Search Mac Software Downloads
|
DESCRIPTION
CVL (Concurrent Versions Librarian) is a version and configuration management tool for Mac OS X, Mac OS X Server (Rhapsody), Windows and OPENSTEP. It helps managing versions of various resources (source code, projects, documents). It allows parallel modifications as well as branches. CVL is useful for one and for many users.
WHAT'S NEW
Version 3.4.14b90 release notes available here.
REQUIREMENTS
Mac OS X 10.4 or later, CVS 1.7 or later.
RELATED LINKS

Bookmark and Share

SCREENSHOT

Developer:Sente, Ltd
Downloads:6,096
  - Version d/l:1,704
Business:Applications
License:Free
Date:23 May 2006
Platform:PPC/Intel
OTHER PEOPLE SUGGEST
    No similar products suggested yet
    Suggest something else:
    Concurrent Versions Librarian User Reviews (4 posts)Write A Review
    sort: smiles | time
    Feb 1 2005

    ANONYMOUS  I had trouble setting this up (an earlier version, admittedly) and ended up trying out MacCVSClientX

    It's what I have used now for some time.  
    (Version 3.4.7b72)

    praisebury
    0
    [ 2 Replies - Reply ]
    Replies:
    Feb 1 2005

    ANONYMOUS  ...and you probably wrote that competing program, too. Don't judge old versions against current versions of competing products. That is not fair for anyone and would get a warning from other version sites.  
    (Version 3.4.7b72)

    praisebury
    0
    Feb 3 2005

    JöRG BULLMANN  No, she/he didn't. I don't know her/him but I do know that I wrote MacCVSClient.  
    (Version 3.4.7b72)

    praisebury
    0

    May 28 2004

    ANONYMOUS  a wonderful product for the crappiest technology ever...CVS sucks!!!

    tried subversion and that rocks  
    (Version 3.3.4)

    praisebury
    0
    [ Reply ]
    Jan 2 2004
    *****

    BRUNO  One word : Perfect.

    Far more complete than apple build-in CVS integration, a must have if you're using CVS.  
    (Version 3.0)

    praisebury
    0
    [ Reply ]
    Nov 23 2003

    ANONYMOUS  doesn't seem to work under Panther.  
    (Version 27.5)

    praisebury
    0
    [ Reply ]