 |
DESCRIPTION
Microsoft Silverlight is a cross-browser, cross-platform plug-in for delivering the next generation of .NET based media experiences and rich interactive applications for the Web. Silverlight offers a flexible programming model that supports AJAX, VB, C#, Python, and Ruby, and integrates with existing Web applications. Silverlight supports fast, cost-effective delivery of high-quality video to all major browsers running on the Mac OS X or Windows.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 3.0.40624:
- Release notes were not available at the time this listing was updated.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4.8 or later, Intel Mac required for version 2 (version 1 supports PowerPC).
| SCREENSHOT
|
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| Silverlight User Reviews (24 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Apr 8 2009 |
Is this you or Microsoft? It shows that VERSION 2+ will run on PPC/Intel but there is no way the installer will run on a PPC. Please change your system requirements... and yes I do know that version 1 will run on a PPC but the download is for version 2+. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
| [ 5 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 8 2009 |
RONL And I am running OSX 10.5.6 on a G5 tower. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
 | Apr 9 2009 |
I(POWER)MAC In the "System requirements" page of Silverlight (see here: http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/resources/install.aspx?v=1.0#sysreq) is clearly specified that Silverlight 2.0 is only for MacIntels. I don't know who has posted this release of Silverlight, but he/she has posted wrong infos about it. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
 | Apr 9 2009 |
The Microsoft site says very specifically that 2 is for Intel and only 1 is for PPC. I wish MacUpdate would fix this because I keep thinking that the latest version has overcome this when I see that it states here (and for the last many updates) that version 2+ is for PPC also. MacUpdate... are you reading this? (Version 2.0.40115) | |
 | Apr 9 2009 |
MISHA We fixed this, sorry about that. Admittedly we do not always verify that previous system requirements have not changed between releases (because 99% of the time they do not). Thanks for bringing this to our attention. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
 | Apr 9 2009 |
RONL Thanks Misha. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
 | Apr 18 2009 |
SPLIG I agree with most of the comments: a: We do not need yet another protocol the installer does warn that it will update automatically, but there is no choice given. I installed this solely to watch Netflix streams. A previous version did not work, but this one does the job and has not crashed for me. I wish Netflix had chosen another protocol, BUT the software does appear to work as advertised, so I can't give it as low a score as others have done. I may need to adjust my stability score after further use. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 8 2009 |
JAMUS I would love to see the market test data that promoted Microsoft to plaster their Silverlight download page with: "Dont Worry! We wont install a bunch of additional stuff on your computer or try to sign you up for unwanted email." So far, I have found it to be glorified junk that Flash could have handled instead (based on sites I have seen so far). If not for Netflix streams I would never have it touch my computer. You think Flash ads have been bad in the past few years? Just wait till this beastly lump of code hits high enough saturation and M$ touts download numbers that gets advertiser's attention... (Version 2.0.40115) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Apr 8 2009 |
JUSTINCASE I agree with JAMUS.... If not for NETFLIX I won't load this junk on my MAC (or PC). (Version 2.0.40115) | |
 | Nov 2 2008 |
THREEDEE912 The NBC Olympics thing was horrible. NBC put a ton of DRM and region-locking and service provider checks in place, which really made everything, well, suck. However, that was NBC's fault, not really Microsoft's. I'm gonna try an post an honest review. Silverlight installed without any problem. It's function is similar to flash, displaying interactive content online. I'd say its about the same speed as Flash too, maybe only slightly faster at certain things. However, not many sites use Silverlight so it's hard to tell. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Oct 14 2008 |
AESCHYLUS During the Olympics, Silverlight was required by MSNBC to watch their expanded coverage. They would NOT recognize a Mac with Silverlight, so we were shut out. Now we should help them to promulgate their proprietary "standard" why?? (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Oct 15 2008 |
MACSOLU SilverLight worked FINE for the Olympics on all INTEL-BASED Macs. G3/G4/G5-based Macs were excluded. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Apr 12 2009 |
SURFSPIRIT One more "protocol", as if aren't already enough of them, anyway, it crashes safari a few seconds after using it in a web page. I just can't understand how Microsoft is such a big company with so bad software! (Version 2.0.40115) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 8 2009 |
AESCHYLUS Does Microsoft purposely try to make their software infuriatingly complicated to use on a Mac, or is this just the best they can do? Even though this is supposed to be seamless, when you finally discover something that needs Silverlight, it doesn't seem as easy or smooth as Flash. It crashes my Intel Mac too. (Version 2.0.40115) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 7 2008 |
SNOWLPRD The only reason I installed this was to test video playback of the 2008 Summer Olympics from nbcolympics.com. I can't say the results were very pleasing. * Uses standard Installer.app * Mostly self-contained in /Library/Internet Plugins/Silverlight.plugin -- the only other installed files are in ~/Library/Application Support/Microsoft/Silverlight * Crashed Safari (3.1.2) every time I tried to play back a video on NBC's site * Required me to use Firefox 3, which did work * Lackluster video quality While I applaud M$ for at least attempting to create a cross-platform solution (unlike WMV), they predictably haven't spent too much time making the Mac version work well. That being the case, I'm going to vote with my mouse fingers and find another source for Olympic video coverage. (Version 2.0b2) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 10 2009 |
LEOOFBORG Agreed. I do not want ANYTHING running VB on my Mac. Why bring Windows problems over to the Mac? (Version 3.0.40624) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Dec 31 2007 |
JAMUS Microsoft is desperately pushing Silverlight as a Flash alternative. Even their download center is trying to get you to use it: [URL=http://img81.imageshack.us/my.php?image=silverlightzv4.jpg][IMG]http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/7738/silverlightzv4.th.jpg[/IMG][/URL] (Version 1.0.21115) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Dec 31 2007 |
JAMUS Sorry... I evidently did not do the image code correctly. This should show the screengrab: http://img81.imageshack.us/my.php?image=silverlightzv4.jpg (Version 1.0.21115) | |
|
| View all 24 posts >> |
|