








(133)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:901,345 |
| Version Downloads:2,031 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Image Editing |
| License:Demo |
| Date:20 May 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $39.95 |
Overall (Version 9.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-31
Dejmac reviewed on 21 May 2012
-2
+37
Mactraxx reviewed on 20 May 2012
While I appreciate the constant updates, the fact that there is no built in software update mechanism in this day and age is unforgivable, especially for as often as it is updated.
I would also agree with some others that this should be put on the Apple App Store, price set at $20. $30 max. That would solve the above issue with updates, and be a more fair price as well.
+449
+1
+2
Freddy-Moncada reviewed on 02 May 2012
+1
+52
FTBZ reviewed on 23 Apr 2012
-8
+38
Magosilvan reviewed on 11 Apr 2012
Non esegue, pagando, quel che Anteprima fa gratis come ad es. la regolazione fine dell'inclinazione della scansione.
+5
+27
It does not execute, paying, those that Preview makes gratis like to es. the regulation fine of the inclination of the scanning.
Now you can respond with impunity:
Such as - Not sure what you are smoking but Preview cannot even come close to VueScan. Try a different planet.
Come - non sicuro che cosa state fumando ma previsione può nemmeno venire vicino a VueScan. Provi un pianeta differente.
-15
-15
okamiokami reviewed on 06 Apr 2012
The interface is absolutely dismal: unprofessional, messy and lacking any kind of style.
Price is a BIG issue as well: the standard version should be free (let's face it, it is severely limited) and the PRO version should be around 30/35USD.
300.000 sales at 40 dollars a pop should make a happy man. I only see a greedy one.
Wanna make big money? Put Vuescan PRO on the App Store at 9.99
+5
+66
+4
+19
About the BIG pricing issue: Is there a program that offers to create raw scan files, ICC and color profiles and IT8 color calibration for less than $80? These are options that many home users won't even bother messing with, making the Standard version a steal if you have a trustworthy but not so new scanner. Price is more than fair for its duties and, when compared to its competitors, cheap.
The developer is highly responsive, well-mannered and kind, qualities of a good person that don't comply with greediness, as you unfairly stated.
+8
+60
Who made you God of Global Finance to decide how much the developer should be allowed to make? I suspect (from your writing) that you live in a country where such things are regulated but in the US, people still are free to become rich from their hard work and good ideas.
--
+5
+80
Old_guy reviewed on 14 Mar 2012
Great value !
+1
+449
+1
+12
+1
+449
So, "Fixed problem with some Canon scanners on Mac OS X" in 9.0.86 is actually causing more trouble with my LiDE 100 rather than resolving anything. I'll be reporting all the issues directly to Hamrick soon.
+2
-31
Dejmac reviewed on 24 Feb 2012
-3
I email Ed Hamrick these details. He replied that there is a different print library used between the two versions. However, I have not heard anything further from him and the problem still persists.
Anyone else having this problem? Any suggestions?
-56
That is what worked for me.
http://www.ceprya.com
+12
This is the only app I have these kinds of problems with.
+1
+102
http://www.hamrick.com/sup.html
It has the correct email address to use, but also provides a list of things to try and information to send to the author if you're having trouble.
Good luck!
+12
+2
+7
-1
-2
Is it that the watermarking process of the demo version is horribly slow? If so, it doesn't bode well for any other image processing functions.
-1
-1
+6
+6
-3
Come on, how difficult is to say Yes or No?
I am a developer and I am applalled at this treatment, I never ignored anybody like this. I don't think it is right.
For the last time:
Will you ever support Microtek Scanmaker 3800?
Please, please, please, please, please....
And have you actually emailed him or just put up a comment here, he may not even read these comments.
-3
I have emailed him from his website, posted comments here for months and still no answer.
I cannot see how he could be too busy to answer a straight yes or no.
I can only assume that he is very unpolite.
If he treats like this potential customers I wander what kind of service he will provide to his users.
Cheers.
It looks very good when you get back to your customers straightaway with no stalling at all.
Perhaps he's living the life of luxury and he has staff who are supposed to pass these messages on but they do not.
Mark
+6
Most of the support is on the Usenet scanners newsgroup, which you know how to get to after reading the Vuescan web page.
Complaining here is about as useful as complaining at your local coffee bar, I think -- the developer isn't here, neither are the experienced users who can help you.
I hope that you are familiar with the bsic how-to advice, if not go here first:
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Copyright © 2001,2006 Eric S. Raymond, Rick Moen ... Finally, I'm going to illustrate how to ask questions in a smart way by example; pairs of questions ...
www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-3
thanks for your interest in this matter.
However:
Firstly I followed all procedures and emailed the developer from his website. Several months (not days) went by and no answer was given.
Secondly, as a developer, I try and read what people think about my software all the time and I feel that it is my duty to answer their queries promptly and to the best of my ability.
And last I have given up wanting to know,really, I am just trying to warn people about the treatment they are likely to get from a company that does not even find the time to answer a sale query. How long will people have to wait for post sales service?
+6
+6
+microtek +scanmaker +Vuescan
It showed me your questions here and also showed me the FAQ file at the Vuescan web page where they are answered:
Quoting from the FAQ file:
http://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/vuescan.htm#unsupported
BEGIN QUOTE:
Unsupported
* All parallel-port models
* All drum scanners
* All UMAX USB models except 3400 (some versions), 5400 and PowerLook 180
* All Microtek USB models except X6USB, X12USL, 4700, 5600, 5700, 6800, 8700, FilmScan
* Canon FS2720
* Agfa SnapScan Touch
* All Lexmark, Artec, Mustek, Primax, Brother, Visioneer models
Please note that these scanners are unsupported for several reasons:
* Parallel port scanners are unsupported because the commands they use are undocumented by the vendors, are extremely complex and are difficult to reverse engineer.
* The other scanners aren't supported because the vendor won't document the commands they use, and these commands are too complex to reverse-engineer.
END quote from the FAQ file.
+6
"Axe" wrote, posted, and emailed Ed Hamrick repeatedly complaining that he was not getting an answer to his question "Will you ever support Microtek Scanmaker 3800?"
Ed makes clear he doesn't answer in email questions answered in the FAQ.
The FAQ says: Unsupported
The FAQ says: because Microtek doesn't document the interface.
Axe, your complaint is with Microtek. Most scanner makers give Ed Hamrick documentation. Talk to Microtek.
-3
+32
+6
CloudB rated on 21 May 2012
FidelSea rated on 21 May 2012
+3
CNYMAC315 rated on 10 May 2012
Wildgruber Martin rated on 10 May 2012
ramon7 rated on 30 Apr 2012
+3
CNYMAC315 rated on 21 Apr 2012
-2
Jab47 rated on 01 Apr 2012
+18
Moogan rated on 01 Apr 2012
+26
Gary_box rated on 26 Mar 2012
+3
CNYMAC315 rated on 23 Feb 2012