Search Mac Software Downloads
|
DESCRIPTION
Fontcase is a font management application that provides an elegant and powerful workflow to help you organise the fonts you have installed on your system. Designed to be an iPhoto for your fonts, Fontcase has a powerful tagging system, which is designed to let you control your fonts like you control your music.

Fontcase can preview every font for you, whether it is activated or not. There's no need to burden your system with thousands of fonts; you keep them all in Fontcase and activate them only when you need them. Other applications instantly recognise a new font without you having to restart them.

You can now share your fonts with other people just like iTunes pioneered this for music. There's one big difference: Fontcase lets you preview, then download fonts from shared libraries. A company no longer needs a centralized server to distribute new fonts through, it's all built into Fontcase.

WHAT'S NEW
Version 1.2.5:
  • Fixes a bug that would make it impossible to switch between collections in list view.
  • Future updates will backup the Database file before upgrading to the new version, just as a precaution.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard

Bookmark and Share

Share
SCREENSHOT

Developer:Bohemian Coding
Downloads:5,440
  - Version d/l:585
Multimedia & Design:Fonts
License:Shareware
Date:26 Oct 2009
Platform:PPC/Intel
Price:$56.00

OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
Suggest something else:
Fontcase User Reviews (10 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Sep 18 2009
****.

GARY30  I have been considering what to do about my fonts with Snow Leopard. I have been using FontExplorer 1.2.3, but it will not work with Snow Leopard. I have really tried to work with Apple's own Font Book, but it seems to do weird things like show fonts as available even though I have deactivated them, and crashes sometimes when moving fonts between collections, etc. This sort of thing leads to corrupt caches and even a corrupt fb.db file from time to time, necessitating too much fiddling for my taste.

Enter Fontcase. It really is the font library equivalent to iPhoto. It manages fonts by simply copying them out of the application's package archive (vault) into the ~/LibraryFonts/ folder. Yes you can do this yourself, just as you can open Terminal and perform a variety of system maintenance tasks that various shareware utilities do for you. If that's you, then go for it. That's not me. I like a GUI. I like simplicity, and I prefer not to have background processes running all the time as is the case with Fontcase's pay-to-play competitors. So I like Fontcase. It costs a little more than I want to spend and I have seen a couple of transient display anomalies. However, it offers a full-featured 15 day trial, the developer seems to be on top of things, and I see myself coughing up the cash.  
(Version 1.2)

praisebury
+2
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Sep 30 2009

GARY30   A hangover from my graphics days is that I like to organize font files on my hard drive by foundry. Fontcase requires that this information be entered manually and files in the font vault package are organized by font family name in a flat file hierarchy. So, as much as I liked Fontcase, when the demo expired I just couldn't find enough value for me to pay the $56 US. I am not sure at what price I would be tempted to give it another try.  
(Version 1.2)

praisebury
+1

Mar 30 2009
****.

AETH  This software shows a lot of promise. It's strength is a fantastic UI, flexible tagging and excellent organization options - drastically better than the all the others I have tried so far (Suitcase Fusion, Font Agent Pro, Font Explorer X). It's weakness is that the way it handles activation is somewhat inflexible and will not suit everyone's needs. Also, applications often need to be restarted for newly activated fonts to appear and there are a few other bugs to be ironed out still.

So far its suiting my personal needs quite well and I'd recommend that anyone new to the world of font managers to give it a trial. Those used to the more in-depth activation options of Fusion/FAP/FEX may find it too different (as opposed to limited) in comparison. One to watch.  
(Version 1.1.1)

praisebury
+10
[ Reply ]
Jan 26 2009
*....

FVDG  Oh, wait a minute!

I got a dialog warning that was from.. Apples own type utility!!

Then I took a closer look at my folders with fonts...

Fontcase does nothing else then copying the fonts you want to your users library!!

It is NO real font manager, it is an interface to Apples own build in Font cataloque.

Well, I feel mislead.

Money back I should say.

This is a LOT of money for a simple copy/replace programm!!!  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
-15
[ 2 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 26 2009

AVETENEBRAE  What is your problem with the way Apple activate/deactivate fonts?

If it works for Fontbook, why wouldn't it work for another font manager?

If you think the ability to tag, rate, preview, print preview, copy characters entities, sharing your library over Bonjour and much more, doesn't worth more than just copying your fonts in ~/Library/Fonts by hand, don't use the software. Rating the software 1 star just by the way it handle font activation doesn't sound fair for me :-/  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
+10
Mar 26 2009

TIM27  The problem with Apple's Fontbook is that it doesn't let you keep fonts where you want to keep them. Apple seems to take this approach with iPhoto and other iapps as well.

Designers want to keep fonts organized and where they want them. Especially with thousands of them.

Apple's auto-activation aslo doesn't work in Adobe's apps. You have to quit out of the app and then open it again for the font to be active in that app.

That said, I have not used Fontcase because I am happy with FontExplorer X, so I cannot comment on it's performance. If it is using the same organization methods as Fontbook, then I would not even bother using it.  
(Version 1.1)

praisebury
+1

Jan 26 2009

FVDG  Nah, NEVER use auto activation. In my opinion no professional should. The firms I do training for with font servers also forbid auto activation. Activate sets, that's where sets are for. You need control over what is activated and deactivated.

One remark however: I found that (the same case in Suitcase Fusion 2 and the new commercial FontExplorer X), if you have sets that have fonts in it that are also in your user libary, and you deactivate that set, this user library fonts get deactivated also!

I want my fonts in (system/user) to be left alone...

Fontagent Pro is the only one that does this the correct way  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
+3
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 26 2009

KINGADROCK  I don't know where you're training but that's not the way it works in the real world. If a client comes in with a print job and it has 10 fonts in it, and it takes 2 minutes to find and activate each one, that's 20 minutes wasted. Using Collections sounds like a wonderful idea, but you can't have Collections set up for jobs created elsewhere.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
+3
Jan 26 2009

COOKIE08  Sounds like you are not using suitcase properly. it will only only activate sets in certain folders when you tell it to. I have no fonts in the fonts folders of library or the user font library. I just let suitcase load the start up fonts I need at boot time another others are auto activated as needed or any new ones i manually activate through suitcase. this gives the minimum needed to run the computer. The system library fonts are never touched.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Jan 27 2009

KINGADROCK  COOKIE08, Actually FVDG is right. FontAgent Pro is the only (of the major) Font Managers that handles system fonts the way it does. There is an option to not handle them at all which is the safest way to go since they are never accidentally overwritten, deactivated or removed.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
+1
Jan 27 2009

COOKIE08  True all. Suitcase has the option not to touch any font folder you chose. It will leave the fonts in the place ie user/library/fonts if this is the way you prefer to work.

Cheers  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
+2

Jan 26 2009

KINGADROCK  Nice application with a clean and intuitive interface, but without auto-activation it's pretty useless to me. Spending several minutes at a time to manually locate and activate fonts before beginning to work on a project is not practical. Add auto-activation and you've got something here.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 25 2009
****.

DMARCOOT  Beautiful app. Smart folders and meta tagging make this app wonderful. Wish it had import options from Suitcase Fusion.   
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
+1
[ Reply ]
Jan 21 2009

FVDG  Simple, elegant. Love the preview options (text vs. waterfall).

I NEVER use auto-activation, so this programm is all I need. Works like a charm here on my Mac Pro.

Only wish: auto de-activate when quiting the programm!  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 21 2009

MATHGEEK  Well, it crashed the first time I tried it, but fortunately it didn't seem to screw anything up. I think I will wait for version 1.1.   
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jan 21 2009

GCOGHILL  I was testing the beta, and now trying out the 1.0 release. A few observations from a fairly large (1200+) font collection:

• Smart Folders do not auto-update (need to click away then back for them to update).

• There are no number counts next to sets, collections, etc. (not sure if this is a big deal or not).

• Generating previews as you scroll through the app slows things down.

• Can't seem to find a way to use the font name as the preview text.

• Font Explorer X sets import, but the fonts weren't placed into them.

There are some nice features to Fontcase — the body text & headline previews are handy for sure. And the compare feature is nice with body/headline tabs. it's definitely a step up from the OS X Font Book (and maybe the target buyer) but it still seems to have small oversights throughout the functionality.

Not sure if this is ready to use in a professional workflow just yet, but it seems the devs are serious about this app and it's one to keep an eye on. I am curious to see where this progresses.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
+3
[ Reply ]
Jan 21 2009
*****

DOUG S.  To start with, I've been using this as a piece of beta software ever since it went public a little while ago so I've watched this app evolve from a rough app to a very fine and sophisticated Mac application.

From the very beginning the developers have worked very hard to squash any and all bugs and have always been very good about dealing with any and all feedback. There were even a few times when they changed things and would specifically ask for the input of their users.

In terms of features, it has all the ones you expect and more. Beyond groups there are smart-groups and tags, two things that are extremely handy. Also, like iTunes, it allows you to fully edit all the info about individual fonts and families just as you would an album.

I really can't say enough good things about this program. I have noticed the occasional issue with stability during the beta phase but it was a beta at the time and now everything seems rock solid.

And then of course there's how the app looks. My guess is if you're looking at a program to manage all your fonts you likely work in some design-related industry. If so then it's always an added bonus when apps look pretty and boy does this one! It fits in perfectly with the rest of OS X while still having it's own unique styling. And when compared to the competition which all look like they were designed by a Microsoft developer... Well, you see my point.

Besides with Font Explorer now coasting $78 (after mid-February), FontAgent Pro costing $99 and Extensis Suitcase costing $99 it's also the cheapest font manager on the market.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 21 2009

CHIN  Font Pilot is also a fine piece oft software that takes you 15 bucks only :-)  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
Jan 21 2009

DOUG S.  Well if Font Pilot does everything you need then go for it. I, however, have more needs and small details like the ability to copy the HTML code for a specific symbol is extremely useful. Fontcase is more but I'd say it's well worth it.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
Jan 21 2009

GCOGHILL  While I agree that Fontcase looks like a great app, keep in mind it is missing some features the others offer, in particular auto font activation in Font Explorer X (I use FEX now).

I also asked the devs about a simple Smart Folder rule "date added" and while they "put it on the list" it seems a simple request to be included. Handy when you install new fonts and want to find them for projects. "Last import" isn't far-reaching enough sometimes.

The devs did tell me that auto-activation plugins for Adobe (& other apps I assume) are on the way in a future release, but no timeframe was given.

I'll be keeping an eye on this, but for now I am sticking with the free version of Font Explorer X. When Fontcase offers the auto-activate I'll be more tempted to consider it.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
+2