








(17)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:6,168 |
| Version Downloads:241 |
| Type:Development : Editors |
| License:Free |
| Date:18 May 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 2.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+2
Raptor01 reviewed on 07 May 2012
Dathinker1 reviewed on 04 May 2012
The writing of my thesis was the first (and only) time I will ever have to use TeX. More than any other editor, TeXnicle has minimized the amount of time I spend formatting or dealing with issues related to TeX's backend. It is push-button simple to generate great-looking documents.
As many other reviewers have said, TeXnicle's author is extremely responsive. The feature additions in b43 were added (and released!) mere minutes after I sent him a request for those features via email.
TeXnicle's author is also gainfully employed at the Max Planck Institute, which should guarantee an adequate supply of motivation for further development in the future.
btalx reviewed on 02 Apr 2012
In addition to an amazing interface, the ease-of-use features on this editor are kind of incredible. The "Paste as Table" command is magic, as far as I'm concerned. Beautiful magic. The code snippets and navigational features make me a happy TeX'er.
Perhaps the best reason to switch to this editor is the speed of development / bug-fixing. On more than one occasion I've submitted feature requests and bugs, and they have been fixed in the next beta (which is to say, within the next week or so).
OldClaudio reviewed on 19 Mar 2012
OldClaudio reviewed on 05 Mar 2012
an negine set up for running XeLaTeX fails miserably saying that:
sh: xdvipdfmx: command not found
The same engine command from the terminal window works perfectly. Actually xdvipdfmx is invoked directly by xelatex; and the engine scrip does not even mention xdvipdfmx; so how come it complains an=bout not finding it?
My MacTeX is uptdated on a weekly schedule and is "THE" complete installation.
Thanks a lot
It is obvius that if one uses TeXnicle, it uses a Mac where MacTeX has been installed: what else!
May be there are around some "afictionados" to the old times that still use gwTeX (the maintanance of which was discontinued in 2006)? Well, OK; I am not so good with scripting languages, by I am sure that there exists some way to capture the working path variable, where in some rare circumstances it might be necessary to add /usr/texbin but most of the times this is already listed in the actual PATH variable.
Thank you very much for your help and assistance; I really appreciated.
Mrs Often reviewed on 26 Jan 2012
supertaurus85 reviewed on 23 Jan 2012
+1
Latexian is better for writing, editing, and live-typesetting. I like the Texnicle code and symbol library, so, I'll keep that open and just minimize the rest.
Regarding the layout, you can open the pdf view in it's own window, and even the editors. Double click a file in the project tree to open a stand-alone editor window. Click the view (or Typeset->View PDF) to open a separate PDF viewer window.
+1
+9
S/ash reviewed on 01 Jan 2012
I know it is a beta, but I wish i could get spell-check/auto-correct and templates to work.
Thanks and cheers to the dev!
+1
What do you mean by templates? If you go to the preferences of TeXnicle, there is a templates tab where you can add/edit templates for new documents.
+9
Somehow auto spell check is not working for me. For me to see the spelling warnings (red lines), I have to select all text and select "Check document now" from the context menu. I have enabled "Check spelling as I type" and "Auto correct as I type", but it doesn't work either way.
And regarding templates, I can use the default templates that are shipped with the app, but I can't create my own. I add a new template from the Preferences and type/paste the contents in the embedded editor. The template gets created, but it is always blank, i.e., the contents are not saved.
+9
+9
+1
+66
If only someone would make a (proper) Cocoa program that does what LyX does in the semi-awful Qt windowing protocol.
alpery1974 rated on 12 Apr 2012
+7
Dhgabriel rated on 25 Mar 2012
+7
Dhgabriel rated on 25 Mar 2012
+26
OsloX rated on 12 Mar 2012
JT12 rated on 15 Jan 2012
Fab_l rated on 02 Oct 2011
+5
Carlosalbert0 rated on 02 Oct 2011
zebrazebra rated on 24 Aug 2011
Charles Wetherell rated on 24 Aug 2011