|
OLIVERNIELSEN I liked demoing Spectre a lot. I write "liked" since I don't specifically NEED Spectre when making music. And since AudioFile Engineering's pricing policy goes towards the ProTools using, rich rockefeller studio rats (whomever they might be) I simply couldn't make myself purchase it at $88 which was its former price. Seeing now that they're at $150 makes me wonder how come most music software is so damn expensive. Musicians earn quite little. Anyway, it seems the developers of this app targets it more at B2B, ie. studios. And of course a studio using Spectre all day, 5 days a week (or more) can easily justify a mere $150. So maybe it's just me. I started out saying I don't need Spectre. I just have a gut feeling there would be a lot of musicians, podcasters, sound designers, that would purchase a cheaper version of Spectre. Maybe they should consider a light-version at $69, or even $59, which does not have all the different choices of scales and modes for each meter, but only the most commonly used, ie. logarithmic for the sonogram etc. That would be a smart business move, that would only help them sell more, also their "pro" version, since more people would use it, hear/read about it, want to upgrade as they outgrow the lite version, etc. (Version 1.2.5) |