Prism is designed to create a better environment for running your favorite web-based applications. Much of what we used to accomplish using an application running locally on our computers is moving into the web browser. Thanks to advances in web technology, these apps are increasingly powerful and usable. As a result, applications like Gmail, Facebook and Google Docs are soaring in popularity.
Unfortunately the web browser, which was originally designed for reading documents, is not an ideal environment for running applications. It is frustrating and time-consuming to wade
What's New
Version 1.0b4:
494133 Set As Desktop Background not available when Prism extension is installed
506886 Check override.ini for environment variables if not found in application.ini
508575 Click handler is not attached when login manager is disabled
509021 Make notification API more flexible by allowing optional arguments and an onclick handler
509294 Prism fails when web app URI does not have a base domain
517892 Provide platform glue with access to the associated window object
527260 Patch to add restore minimized window functionality to JS-API
527827 Build fails because prism/Makefile is missing in makefiles.sh
528903 Stub reports missing Microsoft CRT DLL
535194 Crash on Mac when registering unknown protocol handler
535197 Enable maximize on first run
Version 1.0b4:
494133 Set As Desktop Background not available when Prism extension is installed
506886 Check override.ini for environment variables if not found in application.ini
508575 Click handler is not attached when login manager is disabled
509021 Make notification API more flexible by allowing optional arguments and an onclick handler
Firefox is my primary browser so when Prism first appeared in beta a couple years ago, I was pretty excited by the possibilities; I had fun testing it out, but at the time, though, I had still had a PPC in my network so had to table Prism in favor of Fluid, which, too, is excellent app of the webkit/Safari variety.
I just re-visited Prism recently and, although customizations are not as easily/readily configured as with Fluid, it's still an excellent alternative, albeit Intel only.
What brought me back to it was my need to print out Avery labels - I don't have MS Word or any other of the commercial apps Avery puts out templates for and the .doc templates are some what cumbersome to use in OOo. OOo's built-in templates - at least for a few of the label types I've tried - have not printed out positioned correctly. Whether this is operator error (mine) or something else, I am not sure.
Avery has a pretty good web-based system to create perfect labels but every time you want to use it asks for a log in or your email address...
But if you set up Prism with this URL:
http://enu.print.avery.com/SelectSku
you can bypass all that nonsense and get straight to making to your labels.
The screen at that URL asks the user to enter/select the SKU number for the product you wish to use a template for and you're off to the races.
It's great to be able to get to what you need right away with just a double click of the mouse!
You create your labels - there's options for mail merge, inserting/resizing images, and of course your own personalized text (although fonts are limited to what Avery offers in the interface) - and it prints out to a PDF.
So far it's printed perfectly aligned, great looking labels every time.
(The technology Avery uses for this is Flash so if you are Flash-averse, there's the heads up.)
When making posts you have the choice of "comment" as well as others for the review type. I can see from loads of other decent reviews you've made on Macupdate that you likely know this, but what you and a few others, have done here is not review this product, instead you've made a comment and given that comment a star review. This doesn't really improve the quality of Macupdate feedback.
Also, the only 1984 we could actually "Welcome ... again" would be the year when "Do They Know It's Christmas" was released which isn't really as terrifying as the fictional era of oppression that you are presumably referring to and which never actually happened.
My point is you're ranting and not really helping other users of Macupdate.
I will reply without a star rating.This and other online run software all deserve low stars because this type of madness should be avoided at all costs. The more fools that jump on this bandwagon the more incentive there is for making more like it. Fools that continue to allow companies to take total control over their software and freedom are no better than the lemmings portrayed in the movie 1984.
@MACTECHHEAD: "Fools that continue to allow companies to take total control over their software and freedom"... I can think of several clients of mine that could use this give them MORE control over access to their OWN custom built web applications that are hosted on their OWN servers.
It is a just a tool and your crusading against it is like crusading against telephones because "faceless corporations" could have control over what you've said.
I'm not afraid of the folks at the Mozilla Project who develop Prism. If all web apps were run by altruistic young open sorcerers like them I might even consider getting on board. But, of course, profit-seeking corporations are always just a few steps behind the revolutionaries, waiting for their ideas to mature enough to squeeze a buck out of them. And I think we'd be fools to consider giving up control of our identities to 'the cloud'.
To those who support the concept of web-based software, I ask this: Have you already forgotten the mountains of evidence suggesting we kill this development before it gets off the ground (and into the cloud)? What about the thousands of recent examples of corporations misusing and profiting off our personal information without our approval and often without our knowledge?
What about the US government officials from the Social Security Administration who sold the personal info of nearly 4 million Americans last year -- mostly to corporations?! If our banks and government agencies can't be trusted with our personal information, can the employees of your future web-based software companies?
I had my identity stolen for the second time 3 months ago, and I was responsible for the first $50 charged fraudulently to each of 7 different credit cards (including the ones started up by those criminals)! I had to spend 6 days on the phone convincing the big American credit rating agencies to block issuance of any new credit in my name for the next year, and with my current credit companies convincing them that I really am me, so they shouldn't cancel my current cards! And it's not over yet. But more importantly, how do you think those criminals got my personal info in the first place -- and that of the 27,400 other Americans involved in just this one case? By hacking a BANK! Now consider that banks use much, much stronger security protocols than other companies, including the ones that will host your online apps.
There are NO security standards, NO best-practices regulations, and NO effective enforcement mechanisms in place to guarantee the safety of your personal info. What's worse, the unqualified success of corporate lobbyists at watering down all the legislation that Congress recently passed to protect us from another economic crisis like this one proves that there never will be such protections from government.
Take it from someone who spent 8 years running the Clinton White House's legislative initiatives on social policy: Government is not a proactive entity, it only REACTS to pressures generated by society, and always in the most milquetoast, mealymouthed and ineffective ways. Politicians will never protect us from business interests as long as those same business interests are the sole financiers of their political campaigns.
If you're not yet critical of the fundamental logic of web-based apps and you think FORMICA's rant (below) went too far (especially those geniuses CORNSTALK and HERMIT, who don't even seem to have read it before launching into mini-rants of their own), I propose that you try what FORMICA did. Download and test NetBarrier or Little Snitch so you can intercept your software's calls out to the Internet and decide whether to allow or block them. Then download a new and interesting little music app called Instinctiv (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/33909/instinctiv). When Little Snitch intercepts Instinctiv's callouts, write down the addresses and, if possible, the countries of all Instinctiv's callouts to the dozens of companies and other entities all over the world -- though many are impossible to identify or even locate. I bet you'll get tired and give up way before you get to callout number 50 in just the first 10 minutes (that's when I quit)! If you like, do it again with the software of a company you really trust. Then, let us know if you still trust software companies to ensure the safety of your personal and financial information stored on a net-apps client computer with unencumbered access to the Internet.
Oh, and while you're at it, read a newspaper occasionally.
Outstanding utility! Of course, it has to be used with the same caution that any web application requires. I use this to create standalone apps for streaming Pandora and to manage my Listingly.com lists.
This is a giant mistake. Running ANY software from the web is a mistake. It can do ANYTHING it wants with your information, and you would never know it. Now I am like most people -- I can't stand Microsoft. But when I am writing a letter on Word, I am very confident that the app isn't transmitting any of my own personal information back to Microsoft because I use an application called Little Snitch to alert me of ANY calls OUT of my computer. But if you are using a WEB-APPLICATION to write that letter, how do you know that any of the constant back-and-forth communication between your computer and the web-app's corporation doesn't include your personal information, like for instance your 1Password database, or you Passwords file, or your web browsing history, or whatever?
Go ahead and download the most recent version of Google Earth, then download Little Snitch. Just for one day, count how many times Google Earth calls home -- that is, calls out out over the web back to the home company to do GOD KNOWS WHAT (plus the HUNDREDS of other companies' that now call out to Google Analytics to keep track of their apps' updates). Also, keep track of HOW LONG each one of those calls home lasts. It is SCARY. GOOGLE EARTH ALONE CALLS HOME TWELVE TIMES EVERY DAY, and each call last around 22 seconds! Do you know how much information an application can transmit over a broadband connection in 22 seconds, especially if it had all day to look for whatever it is looking for and organize that info into a packet for rapid transmission during a 22-second broadband connection? What computer software could possibly have a need to call home 12 times a day, and what the hell are those apps telling the home company?
And now Mozilla Prism wants to create an independent platform for an unknown number of companies to create applications to do things like word processing, spreadsheet creating and management, and whatever else? That means that without a web browser as the underlying system, THERE WOULD BE NO SYSTEM MONITORING CALLS OVER THE INTERNET FROM YOUR COMPUTER BACK TO THE CORPORATION THAT CREATED THAT APP! Is that what you want -- LESS MONITORING OF CALLS HOME?
Technically, FORMICA is very correct. Or put another way - there is far too much unannounced OUTGOING communications between YOUR computer and points unknown.
Interesting rant. Starts out with one premise (any software from the web), moves to another while giving a solution (network monitoring such as Little Snitch which allows you to monitor and block ANY outbound connection), then goes on to erroneously say this program is only for other companies to make programs with. Besides the bad example of Microsoft Office (which is moving entirely online for storage and, therefore, a "software from the web"), am I the only one that sees the irony in a person ranting about the privacy evils of web-based programs on a web site using a web browser?
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
Watch Lists are available to MacUpdate Desktop Members Upgrade Now
Download and auto-install
using MacUpdate Desktop. Save
time moving folders and cleaning-up.
Prism is designed to create a better environment for running your favorite web-based applications. Much of what we used to accomplish using an application running locally on our computers is moving into the web browser. Thanks to advances in web technology, these apps are increasingly powerful and usable. As a result, applications like Gmail, Facebook and Google Docs are soaring in popularity.
Unfortunately the web browser, which was originally designed for reading documents, is not an ideal environment for running applications. It is frustrating and time-consuming to wade through a mass of browser windows and tabs just to find your email client. Unstable applications can slow down or crash your entire browser. And many of the conveniences offered by modern operating systems are unavailable to web apps running in the browser.
The Best of Both Worlds
This is where Prism comes in. Instead of running all your web apps in the browser, Prism lets you run them in their own window just like normal applications. A single faulty app or web page can no longer take down everything you are working on. In the future, we will be releasing web app bundles from the Prism developer community that let you customize your application to use many of the operating system features common to a desktop application.
Prism is based on the same world-class browsing engine as Firefox to ensure maximum compatibility with the entire range of applications available on the web, today and in the future.
-2
-39
iLeopard reviewed on 22 Sep 2011
dda
+1
+544
http://salsitasoft.com/blog/2011/02/09/prism-is-now-webrunner/
http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2011/02/prism-is-now-chromeless/
+8
I just re-visited Prism recently and, although customizations are not as easily/readily configured as with Fluid, it's still an excellent alternative, albeit Intel only.
What brought me back to it was my need to print out Avery labels - I don't have MS Word or any other of the commercial apps Avery puts out templates for and the .doc templates are some what cumbersome to use in OOo. OOo's built-in templates - at least for a few of the label types I've tried - have not printed out positioned correctly. Whether this is operator error (mine) or something else, I am not sure.
Avery has a pretty good web-based system to create perfect labels but every time you want to use it asks for a log in or your email address...
But if you set up Prism with this URL:
http://enu.print.avery.com/SelectSku
you can bypass all that nonsense and get straight to making to your labels.
The screen at that URL asks the user to enter/select the SKU number for the product you wish to use a template for and you're off to the races.
It's great to be able to get to what you need right away with just a double click of the mouse!
You create your labels - there's options for mail merge, inserting/resizing images, and of course your own personalized text (although fonts are limited to what Avery offers in the interface) - and it prints out to a PDF.
So far it's printed perfectly aligned, great looking labels every time.
(The technology Avery uses for this is Flash so if you are Flash-averse, there's the heads up.)
-14
-206
Mactechhead reviewed on 15 Jul 2010
Hand over all your privacy to faceless corporations and give them total control over what you can and cannot do.
Big brother is waiting for you suckers!
Submit now!
+3
+46
Also, the only 1984 we could actually "Welcome ... again" would be the year when "Do They Know It's Christmas" was released which isn't really as terrifying as the fictional era of oppression that you are presumably referring to and which never actually happened.
My point is you're ranting and not really helping other users of Macupdate.
-6
-206
No thank you.
+3
+46
It is a just a tool and your crusading against it is like crusading against telephones because "faceless corporations" could have control over what you've said.
+2
To those who support the concept of web-based software, I ask this: Have you already forgotten the mountains of evidence suggesting we kill this development before it gets off the ground (and into the cloud)? What about the thousands of recent examples of corporations misusing and profiting off our personal information without our approval and often without our knowledge?
What about the US government officials from the Social Security Administration who sold the personal info of nearly 4 million Americans last year -- mostly to corporations?! If our banks and government agencies can't be trusted with our personal information, can the employees of your future web-based software companies?
I had my identity stolen for the second time 3 months ago, and I was responsible for the first $50 charged fraudulently to each of 7 different credit cards (including the ones started up by those criminals)! I had to spend 6 days on the phone convincing the big American credit rating agencies to block issuance of any new credit in my name for the next year, and with my current credit companies convincing them that I really am me, so they shouldn't cancel my current cards! And it's not over yet. But more importantly, how do you think those criminals got my personal info in the first place -- and that of the 27,400 other Americans involved in just this one case? By hacking a BANK! Now consider that banks use much, much stronger security protocols than other companies, including the ones that will host your online apps.
There are NO security standards, NO best-practices regulations, and NO effective enforcement mechanisms in place to guarantee the safety of your personal info. What's worse, the unqualified success of corporate lobbyists at watering down all the legislation that Congress recently passed to protect us from another economic crisis like this one proves that there never will be such protections from government.
Take it from someone who spent 8 years running the Clinton White House's legislative initiatives on social policy: Government is not a proactive entity, it only REACTS to pressures generated by society, and always in the most milquetoast, mealymouthed and ineffective ways. Politicians will never protect us from business interests as long as those same business interests are the sole financiers of their political campaigns.
If you're not yet critical of the fundamental logic of web-based apps and you think FORMICA's rant (below) went too far (especially those geniuses CORNSTALK and HERMIT, who don't even seem to have read it before launching into mini-rants of their own), I propose that you try what FORMICA did. Download and test NetBarrier or Little Snitch so you can intercept your software's calls out to the Internet and decide whether to allow or block them. Then download a new and interesting little music app called Instinctiv (http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/33909/instinctiv). When Little Snitch intercepts Instinctiv's callouts, write down the addresses and, if possible, the countries of all Instinctiv's callouts to the dozens of companies and other entities all over the world -- though many are impossible to identify or even locate. I bet you'll get tired and give up way before you get to callout number 50 in just the first 10 minutes (that's when I quit)! If you like, do it again with the software of a company you really trust. Then, let us know if you still trust software companies to ensure the safety of your personal and financial information stored on a net-apps client computer with unencumbered access to the Internet.
Oh, and while you're at it, read a newspaper occasionally.
-1
+36
VRH reviewed on 25 May 2009
-10
+107
Go ahead and download the most recent version of Google Earth, then download Little Snitch. Just for one day, count how many times Google Earth calls home -- that is, calls out out over the web back to the home company to do GOD KNOWS WHAT (plus the HUNDREDS of other companies' that now call out to Google Analytics to keep track of their apps' updates). Also, keep track of HOW LONG each one of those calls home lasts. It is SCARY. GOOGLE EARTH ALONE CALLS HOME TWELVE TIMES EVERY DAY, and each call last around 22 seconds! Do you know how much information an application can transmit over a broadband connection in 22 seconds, especially if it had all day to look for whatever it is looking for and organize that info into a packet for rapid transmission during a 22-second broadband connection? What computer software could possibly have a need to call home 12 times a day, and what the hell are those apps telling the home company?
And now Mozilla Prism wants to create an independent platform for an unknown number of companies to create applications to do things like word processing, spreadsheet creating and management, and whatever else? That means that without a web browser as the underlying system, THERE WOULD BE NO SYSTEM MONITORING CALLS OVER THE INTERNET FROM YOUR COMPUTER BACK TO THE CORPORATION THAT CREATED THAT APP! Is that what you want -- LESS MONITORING OF CALLS HOME?
+2
+8
+6
+93
That's a fact.
+3
+5
-4
-206
I wouldn't trust web based apps ever. You would have to be a complete idiot to think there was any good to come from this.
A waste of bandwidth and a waste of time.
Welcome to 1984 again lemmings.
+3
+30
- Can run multiple web applications
- Web applications created are stand alone and very light
-1
-1