 |
DESCRIPTION
Shockwave is a Web standard for powerful multimedia playback. This player allows you to view both Shockwave and Flash interactions over the Web. The Shockwave player is compatible with the leading web browsers.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 11.5.2r602: Release notes were unavailable when this listing was updated.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4 or later.
|
| Developer: | Adobe |
| Downloads: | 105,067 |
| - Version d/l: | 1,704 |
| Internet: | Plug-ins |
| License: | Free |
| Date: | 03 Nov 2009 |
| Platform: | PPC/Intel |
OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST No similar products suggested yetSuggest something else: |
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| Shockwave Player User Reviews (44 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Jun 16 2009 |
XENOPHILE WTF is this brutalization of the english language supposed to mean: "Version 11.5.0.600 includes no changes in features or functionality. Some small elements of the plugin, which in no way affect the multimedia engine, installations, or other performance aspects, have been updated." If these "small elements of the plugin" affect neither the plug-in's installation, nor its features, functionality, or performance, then WTF are they included at all? Is this the spyware/malware element of the plugin? Adobe's marketing language manages to tell us everything we don't want or need to know, namely, what's new? I suspect the "what's new" is something that most of us probably wouldn't want on our systems, and something all of us definitely would want the installer to require informed authorization to install. | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jun 16 2009 |
NAOH I am also quite mystified at what exactly has been updated in order to warrant a new release. The only thing that might make sense is that it is a security fix. But if so, why not just say that? (Version 11.5.0.600) | |
 | Jun 16 2009 |
MIKE SILVA I really wish Adobe would quite releasing these minimalist updates that supposedly don't do anything, and release a friggin' update that actually made Flash less of a resource hogging whore. It will be a bright sunny day when even the smallest flash content on a web site doesn't ramp my multicore cpu utilization up to 100%, or crash my browser. How about working on an update that addresses those bits of "functionality" mmkay? (Version 11.5.0.600) | |
 | May 2 2009 |
JON555 So the release notes keep saying there is no real changes being made, so what's the point of updating it? What exactly is changing? (Version 11.5.0.596) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 7 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Does anybody else but me think "11.0.0.465" is a totally absurd designation? Exactly how many decimal points does Adobe need?? (Version 11.0.0.465) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 8 2008 |
JCRAIG I'm kind of blown away that a browser plugin is over 15 MB in size. (Version 11.0.3.470) | |
 | Sep 4 2009 |
JON555 This version doesn't work on Snow Leopard (10.6); instead you'll get the message "Incompatible OS version ! Adobe Shockwave Player is supported on MacOS 10.4/10.5". I know how slow and terrible of a developer you are Adobe, so I figured someone should tell you now so we can begin the long process of you rolling out a (probably semi-working) update. (Version 11.5.1.601) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 3 2009 |
FELIX01 Whoa, MooseBreath, it works with Snow Leopard but you DO have to run Safari in 32-bit mode. http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/512/cpsid_51273.html (Version 11.5.2.602) | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
DOC. Oh Great just what I want to do, launch Safari in 32 bit mode to use shockwave. Ya thanks. (Version 11.5.2.602) | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
TACALIT To use it,Safari must be started at 32bit.... sad.... (Version 11.5.2.602) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Nov 3 2009 |
ORION MK. V Truly lame thinking by Adobe, since 64-bit Safari is now the default installed in SL. (Version 11.5.2.602) | |
 | Nov 3 2009 |
TIM.DEHRING I'm not surprised. This is the same company that can't produce a useable version of Flash for the Mac OS, let alone any other program that doesn't kill resources. (Version 11.5.2.602) | |
 | Feb 5 2009 |
3LUSIV3 I don't get it. Do we need shockwave? What's the difference between shockwave and flash? (Version 11.0.3.472) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 23 2009 |
PABLITO I don't have it here, and do not intent to install. I do not see why I need it. Wiki: Adobe Shockwave (formerly Macromedia Shockwave) was Macromedia's first and most successful multimedia player prior to the introduction of Macromedia Flash (now Adobe Flash). It allows Adobe Director applications to be published on the Internet and viewed in a web browser by anyone who has the Shockwave plug-in installed. (Version 11.5.0.595) | |
 | Mar 23 2009 |
LEPPE Well, try Googling for Shockwave games. There are many websites where you can play AAA-games (Quake1-3, Half Life, RtCW, Deus Ex, Doom, Warcraft, etc.), but you need Shockwave. I remember the discussion when Apple switched to Intel. A year after the switch there was still no Shockwave player for Intel Macs. People needed to launch Safari in Rosetta mode if they wanted to play a shockwave game or for viewing a shockwave web site. http://www.shockwave3d.com/ http://www.shockwave.com/home.jsp http://necromanthus.com/Games/ShockWave/quake3.html http://necromanthus.com/Games/ShockWave/quake.html http://necromanthus.com/main.html With regards. (Version 11.5.0.595) | |
 | Mar 23 2009 |
LEPPE Here is something you can read on the Adobe web site: "Over 450 million Internet-enabled desktops have installed Adobe Shockwave Player. These people now have access to some of the best the Web has to offer - including dazzling 3D games and entertainment, interactive product demonstrations, and online learning applications. Shockwave Player displays Web content that has been created by Adobe Director." http://www.adobe.com/products/shockwaveplayer/ With regards. (Version 11.5.0.595) | |
 | Aug 6 2008 |
SULEIMAN KHAN I don't believe my eyes. Am I finally seeing a NATIVE version of Shockwave for the Intel Mac's? Adobe, I am truly at a loss for words. Thank you for ultimately gracing us with support for the Shockwave player. Though some may smite you for releasing it over 2 years after Intel Macs became all the rage, I shall not join amongst them. (Version 11.0.0.465) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Nov 5 2009 |
ILGAZ While casual gaming and Mac market share is on amazing rise, they don't even bother to compile it 64bit or write 10 lines of text to release notes. I bet they didn't bother to submit new file, Mac update admins found it themselves. Basically shows what is wrong with Adobe, in all kinds of senses. (Version 11.5.2r602) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 9 2008 |
BDOG Why is there a "Slim" version that may not include the XTRA(s) you need? Here is a link to the "Full" version. http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/shockwave/default/english/macosx/latest/Shockwave_Installer_Full.dmg Adobe: Stop distributing a "Slim" version, it's useless. (Version 11.0.0.465) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | May 1 2009 |
XENOPHILE Right, and I tried searching Adobe's site to find the difference between the "slim" and "full" installers, only to give up after 20 minutes. WTF is the matter with these people? And WTF doesn't Adobe offer a single download for both Flash and Shockwave? Instead I've got to click through extra pages at their bloated website for updates. Makes no sense. (Version 11.5.0.596) | |
 | Nov 5 2009 |
SECTION8 LOL@32 bit mode. WTF Adobe - get your act together. (Version 11.5.2r602) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
| View all 44 posts >> |
|