








(9)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:4,094 |
| Version Downloads:1,829 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Video |
| License:Demo |
| Date:03 Jun 2010 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $29.95 |
Overall (Version 3.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+118
GeoProf reviewed on 30 Sep 2011
+234
Poikkeus reviewed on 19 Jan 2011
+118
+5
Either this really is bad, or the developer is being saboutaged.
+915
+19
There is no way in all the hells that this company was able to get around this, and matroska is unfortunately becoming a standard in the anime world... so... JUST. NO. POSSIBLE. WAY.
And, how can you trust a company that cheats on MacUpdate's review boards, and can't even be subtle about it?
+2
+181
Shmk reviewed on 01 Jun 2010
+3
+8
Juancab reviewed on 01 Jun 2010
+2
+235
+1
+13
+19
+83
+4
+17
Yeah, what a coincidence. In the 5-star narratives throughout the MacUpdate website, look for tell-tale suspicious hype.
-- First person narratives. Why aren't they reporting critically on the product vis a vis it's usefulness to the readers of the review? Where are the specific reasons? Why is it better than the other applications that do the same thing?
-- Sensational. The keyword "finally!!!" is a dead give-away. "Finally!!!" appears in airline in-flight product catalogs heralding all sorts of solutions looking for problems. "Finally!!!, a vacuum cleaner that works!!!"
-- Exclamation punctuation. Why is this necessary? Does the app really do something sensational - like crack/bypass the DVD copy protection? Do serious evaluations have to have them?
-- Is the review writer writing his review for the reader or for the seller? Hmmmmmm?
-- Why not qualify the review? Is the review a "first impressions" report or a long time user report? Why not reveal the amount of experience using it? Does the review pertain to a demo or to the full implementation?
-- Why not review the registration process (serial number copy protection)? Is it convoluted? Must the buyer deal with esellerate, or is the procedure straightforward?
-- Why would a Mac user who already invested $100 in a commercial software - Roxio Toast, want to switch to a shareware software (and pay for it)? Toast is easy to use if the user bothers to "read the screen." And Mac users, being more intelligent than Pee Cee users, usually don't need to read the documentation.
-- Why didn't the reviewers list the alternative softwares upon rendering their reviews? Why didn't they provide a feature by feature comparison between this software and other wares?
-- Where's Dr. Girlfriend's review?
Reviewers, if you really want to write effectively, and if you want your words to be useful to the reader, then read how Dr. Girlfriend and other top reviewers word their narratives. Write your content at college or post grad level, not down at 6th grade level.
Look, the product may be great, I don't know yet because the 5-star reviews, so far, are not specific.
-16
-16
Tim Whale reviewed on 18 Feb 2010
I had high hopes when I first downloaded it and its worked out well
+1
Chadwithuhc rated on 18 Jul 2011