None of these Launchpad editors are ever going to work unless they include SQL database editing. That's why they don't actually save settings. The successful one will be able to modify the database in ~/Library/Application Support/Dock.
What is the difference between this application and site-specific browsers such as Fluid (http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/26476/fluid) or Raven (http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/40498/raven)?
I agree with everyone expressing thanks to the developer to bring back Spaces.
I also agree with some users, such as Shock-J, who point out that more features are needed so that this can be ready for prime-time and big-time on the Mac. The effects themselves may seem cosmetic, but the result would be an app that fits well into the user's overall desktop experience.
More integration is needed with Mission Control. Here are some things to aim for:
(1) A default transition into the grid that zooms back from the current desktop, as Mission Control does.
(2) An ability to override MC's default swipe transition between desktops, so that whether the user changes desktops from within the grid overview or MC overview, they can still get the same transition, such as cube.
(3) Along with #2, an ability to assign the same keyboard shortcuts to TS as to MC.
I'm looking for a functioning coverflow switcher like the "shift switcher" in Compiz, but haven't found one yet. In the meantime, this one does its job very well. And, at least while it's in beta, the price is right.
Can anyone suggest another app that does as much as this one, and connects in as many ways from one interface?
I use it daily: I call my family on the other side of the world, text-chat and exchange files with clients, visit my family by video. That's at least three separate applications, all from one contact list. Without it, I'd have to use iChat, FaceTime, and Adium, and I still would not be able call my mother on the telephone from my computer.
If there's a more versatile app, please tell me. I'd gladly migrate.
Only gripe: Skype servers have been known to go down, disrupting my text chats in particular. But that hasn't happened in a while. It may have been a regional network issue rather than a server issue, as well.
Wow. So, Compiz finally makes it to Mac! I've looked at the video, and to me it looks just like Compiz. I've waited for this to come, but I always hoped the open-source community would merely PORT Compiz to Mac.
I'm still running 10.5, but planning to upgrade to 10.7 when it's out.
Some questions, then: Is this, in fact, a port of the open-source compiz-config?
Does anyone find bugs, including crashes, in this software? Compiz remains buggy in linux.
Is the confusing preferences GUI more intuitive in Mac than it is in compiz-config?
When are you gonna introduce the "cube?" THAT would be the killer! ;-)
A fascinating application, quite beautiful. Mr. Goyal deserves much credit for all his work, first in developing it for Linux on a machine that didn't like Linux, and then for porting it to Mac.
But let's talk about that interface (nod to Bdikkat)...
First off, the menubar. OK, so this app started on Linux, which increases its appeal for folks like me. But it's not that hard to make it "conform", if I can dare to use that word, to the Mac GUI sensibility. I think this is the very first instance I have run across of an application that uses NONE of the menu labels commonly found in Mac apps. Using Interface Builder, included in XCode, you can easily revise the labels for each menu. Any user can do it, actually.
There are problems with that menubar, very real ones for the average user. If your monitor is 19 inches or smaller, that menu will stretch across more than half, blocking visibility of many menu extras. The developer has converted "system tray" icons and menus to a menu extra, but on a 19-inch screen, you can't use it because you can't see it.
Recommendation: Take advantage of the very easy developer tools that Apple provides to give this more of a Mac GUI. I would only take a few minutes to get the menubar in order, and to easily convert this to a far more usable app.
Until that happens, though, I'm still gonna have fun with this app.
I have 3.1.2 installed. When new versions of Neo and Ooo are released, I like to compare them side-by-side.
Neo office was my first Ooo-forked office suite, and it gave me a good intro to this family of apps. Once Ooo came out with a Mac-native fork, though, I switched over from Neo. Why? Speed, primarily. Neo has, for most of its release history, been slow to write to screen or to composite, slow to load, and overall has just felt clunky and resource-hungry. Ooo remains a far slimmer, more efficient fork, at least in look and feel.
There are some bugs in the latest stable release of Ooo that haven't existed in earliest versions. In particular, the "Insert comment" function--useful to professional writers and editors like me--is buggy. Because of the long hours I spend working with documents, I keep the zoom at 170% so that the text fills most of the screen on my 19-inch display. However, at this zoom level, I cannot refer to the text I am annotating; the horizontal scroll will not work if I have the cursor inside the comment box. My only options are to either decrease the zoom or place the cursor outside the comment box. Again this bug did NOT exist in previous versions of Ooo.
It also does not exist in Neo 3.1.2. I am a big fan of Ooo, but for now, despite its clunkiness, I'm going to give Neo 3.1.2 a good test-drive, waiting for Ooo 3.4 STABLE to be released. I do hope annotations--an essential tool for writers and editors--have been debugged by then.
I rate Neo a "3" on value and a "4" on overall stability... lower than I rate Ooo, overall. However, if Neo continues to improve in stability, and takes the Ooo fork well beyond its current features, I will then consider donating to the project and upgrading to Neo 3.2.
This app has a huge memory leak, and if kept open for long periods of time, which it ought to be able to do, it will eat more than half of my 2GB of RAM.
Here's what it looks like in my Activity Monitor:
340 NeoOffice 0.4 23 440.02 MB 1.64 GB Intel
Disheartening. And to think I could work on the same document, which includes lots of editor's markups, highlights, and comment boxes, in OpenOffice with no such scary memory usage.
In fact that's what I'm gonna do right now... close the document and quit Neo, then work on it in Ooo.
Lots of questions, as this is a very politically motivated piece of software. Does the Document Foundation retain all the coding and development rights for the OpenOffice software, or is this suite a complete rewrite from the ground up? Did Oracle get the rights to the code, as well?
How will these developments affect future development of NeoOffice, as well?
Wishing the Document Foundation all success at preserving open-source development...
Is anyone having an issue where Lion Designer breaks the "Change Desktop Background" setting?
After I installed this app, that is what happened on my system. The desktop background became Andromeda.jpg -- the default desktop -- and I was no longer able to change the background.
I deleted deleted several different caches and preference files, both using OnyX and by manually, but these tries did not fix the problem.
I finally resorted to deleting the file /System/CoreServices/DefaultDesktop.jpg and replacing it by renaming the background I wanted to use as the "DefaultDesktop.jpg." This worked.
However, still no ability to change the background. The preference command is simply broken.
I'm not sure whether Lion Designer is the culprit, but it was the last app I installed before the breakage, and it was installed just before the breakage, too.
If Spike is looking for a new server, he might look into BBC's met service. It's used by many Linux apps.
He could also develop this app in such a way that it doesn't depend on one server.
I wonder why he hasn't implemented a feature in which users may designate a server. Along with this, it would be better if the app didn't freeze up if it can't connect to a server. Meteorologist, for example, just shows the app icon if it can't connect.
Meteorologist, btw, has also had this server problem many times. I switched to Weathervane because, up to now, the weather server there has been reliable.
Launchpad Cleaner 2
iGoogle Translate
TotalSpaces
Kohoutek reviewed on 17 May 2012
I also agree with some users, such as Shock-J, who point out that more features are needed so that this can be ready for prime-time and big-time on the Mac. The effects themselves may seem cosmetic, but the result would be an app that fits well into the user's overall desktop experience.
More integration is needed with Mission Control. Here are some things to aim for:
(1) A default transition into the grid that zooms back from the current desktop, as Mission Control does.
(2) An ability to override MC's default swipe transition between desktops, so that whether the user changes desktops from within the grid overview or MC overview, they can still get the same transition, such as cube.
(3) Along with #2, an ability to assign the same keyboard shortcuts to TS as to MC.
HyperSwitch
Kohoutek reviewed on 14 May 2012
Classic Menu
Kohoutek reviewed on 03 May 2012
And now it's open source.
Skype
Kohoutek reviewed on 03 May 2012
I use it daily: I call my family on the other side of the world, text-chat and exchange files with clients, visit my family by video. That's at least three separate applications, all from one contact list. Without it, I'd have to use iChat, FaceTime, and Adium, and I still would not be able call my mother on the telephone from my computer.
If there's a more versatile app, please tell me. I'd gladly migrate.
Only gripe: Skype servers have been known to go down, disrupting my text chats in particular. But that hasn't happened in a while. It may have been a regional network issue rather than a server issue, as well.
Deskovery
I'm still running 10.5, but planning to upgrade to 10.7 when it's out.
Some questions, then: Is this, in fact, a port of the open-source compiz-config?
Does anyone find bugs, including crashes, in this software? Compiz remains buggy in linux.
Is the confusing preferences GUI more intuitive in Mac than it is in compiz-config?
When are you gonna introduce the "cube?" THAT would be the killer! ;-)
Thanks... looking forward to trying this on 10.7.
+4
In previews of 10.7, I see the new Mission Control. Is the developer planning to integrate this with Mission Control?
calibre
Kohoutek reviewed on 11 Jun 2011
But let's talk about that interface (nod to Bdikkat)...
First off, the menubar. OK, so this app started on Linux, which increases its appeal for folks like me. But it's not that hard to make it "conform", if I can dare to use that word, to the Mac GUI sensibility. I think this is the very first instance I have run across of an application that uses NONE of the menu labels commonly found in Mac apps. Using Interface Builder, included in XCode, you can easily revise the labels for each menu. Any user can do it, actually.
There are problems with that menubar, very real ones for the average user. If your monitor is 19 inches or smaller, that menu will stretch across more than half, blocking visibility of many menu extras. The developer has converted "system tray" icons and menus to a menu extra, but on a 19-inch screen, you can't use it because you can't see it.
Recommendation: Take advantage of the very easy developer tools that Apple provides to give this more of a Mac GUI. I would only take a few minutes to get the menubar in order, and to easily convert this to a far more usable app.
Until that happens, though, I'm still gonna have fun with this app.
-1
+4
+1
NeoOffice
Kohoutek reviewed on 11 Jun 2011
Neo office was my first Ooo-forked office suite, and it gave me a good intro to this family of apps. Once Ooo came out with a Mac-native fork, though, I switched over from Neo. Why? Speed, primarily. Neo has, for most of its release history, been slow to write to screen or to composite, slow to load, and overall has just felt clunky and resource-hungry. Ooo remains a far slimmer, more efficient fork, at least in look and feel.
There are some bugs in the latest stable release of Ooo that haven't existed in earliest versions. In particular, the "Insert comment" function--useful to professional writers and editors like me--is buggy. Because of the long hours I spend working with documents, I keep the zoom at 170% so that the text fills most of the screen on my 19-inch display. However, at this zoom level, I cannot refer to the text I am annotating; the horizontal scroll will not work if I have the cursor inside the comment box. My only options are to either decrease the zoom or place the cursor outside the comment box. Again this bug did NOT exist in previous versions of Ooo.
It also does not exist in Neo 3.1.2. I am a big fan of Ooo, but for now, despite its clunkiness, I'm going to give Neo 3.1.2 a good test-drive, waiting for Ooo 3.4 STABLE to be released. I do hope annotations--an essential tool for writers and editors--have been debugged by then.
I rate Neo a "3" on value and a "4" on overall stability... lower than I rate Ooo, overall. However, if Neo continues to improve in stability, and takes the Ooo fork well beyond its current features, I will then consider donating to the project and upgrading to Neo 3.2.
+1
+4
This app has a huge memory leak, and if kept open for long periods of time, which it ought to be able to do, it will eat more than half of my 2GB of RAM.
Here's what it looks like in my Activity Monitor:
340 NeoOffice 0.4 23 440.02 MB 1.64 GB Intel
Disheartening. And to think I could work on the same document, which includes lots of editor's markups, highlights, and comment boxes, in OpenOffice with no such scary memory usage.
In fact that's what I'm gonna do right now... close the document and quit Neo, then work on it in Ooo.
+2
LibreOffice
How will these developments affect future development of NeoOffice, as well?
Wishing the Document Foundation all success at preserving open-source development...
Lion Designer
After I installed this app, that is what happened on my system. The desktop background became Andromeda.jpg -- the default desktop -- and I was no longer able to change the background.
I deleted deleted several different caches and preference files, both using OnyX and by manually, but these tries did not fix the problem.
I finally resorted to deleting the file /System/CoreServices/DefaultDesktop.jpg and replacing it by renaming the background I wanted to use as the "DefaultDesktop.jpg." This worked.
However, still no ability to change the background. The preference command is simply broken.
I'm not sure whether Lion Designer is the culprit, but it was the last app I installed before the breakage, and it was installed just before the breakage, too.
+4
Thanks
Weather Vane
He could also develop this app in such a way that it doesn't depend on one server.
I wonder why he hasn't implemented a feature in which users may designate a server. Along with this, it would be better if the app didn't freeze up if it can't connect to a server. Meteorologist, for example, just shows the app icon if it can't connect.
Meteorologist, btw, has also had this server problem many times. I switched to Weathervane because, up to now, the weather server there has been reliable.
Flexiglass
Exception Type: EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread: 0
Dyld Error Message:
unknown required load command 0x80000022
Would like to at least try the software, thanks.