Search Mac Software Downloads
|
DESCRIPTION
eOrdering Professional allows event photographer the ability to let customers order their pictures while at the event or let them order later on the internet. Event Proofs uses shopping cart technology to allow the user to store a users order, so they can move around your site and place their order when they want.

eOrdering Professional will:

  • Create the main order page, and then for each roll it will make index pages, a view cart page,a checkout page, a shipping page and individual product pages.
  • The products can have images or can be text.
  • Each product can have a description, cost, shipping cost.
  • Creates the server side code (.asp or .php) or use PayPal to process the order this product.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 4.1.1:
  • [new] Updated for snow leopard and windows 7
  • [fix] updated all watermarking code
  • Code cleanup
  • Various other minor fixes
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.1 or later.

SHARE
Share

Developer:LAJ Design
Downloads:8,693
  - Version d/l:294
Business:Applications
License:Shareware
Date:23 Oct 2009
Platform:PPC/Intel
Price:$450.00

OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
Suggest something else:
eOrdering Professional X User Reviews (4 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Jul 9 2004

DTP  450.00? Get real before you will be forgotten! Or isn't it typo!?  
(Version 2.4.6)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 8 2004

JASON  Grow up. Some people want a turn-key solutions and this is one designed for a specific niche market. This is for someone that wants to continue to be a photographer, and not a webmaster. Not everybody has the time to do what most of you may. I have several clients that are ready to buy into the futureLabs solution, which is thousands of dollars, and basicly is a far more robust version of this.

Bottom line: Don't knock what you have no intention of using in the first place, as most likely, you were never the intended audience from the start.

Another example of this... People knock Apple for its Administrator Tools that it includes with OS X Server. Why? Because it can all be done with the cli using the config files. Does that mean that Server is a waste, when one can do it with Client? Absolutely not. It just means that someone put a lot of effort into making it a lot easier. Both are equally effective, but one is significantly easier for those that don't want to be a programmer, but rather be the best in what they already do.

I am not affiliated with this developer in any way, but I do understand what it takes to write software and web applications. I don't appreciate others that blatantly choose to belittle a persons works, just because they can do it another way. Instead of knocking the software, help it grow beyond those boundaries of what you see in other solutions. Help it become what all of the rest are not. But, just to tear it apart because of one aspect is childish. I guess I expect more out of the Mac community than this type of treatment.

-jason

*let the flames begin*  
(Version 2.5)

praisebury
0

Jun 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  Must be a typo. $450? Get real.  
(Version 2.4.5)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 10 2004

ANONYMOUS  no typo, it is $450  
(Version 2.4.5)

praisebury
0

Oct 10 2003

ANONYMOUS  No kidding. If you're going to sell it a $450 a pop, that's not shareware.  
(Version 2.2b5)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Sep 8 2003
*....

ANONYMOUS  Are you kidding me? $450 for shareware? Somebody needs to lay the smackdown on this developer and give him a clue. You can pretty much do the same thing for FREE through PayPal or a zillion other FREE plugins for this type of setup. I bet he hasn't sold ONE single copy. Gee....I wonder why.....  
(Version 2.1b3)

praisebury
0
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Aug 7 2004

JASON  Grow up. There is more to this world than just your opinion. Some people want a turn-key solutions and this is one designed for a specific niche market. This is for someone that wants to continue to be a photographer, and not a webmaster. Not everybody has the time to do what most of you may. I have several clients that are ready to buy into the futureLabs solution, which is thousands of dollars, and basicly is a far more robust version of this.

Bottom line: Don't knock what you have no intention of using in the first place, as most likely, you were never the intended audience from the start.

Another example of this... People knock Apple for its Administrator Tools that it includes with OS X Server. Why? Because it can all be done with the cli using the config files. Does that mean that Server is a waste, when one can do it with Client? Absolutely not. It just means that someone put a lot of effort into making it a lot easier. Both are equally effective, but one is significantly easier for those that don't want to be a programmer, but rather be the best in what they already do.

I am not affiliated with this developer in any way, but I do understand what it takes to write software and web applications. I don't appreciate others that blatantly choose to belittle a persons works, just because they can do it another way. Instead of knocking the software, help it grow beyond those boundaries of what you see in other solutions. Help it become what all of the rest are not. But, just to tear it apart because of one aspect is childish. I guess I expect more out of the Mac community than this type of treatment.

-jason

*let the flames begin*  
(Version 2.5)

praisebury
0