There is also a smaller version of Glyphs available in the Mac Appstore: Glyphs Mini.
It is priced for €35,99 (Dutch price). Has anybody tried it?

Three stars are not enough credit for an application like this. I switched from BBEdit to Freeway Pro ten years ago, from Freeway Pro to Coda and Espresso three years ago, and from those two back to BBEdit since january 2011 (that was version 9.6, I think).

I have used all the apps mentioned above to write small to medium sized websites: Coda is great, but it lacks code folding and sometimes does not highlight all HTML5 tags properly. It also lacks some of the utilities that BBEdit has for tidying texts and the search and replace functions are not as good as those found in BBEdit. The new built-in Markdown support (and conversion from Markdown to HTML) is a great timesaver (although it took some time for me to realize this, while I had installed the .pl tools in version 9 so I assumed I did use those). Espresso is a very promising piece of software: the problem is it stays 'a very promising piece of software' for a very long time and it continue to crash more often than any other app I use.

I use BBEdit on a daily basis and almost every day I find a solution in this software for a problem I've encountered. Almost all my little helper apps I kept around online or offline remain untouched since I switched.
Version 10 (round number) had some troubles but most of them are ironed-out in 10.0.1. At the moment I don't have a reason to look elsewhere.

Well, Espresso is finally on the front page of MacRabbit so I assume the developers are happy with it. And they have got enough reason for this: Espresso always was a nice and fast text editor (at least since version 1.0.5 which was the first version I have used) and it is one of the best looking apps I own.

A lot of the bad comments on this app are based on the idea Espresso is the same type of application as Coda. But while Coda beats Espresso in workflow possibilities like uploads, working on local and remote servers, previews and such its text editor is counterproductive.
Of course: Espresso has 'codefolding' (and Coda will have this in a future version since it is based on SubEthaEdit), it's autocompletion and codewrap is superior and just gets the daily code writing done faster.

Other bad comments were made because people expected Espresso would have the same features as CSSEdit for it's CSS. But CSSEdit was nice when I started to explore css, but I hardly use it anymore since I know what to type.

Now, with this new version, startup-windows and projects work like expected, there is finaly (a very basic) picture preview with a 'open with' commando and probably much more.

…it still is note a very stable app: I had a very nasty crash when I tried to move some blocks of code within the code navigator: the feedback report was so large I could not reach the 'send' button to submit it to Macrabbit.