Synchronize! Pro X is a professional-strength system backup and file synchronization utility for Mac OS X.
Synchronize! Pro X has many uses. As an example, you can use Synchronize! Pro X to backup your OS X startup disk to another hard disk, so that the backup disk is bootable. Update your backup with "Fast scan" enabled, and it will be done 10X faster!.
You can sync your home folder with a file server, or your PowerBook, or a FireWire disk, so that the files on both are up-to-date.
Synchronize! Pro X is specifically engineered for OS X, taking advantage of the
What's New
Version 6.3.1:
Access to this version of Synchronize! Pro X is free if you've purchased a license within the last two years.
Fixed a problem with the acceptance of serial numbers.
Fixed a problem which could cause warnings to not be shown.
At the price charged, plus bi-annual renewal costs, I have always, over the years, compared Sync Pro's features to alternative software to see if it’s worth it and over the last 7 years, I found it to be indispensible as it could do a whole load of things other backup software couldn’t. As its now time for another comparison (another bi-annual cost is looming), I thought I'd post how, for me, Sync Pro currently compares:
1) Bootable Backup - One of the reasons I bought Sync Pro X years ago was because of its ability to take advantage of FSEvents technology in OS X which initially resulted in me being able to do a bootable backup on my MBP in seconds. However, FSEvents has proved to be a bit flakey, resulting in Sync Pro being unable to properly commence, let alone finish a bootable backup. The workaround is to turn off FSEvents, which reduces Sync Pro to the same speed as the considerably cheaper and even free alternatives out there. In fact, those same alternatives actually produce a better quality clone, if Backup Bouncer is your guide. The developer has also suggested that I should fix permissions on my drive/ completely re-install my system, just to make Sync Pro work properly. Despite the fact that I haven’t needed to do this with other backup software, I went along with these suggestions, but the issues still persist.
2) Syncing - No problems here but again, the syncing abilities are easily replicated by cheaper alternative software.
3) Archiving - There’ still nothing that can better Sync Pro’s archiving options. By this, I mean the ability to distinguish exactly what files and folders get archived, where the archives are saved (ie, a different disk to your backup destination drive), and the ability to group archive folders into DVD sized chunks. Well, DVDs are on the way out, so there’s not much need for me to burn archives to DVD and to be honest, I can’t think of a reason for me to save archives to a different disk (your experience may vary). Personally, I am happy to archive files and folders in a folder structure to the same destination backup disk and this can also be done with cheaper alternative software.
4) Ability to open and close disks - Again, this can be one with cheaper alternative software.
5) Ability to open and close other programs - Still (I think) a unique feature of Sync Pro if it’s what you need.
6) Bugs and support - In my experience, Sync Pro has always had bugs of some sort, which is ok, considering how complex it is and the developer will always strive to provide a fix. My current issue is that it won’t complete a backup on just my home folder then, after a special copy of Sync Pro had been provided by the developer to try and fix the issue, files and folders which it was supposed to backup were completely missed. I'm sure, the developer would have eventually found a fix or workaround for all of these issues and he does reply within a day, provides suggestions to problems and provides specific copies of the software to try work around your problem. But for the price paid, I'd hoped that these kind of issues didn't arise in the first place, they don't seem to with the alternative software available. The developer's suggested solutions (fixing permissions/ reinstalling the system which as I say, aren't necessary with alternative software) haven’t always worked.
Sync Pro does provide extra very good features such as folder watching and being able to log in without being the root user but for the price paid, what I really wanted/needed was for this to work first time a lot more than what it did without having to find fixes. So for my needs, I settled on separate cloning software and syncing/ archiving software to complete those specific tasks. I find that works out far more reliably and cheaper than Sync Pro.
No set agenda here, and the software has worked more often than not - just my experience.
I have made dozens of bootable backups and migrated my OS from one machine to another using Super Duper and Carbon Copy Cloner over the years, I have never had an issue with either program. I have rated this program at 50%, because I have never used it, and don't believe I ever will.
I found this review by Mikesavory singularly unhelpful since he's rating a product that by his own admission he's never used. For that I rate him a big fat stupidhead,
I'm looking forward to the millions of postings that you will make on other products that you have also NOT used. Keep up the good work.
BTW: I have been using the Synchonize! Pro application for around 6 years now and does not find that any other product does provide the broad scope of diffrent functions and a clear overview of what happens during the process. I like to understand what the program does, and make corrections if needed.
I’ve been a Mac user since 1986, so I have some perspective on Mac applications. There are few that I rate as highly as SyncProX. It was the first full-featured OS X backup app that could reliably make bootable backups. I’ve been using it since 2002 (v1.2.2). When SuperDuper and Carbon Copy Cloner came along, I tried them. I even own a SuperDuper license. So, I know what those apps can do.
First let me say that any comparison between backup & synchronization applications is useful only if you’re fully informed about their capabilities—and you seldom get that in user reviews (even this one). All backup & sync requirements are not equal, and neither are all backup & sync applications. If your needs are simple, you can get by with a simple app. But if you need a backup & synchronization application that can do it all, then you should take a closer look at SyncProX than most user reviews can provide.
Anyhow, here’s what SyncProX does for me. I need to run both manual and scheduled backups of data on networked computers. SyncProX can handle either, but part of its power is in its ability to automate the process. The backups include complete bootable backups as well as dedicated backups of database files.
For automated backups, I need powerful control over permissions and difference criteria for file size, date, modification time, creator, type, ID resources, as well as the ability to specify file skipping rules (in case of errors), what data are logged, how to handle file attributes, what should and should not be copied…and that’s just a partial listing of the kinds of options SyncProX provides. It takes some time to learn what all the features do, but it’s well worth the effort if you need them.
My automated database backups need to run scripts to shut down data and license servers, write the backups to sparse.image disks mounted remotely from the networked computers on which they reside, then unmount the disks, and then restart the servers. Everything has to be done with root privileges because the database directories have “No access” permissions for everything except the database application. SyncProX does it all, fully automated, without any need for me to log in as the root user.
The ability to specify what data are logged is critical for troubleshooting any problems…for example when an anti-virus app detects and quarantines some malware during the backup write operation, and creates several hundred temp files in the process, all of which appear as errors in the backup log. Ditto for bizarre problems that occasionally show up due to the way OS X reports changed files in FS Events when Fast Scan is enabled. In that case, turning off Fast Scan, repairing permissions, and running a full backup clears the problem. The log file provides all the info I need to track down the culprit and solve the problem, or get help from Qdea support.
Oh, yeah…want support? Got it. The developer usually responds within 24 hours, and often within a few hours. Qdea has even provided me with special builds of SyncProX to work around problems that appear when something changes in OS X…and something is always changing in OS X.
Qdea’s licensing policy is eminently fair…although for some reason it’s often deeply misunderstood. Well, here’s the bottom line: Any version of SyncProX that you download works forever…or for as long as the version of OS X you’re running is compatible. I have copies of SyncProX v 4.x and v5.x running on two old Tiger machines. They’re fully licensed, forever.
If I don’t need to upgrade when the two-year license expires, I just don’t renew the license until I need it. All previously installed versions continue to work on their respective licenses. If I upgrade my system and need a SyncProX upgrade, I buy the renewal (for $49.95…NOT $99.95), but I don’t have to buy it until I need an upgrade. And during the two-year license period, I can download any upgrade that Qdea releases, any of which are covered by that license—permanently. Sounds fair to me.
Considering the great support and the fact that SyncProX is constantly under development to keep up with changes in OS X, that’s a pretty low cost of ownership for an application that does so much and works so well.
SyncProX probably isn’t for everyone. If you don’t need all the features it provides, then use a backup application that does what you need. But if you need the Swiss army knife of backup apps—the stainless steel, chrome-plated, nuclear laser turbo-diesel high-strength industrial backup app—SyncProX will get the job done. It’s worth every penny.
Regarding Synchronize Pro's rival offerings (e.g. SuperDuper and the free --- oops, dirty word --- Carbon Copy Cloner): they are not really equivalent. To my mind, Synchronize Pro is more like a shell for RSync, and can be directed to backup and/or synchronize specific folders, disks, etc. For system backups, I've used SuperDuper, as it was designed for that purpose, I believe.
Regarding the upgrade policy: renewal fees of $100 every 2 years have to be factored in the storage equation (disks, RAID boxes, NASes, etc). To my mind, they represent a very small percentage of total cost, and I'm willing to accept that in order to maintain a stable workflow. In this respect, BTW, Synchronize Pro certainly delivers.
The one thing mentioned that bothers me, but I'm not sure if it's true, is the fact that a 2nd computer with the same license is crippled. This, I think, is a major flaw, that represents very bad practice. Can't help but feel that the authors don't trust me.
BTW, I haven't upgraded yet, so the stars reflect my rating for the previous version.
It's not "$100 every 2 years" renewal fee, it's $49,95 (which has not been jacked up in the 7 years I licensed this product now) and it's only "every 2 years", if you want to use a new version, that was released two years after you bought your initial or renewal license.
My own renewal history is a good example: I bought my last renewal in October 2008 and I am still running SPX v6.1.3, which was released it September 2010. Now it's September 2011 and I don't see myself installing Lion in the near future. Could well be that I'll be running SnowLeopard with SPX v6.1.3 for another year (or longer). That would make 4 or more troublefree years without having to buy a renewal. The only reason I will buy a renewal sooner is to support Qdea in return for the support this app and the developer gave to me over the years - see my review from May.
On the license for the 2nd computer: SPX on your 2nd Mac wil not be able to run automatic backups and doing a backup manual is always possible, when SPX on your first machine isn't doing a backup at the same time. While this mode is not in any way limiting synchronization in both directions, I also would like to be able to run automatic, simultaneous backups on my 2nd Mac, which is not included in the license terms. When you have scheduled multiple backups running on your 1st Mac you only have specific time windows to run manual backups on the 2nd Mac. However I feel that this mode is fair enough as you can use SPX for free within limits on the 2nd Mac and for me the many pros of this software outweigh this limit by far.
Please don't use the free as below. It's not free since I have to buy the software in the first place to get the upgrade. Look up the definition of free...
"Access to this version of Synchronize! Pro X is free if you've purchased a license within the last two years.
Document revisions are now backed up on Mac OS X 10.7 Lion."
And what is your point? Just in case you had not noticed before: This is shareware.
My last 2-year-renewal ($49) ran out some months ago, but the last version of SPX stills runs troublefree on OS10.6.8. I will happily buy another renewal licence someday when I will switch to Lion or what comes after Lion.
The point is how they use the word free. The upgrade is useless if I hadn't bought a license in the first place. Just as the advertised free delivery that you hear everywhere for beds and stuff. It is not free. I have to buy a bed or whatever to get the "free" delivery. Hence it's not free.
They can say there is no cost for the upgrade or that it's included in the 2 year license or whatever but it's not free.
Well, of course it is free, if you bought a licence within the last two years and of course it is not free in general, because it is shareware.
Get it?
I have never seen anyone complaining about free upgrades for shareware. This must be a joke.
I'm not complaint about the upgrade provided at no extra cost. I'm merely commenting on the usage of the word free. The semantics of the word free.
If the new version of this software provided here was truly free. I could just download and use it without a license, right?
In Europe we care about things like this, how important words like free are being used. It's obviously swishing above your head so I'll leave it at this. You no longer know what free means.
It's like telling a slave, you're free as long as you stay here and work. Free means no shackles. This is an analogy. You can google the word analogy if you want.
Ok, you're on a semantic crusade. Then you will have a whole lot to do here at MacUpdate, because almost every shareware company provides so called "free" updates to their applications.
I just bought this and while I'm still very impressed with the speed and functionality and it's low cpu utilization what really bugs me is the fact that unlike ALL other software packages I have where you get a full use license for 2 or more computers as long as you're the only user this company decided for some reason to sell you one license and a second usage crippleware.
You can't use all features on the second computer and the software will go online and check that you comply. The feature lost is the automatic operation. The core of a program like this. They don't even provide an option to license it. I would have considered it if it was displayed upfront.
I have used this software for a couple of years with no problems. Of course I have never had to do a restore, so I cannot state it does that function well.
WARNING - READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE DOWNLOADING THIS UPDATE!
My problem is that this company is now demanding $100 to continue using their product. They say my license expired. Who the hell does that? I understand paying for an upgrade when a major revision is released, but a license that expires? Even Microsoft doesn't screw their clients in that way. On top of this, there is no upgrade price for current users. I am supposed to pay $100 for another two years.
I strongly recommend SuperDuper! in place of Synchripoff. It has just as good an interface and runs with reasonable speed. It costs only $28 for a license with no "expiration date."
I do not work for SuperDuper!, I just feel that Synch Pro should pay a price for ripping-off their loyal clients.
When you purchase a serial number, new versions of Synchronize! and Synchronize! Pro can be used at no additional charge for a period of two years from the date of purchase.
This means that the serial number you purchase will be valid for new versions of the software which are released within two years of your purchase date.To use a version of the software published more than two years after the purchase date, a new serial number must be purchased at the renewal price.Your license does not expire - the serial number you purchase will always work with the software available at the time of your purchase - but it only works with new versions of the software for two years after your purchase.Here's how it works. You enter your serial number into the latest software available at the time of your purchase. This software will work on your computer forever - there is no expiration. In a year, you notice a new version has been released, so you download it and use it on your computer. This new version works, too, because it's only been a year since your purchase of a license. Now, two and a half years later, you download a third version. This version won't work unless you purchase a renewal license, which is good for another two years. If you wish, you can choose not to upgrade, and the first two versions you downloaded will keep working.
Upgrades
Upgrades from Synchronize! to Synchronize! Pro can be purchased for the difference in price between Synchronize! and Synchronize! Pro.
and the renewal is not the full price, it's $49.95
The license you have for any version installed within the 2 year period will never expire. SuperDuper! has also charged for major upgrades in the past.
Your first reply makes no sense. You copied a bunch of text from the website that reiterates what I said. After two years i have to pay a renewal. I have purchased hundreds of applications over the years and none ever had an expiring license.
If I got the renewal price wrong, I apologize to MacUpdate readers. I went through the "license renewal" process and the price I was given on the screen was $99.95. Your comment about the license never expiring is a repeat of their double-talk. It doesn't expire but it doesn't work on any release (of any scope) after two years. Of course SuperDuper charges for major upgrades... so does everyone else. I am OK with that.
So, assuming you got the renewal price correct, you wasted a lot of space and said nothing. Несамоходные дерьмом
You got the price wrong and you didn't read or understood the text I copied. The license have will work forever for any version released within 2 years from your purchase. Only if you upgrade will you have to pay a renewal. Not very different than other products that charge for major upgrades. Only tweak here is that they tell you upfront how long that period is. They don't tie it to a specific release.
After installing Lion 10.7, nearly 30% of my MBP's Disk directory was suddenly out of sync. I then had to clone its boot drive excluding the home folder, to a portable external firewire drive so I could run Diskwarrior on the MBP. Everything turned out fine in the end and I can say that the clone produced by Synchronize! Pro to enable this, worked perfectly. Obviously, it does more than just clone, but the point is, it seems to work fine under Lion. Important to know when preparing for the inevitable bugs the early versions of the new operating system will bring.
I am registered to this application since August 2004 and through all the years on any OS X version on any of my Macs Synchronize Pro X has been a stable workhorse. And it still is.
It is fast, it is absolutely reliable and very powerful! I love the many options, e.g. SPX lets me start scripts that closes different databases before the back up begins and that opens them again, when SPX has finished ... or that it starts a back up when a folder changes.
I have different scheduled back ups for different purposes and content, some running every two hours, some scheduled weekly and also I made bootable system clones all the years. I have never experienced any failures or problems when I needed those clones or back ups.
Over the many years I contacted Hugh Sontag four or five times. He always replied literally instantly with great help, always competent and kind. Half a year ago I was trying to figure out the best way for a complex yet flexible back up strategy for a friend of mine and asked Mr. Sontag if my concept could work and received great help and much input from him.
There are many competing apps to this product, many somewhat more popular-priced. At the time I registered to SPX I tested many and found none to be as powerful. Since then I never cared for other apps as SPX just does it perfectly for me and I simply totally trust this app.
Someone very kindly showed me the complete backup bouncer test result for version 6.13, which is as follows:
Verifying: basic-permissions ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: timestamps ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: symlinks ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: symlink-ownership ... FAIL
Verifying: hardlinks ... FAIL (Important)
Verifying: resource-forks ...
Sub-test: on files ... ok (Critical)
Sub-test: on hardlinked files ... FAIL (Important)
Verifying: finder-flags ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: finder-locks ... ok
Verifying: creation-date ... ok
Verifying: bsd-flags ... FAIL
Verifying: extended-attrs ...
Sub-test: on files ... ok (Important)
Sub-test: on directories ... ok (Important)
Sub-test: on symlinks ... FAIL
Verifying: access-control-lists ...
Sub-test: on files ... ok (Important)
Sub-test: on dirs ... ok (Important)
Verifying: fifo ... FAIL
Verifying: devices ... FAIL
Verifying: combo-tests ...
Sub-test: xattrs + rsrc forks ... ok
Sub-test: lots of metadata ... ok
Don't know what the results are for this new 6.2 version but if the results are the same as above, then that'll do me - all the relevant stuff (for me) is there.
Time Machine, Chronosync/CCC/Superduper!/ Superflexiblefilesynchronizer are great and I recommend all of them to other Mac users, but I still use this, because I can't see one product that does *everything* this does.
Just downloaded v 5.1. Crashes immediately under OS 10.4. Reverting back to 5.0.7 works fine. I haven't loaded Leopard yet, but will try this version again when I do, even though the description says that 5.1 is still compatible with 10.3-10.4.
I'd recommend holding off on this one unless you're ready to do some troubleshooting.
I'd pass on v 5.0.5. Seems to be a problem with registration, at least on my machine. 5.0.4 (which I thankfully kept, still works fine. Though I have been plagued by the volumes not un mounting issue.
Also, weird display problems when the help/registration window is opened.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
Watch Lists are available to MacUpdate Desktop Members Upgrade Now
Download and auto-install
using MacUpdate Desktop. Save
time moving folders and cleaning-up.
Synchronize! Pro X is a professional-strength system backup and file synchronization utility for Mac OS X.
Synchronize! Pro X has many uses. As an example, you can use Synchronize! Pro X to backup your OS X startup disk to another hard disk, so that the backup disk is bootable. Update your backup with "Fast scan" enabled, and it will be done 10X faster!.
You can sync your home folder with a file server, or your PowerBook, or a FireWire disk, so that the files on both are up-to-date.
Synchronize! Pro X is specifically engineered for OS X, taking advantage of the modern properties of the operating system, such as pre-emptive multitasking, and supporting the full capabilities of the file system, including 255-character Unicode file names and OS X file permissions. Files are copied at the maximum speed possible, using pre-emptive multitasking to full advantage. It makes bootable backups of OS X system disks, without logging in as 'root'. "Fast scan" makes updating a bootable backup incredibly quick, and real-time folder watching starts backups when files are changed. Old files can be archived rather than deleted. The status of backups can be monitored and accessed from any web browser and email can be sent when backups happen, don't happen or have errors.
Synchronize! Pro X actions can be scheduled to be performed at night or at any preset time, once or periodically, without anyone present. Passwords can be supplied automatically for file server connections.
+259
Bigboysdad reviewed on 12 May 2012
1) Bootable Backup - One of the reasons I bought Sync Pro X years ago was because of its ability to take advantage of FSEvents technology in OS X which initially resulted in me being able to do a bootable backup on my MBP in seconds. However, FSEvents has proved to be a bit flakey, resulting in Sync Pro being unable to properly commence, let alone finish a bootable backup. The workaround is to turn off FSEvents, which reduces Sync Pro to the same speed as the considerably cheaper and even free alternatives out there. In fact, those same alternatives actually produce a better quality clone, if Backup Bouncer is your guide. The developer has also suggested that I should fix permissions on my drive/ completely re-install my system, just to make Sync Pro work properly. Despite the fact that I haven’t needed to do this with other backup software, I went along with these suggestions, but the issues still persist.
2) Syncing - No problems here but again, the syncing abilities are easily replicated by cheaper alternative software.
3) Archiving - There’ still nothing that can better Sync Pro’s archiving options. By this, I mean the ability to distinguish exactly what files and folders get archived, where the archives are saved (ie, a different disk to your backup destination drive), and the ability to group archive folders into DVD sized chunks. Well, DVDs are on the way out, so there’s not much need for me to burn archives to DVD and to be honest, I can’t think of a reason for me to save archives to a different disk (your experience may vary). Personally, I am happy to archive files and folders in a folder structure to the same destination backup disk and this can also be done with cheaper alternative software.
4) Ability to open and close disks - Again, this can be one with cheaper alternative software.
5) Ability to open and close other programs - Still (I think) a unique feature of Sync Pro if it’s what you need.
6) Bugs and support - In my experience, Sync Pro has always had bugs of some sort, which is ok, considering how complex it is and the developer will always strive to provide a fix. My current issue is that it won’t complete a backup on just my home folder then, after a special copy of Sync Pro had been provided by the developer to try and fix the issue, files and folders which it was supposed to backup were completely missed. I'm sure, the developer would have eventually found a fix or workaround for all of these issues and he does reply within a day, provides suggestions to problems and provides specific copies of the software to try work around your problem. But for the price paid, I'd hoped that these kind of issues didn't arise in the first place, they don't seem to with the alternative software available. The developer's suggested solutions (fixing permissions/ reinstalling the system which as I say, aren't necessary with alternative software) haven’t always worked.
Sync Pro does provide extra very good features such as folder watching and being able to log in without being the root user but for the price paid, what I really wanted/needed was for this to work first time a lot more than what it did without having to find fixes. So for my needs, I settled on separate cloning software and syncing/ archiving software to complete those specific tasks. I find that works out far more reliably and cheaper than Sync Pro.
No set agenda here, and the software has worked more often than not - just my experience.
-6
+2
Mikesavory reviewed on 03 Feb 2012
+3
+6
+2
+2
BTW: I have been using the Synchonize! Pro application for around 6 years now and does not find that any other product does provide the broad scope of diffrent functions and a clear overview of what happens during the process. I like to understand what the program does, and make corrections if needed.
+1
+21
Vito reviewed on 24 Oct 2011
First let me say that any comparison between backup & synchronization applications is useful only if you’re fully informed about their capabilities—and you seldom get that in user reviews (even this one). All backup & sync requirements are not equal, and neither are all backup & sync applications. If your needs are simple, you can get by with a simple app. But if you need a backup & synchronization application that can do it all, then you should take a closer look at SyncProX than most user reviews can provide.
Anyhow, here’s what SyncProX does for me. I need to run both manual and scheduled backups of data on networked computers. SyncProX can handle either, but part of its power is in its ability to automate the process. The backups include complete bootable backups as well as dedicated backups of database files.
For automated backups, I need powerful control over permissions and difference criteria for file size, date, modification time, creator, type, ID resources, as well as the ability to specify file skipping rules (in case of errors), what data are logged, how to handle file attributes, what should and should not be copied…and that’s just a partial listing of the kinds of options SyncProX provides. It takes some time to learn what all the features do, but it’s well worth the effort if you need them.
My automated database backups need to run scripts to shut down data and license servers, write the backups to sparse.image disks mounted remotely from the networked computers on which they reside, then unmount the disks, and then restart the servers. Everything has to be done with root privileges because the database directories have “No access” permissions for everything except the database application. SyncProX does it all, fully automated, without any need for me to log in as the root user.
The ability to specify what data are logged is critical for troubleshooting any problems…for example when an anti-virus app detects and quarantines some malware during the backup write operation, and creates several hundred temp files in the process, all of which appear as errors in the backup log. Ditto for bizarre problems that occasionally show up due to the way OS X reports changed files in FS Events when Fast Scan is enabled. In that case, turning off Fast Scan, repairing permissions, and running a full backup clears the problem. The log file provides all the info I need to track down the culprit and solve the problem, or get help from Qdea support.
Oh, yeah…want support? Got it. The developer usually responds within 24 hours, and often within a few hours. Qdea has even provided me with special builds of SyncProX to work around problems that appear when something changes in OS X…and something is always changing in OS X.
Qdea’s licensing policy is eminently fair…although for some reason it’s often deeply misunderstood. Well, here’s the bottom line: Any version of SyncProX that you download works forever…or for as long as the version of OS X you’re running is compatible. I have copies of SyncProX v 4.x and v5.x running on two old Tiger machines. They’re fully licensed, forever.
If I don’t need to upgrade when the two-year license expires, I just don’t renew the license until I need it. All previously installed versions continue to work on their respective licenses. If I upgrade my system and need a SyncProX upgrade, I buy the renewal (for $49.95…NOT $99.95), but I don’t have to buy it until I need an upgrade. And during the two-year license period, I can download any upgrade that Qdea releases, any of which are covered by that license—permanently. Sounds fair to me.
Considering the great support and the fact that SyncProX is constantly under development to keep up with changes in OS X, that’s a pretty low cost of ownership for an application that does so much and works so well.
SyncProX probably isn’t for everyone. If you don’t need all the features it provides, then use a backup application that does what you need. But if you need the Swiss army knife of backup apps—the stainless steel, chrome-plated, nuclear laser turbo-diesel high-strength industrial backup app—SyncProX will get the job done. It’s worth every penny.
-2
-3
Xenophon reviewed on 13 Sep 2011
Regarding the upgrade policy: renewal fees of $100 every 2 years have to be factored in the storage equation (disks, RAID boxes, NASes, etc). To my mind, they represent a very small percentage of total cost, and I'm willing to accept that in order to maintain a stable workflow. In this respect, BTW, Synchronize Pro certainly delivers.
The one thing mentioned that bothers me, but I'm not sure if it's true, is the fact that a 2nd computer with the same license is crippled. This, I think, is a major flaw, that represents very bad practice. Can't help but feel that the authors don't trust me.
BTW, I haven't upgraded yet, so the stars reflect my rating for the previous version.
+1
+29
My own renewal history is a good example: I bought my last renewal in October 2008 and I am still running SPX v6.1.3, which was released it September 2010. Now it's September 2011 and I don't see myself installing Lion in the near future. Could well be that I'll be running SnowLeopard with SPX v6.1.3 for another year (or longer). That would make 4 or more troublefree years without having to buy a renewal. The only reason I will buy a renewal sooner is to support Qdea in return for the support this app and the developer gave to me over the years - see my review from May.
On the license for the 2nd computer: SPX on your 2nd Mac wil not be able to run automatic backups and doing a backup manual is always possible, when SPX on your first machine isn't doing a backup at the same time. While this mode is not in any way limiting synchronization in both directions, I also would like to be able to run automatic, simultaneous backups on my 2nd Mac, which is not included in the license terms. When you have scheduled multiple backups running on your 1st Mac you only have specific time windows to run manual backups on the 2nd Mac. However I feel that this mode is fair enough as you can use SPX for free within limits on the 2nd Mac and for me the many pros of this software outweigh this limit by far.
-3
-45
"Access to this version of Synchronize! Pro X is free if you've purchased a license within the last two years.
Document revisions are now backed up on Mac OS X 10.7 Lion."
+29
My last 2-year-renewal ($49) ran out some months ago, but the last version of SPX stills runs troublefree on OS10.6.8. I will happily buy another renewal licence someday when I will switch to Lion or what comes after Lion.
-2
-45
They can say there is no cost for the upgrade or that it's included in the 2 year license or whatever but it's not free.
Lookup the definition of free...
Get it?
+29
Get it?
I have never seen anyone complaining about free upgrades for shareware. This must be a joke.
-3
-45
If the new version of this software provided here was truly free. I could just download and use it without a license, right?
In Europe we care about things like this, how important words like free are being used. It's obviously swishing above your head so I'll leave it at this. You no longer know what free means.
It's like telling a slave, you're free as long as you stay here and work. Free means no shackles. This is an analogy. You can google the word analogy if you want.
+29
-1
-45
Mikaelf reviewed on 05 Sep 2011
You can't use all features on the second computer and the software will go online and check that you comply. The feature lost is the automatic operation. The core of a program like this. They don't even provide an option to license it. I would have considered it if it was displayed upfront.
This is not Pro! This is Scam...
Looks like a return for me...
-58
WARNING - READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE DOWNLOADING THIS UPDATE!
My problem is that this company is now demanding $100 to continue using their product. They say my license expired. Who the hell does that? I understand paying for an upgrade when a major revision is released, but a license that expires? Even Microsoft doesn't screw their clients in that way. On top of this, there is no upgrade price for current users. I am supposed to pay $100 for another two years.
I am off to find a replacement. Screw these bums.
-58
I do not work for SuperDuper!, I just feel that Synch Pro should pay a price for ripping-off their loyal clients.
+1
-45
Renewals
When you purchase a serial number, new versions of Synchronize! and Synchronize! Pro can be used at no additional charge for a period of two years from the date of purchase.
This means that the serial number you purchase will be valid for new versions of the software which are released within two years of your purchase date.To use a version of the software published more than two years after the purchase date, a new serial number must be purchased at the renewal price.Your license does not expire - the serial number you purchase will always work with the software available at the time of your purchase - but it only works with new versions of the software for two years after your purchase.Here's how it works. You enter your serial number into the latest software available at the time of your purchase. This software will work on your computer forever - there is no expiration. In a year, you notice a new version has been released, so you download it and use it on your computer. This new version works, too, because it's only been a year since your purchase of a license. Now, two and a half years later, you download a third version. This version won't work unless you purchase a renewal license, which is good for another two years. If you wish, you can choose not to upgrade, and the first two versions you downloaded will keep working.
Upgrades
Upgrades from Synchronize! to Synchronize! Pro can be purchased for the difference in price between Synchronize! and Synchronize! Pro.
+1
-45
The license you have for any version installed within the 2 year period will never expire. SuperDuper! has also charged for major upgrades in the past.
-58
Your first reply makes no sense. You copied a bunch of text from the website that reiterates what I said. After two years i have to pay a renewal. I have purchased hundreds of applications over the years and none ever had an expiring license.
If I got the renewal price wrong, I apologize to MacUpdate readers. I went through the "license renewal" process and the price I was given on the screen was $99.95. Your comment about the license never expiring is a repeat of their double-talk. It doesn't expire but it doesn't work on any release (of any scope) after two years. Of course SuperDuper charges for major upgrades... so does everyone else. I am OK with that.
So, assuming you got the renewal price correct, you wasted a lot of space and said nothing. Несамоходные дерьмом
-45
Nice talking to you too...
-45
+1
+259
Bigboysdad reviewed on 23 Jul 2011
+1
+29
Oldmiller reviewed on 29 May 2011
It is fast, it is absolutely reliable and very powerful! I love the many options, e.g. SPX lets me start scripts that closes different databases before the back up begins and that opens them again, when SPX has finished ... or that it starts a back up when a folder changes.
I have different scheduled back ups for different purposes and content, some running every two hours, some scheduled weekly and also I made bootable system clones all the years. I have never experienced any failures or problems when I needed those clones or back ups.
Over the many years I contacted Hugh Sontag four or five times. He always replied literally instantly with great help, always competent and kind. Half a year ago I was trying to figure out the best way for a complex yet flexible back up strategy for a friend of mine and asked Mr. Sontag if my concept could work and received great help and much input from him.
There are many competing apps to this product, many somewhat more popular-priced. At the time I registered to SPX I tested many and found none to be as powerful. Since then I never cared for other apps as SPX just does it perfectly for me and I simply totally trust this app.
+3
+259
Bigboysdad reviewed on 12 Feb 2011
Verifying: basic-permissions ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: timestamps ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: symlinks ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: symlink-ownership ... FAIL
Verifying: hardlinks ... FAIL (Important)
Verifying: resource-forks ...
Sub-test: on files ... ok (Critical)
Sub-test: on hardlinked files ... FAIL (Important)
Verifying: finder-flags ... ok (Critical)
Verifying: finder-locks ... ok
Verifying: creation-date ... ok
Verifying: bsd-flags ... FAIL
Verifying: extended-attrs ...
Sub-test: on files ... ok (Important)
Sub-test: on directories ... ok (Important)
Sub-test: on symlinks ... FAIL
Verifying: access-control-lists ...
Sub-test: on files ... ok (Important)
Sub-test: on dirs ... ok (Important)
Verifying: fifo ... FAIL
Verifying: devices ... FAIL
Verifying: combo-tests ...
Sub-test: xattrs + rsrc forks ... ok
Sub-test: lots of metadata ... ok
Don't know what the results are for this new 6.2 version but if the results are the same as above, then that'll do me - all the relevant stuff (for me) is there.
Time Machine, Chronosync/CCC/Superduper!/ Superflexiblefilesynchronizer are great and I recommend all of them to other Mac users, but I still use this, because I can't see one product that does *everything* this does.
+4
I'd recommend holding off on this one unless you're ready to do some troubleshooting.
+4
Also, weird display problems when the help/registration window is opened.
Best to pass on this one.
Gigadiva rated on 20 Feb 2012
-2
David Losada Soler rated on 03 Feb 2012