Macintosh Software Search: New column sorting and sidebar filtering!  
|
Deals: Daily  /  Extended  |  Weekly Popular  |  Hot Picks  |  iPhone  new!  |  AboutAdd a File +
DESCRIPTION
Berkeley Madonna is arguably the fastest, most convenient, general purpose differential equation solver available today. Developed on the University of California at Berkeley campus under the sponsorship of NSF and NIH, it is currently used by academic and commercial institutions for constructing mathematical models for research and teaching.

Berkeley Madonna individual licenses cost $299 per user. Quantity discounts are available for 5 to 14 licenses ($199 per user) and 15 or more licenses ($129 per user).

Student licenses are available to those attending accredited academic institutions for $99 per user. Quantity discounts are available for 5 to 14 licenses ($69 per user) and 15 or more licenses ($49 per user).

Competitive upgrades are offered for $99 to licensed owners of the following products on a one-for-one basis:

  • ModelMaker
  • SAAM II
  • STELLA/ithink
  • PowerSim

Version upgrades are offered to owners of Berkeley Madonna 7.x or Madonna 6.0 individual licenses for $49 per license. Site license holders should contact us for upgrade information.

Download Now
WHAT'S NEW
release notes not available currently
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.1 or later.


Developer:Robert I. Macey & George F. Oster (UCB)
Downloads:4,817
  - Version d/l:245
Education:Mathematics
License:Demo
Date:06 Mar 2008
Platform:PPC
Price:$299.00
OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
    No similar products suggested yet
    Suggest something else:
    Berkeley Madonna User Reviews (4 posts)Write A Review
    May 8 2008

    AJOGUY  I downloaded 8.3.21 today, running Leopard (10.5.2). I'm having all kinds of problems - not only does the flowchart option not work (this is flagged on the BM website), but neither does HELP, I'm having problems with graphs, nothing seems to work. Overall, it appears that BM 8.3.21 and OS 10.5.2 are not compatible. If this is so, why were we not warned? Anyone else have similar problems? Thanks.  (Version 8.3.21)

    [ Reply ]
    Jan 19 2007

    PAUL DORMAN  Yeah, it seems the BSD license would be appropriate... guess that's too "old-school" though.  (Version 8.3.18)

    [ Reply ]
    Oct 9 2005

    PROFESSOR  Indeed both NSF and NIH are funded by tax dollars, and in both cases underfunded. It is interesting that software resulting from many NSF sponsered projects remains in the public domain, as it should be. At the same time Fed's push for tech-transfer and the commercialization of research is seen as an economic stimulus. This product, however, is not tech transfer, but simply a wrapper for basic mathematics. It does appear to be an unethical if not egregious violation of the intent of those Federal funds.   (Version 8.1b13)

    [ Reply ]
    Sep 9 2004

    ANONYMOUS  Developed with the sponsorship of NSF and NIH. And $299 for individual licenses? Oh, sure. I bet UCB is grabbing bank on this one, too. These are desperate times indeed.

    These guys are a strange amalgam of Democrat and Republican. Though I like the idea, I withhold my full approval pending court challenges.

    Why don't they let me to send my $299 directly to the NSF? Or, for that matter, UCB.

    This just mixes together public and private money too much for my taste. If these brilliant (but kinda wooly) mathematicians want to make a living at this, they should get out into the real world and try to make a living there.  (Version 8.1b10)

    [ Reply ]
    View all 4 posts >>