Help MacUpdate by , and win an iPod!
|
DESCRIPTION
TaskPaper is a simple to-do list that's surprisingly adept. Unlike the competition, TaskPaper's text based interface offers you paper-like simplicity and ease of use.

It was quoted in a review by TUAW.com as the author's "favorite new app of 2007." People interested in efficiency of life, or GTD, will fall in love with TaskPaper.

WHAT'S NEW
Version 1.0.3:
  • Added Support for reading/writing all plain text file types. TaskPaper can now open files with .txt extensions, or any other extension, as long as the content is plain text formatted in UTF8.
  • Added Spotlight support and Quicklook support for .taskpaper files. (Thanks to posters in forums for the help)
  • Fixed Command-D (@done) shortcut so that it will work reliably in search results view.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4 or later.


SCREENSHOT

Developer:Hog Bay Software
Downloads:3,623
  - Version d/l:1,695
Business:Personal Info Managers
License:Shareware
Date:11 Nov 2007
Platform:PPC/Intel
Price:$18.95
OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
Suggest something else:
TaskPaper User Reviews (10 posts)Write A Review
sort: smiles | time
Jul 30 2008

TEKL  It would be nice to have a global hotkey to toggle visibility of TaskPaper. I would like to use F16 for that.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Jul 28 2008

AETNARIA  Any chance that an 'Archive Done Projects' feature will be added before the 2.0 update? I have a bunch of empty projects I have to scroll through to reach others now, since all their tasks have been marked done and moved to the Archive.

The only clean-up option I can find is to drag the cursor over the project's name (since a double-click triggers the single-click phenomenon) and hit delete to remove them entirely. Given that tasks can be archived, is there no better way?  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Mar 4 2008
*****

VERYVITO  TaskPaper is the ToDo list I've been looking for: It actually replaces the pocket-sized notebook I've kept on my desk for years -- and is just as simple to use.

It doesn't do a whole lot (thankfully!), but what it does do, it does great.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 16 2007
****.

IGAUCHO  TaskPaper is an excellent alternative to the new swarm of GTD apps hitting the Mac market. There are some great choices out there. Personally I have been an iGTD user since the start, but this one really is simple and allows you to organize your tasks quickly and get started on them. It helps to avoid the hassle of over-organizing things. TaskPaper is really in its infancy still but it is backed by a very responsive developer who is burning the midnight oil to make it better constantly. Version 1.1 is supposed to bring some huge improvements and new features. Can't wait!

There are a couple features that it is missing that would make it an absolute top contender (most are echoed on the Hog Bay forums). It really needs sub-tasks, drag and drop reordering of tasks and projects, iCal syncing, and .Mac support. Aside from those few shortcomings, I enjoy using it.  
(Version 1.0.3)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Nov 3 2007

GLOBETROTTERDK  I just purchased TaskPaper as a MacUpdate Promo. I went into the Hog Bay software forum to find an answer to a question I had and found the following comment from Jesse:

"I'm very likely to move new development ie version 1.1 to Leopard only..."

Maybe this should have been mentioned in connection with the MacUpdate Promo? Quite an important piece of info for anyone not planning to upgrade to Leopard right away! As far as I know, this is the only app that is planning to go "Leopard only" at this stage.  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
[ 6 Replies - Reply ]
Replies:
Nov 4 2007

JESSE GROSJEAN  This thread discusses this decision...

http://hogbaysoftware.com/forums/taskpaper/topics/338_Leopard_Only_for_1_1_Was_Recognizing_URLs_and_URIs_

In my mind, since your upgrade will be free once you decide to upgrade to Leopard, I don't see a lot of downside for existing users.

There are apps that are planning to go Leopard only. Here are a few big ones that I've heard about. Delicious Library. TextMate 2.0. Also consider lots of apples apps like Mail, iCal, etc.

There are really good reasons for going Leopard only. It will enable me to produce a higher quality application quicker. And you are free to upgrade when you are read.  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
Nov 5 2007

GLOBETROTTERDK  After my experiences with Apple and the clone wars, Apple dumping Apple Works, as well as various experiences with other hardware producers and software developers, I admit that my antenna are slightly quicker to react than they used to be.

I admit that your plans seem reasonable and well argumented. I personally appreciate backward software compatibility where feasible. There are some software developers represented here on MacUpdate that may add a little new code, but no real features, thus providing the justification for jacking up the software version and releasing the need to purchase an upgrade license.

Having first read some of the critical comments about you as a developer (referring to your Mori software), but deciding anyway to purchase TaskPaper and then having read the message that I quoted, I was concerned that you might belong to the category of more dubious developers. However, considering your levelheaded response, I believe that my concerns were unfounded. Thanks for your reply.  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
Nov 8 2007

GCOGHILL  Hmm, I knew nothing of these plans either. I agree it should be made apparent (on the apps main site, possibly here on MU, etc.) that the 1.1 release is planned to be 10.5-only if the dev has already made that decision.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
Nov 8 2007

JOHN F.  I didn't know it was going Leopard-only either. But TaskPaper going Leopard-only is not really what's bothering me, as I like the software as it is. I use the software for the features it has now. What I am worried about is that some persistent bugs will only be addressed with the 1.1 Leopard-only release. Letting TaskPaper going Leopard-only before the most stable and bug-free Tiger version is made, that's what I'm worried about. I hope this worry is unfounded.

I'm all for going forward and letting the developer go forward and let him use all the wonderful developer tools Leopard has to offer. But it is my strong opinion that the switch to Leopard-only should not be about bug-fixes. The switch to Leopard should be about added features. Sure Leopard makes it easier to address those bugs, but that doesn't help those who are stuck in Tiger with each their own valid reasons. Sure, a developer has to weigh-in which bugs he can fix before the switch. All I ask is that the developer addresses as many as possible before the switch. That's all I ask, that it's his attention to at least try his best to squash as many bugs for all the people stuck in Tiger before going Leopard-only.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
Nov 8 2007

GCOGHILL  I'd have to agree with John F. that 1.1 should be features and not bug fixes, but I suppose since we're at 1.02 right now, we should give the dev the benefit of the doubt on this.

I think the main thing about the 10.5 jump is that it happened so close to the 10.5 release - a lot (or all) of the apps the dev mentioned were going 10.5-only haven't really seen any major updates, and I am sure all major Tiger issues have been smoothed out.

TP 1.0 was released I believe right before Leopard, so technically all of his users were running 10.4 when purchasing, so it's only fair to make the 1.0x version right before moving on. I think I recall either here or on the dev's forums that he mentioned the 1.0 release was an in-progress release.

I'm sure he'll make good on getting 1.0x up to snuff with 10.4 before moving on to 1.1 and new features.  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0
Nov 8 2007

JESSE GROSJEAN  Thanks for everyone's comments on moving to Leopard only. I've just started a thread in my user forums looking for feedback on specific issues that you think should be addressed before doing Leopard only. Please add your comments to that thread.

http://hogbaysoftware.com/forums/taskpaper/topics/387_What_should_I_work_on_before_1_1_and_going_Leopard_only  
(Version 1.0.2)

praisebury
0

Oct 31 2007
***..

NIAMOR  I like it immediatly... Easy, fast, clear ! But i would not use it. For what ?

There are lots of little bugs in it, sa with the preferences loading, crash when opening the file with another editor at the same time, ect...

I think the support of XML would be the missing value.

At minimum, the possibility to export as xml format. Maybe the possibility to read xml...

And in the same way, it could be really a great improvement to have multiple task level in a "Project".

And then, with all that, i will found it usefull as a very simple xml editor. (or a very simple task manager ;-))

As i've say at the beginning, i like it. But for the value, 18$ is far too much !!!  
(Version 1.0.1)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 25 2007

ALEXIUS  After trying it out just for a few minutes... something kept nagging at me, until I realized that this really reminds me of VoodooPad.

http://trichech.us/?p=12#more-12

Is a GTD bridge for VP, and quite similar to taskpaper at first glance. I wonder if it can be expanded upon...

Don't get my wrong, TaskPaper looks great, but I've already paid for VP and 20 bucks is a little steep for me!  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 23 2007
*****

CRUCIAL  Genius

Like the other reviewer I have tried several GTD apps before, and all seemed overly complex, and incredibly rigid for my needs. Your needs are probably very different than mine, and a task management program / methodology is a very personal thing. There are no right and wrong ways, only ways that work and don't work for that particular user in their particular context.

What sets TaskPaper apart from all the other GTD / ToDo / task management programs is that it does not impose a strict structure on you. By liberating you from someone else's strict structure you are also liberated from having to tab from field to field and feeling like you are doing data entry. Entering information is just like writing notes.

TaskPaper is is based on an incredibly easy to learn syntax that you type like punctuation. Projects are denoted with a : at the end. Tasks have a - at the beginning. Contexts or tags use a @. Thats it. Nothing more to learn. TaskPaper then takes care of all the formating, allows you to search in multiple ways, presents projects in different tabbed views that behave in much the same way as Safari tabs. Click a project and you view only that project in the current tab. Command click and your project opens in a new tab. A couple of pull down acts like bookmarks letting you go directly to a project, or tag view.

Unlike any other so called productivity app, TaskPaper lets you change fonts, font size, font color and background colors. You can personalize it to look right for you. No more forms, with distracting fields all over the place, or columns that are too wide or narrow. It looks like a well formatted intelligent list, because thats what it is.

The back end of TaskPaper is a plain text file. You can move that file to any device, email it in the body of your email, view it in a web browser and even edit it on a PC. Because the syntax of TaskPaper is so transparent you can even create your tasks on a PC then view them on a Mac.

Price:

If this sold for $1.00 someone would still be complaining it was too expensive. I guess those people just don't value their time, or feel like anybody should be able to make a living from their programming skills. If I consider how much time TaskPaper has saved me, it pays for itself in hours.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 23 2007
****.

JOACHIMR  I tried a number of GTD software, and obviously many of the apps out there have a WAY larger feature set than TaskPaper. But that was exactly my problem with them. I ended up editing this and that and spent far more time organizing than actually doing. Read the description on the website, it summarizes the differences between, say OmniFocus and TaskPaper very well. The simple structure is as follows - if you add a : behind at the end of a sentence, it becomes the "header" (or marks the beginning of a new Project). If it has a - in front, it's a Task. Everything else are notes. And if you start a word with @ in a task, it becomes a link/keyword.

The file is an actual text file that only has this structure. So you don't have to follow a database logic or file structure, but you can just type your list in any form or shape that you want (within those four parameters). It's actually pretty powerful, because the software only "understands" the text in a way that makes it easier to view and edit and "deal" with your notes. But the actual note-taking is very, very simple. Type. Done.

I agree that some features - such as web-integration - are still missing, but they are available in some form (only not for the regular user who just wants to use it) already (scripting, web). Given the previous rate of development, v1.1 can't be that far away. And with it comes a plug-in structure, so folks can add a lof of different features.

I came back to this simple approach, because in the end a simple list, just dotted down, allows you focus on the important stuff and not to dabble with "if I set this up now in this way, it will automatically do this in 3 weeks together with..." So I gave a "4" for features - not for amount or depth, but rather of effectiveness of the features.

Give it a shot. It's not for everybody. But if the other GTD or To Lists out there don't really work for you and regular handwritten, simple lists work oddly enough really well for you when you shop, for example, then give this a try. It's WAY more powerful than handwritten notes but it's simple enough to dabble with it in the rawest of formats - text - and still make sense of it.  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]
Oct 23 2007

THM  nice, but not worth the 19$. tools like these should better move to the web (hogbay actually has one available)  
(Version 1.0)

praisebury
0
[ Reply ]