|
GARY30 I must be missing something: I am not trying to start a controversy here in asking why SuperDuper seems to get so many more "warm fuzzies" than does Carbon Copy Cloner. As near as I can tell, they both have the same features, just implemented a little differently. For me, the procedure for setting up file exclusions seems much simpler on CCC. Neither of these apps perform incremental backups (which is fine--that is not what they are intended for). I think they are both fairly priced (I donated to Bombich so long ago I can't remember, but I think it was 20 or 30 bucks). Both developers are wonderful. Maybe its just publicity. I started with CCC way back when so I am going to stick, but if I had started with SuperDuper I imagine I would stick with it. Or maybe there is a preference or option in SuperDuper I am missing that would make me say, "Aha!" (Version 2.5) |