 |
iFreeMem... Free system memory for better application performance. A quick and easy alternative to either a reboot or RAM upgrade to get defragmented free memory.
If you are in the middle of using an application and the system becomes unresponsive for several seconds it could be the memory manager organising free memory for your application to use. IFreeMem clears Inactive memory to help your applications avoid the performance hit you get when running low on Free memory. You could think of it like a RAM upgrade.
Especially useful for users of memory hungry applications, i.e.:
- Musicians
- DJ's
- Graphic Designers
- Final Cut Pro users
- Photographers
- Scientists
- Parallels Desktop users
Rejuvenates old Machines and optimizes new machines.
release notes not currently available at developer site nor in download
|
| Developer: | Activata |
| Downloads: | 18,257 |
| - Version d/l: | 2,287 |
| Utilities: | System |
| License: | Shareware |
| Date: | 29 Jul 2008 |
| Platform: | PPC/Intel |
No similar products suggested yetSuggest something else: |
|
 |
|  |
 | |  |
| iFreeMem User Reviews (31 posts) | Write A Review |
 | Aug 22 2008 |
EASER I honestly wonder if this works. I ran VMfusion, which ate up pretty much all of my remaining memory. After I quit, I ran iFreeMem. Although the graph visually says I "recovered" a lot of memory, my computer still ran about as sluggish as it did right after I quite VMfusion. It most certainly did not run as fast as it would if I restarted. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jul 30 2008 |
GERWINPHILIPPO "Defragment memory" ? That must surely be a joke?! That's just proposterous! Fragmentation is a mechanical phenomenon that cannot, by definition, occur in memory. This is definitely snake oil. You must be a fool to actually pay for this rubbish. (Version 3.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 9 2008 |
FOULGER Sure there are plenty of Applications/Utilities that do the same thing and one can enter a unix command & also optimise RAM but ifreemem is in the menubar, memory use can be seen and clicking on optimise takes just a small amount of time. For me that saves money each time I use it. The author has offered it for sale, if you like it then pay for it, if you don't then use something else. Its just so convenient and can be used with very little waste of time. As a codicil, I would, however exhort my oft used advice "Halve the price & triple the profit" (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 8 2008 |
NARBO sudo /usr/sbin/periodic weekly produces the same results for FREE. (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ 1 Reply - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Aug 25 2008 |
XPLICIT ... but takes up to 10 minutes. (Version 3.0) | |
 | Jun 8 2008 |
HOLYPOLY Leopard Cache Cleaner does that (and MUCH more) for $8.99 . (Version 2.5.1) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Jun 5 2008 |
XPLICIT Thanks Dana for telling that it works as advertised, because I get slow downs on a MBP with 2GB RAM. That is without even starting the "killer" apps, like PS and such. And I don't agree to 2GB not being enough memory. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Apr 11 2008 |
DANA SUTTON Well, for better or worse it works as advertised. Use it, you get significantly more free memory. But nearly twenty bucks for a gizmo like this is i. m. h. o. unacceptably steep. I'd spring for about five, tops. If you have so little memory that you really need it, you probably would be better advised to start saving your pennies and buy more RAM. (Version 2.5) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 25 2008 |
MAC-KIWI If you clean the cache-folders by an apple-script, you have the same effect. Applescript is for free and integrated in OSX. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ 2 Replies - Reply ] | |
Replies:
 | Mar 2 2008 |
ARROYODORADO Sorry, but reorganizing your built in RAM is something so totally completely different from "cleaning the cache folders" that I doubt you understand anything this little app does at all - regardless of if it really works or not. I don't know if this app is an alternative to some reboots one has to do from time to time, but I think someone with such limited understanding of computers should not post discrediting comments like yours. My opinion. (Version 2.0) | |
 | Mar 11 2008 |
NEUTRALZONE Not only is cleaning the cache folders on disk not the same as the questionable purpose of this software, but cache cleaning normally lengthens startup time quite a bit! Startup time in OS X is optimized by caches, so when you lose those, they need to be rebuilt. When I dump caches, startup time goes from 35 seconds to 3 minutes. (Version 2.5) | |
 | Feb 24 2008 |
PHYSICSGUY You shouldn't have much free memory. What you want to make sure of is that your free + inactive memory isn't low. The reason people see slowdowns when they run this program is that you're effectively deleting a bunch of cached data (like Safari tabs you aren't currently viewing) from memory, so you have to reload it from disk. Here's an Apple document that goes over the types of memory you see in Activity Monitor and what they mean: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107918 (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
 | Feb 24 2008 |
FOULGER I've been using the trial for two days and it appears to be making things more zippy. I'll use it till the trial expires and if I conclude that it speeds things up overall I will buy it. (Version 2.0) | |
| [ Reply ] | |
|
| View all 31 posts >> |
|