The description is misleading. It still does not support encrypting a Mac boot volume.
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=sys-encryption-supported-os
This page lists various versions of Windows only.
When a software vendor can't get the basics of what their software can and can't do, be very wary about using it. Doubly so if the software in question has anything to do with security.
How do you know that the "vendor" is the one that created or updates this entry? There's tons of faulty information on MacUpdate, partly due to the fact that the "vendor" is often not the entity creating or maintaining the entry in the first place. This is particularly true of cross-platform applications, where generic descriptions don't get tailored to the limitations of the OS X version.
Ha! You want references?? If you are worried about that sort of stuff then you definitely shouldn't be using this app. Do you have any idea who actually created it? There are so many unknowns about TC it is ridiculous.
If anyone is interested, I wrote a short tutorial on how to mount truecrypt volumes on startup here: http://www.myiphoneadventure.com/os-x/truecrypt-automator-automatically-mounted-encrypted-drives-in-os-x
It's pretty easy to do with automator and makes truecrypt a little less unwieldy.
Truecrypt through and including 7.0 does not support Snow Leopard in 64-bit mode. This is in part because it relies on MacFuse, which is not 64-bit. This is documented here:
Also, while it touts whole-system encryption in the announcement here ("allows the encryption of the entire boot volume"), this is not supported for Mac, as documented here:
It is a shame that this is what Mac users are stuck with. The entire experience is quite un-Mac-like. It is not possible to open a TC container file by double-clicking, instead we must first launch the app and then select a container file from within the app itself - the app must then remain open the entire time that a volume is mounted.
The Mac version also treats Mac users as second class citizens with no support for sparse containers or system encryption - what happens if we need to mount a sparsecontainer which was created on WIndows?? The TC support forum is full of posts by users having difficulty using TC between Win and Mac - support is almost non-existent-not to mention that if you want to use the forum you must register with an ISP provided e-mail (yahoo, gmail, etc not accepted). The app also creates a copy of any mounted TC container in your /tmp folder - very odd and possibly insecure from an architectural standpoint. The encryption itself may be great, but the Mac execution is severely lacking in usability and functionality.
You need to run TrueCrypt on each machine that you want to mount the USB drive on. That is not so convenient, but bearable. I use my 15 GB TrueCrypt USB drive on Windoze, Mac and Linux machines and have not met with a single issue.
Truthfully, everything you have described is how it works on Windows as well. It's not like Mac users are getting short-changed some awesome interface from the Windows version.
In any case, Truecrypt uses its one encryption through and through. It is not intended to be a simple interface for the built-in encryption in OS X. For one thing, paranoia is a dominant aspect of Truecrypt's design. Using Mac OS encryption would rob the developers of control over the level of security provided. It would also break cross-platform compatibility.
In Preferences:Security, the first option is to dismount all volumes when TrueCrypt quits. It's on as a default. Unselect and you will not need to have TrueCrypt open all the time.
This is an excellent cross-platform solution to keeping things secure! I have no problems with this and it gives me different ways to encrypt volumes for various tasks eg. From storing my bank details to my plan to take over the world.
Wow, what you said is so ironic! That is how these elite bankers operate; bank details (usury management via interest rates and market manipulation) AND their plan to take over (control) the world.
DOM21, MODEST GINGER gave a real answer. The Serpent-Twofish-AES cascade was right, it just takes a longer time than the individual parts. Hence the bring a sleeping bag reference, It was helpful.
Just installed TrueCrypt and I find that, despite some quirks, it's great for my purpose: accidentally losing my flashdrive that contains confidential company information.
I sometimes have to bring home confidential stuff like financial documents, sometimes passwords in plaintext (i really should start using KeePassX for that), etc. Now I encrypt my entire flashdrive. This way, if I drop it or lose it or get mugged, any confidential information I have on me is protected. Whoever gets my flashdrive can have it.
It's great too that it's cross platform, although the compile on CentOS 5.2 was a bit of a hassle (not enough clear documentation on this yet). But at least I can use my encrypted flashdrive on Linux, Windows, and, last but not least, my Mac. DMGs are great but obviously out of the question when you're working on multiple platforms like me. TrueCrypt is the solution for me.
I'm having several issues under Snow Leopard. Trouble with mounting the device, trouble when backing up on the device. Get system crashes -> have to force shut down...
Please fix this. This would be essential.
Ok, i had this problem too. But if you open using Rosetta (right click application, then get info, then tick "open using Rosetta" under the general tab.) it should work.
I had the MacFUSE beta 2.1.5 installed. When I uninstalled it, installation of TrueCrypt 6.3 went fine. However TrueCrypt seems to have reinstalled it. Which isn't s problem since now, the installation is ok.
Leopard, PPC. I have installed MacFUSE with additional filesystems and this works ok.
TrueCrypt creates a volume, but when trying to mount it I get an error message from hdiutil telling me there is no filesystem. Please, help
+1
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=sys-encryption-supported-os
This page lists various versions of Windows only.
When a software vendor can't get the basics of what their software can and can't do, be very wary about using it. Doubly so if the software in question has anything to do with security.
+2
+480
-3
-38
If so, I have little doubt that it is leaving fragments of plain text data scattered on the system volume.
+1
+18
-3
-38
+6
+4
It's pretty easy to do with automator and makes truecrypt a little less unwieldy.
+4
-1
+46
Thanks.
+3
+14
-13
-11
+6
+169
+1
+59
+5
+12
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/supported-operating-systems
Also, while it touts whole-system encryption in the announcement here ("allows the encryption of the entire boot volume"), this is not supported for Mac, as documented here:
http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/sys-encryption-supported-os
It does offer very strong encryption for a USB key, though.
+1
-38
Timmyb reviewed on 11 Feb 2010
The Mac version also treats Mac users as second class citizens with no support for sparse containers or system encryption - what happens if we need to mount a sparsecontainer which was created on WIndows?? The TC support forum is full of posts by users having difficulty using TC between Win and Mac - support is almost non-existent-not to mention that if you want to use the forum you must register with an ISP provided e-mail (yahoo, gmail, etc not accepted). The app also creates a copy of any mounted TC container in your /tmp folder - very odd and possibly insecure from an architectural standpoint. The encryption itself may be great, but the Mac execution is severely lacking in usability and functionality.
+1
+52
+2
+155
In any case, Truecrypt uses its one encryption through and through. It is not intended to be a simple interface for the built-in encryption in OS X. For one thing, paranoia is a dominant aspect of Truecrypt's design. Using Mac OS encryption would rob the developers of control over the level of security provided. It would also break cross-platform compatibility.
+2
+432
+1
+2
+3
+100
Thebluenowhere reviewed on 25 Oct 2009
+13
+5
-3
luminous reviewed on 01 Nov 2008
6.1 is much more faster!!
By the way, which is the most secure encryption?
+8
-70
+7
+14
-1
-33
+8
+100
+2
+35
follerec reviewed on 19 Oct 2008
I sometimes have to bring home confidential stuff like financial documents, sometimes passwords in plaintext (i really should start using KeePassX for that), etc. Now I encrypt my entire flashdrive. This way, if I drop it or lose it or get mugged, any confidential information I have on me is protected. Whoever gets my flashdrive can have it.
It's great too that it's cross platform, although the compile on CentOS 5.2 was a bit of a hassle (not enough clear documentation on this yet). But at least I can use my encrypted flashdrive on Linux, Windows, and, last but not least, my Mac. DMGs are great but obviously out of the question when you're working on multiple platforms like me. TrueCrypt is the solution for me.
+1
Please fix this. This would be essential.
Hope this works for you too :D
-295
-295
+5
TrueCrypt creates a volume, but when trying to mount it I get an error message from hdiutil telling me there is no filesystem. Please, help
-295
Monkeyjunkey rated on 08 Feb 2012
Godefroyr rated on 13 Nov 2011
+4
myiphoneadventure rated on 17 Oct 2011
Georgen rated on 27 Sep 2011
+4
Steadysignal rated on 22 Sep 2011
iappleman rated on 07 Sep 2011
-295
Monkeyjunkey rated on 02 Sep 2011
+3
Macmade rated on 23 Feb 2011
oattar rated on 30 Jan 2011