 |
DESCRIPTION
Logitech Harmony Remote is driver software for the Harmony Remote series. This installer has built-in support for English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Danish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Portuguese, Polish and Norwegian.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 7.6.0.8:
- Provides compatibility with Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.3 or later.

|
SCREENSHOT
| Developer: | Logitech |
| Downloads: | 3,816 |
| - Version d/l: | 451 |
| Drivers: | Other |
| License: | Free |
| Date: | 24 Jun 2009 |
| Platform: | PPC/Intel |
OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST No similar products suggested yetSuggest something else: |
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| Logitech Harmony Remote User Reviews (18 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Dec 12 2008 |
CRWRIGHT Remote is nice enough. Macros work sometimes - with lots of effort to set them up. I've resorted to just using it as a very flexible multi-brand learning remote... as usually the macros get confused by some component that either missed a command or was on when it was expected to be off... or the like. The software is only eclipsed by some of HP's worst printer drivers in "Windows bodge comes to the Macintosh". The good news is that it's just as terrible on a PC (I've tried it in parallels under Win2k). The user interface was written by someone whose idea of slick and well laid out was Windows 3.x. There are radio buttons with "Next" buttons at the bottom (frequently below the bottom of the window). There is an unscalable Wintel window inside of a resizable Mac window. The unscalable window is not large enough for most of the screens once you add any devices... so you have to scroll within a scrolling window to find your "Next" button. No default button, so you must ALWAYS click. No default radio buttons, so you must always choose one (even if the choice is obvious). Dreadful, embarrassing, convoluted, inconvenient, ill-conceived and ill-executed piece of rubbish, this software. I think that pretty much covers it. But if you've used their mouse drivers before you're probably used to that. Still and all - I like the remote; but I could write a better interface in AppleScript if I had the APIs for the stupid remote. (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 16 2008 |
CMIYC The software is remotely functional. The step-by-step-next-button-on-the-other-side-of-the-screen method is okay for the first time you setup the remote. However when something isn't setup right it is utterly PAINFUL to make adjustments. Also, why do I need to enter a login and password for a piece of software on my computer?!? (To others, yes I know the answer. I'm a little annoyed that with each software update I have to remember what it was.) I guess since there isn't an alternative you have to this software. I doubt anyone from Logitech reads MacUpdate. If you do, please add an advanced functionality that lets me make changes directly. (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 12 2008 |
FILCHESCAT true to their word, Logitech fixed their 7.5.0 release of Harmony software, apparently w/o changing the version number of the app; the single button press = multiple transmission of commands problem has been fixed in a release that appeared sometime on Monday 8/11/08. They admit their goof - good for them. There was no overt announcement, though, to log in and update - just a notice on the app if you took the initiative. I updated the firmware again as well, but there is no indication that this was necessary (Version 7.5) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 12 2008 |
MACUPDATE ADMIN Good to hear. But 'silent' updates area such a bad idea in general. How can most/all users know that a new version is available if the new version is still numbered as being the old version... (Version 7.5) | |
 | Aug 12 2008 |
FILCHESCAT I agree - there are similar comments in the website forum; go figure (Version 7.5) | |
 | Aug 10 2008 |
FILCHESCAT Logitech confirmed via call to customer support that 7.5 is flawed - used on a Harmony 1000 with DirecTV it sends two pulses for each button push. I was informed Sat 8/9/08 that 'engineers' were working on it and reverting to a previous version would not help - probably because of the firmware update that accompanies the application (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 9 2008 |
SANJAY MEHTA 7.5 runs a little faster than the previous versions. Fixes the filesystem issues. One annoying problem showed up though; text entry into form doesn't always work. Restarting the program seems to fix it and a quick look at the Logitech support forum shows that this is an old problem which affected some users earlier as well. The GUI is unchanged and as annoying as it was earlier. (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 9 2008 |
SHOCK J The version has radically increased the sensitivtiy of the button presses on my remote. The repeat pref are already set to 1. Reducing the repeat pref to 0 make button presses completely unpredictable and/or unresponsive. So my choice is now no press or too many presses. Lame. I need to go back to the previous version. (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 8 2008 |
MAC808 Version 7.5 is finally able to update my Harmony Remote Model 659 under OS X 10.5.4 on an Intel Mac mini Core 2 Duo. The previous version (7.4.3) was inconsistent at best, losing connection to Logitech's server and requiring work-arounds like changing Javascript versions & resetting the network switch that only worked sometimes. Along reducing the sprawl of files its Installer littered across the hard drive, the new version responds more quickly when moving from one screen to the next. In my limited testing, this version of Harmony Remote finally appears solid and usable. I'm disappointed that Logitech took so long to release a stable version, but relieved to be able to reprogram my remote at last. (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Aug 8 2008 |
JUTGREEN They finally moved the application support files to "~/Library/Application Support/Logitech/" instead of in the User Home directory. Unfortunately, the remotecore application is still in the Applications directory... (Version 7.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 1 2008 |
MONOCLAST I think you'll find there are quite a few pieces of software that assume the file system is *not* case sensitive. Are you also giving all the other software bad ratings for this? Personally, I don't see why you'd want to use a case sensitive file system with Mac OS X to begin with. I mean really - who wants to have two files with similar names like ReadMe.rtf and Readme.rtf in the same folder? All you're doing is adding a layer of complexity... and for what gain? (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
| [ 7 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 7 2008 |
SANJAY MEHTA I just noticed your sophomoric little dig on comment ratings. It's one thing to not support case sensitive filenames and it's another thing to fail to install or fail to run. A big failure is not to provide meaningful error messages. In this case, Logitech didn't think it through and definitely didn't matrix test on different configurations. (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
 | Jul 8 2008 |
MONOCLAST "Unix"? Really? If that's your sole reason for running a case-sensitive file system, I find that pretty humorous. In that case, maybe I should start using the 8.3 file name convention since my Macs also run Windows... Pfft... (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
 | Jul 8 2008 |
SANJAY MEHTA 8.3 in UPPER CASE. (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
 | Aug 8 2008 |
VERYVITO While you may not notice it in day-to-day drag-and-drog file operations, there are several reasons a case-sensitive OS is preferable. First, it allows more flexibility when naming files. This example is extreme, but an attorney might have two documents he wants to keep in an archive folder: MoleStationCase.doc (concerning Mole Station, MD) and MolestationCase.doc (concerning sexual misconduct). A glance could tell the names apart, but in a case-insensitive OS, they would overwrite one another. Also, consider the developer's convention of uppercasing class names, such as Button.java, to differentiate them from instance-level directives found in button.java. There are many reasons to choose case-sensitive file systems, and I think it's only for historical reasons that Apple even includes the non-sensitive option in OS X. (Version 7.5) | |
 | Aug 8 2008 |
Thanks for the write up - some people do need the obvious to be batted around their heads before they get it - my one word attempt ("Unix") was perhaps too subtle. More relevant to the Logitech Software - the new 7.5 version seems snappier and runs on a case sensitive FS. I still hate the UI though. (Version 7.5) | |
 | Aug 9 2008 |
MONOCLAST VeryVito wrote: > an attorney might have two documents he wants to keep in an archive > folder: MoleStationCase.doc (concerning Mole Station, MD) and > MolestationCase.doc (concerning sexual misconduct). A glance could tell > the names apart, but in a case-insensitive OS, they would overwrite one Then again, if he had used spaces, that problem wouldn't exist to begin with: Also, one might argue that someone less computer literate, say a grandmother, might be very confused that she somehow ended up with two files, Rose Bushes.pdf and Rose bushes.pdf in the same folder, because she just happened to download the file from different web sites that happened to capitalize letters in the name differently. The point is, some people benefit from case insensitivity in a file system. I think Apple realizes this, and I'm glad we have a choice. > Also, consider the developer's convention of uppercasing class names, > such as Button.java, to differentiate them from instance-level > directives found in button.java. > There are many reasons to choose case-sensitive file systems"= Sure - there are reasons; but they are, by and large, preferential reasons. In fact, we see many open source project adding support for case insensitive file systems today. The majority of the most popular open source project compile just fine on case insensitive file systems. > I think it's only for historical reasons that Apple even includes the > non-sensitive option in OS X. That's definitely *one* of the reasons. > Thanks for the write up - some people do need the obvious to be batted > around their heads before they get it I "got it" from the beginning. I still don't think there is real benefit from using a case sensitive file system. > my one word attempt ("Unix") was perhaps too subtle. Too subtle? No. Your one-word attempt was simply inadequate. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: I'm in no way excusing Logitech, or any other software maker, should their software not function correctly on an Apple-supported file system. Apple does support case sensitivity, and therefore so should ----------------------------------------------------------------------- (Version 7.5) | |
 | Mar 11 2008 |
SANJAY MEHTA Horrible software. It seems to be written in Java, which makes it pathetically slow. It doesn't understand proxy definitions in Systems Preferences. The less said about the GUI and the truly horrible way in which you have to keep moving the mouse down to the bottom right corner to click Next, Next, Next is infuriating. Finally, it doesn't even work with case sensitive file systems. The remote isn't really worth the money either, unless you're willing to spend hours trying to tweak the buttons to what you want. Save your money and stay away from this piece of rubbish. (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Jul 7 2008 |
SANJAY MEHTA This just gets worse and worse. After giving up on the software, I tried their online configuration system which generates a small downloadable file for the remote. Turns out that needs something called remotecore to send it to the remote. The website helpfully offers a link to download the entire package again. All 50Mb of it. Thinking that I might as well upgrade, I do so to find it's actually 7.4.1 replacing the 7.4.3 which I actually have on my system. And 7.4.1 doesn't work. Now I have no idea how I had acquired 7.4.3 in the first place. And this review is for 7.4.1.1, which I might as well try out now that I'm here. (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
 | Jul 8 2008 |
MONOCLAST Gosh you seem to have so much trouble with this software... Meanwhile it's worked fine for me and many others. It definitely needs improvements in terms of how the application is packaged, but that's largely cosmetic. But the fact is it gets the job done on most systems - certainly those systems that use the HFS default case-INsensitive file system. I really have to wonder how many of your problems are caused by your stubborn decision to use a case-sensitive file system just because "this is Unix"... (Version 7.4.1.1) | |
|
| View all 18 posts >> |
|