Search Mac Software Downloads
|
DESCRIPTION
Things is task management solution that helps to organize your tasks in an elegant and intuitive way. Things combines powerful features with simplicity through the use of tags and its intelligent filter bar. A Leopard style source list allows for quick and easy focusing. Together with a beautiful user interface, Things aims at the seemingly impossible: making task management both easy and fun.

Our screencast is a great introduction. Learn from our users why Things is different ? either on i use this or Newsvine.

  • The big picture. A Leopard style source list lets you easily focus without ever switching view modes or wrapping your head around filter criteria.
  • A magical tag bar automatically appears when needed and adapts to the currently displayed list. It lets you drill down even the longest list of To-Dos. Hierarchical tags? We got you covered!
  • Teamwork. Things offers convenient collaboration features. Easily delegate tasks to members of your team. (This is work in progress.)
  • No columns! Whether it's multiple tags, dates or notes, To-Do items display their information on an as needed basis. No more space wasted by empty or irrelevant column cells!
  • Out of your head, out of your way. A quick entry HUD lets you enter any idea the moment it hits you. Never let the thought of an unfinished business distract you again.
  • Yours forever. We won't lock you in. Things will use an open XML file format to store your data. (Not yet activated.)
  • Things even supports GTD, so if you're familiar and comfortable with GTD concepts, you'll feel right at home.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 1.2.5:
  • Fixed a bug that caused the Quick Entry hotkeys to only function after opening the Preferences.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4.11 or later.
RELATED LINKS

Bookmark and Share

SCREENSHOT

Developer:Cultured Code
Downloads:47,543
  - Version d/l:2,541
Business:Personal Info Managers
License:Demo
Date:08 Oct 2009
Platform:PPC/Intel
Price:$49.95
OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
Suggest something else:
Things User Reviews (68 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
May 25 2009
***..

SOULBARN  I don't quite get all the four and five star reviews.

Things is really good. It might be the best complex, GTD-oriented task manager out there.

But that's because most of them are awful.

Yes, the Things creators have done their homework and are on the way to something great.

But they aren't there yet. They aren't even close.

The software has plenty of unimplemented features - I won't go into all of them, because even the rave reviews mention them. For my purposes, the worst among them is machine-to-machine sync. Essential for power users who carry more than once machine. (And if that's not available, then iPhone sync - and not the kludgy iPhone wifi sync. It needs to be seamless, as it is with other iPhone task managers.)

(I'm revealing my biases here - a genuine five-star task manager MUST, in my view, be universally available; that means on my iPhone and at least on my travel and home machines. I believe this is a reasonable expectation, both because it is fairly standard in the category's feature set, and because the Things folks have more or less said so.)

Right now, the best alternatives are a Remember The Milk or ToodleDo account, plus the ToDo, RTM, or ToodleDo native iPhone app. Neither RTM nor ToodleDo are as pretty or intuitive as Things, but both offer extraordinary feature sets, including RSS feeds, text message reminders, Google gadgets, and open APIs that may (for many users) compensate for the lack of beauty in the interface, since the feature sets - especially with ToodleDo, which allows folder-based project management - are pretty close (too bad that ToodleDo is shamefully ugly.)

ToodleDo's iPhone app is $3.95, and it works quite well; ToDo is $9.95, the same as the Things app, and it syncs with both RTM or ToodleDo, or via Wifi with your desktop. I'm not saying that these are necessarily better than Things in all ways - but I do assert that they're more mature, and that it is Things' lack of maturity that is the reason it does not yet merit the accolades it is being given, and that merits a "buyer beware" at this point.

I'd add that at the price for Things and the iPhone app, the bar is set very, very high. I'm not saying the product is too expensive - in fact, I'm all in favor of charging as much as the market will bear. But I believe that there's a disconnect between what people think they're getting and what they actually are.

I'm also dismayed that Things recently removed their user forums from their website; again, at the price, offering such an area for comments and help - even if critical - seems near-obligatory, and it makes me suspicious.

I like Things. A lot. It has the potential to be the best task manager available. But it has yet to live up to that potential, and with so many missing features at the premium we're being asked to pay, I can't possibly see it as anything more than a three-star app. Those fourth and fifth stars need to be -earned-, not offered for future promises and potential, which Things may or may not - and I hope it does - deliver.

I urge anyone considering buying this to give the demo a hard, hard look.   
(Version 1.1.2)

praisebury
+20
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jun 30 2009

JAZZADDICT  Good review. I have to agree with everything said. I actually gave a 4 or 5 star review back in beta (because I thought they were doing great), but I haven't been impressed with how the app has matured; including the iPhone App which I think is mediocre. There is still no good Mac GTD software in my opinion. I use toodledo and 'Todo' for the iPhone. The tandem is quite impressive. I want there to be a great desktop GTD app. I would love to be using some of the features of Things like the tag implementation and what not. But to much functionality is missing for me. For instance, last I checked there wasn't a way to promote a task to a project. This annoys me. It means I have to copy and paste into and re-enter all the meta-data. If someone knows how to do this let me know. :-) Anyway I hope this App improves. The interface is very nice.   
(Version 1.1.2)

praisebury
+8
Jul 1 2009

SLEAV  I'll second both the review and the other comment about it...

I like Things. I wanted to LOVE things. But I can't. Things has amazing potential, but the overview for me is it isn't there yet. I bought all the apps, and now have it shelved until it's truly cloud-capable. Trying to do mac-to-mac syncs results in crazy-making duplicates - I've tried several ways to solve this.

And I'll also concur about the desolate state of GTD implementation on Mac. This just simply amazes me. And hey - nevermind GTD! Let's say you just want a really good, reliable to-do list that'll sync across several Macs and iPhone or cellphone - you're flat out of luck. I know - I have them all. RemembertheMilk, ToodleDo, ToDo, ToDo's, iCal+Apple Mail (whose bright idea was that - putting tasks in with the mail?). Heck, I'd settle for the functionality that came with my old Palm.

At this point, I've settled into OmniFocus - which cost a boodle to do both the Mac version and the iPhone as well - but it's the best (so far) at solving the problem for me. Steep learning curve, and it's like using a steam roller to make pie crust, but at least it works.  
(Version 1.1.3)

praisebury
+5
Jul 1 2009

BENR  I agree with all the above. I bought the Desktop app as soon as it left Beta – with the promise of multiple Mac sync hanging in the air – and the iPhone app as soon as it was available. Half-a-year later and still no sync, which really makes it a non-starter for me.

Like the other commenters, I really hope they make good on their early promise (and promises), but the disappearing forum makes me somewhat nervous...  
(Version 1.1.3)

praisebury
+4

Jan 5 2009
***..

ROBBNASHVILLE  I began testing both THINGS and OMNIFOCUS last summer and didn't make my final choice until after the near-final version of Things was released a few days ago to those using the beta version.

Things is a beautiful program & it is very easy to use. However, my final decision is to go with OmniFocus because of it's superb power. IMO the purpose of a program like this is the ability to organize and view data easily in a number of ways to facilitate planning and actually accomplishing goals.

While Things provides a great deal of what I need, the bottom line is that I found it's approach a little too scattered. It was often difficult for me to see all my actions & projects in one view for a given period of time. Because I am an organizer, I would file some tasks in "Someday", others in "Scheduled" and the rest in "Next". When I would try to see where I had an opening for another task or project, I often could not get a clear sense of my planning with Things. It's heavy use of tags is just not to my liking. I prefer the use of contexts, which are like categories. OmniFocus follows the use of contexts. (Things has something similar called "Areas"; but they are just not the same thing in practice.)

Things does not allow the use of start dates as well as due dates. Even though it is true that projects should be constructed of single actions that can be accomplished at a given time, the ability of OmniFocus to assign start dates allows tasks to be unavailable until their start date. This approach gets them out of the way until I am ready to review them or focus on them.

Also, Things just doesn't use dates well. OmniFocus not only allows easy entry of dates, it also presents the due date more clearly for each task and, because it has an inspector panel, it's easy to see more about repeating items, when items are due for review, etc.l.

The final straw that broke the camel's back for me was the difference between the iPhone clients. If iCal had been able to handle to do items better (especially repeating tasks) and present them on the iPhone, I might never have started this journey. Both Things and OmniFocus have iPhone clients; but there's no real comparison. Things, like it's desktop counterpart, is very scattered on the iPhone, while OmniFocus is just as organized on the iPhone as it is on the desktop. Things only allows syncing while on the same wireless network. OmniFocus allows syncing via a number of methods; and since I am a MobileMe subscriber, I use that method, which allows me to sync from anywhere.

I'm sure Things will meet the needs of many people; and for those who place a big emphasis on price, it will probably win. For me, time is money; and OmniFocus helps me get the most done.  
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
+18
[ Reply ]
Sep 28 2008

DOOBIEXX  Things, is by far the most intuitive and versatile to-do software available and it's still in beta status. I have no idea why anybody would post the other recommended applications because there is simply, in my opinion, nothing comparable to Things. The only "thing" that worries me is that once it's out of beta and they are charging for the software it will be appropriately priced. I think the developers will make a smart decision and make the software affordable so there will more customers paying the smaller fee than fewer customers paying the higher price and in the end more users = more money no matter how expensive the soft. I don't review or comment on much software, but this app is so amazing I was dumbfounded to read the programs others posted as "similar" and recommended if Things didn't pan out. Great app, and I hope to see the final release soon! Please continue listening to your customers because your doing an excellent job!  
(Version 0.9.4.1)

praisebury
+10
[ 1 Reply - Reply ]
Replies:
Dec 24 2008

JAZZADDICT  do you know when the first release is suppose to come out?  
(Version 0.9.6.1)

praisebury
0

Jan 10 2009

XPLICIT  Mmmmh, why does Mac software have to be so expensive? Even with the discount and plus taxes I'll have to pay about 48$. Honestly, after all Things (as well as OmniFocus and The Hit List) is just some kind of notepad, with sorting, grouping and filter functions.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
+7
[ 3 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 27 2009

KAIDOH  Well, if you are looking for a notepad, Things is definitely the wrong place. It is not a notepad. Or does your notepad know about recurring tasks? Does it sync with iCal? Does it connect with your adress book? Does it allow entries to appear on my desk at a given date? Does it allow tagging? It's perfectly allright if Things is not your thing or too expensive for your taste but mistaking it as some kind of notepad is just somehow finicking (would you call Word an image editor just because it allows for some basic picture editing). It is a task manager. If you don't need one: stay of.  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
+2
Apr 9 2009

XPLICIT  Really? So Things takes some kind of note - you know a note, a small piece of writing - and then certain things can be and are performed with it. Sounds to me exactly like SOME KIND of notepad.

You ever dealt with software design and ergonomics before? No offense.  
(Version 1.0.4)

praisebury
-1
Apr 9 2009

KAIDOH  Hey, Photoshop allows you to take "some kind of notes" and let's me do "certain things" with it, sounds to me exactly like "SOME KIND of notepad" too. Sorry, but I am not getting why you are so hard bitten about that notepad classification. My point was: An app that lets you take notes is not inevitable a notepad application in it's main occupation (even iTunes allows you to take some kind of notes). Your first post sounded like "Things is a notepad an has to be judged by this premise". My point was: With this argument you turn a blind eye on the fact that is main purpose is the handling of tasks (which it is quite good at imo) not the handling of notes. A task is something different than a note. An appropriate software has to meet other demands.

And btw: yes, I have to deal with software every day that was apparently designed by people who are glued to abstract programmer concepts and terminologies and don't seem to care about clear user concepts and usage metaphors. Fortunately, Things is not one of them.

No offense taken.  
(Version 1.0.4)

praisebury
+1

Jan 21 2009

PELLEFRI  Hi,

I defenatley got the impression I purchased Things from the Mac Update Promo in dec 2007. I have an invoice that shows Things as purchased and my MU account says: "a serial number will be updated in you acount within 24 hours". Well the 24 hours was a long time ago I guess...

Ok, the MU bundle was not that expensive but I paid and got Things ao.

Well what is happening: I choose start using Things instead of other apps because I got it in the promo, build up routines around it, buy it for the iPhone (great, that is the same I use on the laptop) and suddely after more than a year I see "3 days left, buy now".

What?? Thats hustling. Pay $49 in 3 days or your planning is gone??

I will absolutley look for some other organizing-app. 49$ it's not that much money, but the way I have been tricked learning this software is hustling and just not a honest way of threating "customers" (as I believed I was). On culture codes website they say the MU Promo was an "exclusive preview" ..... exclusive preview of BETA software, come on..  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
+6
[ 4 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Feb 5 2009

KITMOS  Thanks, I just realized I also bought it during the sale but don't have a serial # for it. I wasn't willing to pay $50 for it new. Now I just have to find the code.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
Feb 7 2009

PATRICK SITTON  I received that also, but that version was the preview version, no registration required. Things Preview 0.8.2mu is what came with that bundle in 12/07.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
Feb 7 2009

PELLEFRI  Hi!

I went for Omnifocus both on the iPhone and laptop and is happy I did. Great (and many more) features but also a bit more complicated to get into. Fx beeing able to take pictures and record audio to a todo.

Things is a nice useful app and probably improving. I just turned off because the way I was presented for it and happily spend more money another place.

Best,

Pelle  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
+1
Mar 1 2009

BNBLISS  I can be added to this group as well. I even wrote to them 3x since January and not a single response. This is unacceptable and frankly rude. I was completely willing to shell out money for a license had I received a response to any one of my three emails to them. Things is a fantastic product however, in my experience they display really crappy customer service. I cannot in good conscience recommend this product to anyone. Whoever is doing customer service might want to consider what happens to products that while good have treated there customers less than the way they should.  
(Version 1.0.4)

praisebury
+1

Jan 4 2009

BITEBIT  Bye bye Things!

I have Things for the iphone and I used to use things for my big mac as well, but 58$ (with European taxes) is really really expensive for one app text-only, so I am going to start to use iGTD, Anxiety, omnifocus, Mori or Evernote, cheaper ones and with more features in general.

Things was good, but in my oppinion it is not a 58$ app. ¡with a little more you can buy the full OSX Snowleopard!   
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
+6
[ 5 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Jan 4 2009

XPLICIT  Wait until The Hit List is released. That app will be about 70 bucks. Some developers should really consider what their app is worth to customers, not to themselves.  
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
-1
Jan 4 2009

KAIDOH  This is a little lame:

- taxes apply on other apps too (just for the record: taxes go to the state not to the software vendor)

- Omnifocus is even more expensive

- iGTD wasn't updated for over a year

- Evernote and Mori are other-purpuse-ware (collecting stuff vs. managing tasks)

- That Snowleopard argument is nonsense. Comparing an OS with an application leads nowhere. Again with this argument every other software could be blamed too expensive (also Apple sells millions of copies of an OS, third party developers count in thousands. You need a different calculation based on such premises)

It's perfectly all right if Things is not right for your purposes or just too expensive. But it is not helpful to other people if you just blame an app for its price (or for paying taxes on it), neither is name dropping some better apps (that apparently do "something" better) and not talking about which feature you actually miss.

For its money Things delivers a robust and flexible feature set. One can see that much effort has been put into making it actually easy and fun to use. Regular updates give me the calm feeling that this app is maintained and offers continuous support. For me it is absolutely worth its price (even without it's introducing 20% discount)  
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
+5
Jan 4 2009

XPLICIT  Your absolutely right, most apps can be blamed too expensive. I think too 58 bucks is too much.  
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
-1
Jan 4 2009

BLLOYD  Of course, right now the app is $40 and not $50 (taxes excluded). Why grouse about the full price when there's a 20% discount for early adopters?  
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
+2
Jan 4 2009

MACD  I agree the current price tag is like.. hm.. twice as much as I expected developers to ask for the software in its current state. I'll explain why:

- first of all, there's no support for sub-projects. Yes, I know this feature will be added and on top of their feature list. However, it's been like that like.. forever already

- this brings the second gripe: the speed at which the software evolves is slow as hell if you ask me. I have tried Things half a year ago (or even more than that?) and the current version didn't bring much to the table in comparison

- now, how about MobileMe/WebDAV/anything to sync data between 2 or more computers? or to sync data between iPhone app (which I own but don't use) and desktop data on the go (in case I forgot to sync before leaving for home, or for work, or for vacation, or for whatever)

- did I mention sub-projects?

- ah did I mention they told us forever that sub-projects will be supported, but without ANY timeline AT ALL?

Now, the software is looking good, and parially usable, but in its current state its NOWHERE LIKE in the range of prices they are asking for, EVEN with currently available "early adopters". OmniFocus definitely has its quirks and a good amount of stuff I don't like about it, but at least after (supposedly ungodly amount of time, for some users) customizations, it because actually usable.

Things, on the other hand, does not, because it just lacks the ability to spend that ungodly amount of time on customizations, because there are not that much features inside this software - not even some extremely basic stuff for power/average-users included (see above)

So yeah, speed of development is extremely slow, no sub-projects (they are coming for ages now), no mac to mac sync. Paying (any price) just for eye candy is for folks who just like new toys. Staying with OmniFocus. Don't like it too much, but it's way better now.  
(Version 1.0rc3)

praisebury
0

Sep 4 2008
*****

MARKAUK  Hands down this is the best todo list manager I have ever used. Things has a simple, attractive interface, which never gets in the way of helping me to get things done.  
(Version 0.9.4)

praisebury
+6
[ Reply ]
Oct 7 2009

STEVEN GOODHEART  I own and use OmniFocus and The HitList...but always keep an eye on Things to see if it's evolving/improving, since the perfect PIM has yet to be created, and I have no loyalty to any particular software -- if I find something better, I'm there.

So, what I see, especially since the addition of the programmer who created the brilliant, but fairly short-lived iGTD, is that the pace of improvement and changes with Things has been quite impressive....way more often and significant than my other PIMs (though in fairness to OmniFocus, they got so much right, I don't really expect big changes there, though they keep refining it. The HitList already has a terrific, intuitive interface, but my impression is that the focus seems to be getting synching and the iPhone thing going. In that area, OmniFocus is the gold-standard.)

Anyway, kudos to the Things folks. They are really improving their program. For example, this new list of changes and additions shows some real intelligence and definitely improves the functionality of the program. I'm impressed. Maybe not enough to buy yet *another* PIM -- I think I have a PIM addiction problem -- but if the program continues to improve at this rate and show such intelligence in changes to the interface/functionality, it's going to do just fine and win lots of new users.

  
(Version 1.2.4)

praisebury
+5
[ Reply ]
Sep 4 2009
*****

TICONUCK  There are strengths and weaknesses in all of the competitor in this application category, including Things. But may I just say that I have used a variety of similar applications, most notably OmniFocus, quite extensively, and I really wish that Things had been around sooner, and had matured sooner. It could have saved me so much of the frustration that I experienced with those other apps.

It is very easy to use, and it has a very pleasant interface, and it is quite powerful, without being overwhelming, and without forcing you to use all of its features if you don't want to. I recommend you give it a try. Maybe it will be as good of a fit for you as it is with me.  
(Version 1.2.1)

praisebury
+5
[ Reply ]
Sep 4 2009

AHARMON  It is counterproductive to complain so, when there is so much to be thankful for...

Since this is a "1.x release", it should be obvious that there are areas where there will gaps that need filling.

THINGS is the most professionally crafted, well-thought-out GTD application on the Mac market, and as such, deserves a lot more credit than the nabobs of negativity are giving it.  
(Version 1.2.1)

praisebury
+5
[ Reply ]
View all 68 posts >>