVNC now work flawlessly. Funny thing though, both are about the same speed now once the desktop comes up. JollyFastVNC is still superfast at getting the initial screen up and usable.
burypromote

PandoraJam
Lvwolfman tipped on 11 Jul 2009
Contrary to a comment below about Pandora using AAC+ and crappy sound... I just recorded a song using the trial version of PandoraJam.

The file it left in my iTunes folder is a 192kbps standard MP3 file encoded with Lame 3.96.

I didn't change anything in the program's preferences, nor even looked for them. I AM a Pandora subscriber though, which is why I get 192kbps.
[Version 1.3b256]


1 Reply

burypromote

+11
Lvwolfman replied on 11 Jul 2009
Ok, dummy me didn't read the changes...

I'm getting the mp3's BECAUSE I'm a Pandora One subscriber. OTH, if you're going to rip their music you should be a subscriber. ;-)

This thing rocks!
burypromote
+2

PandoraJam

Lvwolfman reviewed on 11 Jul 2009
I've tried several other Pandora apps including the official Pandora program and while they all worked well, I like PandoraJam the best. Basically they all do the same things... recording to iTunes is frosting. Well worth the $15.
[Version 1.3b256]



burypromote

GarageBuy
Lvwolfman commented on 18 Jun 2009
Nice looking program. Crashed twice in a row doing a simple search. It is no longer on my system.

MBP 17" late 2007, Leopard.
[Version 1.5.8]



There are currently no troubleshooting comments by this member.

Displaying 1-10 of 13
< 1 2 >
Please login or create a new
MacUpdate Member account
to use this feature
Add/Update Listing About MacUpdate Desktop Career Opportunities RSS Twitter Facebook Advertise Sitemap
Copyright © 2012 MacUpdate LLC


- -