 |
DESCRIPTION
Tinderbox is a personal content management assistant. It stores your notes, ideas, and plans. It can help you organize and understand them. And Tinderbox helps you share ideas through Web journals and web logs.
Tinderbox's agents automatically scan your notes, looking for patterns and building relationships. Agents help discover relationships and help make sure important things don't get lost. Agents are easy to make and easy to modify. They're flexible and powerful.
Tinderbox can even gather and update changing information and breaking news from the internet.
When it's time to share your notes, Tinderbox can assemble multiple notes into one page. Updates are a breeze -- even if you update several times a day. Private notes, timestamps, permanent links, archives: everything you want, just the way you want it.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.3.9 or later.

|
SCREENSHOT
|
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| Tinderbox User Reviews (20 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Mar 22 2009 |
SUMNERG Deep application by a responsive developer. Tinderbox can do many, many things for confirmed geeks as well as more casual users. Alas, no Unicode support, so you're out of luck if you want to work with Chinese, Japanese or many other languages. Also not a "universal" native Intel app; still runs under Rosetta with, some users report, less than optimal results. (Version 4.6.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 1 2008 |
F451 Here are some basic notes of the new features in v4.1: - display even more information in maps and outlines - use agents and rules to move notes to new containers - work with dates before 1904 - send email to a specific Tinderbox container, and take actions when it arrives (Version 4.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 20 2006 |
LEV There seems to be a huge amount of misunderstanding about what Tinderbox actually _is_, partly because, to go beyond the basics (which are themselves pretty powerful) does indeed involve a steep learning curve... as in "learning". Like you have to do with any tool. And partly because Tinderbox is, in the end, more or less whatever you want it to be. Which is why it takes some learning. Personally, I can't understand why anyone would spring for a CAD/CAM system or Adobe InDesign. Why? Because I don't need them or use them. I do need and use Tinderbox. Its web features -- handy customizable blogging, for example -- are wasted on me. So I don't use them. But the rest, I _do_ use. Since I first ran across Tinderbox I've used it for two full-length books (and currently on a third) and lord knows how many articles, lectures, papers and what-have-you. The price question is economics 1.01. For the cost of Tinderbox, a commercial organization will buy approximately 20 minutes of my time. Given slack-time, prep. etc., TInderbox is probably representing a capital outlay of one hour of my time. It has saved me that hour time and again; most recently when I wanted to set up some reasonably complex bibliographic stuff. I could have spent an hour searching for off-the-peg software (though there isn't any); instead, I spent the hour in building it myself in Tinderbox. Job done, and fit for purpose. In other words, YMMV. Perhaps if people thought of Tbx as an _environment_ rather than a standard app., it might clarify things a bit. I know that about 70% of people I show it to say "Oy gottenyu" or something similar; but 20% say "Hell's teeth, that's EXACTLY what I need." (The other 10% say "Is that a Mac? There's no software for the Mac.") (Version 3.5.4) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 3 2007 |
CHRIS WALKEN I'd be interested to see a tutorial or explanation of how to use it for books, articles, etc. Anything like that anywhere? The last time I looked, there was little documentation. I see there's a book/manual now for sale. (Version 4.0) | |
 | Feb 9 2008 |
NOWODU If you are writing books or articles now, presumably you gather and organize your writing somehow, and then put it in a publishable form with a word processor. So the short answer is, you gather and organize your information with Tinderbox, export it to text or HTML, and "dress it up" with a word processor. Try gathering information for an article using the number of notes you can create in the demo, and take a look at it in the different views available- Map, Outline, Nakakoji (text). See what questions you have. The longer answer has to come in a conversation. People will want know what you do now, and what you would like to do. http://eastgate.com/wiki2/wiki.cgi?TinderboxWiki http://eastgate.com/Tinderbox/forum/ There are novelists, academics, and other friendly people there who are already having this conversation. (Version 4.1) | |
 | Feb 9 2008 |
NOWODU Here's a page with a discussion of writing http://eastgate.com/Tinderbox/Using/Writing.html The amount of documentation has built up quite a bit in the last few years. (Version 4.1) | |
 | Feb 9 2008 |
NOWODU Sorry that I keep thinking of things- I wish one could edit one's comments. A 277 page manual comes with the application. The book is separate. (Version 4.1) | |
 | Aug 20 2006 |
CA The enigmatic release notes: The legacy date elements ^today, ^created, and ^lastModified have been slightly revised. ^created and ^lastModified take two arguments. The first argument is mandatory, and designates which note's date of creation is to be exported. The optional second argument designates a format string. ^created(whichNote[,format string]) ^today supports zero, one, or two arguments. It always exports the current date and time at the time of export; in the two-argument form, the note designator is ignored. ^today(which_note,format_string) (Version 3.5.4) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 28 2006 |
EASTGATE Translation for visitors: "A couple of really arcane details of the program were broken in 3.5.3 . We fixed them in 3.5.4 . The users who relied on them are happy. A project that needs them to link Tinderbox to TiddlyWiki is happy. " Nobody else really needs to worry about this stuff. The point of release notes is to document every little change. (Version 3.5.4) | |
 | Jun 29 2006 |
YOXI I'm sure this app isn't really $192 ?? (Version 3.5.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 29 2006 |
EASTGATE Yes, it's just $192. And at the moment it's on sale- so you can save $25. It's a professional tool. Lots of people don't need it. But if you do need Tinderbox, it's going to save you thousands of dollars. (Version 3.5.0) | |
 | Jun 28 2006 |
MACLOVER1.1 Oh Yeah... with a screenshot like that you're not gonna scare anyone away.... DUH... I want things to simplify my brainpatterns, not tie them into a wiry-knot, how nerdy is one supposed to be... ok cool, it'll look like I'm in a Sci-Fi movie when my friends come over, and peak at my screen, they'll be tweaking LOL (Version 3.5.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 29 2006 |
EASTGATE Some ideas are simple, and can be presented simply. Others are complex. Sometimes, simplicity can only be found after sorting through lots of data and lots of research. Some of the more complex screen shots above come from research into game design principles and practice by Professor Julie Tolmie at Kings College, London. It's a tremendous amount of work; if it could be simpler, I'm sure she'd make it simpler. (Version 3.5.0) | |
 | Jul 21 2007 |
LEV The point of your comment, exactly...? Looks like your brainpatterns aren't complex enough to require Tinderbox. Still, when in doubt, sneer, eh? (Version 3.6.2) | |
 | Jun 10 2006 |
I gave Tinderbox a try but the learning curve is way too steep. The interface is the worst I've ever seen (I'm sold to Cocoa and this Carbon ugliness, oh please!) and the "help" is a joke. Tinderbox was always between me and my ideas. I spent my time wondering "how could I do this?" That said I have nothing against it, it _is_ very powerful. (Version 3.0.6) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 13 2006 |
LEV If you don't like it, don't understand it, don't need it or can't afford it, don't buy it. It's not as if they are forcing your money out of your pocket. If you *do* have a use for it, then it's not a high price to pay. Or are you little people so angry because you've got used to something for, if not nothing, then very little? Cost/benefit analysis is the way to go, don't you think? Oh - and re "I[f] you did not have such a "Major" attitude and scheme I would have been more interested in your product"... see, if *you* did not have such an "Infantile" attitude, I would be more interested in your opinion. For the grown-ups here: Tinderbox is complex and powerful. I've yet to find something it couldn't do within it parameters of use. But, true, it's not for children. Thank goodness. (Version 3.0.6) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 30 2006 |
From your comments, the little people are quite clearly people who: 1. cannot grasp the concept of posting feedback or cannot deal with feedback they do not agree with 2. deal with their frustration by resorting to namecalling Calm down and your place/our place will be a little better. (Version 3.5.0) | |
 | Nov 20 2006 |
LEV Feedback is fine. Uninformed, lazy feedback, though, doesn't help anyone. (Version 3.5.4) | |
 | Nov 11 2005 |
MICHAEL BYWATER Tinderbox continues to get better. True, it's not for kiddies who need their hands held, but if you have information to organise and manipulate, and know what you want to achieve, it's 99:1 that Tinderbox will be able to do it. The combination of outlining, visual mapping, extreme user-configurability and intelligent HTML export are unmatched in any other application I've found. With Tinderbox in tandem with DevonThink Pro and Mellel, you have an information-gathering system which will take you seamlessly from research to planning to producing finished output which is simply second to none. The comments about the built-in Tutorial and manual have some basis in fact, but the online support (both the Wiki and the developer's response) is excellent. The problem is conceptual: if you have an app which can do more or less anything, an exhaustive manual would be inpossible to achieve. When you learn C++ or whatever, you wouldn't expect to then be told what sort of apps to code in it, would you? Same applies to Tinderbox. Think of it as an elegant and powerful language, not for coding but for thinking, and you'll start to get the point. Of course, if you don't know what you want to think *about*... well, then you will have problems. (Version 3.0.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jan 1 2006 |
CHRIS WALKEN I'm interested in the app, but this is yet another excuse for why it's so difficult to learn. If the developer spent some time writing a decent manual and tutorial, he might rake in some cash with those expensive license and upgrade fees. A little work on what a previous reviewer called the "Ugliest interface imaginable" might help too. (Version 3.0.2) | |
 | Nov 10 2005 |
MILAN Masterpiece of uglinesss. Come on, we have Devonthink or Notetaker, we have many notebook-apps to organize and "think", We don't need such carbon-crap. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 10 2005 |
BLODWYN Clearly you have never used Tinderbox to any depth at all. A casual glance is totally inadequate to understand what it can and can't do. Tinderbox is more of a framework than a dedicated application, so it needs some effort to get used to it. I use all the applications you mention. Tinderbox cannot do all that they do unless you did some serious work, but Tinderbox can also go where the others can't because of the customization options available. I spent a long time trying to find a todo list and related notes manager that worked the way I wanted it. I chanced on Tinderbox while researching the 43folders website, and implemented my own version of GTD (Getting Things Done) using Tinderbox. Over a few weeks I tweaked it into the perfect solution for me. I use Tinderbox all day, every day. DT, Notepad, and OO get opened up a couple of times a week for specific things. It's not for the casual faint hearted user though. (Version 3.0) | |
 | Nov 12 2005 |
ANONYMOUS Funny how the minute you hear someone trot out the old "this app is carbon" sneer, you know you're dealing with an amateur... (Version 3.0.1) | |
|
| View all 20 posts >> |
|