








(16)
Your rating: Now say why...


| Downloads:2,786 |
| Version Downloads:438 |
| Type:Development : Editors |
| License:Free |
| Date:05 May 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 1.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+1
+28
Jan_rybar reviewed on 06 May 2012
BUT:
GUI is ugly and non-Apple (flying window with four lost icons/words – huh, Windows 3.0 like!). Developer should read some basic rules of Apple GUI standards. It should be simple, not chaotic.
+1
+93
Prypjat reviewed on 05 May 2012
This is a rushed project, stick with Bean or TextEdit.
-2
-7
I absolutely don't care about YOUR feedback.
It's my app, not yours. I like people who 'think different' (just to use something familiar) from others, and I do as you can see. Your last post (i.e. the post above) is merely too much away from constructive criticism.
Do you feel a step over others? Well, you're not Apple.
+93
+93
Prypjat reviewed on 28 Apr 2012
1) Read Apple's Human Interface Guidelines. Menu items like "Make Blueish" or "Turn On" hurt the user's eye. One of many advantages of Mac OS X is consistency, but you're heading an entirely different road. Have a look at NSMenuItem's 'state' property for a more standardized approach. Same goes for using a panel window as a preferences window. That's not what it's for. Read the guidelines and restructure your app's UI a little.
2) The "Help" page is too large for the window. Again, Apple provides information on how to do this properly.
3) The Preferences panel is littered with (Needs Relaunch) labels. It doesn't need a relaunch for most of these settings as you can set these to your NSTextView using observers. Refer to the Apple Developer Documentation for that. Having to relaunch all the time to test a setting is annoying.
4) Most keyboard shortcuts are a bit random and not the same as in all the other apps. Refer to point 1.
I hope this helps you improve Uno. Take some time developing updates. There's no need to rush updates. Read Apple's developer documents, they're there to help. I hope that in the future I'll be able to give it a higher rating.
+93
This editor should be called DIY instead of UNO, hehe! ;)
+1
+1
Ringoslam reviewed on 12 Apr 2012
oh, and "As others have already pointed out, Uno is unnecessary in light of what's already out there. Why "reinvent the wheel?" - you must be kidding, tons of software here and in MacAppleStore are way more "reinvented wheels".
Best wishes,
G.
-7
marluke reviewed on 11 Apr 2012
If Uno is harmful for your eyes or Mac, please hang on wasting your words and time advertising other apps in comments; just suggest other ones.
-2
-7
If Uno is harmful for your eyes or Mac, please hang on wasting your words and time advertising other apps in comments; just suggest other ones.
+294
Text Edit. It's called 'Text Edit Plus'. Check it out.
It's $15 shareware but it's developer says that it can be used free of charge in it's uncrippled state for as long as you want. you don't have pay for it!
Need need to waste your time with Uno.
+294
www.macupdate.com/app/mac/5077/tex-edit-plus-x
-1
-7
If you want to say something useful, don't post anything.
-2
+294
to Uno!
You say you're developing Uno step by step. To which I reply "what's the point"?
Why not use your talent and creativity to develop something useful and unique instead?
As others have already pointed out, Uno is unnecessary in light of what's already out there.
Why "reinvent the wheel?"
Yodvertising" Text EditPlus X but letting others know of worthy alternatives
to Uno!u say you're developing Uno step by step. To which I reply "what's the point"?
Why not use your talent and creativity to develop something useful and unique instead?
As others have already pointed out, Uno is unnecessary in light of what's already out there.
Why "reinvent the wheel?"
+294
Text Edit. It's called 'Text Edit Plus'. Check it out.
It's $15 shareware but it's developer says that it can be used free of charge in it's uncrippled state for as long as you want. you don't have pay for it!
Need need to waste your time with Uno.
+1
+38
bbw7 reviewed on 02 Apr 2012
As others have said, perhaps this is the developer's first entry into the field and the app will evolve to greater functionality over time. In any case, it is meant to be an alternative to the basic editor TexEdit, having several additional functions TE doesn't.
For example, I like the "stay on top" or flot feature of this one; I have a use for this, so I don't consider it just a vanity app.
One suggestion to the developer: with the "transparency" feature it seems like it would make sense that the command for this ought to be a toggle one; as is, one must use a separate command, "restore to default" (or something to that effect) to negate the transparent screen.
Also, I found the requirements info a little confusing. For anyone wondering, the pure Intel version is only for OS 10.7+; 10.6 users (like myself) should use the universal version said to be for OS 10.5.
+27
DelportF rated on 18 Mar 2012
+13
Stef_Vandenabele rated on 18 Feb 2012
+11
Agent59653198 rated on 22 Jan 2012
+6
CloudB rated on 19 Jan 2012
+9
Quiiick rated on 31 Dec 2011