 |
EDITOR NOTES
Buy iDrive from MacUpdate's link to help support MacUpdate.
DESCRIPTION
IDriveforMac is a user-friendly, secure and reliable application that performs automated online backup of your files and folders.
The application safeguards your critical data in case of a system crash. The graphical interface is coupled with powerful scheduling and logging features.
- Incremental backups - only modified portions of files are backed up, thereby conserving bandwidth
- Data compression during transmission that lead to quick backups
- Enhanced security with 128-bit SSL encryption on data transfers
- Network or Mapped Drive backup support
- Automatic backup of critical data including the Desktop, Downloads, Documents, Music, Movies and Pictures folders
- Locate files and folders backed up to your account and restore the same to your Mac desktop
- Snapshots allow you to retain changed data history over a period of time
- Provision to regulate the Internet bandwidth usage with the Bandwidth Throttle feature more
- Provision to perform interactive backups/restores or schedule backups for a future date and time
- 'Automatic Power off' option after a scheduled backup - the machine shuts down automatically once data is backed up
WHAT'S NEW
Version 1.3.9:
Release notes were unavailable at the time this listing was updated.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4 or later.
| SCREENSHOT
|
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| iDrive User Reviews (15 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Sep 19 2009 |
MACSOLU Direct download link: http://www.idrive.com/downloads/IDriveforMac.dmg (Version 1.3.8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 20 2009 |
MISHA Thanks -- we actually already have this listed under 'Related Links' above. (Version 1.3.8) | |
 | Sep 17 2009 |
SYZZYGY I guess nothing beats a good, high quality fast external hard drive to back up one's data. hmmm? Personally, I wouldn't trust my valuable or sensitive data to some storage facility in God-knows-where. But, to each his/her own. (Version 1.3.8) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Sep 18 2009 |
TOD WICKS So SyyzZzygy, exactly what is your point? I think you logged in just to waste everyone's time with a smart-ass comment. (Version 1.3.8) | |
 | Jun 21 2009 |
KAZ219 This app needs work. It very often freezes (it doesn't crash though): the spinning beach ball of death, and you can't do anything. This is not that relevevant if it is going on in the background since it always comes back somewhen. It's just annoying when you want to cancel an automatic backup (not enough bandwidth at the moment for example), you have to wait for iDrive to be responsive again. Another problem in my opinion is the memory usage. Right now, with *no* backup going on, it uses 150MB RAM ("real memory" column in activity monitor) which is quite a lot for a background daemon... Otherwise it's ok, and still a better (or "less worse") interface than the one from Mozy (where you can't even get rid of the menu bar item mine is already cluttered, I really don't need another item there.). (Version 1.3.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | May 7 2009 |
RADDLE Two requests, devs: 1. Could you please post revision notes? There's been two in about a week. 2. Sparkle updating would be very nice. Thank you! (Version 1.3.2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 15 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I have been wanting offsite backup, and investigated several options. Finally I selected iDrive, mostly because their software is vastly better than that of any competitor. Yet I have one serious reservation. Since iDrive only permits archived backups, and since it limits you to 150 GB, sooner or later I'm going to use up my quota, and I haven't a clue what's going to happen then. I e-mailed their support asking about this, and never received an answer, which suggests to me that they don't have a clue either. So if by the time I hit my limit they haven't come up with a solution to this problem, I'll probably just walk away from this service and look for another one. And I bet this is going to be the reaction of a large part of their customer base. So it is really in their own best interest to face up to the fact they have a problem on their hands. There are two ways of fixing it, both of which I would find acceptable: a.) give us the option of simple mirrored backup with no archiving, or b.) use the Time Machine "first in first out" scheme, whereby old archives are automatically cleaned out to preserve space for new backups. Let's hope the developers wake up and smell the coffee over this one. (Better security protection would be very welcome too). Also, anybody with a fairly large body of data that needs to be backed up should be aware that the initial upload is going to take a long time (mine took over five days). If you aren't very cool about using the bandwidth throttle you're internet performance is going to take a massive hit. (Version 1.3.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 21 2009 |
DANIO Just signed up for this service - in respect of archived backups and space taken up; they do actually seem to ignore these. they refer to them as snapshots in the case of their Mac service; this from the FAQ section -: "The available daily Snapshots have been set to 10 (This may change without notice). The additional storage requirements for Snapshots have no impact on your account quota usage." Once 150GB is filled, you can simply add an additional account and control from the same software. Honestly, I don't see the issue with providing 300Gb for double the cost, but, they don't seem to offer that right now and simply allow you to buy as many accounts with 150GB as you want.... (Version 1.3.1) | |
 | Apr 5 2009 |
RADDLE Still persevering with this, though it's trying my patience a little. yes, there's kind of a sync option available now - though it seems to be a manual process (a per-time comparison of online and offline folders) that is far from intuitive, and not the same as mirroring. The multiple machine set-up seems flakey too. I want to like this service, and they are updating features fairly regularly, but it's just not right yet... I (and many other people) want simple, automatic mirroring of folders. This can't be that hard. (Version 1.3) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 22 2009 |
SFURST This is yet another backup-to-cloud client in the same vein as Mozy, SpiderOak, and JungleDisk. A 2GB account is free, while a whopping 150 GB can be had for $49.50/yr. Unfortunately, the Mac client serious lags behind the Windows client. As pointed out by numerous reviewers, there is no data encryption available for Mac, leaving your files unencrypted on the servers. While the web site claims versioning, this is only available for Windows; a poor substitute "Snapshots" is available for Mac, which makes you go through the last ten backups searching for a previous version. In my experience, Snapshots were unreliable as well as tedious (think Time Machine, only very limited). If I want a previous version of a file, I want to see what versions are available, not have to dig. Unlike SpiderOak and JungleDisk, the same storage cannot be shared between a Mac and a PC client. A web interface is available. Support from the developer is responsive but unhelpful. "Encryption is being consider in the future and we will notify our customers when it is available". I suspect this is quite a nice program on the PC, but it has a long way to go for us Mac users. (Version 1.2.9) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Mar 19 2009 |
AESCHYLUS The lack of secure encryption on their server renders this software useless for all but the most casual uses for Mac users. We Mac users need something like this, but until iDrive becomes responsible enough to treat Mac users like PC users, this is not the solution we need. (Version 1.2.9) | |
| [ 3 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 19 2009 |
LARRYMCJ Here's what their site says: "Enhanced security with 128-bit SSL encryption on data transfers" (Version 1.2.9) | |
 | Mar 19 2009 |
AESCHYLUS It is not the security of the info during the transfer that I'm concerned about. I'm concerned about the information not being encrypted while residing on their servers, as it is for PC users. (Version 1.2.9) | |
 | Mar 20 2009 |
DOM21 The two PDFs on their site are of no help in this regard, because they make general claims about encryption without distinguishing between PC and Mac or saying it refers to both platforms. Clearly everything doesn't pertain to the Mac- yet this is not pointed out. User-controlled encryption for Mac on the site's server is the issue. (Version 1.2.9) | |
 | Mar 12 2009 |
DANA SUTTON I'm watching this one very closely because it's potenrtially so attractive. In view of customer complaints about its present shortcoming, it's a shame that the developers aren't more explicit about what's new in this version. In case the developer reads this, it's clear that it needs a.) mirrored backups, so that deletions, name changes, etc., made on the user's local computer are reflected on the remote site, b.) a cast-iron guarantee that the user's data cannot be accessed by the developer's employees, and I hope that a new version will address these concerns in the near future. As soon as these issues are fixed it's very likely that I'll become a happy subscriber. But right at the moment I'm a little hesitant to entrust my sensitive data to this product's safekeeping. (Version 1.2.8) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 13 2009 |
RADDLE I like this, and have signed on for the package. However the Mac version needs the following very soon before I come to really rely upon it: 1. The option to sync with the server. I don't want to have to go up there and manually weed through files left there which have been moved or deleted on my computer. 2. Various app glitches, like the main window not remembering its size, and the apparent inability (or certainly non-obviousness) of how to select multiple files on the server for deletion at once. (Version 1.2.4) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
| View all 15 posts >> |
|