 |
EDITOR NOTES
Buy QuarkXPress 8 for $674.97 (save $125) via Amazon. Your purchase from this link helps support MacUpdate!
See 'Related Links' below on this page for link to the demo version.
DESCRIPTION
QuarkXPress 8 delivers superior design power through a new, intuitive interface developed purposefully for the creation of high-end page layout and includes new features such as built-in print, Web and Flash authoring tools, advanced typography control, and global publishing capabilities. QuarkXPress 8 also offers users an enhanced design experience so they can work faster and smarter by quickly and easily accessing the tools they need. The new, intuitive interface delivers updates that allow for more design with fewer clicks.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 8.12: - This update improves PDF output capabilities and introduces features that make the page-layout process even more intuitive and productive.
- QuarkXPress 8.1 introduces a 'Native Transparency' mode for creating PDFs which can offer designers faster and more flexible PDF output support and provide greater control over their PDF workflow process.
- This release also renovates spell checking, adds the ability to paste text without formatting, and improves productivity with Scale functionality.
- QuarkXPress 8.1 also fine tunes Usability and Item Styles.
- In addition, it can help prevent errors by reporting faux font styles such as bold or italic.
- This version readies QuarkXPress for Snow Leopard and Windows 7 compatibility.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4 or later.
| SCREENSHOT
|
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| QuarkXPress User Reviews (125 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Sep 19 2009 |
MACSOLU Direct Download link (registration required): http://downloads.quark.com/Details.aspx?fid=146&&mid=2 (Version 8.12) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 13 2008 |
MACMUSER Probably the best release of QXP since version 5 running in Classic on OSX. The new interface shows how clunky Adobe's has become and the tools are in many respects better than inDesign's. But best of all, QXP8 is fast. Huge files open almost instantly, the annoying buglets of QXP 7 have been fixed (no autosave bloat). Quark's helplines are excellent. Anyone using inDesign really must look at QXP to see what they are missing (I use both so have no axe to grind). The 60-day full version try-out is free. Anyone using QXP6 needs their heads examining. Why on earth don't you upgrade to get superior typesetting and on-screen display, better tools, transparency, page and box baseline grids, faster working
you might as well be back using QXP 3 or 4 in comparison with version 8. There are a few rough areas waiting for attention: the book pallet needs redesigning, grids are a little clunky to set up, in-line graphics can become unstable (but still far better than inDesign's) but given the choice between working in QXP8 or inDesign, it's QXP every time. (Version 8.01) | |
| [ 4 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 26 2008 |
MACMUSER I find it very strange that I am supporting QXP 8 after many years spent trying to convert hardened QXP users to inDesign. Up until CS2, inDesign deservedly held sway on OSX. Then QXP7 and CS3 came out and started to match each other feature for feature. inDesign CS4 is
problematic
and expensive to upgrade to. Adobe seem to have developed Quark-of-old's style of customer support whereas Quark have seen the light and realise they actually need customers. QXP 8 is what version 7 should have been (and version 7 is what 6 should have been). Quark lost sight of the ball and needed to get back into the game in a hurry. As far as the interface is concerned, it is always a matter of personal taste although Adobe have consistently used one box to achieve one end result throughout their product range whereas Quark prefer multi-tabbed boxes which will serve a multitude of settings. Adobe have vertical tabs down the side of the screen while Quark use horizontal. QXP 8 has a (IMHO) more developed and user-definable tool bar and contextual measurements pallet while inDesign has a far better help system. For speed, try them both. I find QXP 8 quicker to set-up and lay-out a piece of work (especially books) and what I read on the web would agree with me. (Please don't ask for references, it is Xmas holiday after all). For the future, I see Quark possibly being side-lined and undeservedly so because it is as good, if not better than inDesign. Just as Freehand did with Illustrator and @£$%^ (fill in blank) was usurped by Photoshop. Younger designers might know only the program they use rather than having a more open and experienced view about things. We started in Calamus before moving to Pagemaker. The former has been reborn while the latter is a page in Wikipedia. Nevertheless, Calamus is unlikely to challenge for the DTP crown. (Version 8.01) | |
 | Jan 9 2009 |
DONMONTALVO Most shops ALREADY OWN Adobe InDesign. I've tested QuarkXPress 8.01 and I'm not impressed. It's still problematic (caching routine, lack of pref to designate temp directory, etc.). We're already done moving most shops to InDesign CS3. Not jumping on InDesign CS4 until enough bug fixes are released. Maybe six months or so. InDesign CS3 is fast, stable and reliable. The only people who are opposed to it at our client shops are the old timers who refuse to learn it. Too bad, as there is a whole pool of talented InDesign users coming from design schools (ironic, we may see more QuarkXPress-only people hitting the streets given the economic downturn). Don Montalvo, NYC (Version 8.01) | |
 | Aug 5 2009 |
TIM27 The problem is that no matter how good Quark makes their software, they damaged their reputation so badly for myself and MANY other users years ago with poor support, slow bug fixes, and high priced updates, and that incredibly strange and paranoid software registration, that we will never go back. Unfortunately, Adobe is only a little better. But, a little better goes a long way when talking about Quark. *sigh* I wish Macromedia was still around. (Version 8.1) | |
 | Aug 5 2009 |
TIM27 Additionally, it doesn't really matter what DTP software you use anymore, because the majority of print shops request PDF files now rather than native docs. (Version 8.1) | |
 | Oct 14 2008 |
DLWHITE As yet, Quark 8 has no font auto-activation. And Extensis/Suitcase Fusion has no plans to provide a free plug in to make this happen. If you want to auto-activate fonts in Quark 8, you'll have to pony up the fees for Suitcase Fusion 2, and there's not even a release date for that software yet. Unconscionable behavior by all parties. Quark 8 has been out for months. And although Quark has a long history of sketchy customer service, this must be a new low for Extensis. Is there another professional font manager that supplies font auto-activation with Quark 8? (Version 8.01) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 18 2008 |
DLWHITE On a related note, Lynda.com has no plans to develop _any_ Quark XPress 8 training videos, while their entire site is gung-ho over CS4 (including InDesign, of course). Is this end of Quark XPress? My vendors have been slowly switching to InDesign for years, but Quark was still a going concern, if only for legacy jobs. Is that over for good? (Version 8.01) | |
 | Dec 13 2008 |
MACMUSER There are now two font managers for QuarkXPress 8, Suitcase Fusion 2 and FontAgent Pro 4. Only the latter will still work with earlier versions of QXP and CS, plus it also opens fonts in Photoshop. Both cost the same amount. (Version 8.01) | |
 | Oct 3 2008 |
JAMUS Ok, after the 8.01 "update", here is how it breaks down for me: 1. Deducting points for no autoupdater or incremental updates. 2. Deducting MAJOR points for requiring me to create a login with Quark just to download an update to fix bugs/problems in your own software. Attention all companies: please stop doing this! A demo sure, a free XTension sure, but an update? No way. Enjoy that fake login profile now sitting in your database. 3. Adding points for no apparent problems with the install of the update. 4. Deducting points from still relying on a license server for unified volume licenses AND a serial number AND a validation code (thanks for tying up server hardware for that by the way). 5. Adding several points for trying to update the UI some. 6. Deducting points for STILL having quirky PDF exports. 7. Deducting points for almost 1.5GB install. B-L-O-A-T. Two stars is the best you are getting out of me for this one Quark. You are trying to do better, and I appreciate it, but you just keep missing the target. If this keeps up, 8.x is the last time you will get a purchase from me. (Version 8.01) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 5 2008 |
VICLEN Do we really care whether someone has "moved 4 production departments to InDesign" or has some other axe to grind? Nope. Why won't anyone download the 60-day trial, work with it and then post a review? Why live in the past? Judge QuarkXPress 8 on its merits. I've been using it for three weeks or so. In that time there have been no crashes or unexpected quits - not that I get many problems with v7. On a dual-processor G5 running Mac OS X 10.4, the screen redraws are much faster than with v7 - my productivity is definitely up irrespective of the new user interface. Being able to just draw a text box and instantly type into it is a no-brainer - should have been there years ago. And no, Adobe didn't 'invent' this for InDesign as it was a standard feature in PageMaker when I used it back in the early 90s. The new user interface has allowed me to speed up quite considerably courtesy of instant object rotation, live preview of changes, Adobe-style bezier tools and the easy-to-use measurements palette. Dragging text and graphics to or from any drag-&-drop-enabled app is also a useful addition, probably more so than some others such as being able to use grids on individual text boxes. But the new hanging characters feature and vertical alignment have their place in day-to-day work. It's also nice to see an end to language problems with QXP handling 30+ languages as standard. Being able to import Illustrator files as well as Photoshop ones has useful and having Flash creation/exporting as standard makes QXP 8 an all-in-one for design: paper, web and presentation. Yes, I use InDesign too but given the option I'd rather work in QXP and v8 has enough going for it to convince me to upgrade. Cover disc editor, Macworld UK magazine (Version 8.0) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 13 2008 |
DONMONTALVO viclen asked: > Do we really care whether someone has "moved 4 production > departments to InDesign" or has some other axe to grind? Nope. Actually, yes, we do care. Everyone responsible for supporting a production department who works with QuarkXPress DOES CARE about this stuff. I work in a very high profile company responsible for publishing 600+ high quality (and very expensive) fine art cataloges per year. We use QuarkXPress 6.52, never moved to v7 and are not even considering v8. We are moving to InDesign in the coming months. And guess what? We already own it. So does anyone who has Creative Suite. There is NO MONEY TO SPEND. And anyone who has migrate to InDesign knows the level of support you get from Adobe as opposed to Quark is many fold better. I would suggest anyone who is UNSURE if they should migrate should contact Adobe and ask them to send a rep to your company to review your workflow and give you an honest assessment. We did it, and we'll be moving over soon. Don Montalvo, NYC (Version 8.0) | |
 | Sep 17 2008 |
S_ENGEL I switched to InDesign a few years ago. The reason was that InDesign was state-of-the-art at that time, had better typo-tools, better output etc. Now I use both, ID and XPress, and I'm thinking about switching back to XPress. InDesign (and other ADOBE apps) are bloated with tons of things I never use in my workflow. The support is beneath contempt and their arrogant behaviour towards customers is totally out of the question (does anyone know where Quark's former boss works now?). By the way: Who is willing to pay for an update EVERY year (remember:CS4 is coming soon)? No, ADOBE is not interested in the needs of their customers, they are only interested in money. XPress 8 has a clean interface (looks a bit like Macromedia's GUI), runs fast and has everything I really need for a unobstructed workflow in print. (Version 8.0) | |
 | Oct 3 2008 |
MACMUSER Vic, I couldn't agree more. QXP8 is very much faster than QXP7 and inDesign come to that but that's nothing difficult to achieve. I have to work in both so have no axe to grind about Quark or Adobe The new QXP8 interface is faster, I've had to convert the book I'm working on back to QXP7 for compatibility with my clients. Working in QXP7 feels like rowing through Roquefort and files open sooooo sloooowly. BUT I am getting very tired of QXP8 continually messing with text flow. I really hope the upgrade (downloading as I type)b sorts that out. The book pallet wont allow the page numbers' column to resize either so that's another glitch I hope they fixed. (Version 8.01) | |
 | Aug 3 2008 |
PHOTEK the pricing structure alone is enough to make me NEVER want to use Quark again... £799 in the UK...??? You can almost buy Adobe CS Standard for that (InDesign, Photoshop, illustrator, Acrobat) £1068 for West Europe..??? WTF?... What do they have to pay more than me? $799... in the US..??? Thats just an insult to the rest of the world..... thats the equivalent of £399!!! How do they ship the SAME version of Quark 8 to the UK? Via Mars???? I have moved 4 production departments to InDesign... and Quark are giving me NO reason to turn back. And if I said what I really felt about Quark I would be banned for using offensive language. (Version 8.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 23 2008 |
SPECTRAL7 quark sucks .....full stop joke pricing, they are going down IMO. Version 3.11 was teh best layout program at its time, 4.11 was bearable then things went bad...there reign is over, wake up quark or die ! (Version 8.0) | |
 | Aug 2 2008 |
SEMIOTICMONKEY Well, i don't know you but i'm downloading right now the trial to see what's changed cause the comments below are the same old adagio about Quark out of biz yada yada and nothing to do with the version 8.0. Have you tried this before comment on it? It works? It is better than 7.0? And so on. The preferred DTP sport, Quark bashing, is now too old. Judging by on line reviews and from the version changes it seem it is now offering a bunch of good features. All i can honestly say, without tried it out, is about its price. Here in Europe it costs 1.300 euros VAT excluded and it is way too much (WTF about Adobe and Quark charging so much we europeans? Protectionism at its worse). Just for clarity but we are still waiting proper fixes from Adobe for the silly bloated Indesign so stop to glorify it cause it have its flood of faults and quirks not fixed and waiting in line for the next CS4. After that, we will be waiting for the CS5 and so on and on. (Version 8.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 3 2008 |
DONMONTALVO This isn't about bashing QuarkXPress. This is about spreading the word that Quark (the company) is milking Tim Gill's hard work. The bugs and issues we've reported over the years have NOT been resolved. Caching/temp file routine is STILL unmanageable - we've asked for a temp directory pref and never got it so QuarkXPress documents go south in many Xinet/Helix environments ; lack of *.plist mean inability to push defaults commands which is a huge step back in production environments; I can go on...but why bother. The simple fact of the matter is people need to be warned. Do NOT spend money on QuarkXPress until you've done your homework - get in touch with the folks who manage large production environments to get the untainted truth. Call the schools (who are pushing InDesign heavily). Call the recruiters (who have an overage of overpaid QuarkXPress experts, but can't keep up with the demand for InDesign pros. Please...let's not get into a food fight. Just make a few calls and get the truth. And, for the record, if you're looking for work in NYC, you better get up to speed on InDesign. Those production environments that haven't made the switch are quietly working on getting switched over as I type. Don Montalvo, NYC (Version 8.0) | |
 | Aug 5 2008 |
SEMIOTICMONKEY Let me be clear. I'm using Indesign from version 1.0. Yes, from day one on freelance projects (Quark on studio projects). So i know the pros and cons of Indesign versus Quark. I'm simply stating the futility of comments Quark bashing on a new (e revamped) version. These comments give us no real info about the software in the actual state but all the so famous Quark (Devs) problems. You all are right about the Quark (Devs) but now we need to know if and how somethig is changed in Quark (SW). I don't believe is a good choice to have no choice but the Adobe Behemoth that, btw, is full occupied charging you for bug fixes in Indesign (and the all CS) from so much time (Illy crashing all the time anyone? Install Air from Admin account? Acrobat costing the same amount on Win and Mac despite the fact there is a module not bundled with the Mac version, and so on). It is better for us, consumer, to have real competition. ps. the DTP arena is always too monolithic in its choice. Or ID or Quark. Gets a bit of life from the Web world (or the 3D world). There are so many ways to accomplish your homework. The right tool for the job not the one ring to rule them all approach is something DTP is unwilling to learn. Oh, btw i'm not willing to take a software only cause it is in a bundle if (IF) there is something better out there. It costs more? Well, i must consider the ROI not the initial cost for a more mature decision. (Version 8.0) | |
 | Aug 2 2008 |
DONMONTALVO Quark (the company) is on a downward spiral. Over the past few years I have tried in vain to communicate necessary fixes/changes to Quark's development team. Long standing bugs have NOT been fixed. Long standing requests (such as *.plist based preferences which would allow central management via WGM Manifest Editor, ssh defaults push, etc.) which would have put QuarkXPress on par with other PROPERLY WRITTEN applications were ignored. Quark (the company) has changed hands several times in the past few years. Each change of management brought with it new waves of marketing hype - which in the end turned out to be the same business as usual path. My colleagues who manage the largest graphics, design, and production environments, including many of the top Fortune100 companies who have internal Mac shops, have been actively migrating to InDesign (which they ALREADY OWN as part of the base Adobe Creative Suite bundle). I had hoped Quark (the company) would listen, if only to keep QuarkXPress afloat. I loathe companies that rest on their laurels. All that is left of Quark (the company) is a company in trouble pouring money into Marketing, and lacking proper management who can turn things around. My biggest disappointment is that without QuarkXPress alive and kicking, then Adobe InDesign will not have the competition it needs to keep forging ahead with new ideas while responsibly maintaining the fast, stable and usable interface it has. Tim Gill should buy Quark (the company) again, if only to preserve the competitive environment. Don Montalvo, NYC (Version 8.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 1 2008 |
KONG Surprise, surprise: instead of working out QXP's 7.31 longtime standing bugs running under Leopard OS X 10.5 they come up with a newer version of the app, . The german passport version does not allow file names (or the folders they are saved in) to contain "special characters" such as underscores or german language "Umlauts" (ä,ö etc.) The files become corrupted while being auto saved or placed in a auto-created folder with the Umlaut replaced by some other signs. No problem if I create new files but I got a gazillion files that I need to check the names of before I can dare and open them in QXP 7. Customer support says they are is well aware of the problem (have been for months, that is) and will request one in all earnest to go back to using QXP 6.5. The guy found it all funny (he repeatedly laughed out while talking about the issue to me) that I didn't like to hear what "support" he had to offer (they might or might not have a solution in the next couple of months)!!! So you shed a bucket of bucks for a faulty application, get no hint of help when you need it and instead of a bugfix you have to pay more money for another upgrade. The app is way clumsier to handle than InDesign and uses forever when saving large files. In addition to that files tend to get bigger and bigger (and I mean huge: a 20 page A5 brochure gets blown up to 600mb) after a couple of savings. "Saving as" can reduce the size but then the game starts all over. Exporting to PDF adds dozens of extra gibberish characters that too often have to be manually removed from the file's name in the finder because the export dialog won't let you do it properly or in reasonable time. Don't worry, be happy: get InDesign! (Version 8.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
| View all 125 posts >> |
|