KEN MANKOFF Regarding the science claims by the original review: There were none. But EdGCM produces good scientific data/products/processes. A reply to each statement in the review: > How did this monstrosity get to the Mac? We designed/wrote/ported it to the Mac. Please do not expect a simple eye-candy-ish Aqua UI with a few buttons. This is a monstrous task. > It's a pile of programs with no apparent links, no beginning, and no end. It is modeling the climate... A pile of processes with semi-apparent links (feedbacks) with a beginning several hundred million years ago, and an unknown end. :) This pile of programs allows you to: * modify and customize: continent layout, vegetation, atmosphere, greenhouse gasses, orbital parameters, and more * interface to a database, manage multiple climate simulations * Disk usage, job control... * post process from level 0 data (raw outputs) to level 3 or 4 (averaged, binned, organized end products) * extract and view hundreds of different variables * scientific visualization * image categorization / libraries It isn't a simple task so the program(s) are not necessarily simple to use. > The long flowery introduction tells you everything but how to run that software. we are in the process of moving to a new site, new layout, new content. > Judging by the (lack of) project organization and non-usable software, the authors themselves do not have a grasp on the product. Without a coherent description, it leaves an impression of a hastily arranged pile of disjoint pieces of software. Have the authors ever heard of QA or GUI? This mammoth easily replaces Encyclopaedia Britannica as the worst designed piece of software. This is a work in progress and much of it on donated time. We welcome both feedback (constructive, relevant), software patches, graphics, and articles. We provide assistance rapidly on our website. We do not respond quickly to criticisms left on miscellaneous websites because we don't know about it for a while. > In the times when understanding climate changes becomes > critical for the survival of mankind, these bureaucrats spend > a lot of taxpayers money on a project that nobody can understand. > And by the way, do not be fooled by a "free" designation for EdGCM. > It was paid for by all of us, courtesy of the National Science > Foundation. (7/13/2005, Version: 2.4.1) I'm glad you understand the importance of climate change. I can assure you some part of you or your job, employer, industry, or product is given tax-derived money that I could take offense with if I so choose. (Version 2.4.1) |