Search Mac Software Downloads
|
DESCRIPTION
Nova X... Lite web browser.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4 or later.

Bookmark and Share

Share
SCREENSHOT

Developer:RyanAndFriends Software
Downloads:1,740
  - Version d/l:934
Internet:Browsers
License:Free
Date:01 Jan 2008
Platform:PPC/Intel

OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
    No similar products suggested yet
    Suggest something else:
    Nova X User Reviews (3 posts)Write A Review
    sort: smiles | time
    Jan 25 2008
    *....

    DNELSON  Please get rid of this. It is an eyesore, it's not fast, it's large in megabytes, the list goes on.

    If you want to even compete in the "small-browser world", you need more than this. Regular "basic-as-sample code" Cocoa web browsers do more than this and are much less in size. This is 10.6 MB, while most others (that do similar or more) are running around 1 MB to 3 MBs.

    Also, it takes 5 seconds to load on my computer. That is very comparable on launch time to OmniWeb, and everybody knows OmniWeb does 50x what this program does.

    Another thing, the toolbar icons are poor quality, and the interface needs to look like it didn't get pasted from Microsoft Word 2004's Autoshapes.

    The history needs to show up in the menu bar and be clickable and clearable. The option to not record the history should be called "Private Browsing" and should be in the menu bar, as should be the options to block pop-ups. Also, the page title should be in the page title area.

    It is best to make your application mirror other apps, so if you learn one, you've learned all. In other words, try to configure your interface and menus like Safari.

    This should be version 0.1 alpha release.  
    (Version 0.5)

    praisebury
    +1
    [ Reply ]
    Jan 2 2008

    SIXER ___2  Please stop making pointless WebKit wrappers.  
    (Version 0.5)

    praisebury
    +1
    [ Reply ]
    Sep 16 2007

    MORJOVY  what are the features of this? why should we use this instead of our usual and handy browsers like safari, opera or firefox?  
    (Version 0.4)

    praisebury
    +1
    [ Reply ]