DOOBIEXX  Ummm, I don't know why you would write something like that. I am sure the developer could make updates and not release them but twice or three times a year max like you said but what good does that do?

When he can offer his customers a fix or a new feature he wants to give it to his supporters asap, rather than have it sit in an updated development or have a requested feature and wait 6 months to release it just because. I am lazy as well, I hate downloading so many apps when there are a ton of updates but if the app has implemented a way to download or let you know their is a new version without having to come to a site like this to check if the app has been updated it is no problem. If it is freeware that is updated all the time with no way to check for updates via the app then I would complain. But for an app you pay for, I would take every update that comes my way.

Great Example is the great app by agile, 1password. It is updated pretty much twice a week for the last year, building up to their version 3.0 release, I guess now waiting for snow leopard. Compare the two. I think both are great apps and most agree with me but obviously there is a chasm between others, you, and myself.

Now I know why nobody else responded to your post. It's just ridiculous waste of time. Not a beneficial post.

To sum it up your complaining about a developer staying active and updating his apps as soon as he can whether it be a simple fix or a huge release, he works to implement new features and requests as they come in instead of letting a laundry list grow and make his customers pay. So I would think his customers are happy with updates, however they come.

## In the end, you are your own person, if you don't like having updates frequently you don't have to update. Nobody forces you to update your app whenever a new release comes out so just update it every six months. Everyone is happy. ##  
(Version 3.0.2)