Ok is the name Raven or Robin??? The page says Raven, my old version is Raven (but I have been having trouble updating) but the download is Robin. When you go to the developers site the name has changed to Robin??? Should't a change of name be something users would be notified about?

Developer what's going on??

This would be a 4 or 5 rating if more of the features / options worked and the user did not have to figure out the name change to update.

I've been using Sophos since I kicked Norton to the curb. A close look at Norton (which I understood was a PC program) was really not being actively developed for the mac. The PC program continued to get regular updates and frequent new features) while the mac program languished all the while charging me for updates to a program that no longer installed on my system.

Sophos did have problems with slowing down in Lion while upgrading the virus definitions but that seems to have stopped at least for me. I runs in the background and I only see it when there is a questionable file on my system. And the best thing is I do not have to pay for it on a yearly basis. And I no longer have to deal with a program that has been patched to death in order to get it to run on my system. Thanks Sohpos!

My only request is to get a little more info on the definitions being installed.

I am asking or feed back on this product as I am considering a purchase and $99.00 is not a small amount. I have Adobe CS3 and now only use Photoshop and Acrobat from the suite. I would like to get rid of everything but photoshop as I do not intend to upgrade for $600+ and they will not allow me to upgrade only Acrobat. Which leads to my question.

Is they program a good replacement for Acrobat? I mainly acquire (via scanner usually) and modify, print, etc PDF's. Like most most of my work is converted to PDF before sending it to clients. So is this a good replacement or should I keep the aging Acrobat along with the Adobe bloat? Please only answer if you have used or are also using Acrobat and have meaningful feedback. Thanks

The lack of any sync option is a deal breaker for me. I could live with the limited import, even more limited print options and would be willing to wait for the inability to out put passively collected data to be corrected. But I do not only write or have ideas while sitting at my computer. And the built in bug you feature (I think this is a good feature) makes this only a "log of my computer activity and how I feel while working at my computer rather than a true journalling app that recognizes that things occur in my life even when I am not sitting at my computer.

This is not a review and I did not rate the app because I have never used the app. I fully intended to try the app but then noticed the one review (4.6) for this app was made by the developer. I do not have a problem with the developer leaving what I am sure he feels is a useful message. In addition I want to be clear that the developer clearly identified himself as the same. However, while I am impressed with what the app says it will do I think it is extremely disingenuous for the developer to rate his software???

Of course it is a 4.6 to you (why not a 5?) But the developers review should not be among impartial end user reviewers (and why didn't you give it a "5" is there a problem that prevents it from being a "5")?.

The developer did not have to rate the software to post his comment as he could have done what I just did and make his review a comment.

Is there something I am missing. If I am to trust these reviews to narrow my search for software that meets my needs ratings such as this diminish this site as a useful tool. (Every developer no matter how good or bad the software from the end users point of view believes his software is a 5. And he/she should because of the work, time and effort they put into it.

This is probably an oversight by the developer but this makes me less likely to try his product until there are many many more reviews that do not appear to be linked to people who stand to make a profit from its sell.

I don't usually write this type of comment and hope the developer sees my point but this site is to valuable to have people lose faith in the reviews to the point of ignoring the site. I learn form other reviews and hope some do the same from mine but this behavior undermines the whole idea of the site.

If the developer wants to write a note telling us how his software is better than all others in the category great just do not influence the overall ratings (what users think of the software) by rating your own software!