








(17)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:63,455 |
| Version Downloads:3,998 |
| Type:Business : Personal Info Managers |
| License:Updater |
| Date:20 Sep 2011 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $49.00 |
Overall (Version 4.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+104
Rubaiyat reviewed on 07 Feb 2012
Oh it doesn't! Couldn't be simpler!
Other than report on quarterly returns, do the people at FileMaker ever talk to the people at Apple?
+1
ScienceGuy reviewed on 30 Jan 2012
In general, you have limited to no ability to format the display of a field:
A number field has no way to check to see if the input is out of range:
No way to format the way a date displays.
No numeric formatting. Enter a number as 1E45 and have watching the nonsense that gets displayed.
+1
Date formats.
Color, shading, the name of the field on the display as opposed to the name of the field in the database.
URl field ask for a label, but are so dumb as not to allow "no label", so you have two labels, the field name and the url label. Dumb.
And it goes on and on.
I tried to build a very simple first time test datase of storing notes with a few simple fields. Yes, you can do it, but you have little choice on how looks or behaves.
This is a database system for people who don't want any choices but very simple ones. For anyone else, it's just not worth the money. Maybe if this was $10, the limitations would be worth it, but not at this price.
-1
-1
TomasA reviewed on 21 Jan 2012
After installation the program just doesn't do anything. It does not load any database, all submenus are greyed out and you can't even access the preferences.
No support and no guidance in their support forum either. But others seem to have similar problems according to the Forum.
I will NOT upgrade to the full version, since it seems I am to pay for a program that doesn't work.
A qualified piece of crap. Pity since I really liked v 3.
Can't give much more than lowest stars, since it is impossible to get to work. Version 3 however would have received much more.
+1
+59
+93
+7
+31
-1
+21
+59
+222
+177
+15
-1
+222
+222
+3
+93
-2
+222
+93
Because I am still on PowerPC I haven't spent a lot of time with Lion's version of Spaces so admittedly I can't say necessarily that they got it complete right but I think we can agree that it is much better then SL that hardly worked at all. Just out of curiosity in what ways does Spaces need to be improved still? I would love the ability to name the spaces but I can't think of a whole lot more that needs to be changed.
John Siracusa did a great article in depth explanation why versions is a really big deal here:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/07/mac-os-x-10-7.ars/7#document-model
I especially like the sixth paragraph of the review. This is a massive improvement over the way in which we have been using the Mac for nearly 30 years.
+3
+2
+93
+2
+17
+6
+915
+3
+650
http://www.provue.com/panoramasheets/index.html
The full version of Panorama has a steep learning curve, but even with that version some things are quite easy to accomplish. Panorama Sheets should be easier to use.
+17
+32
+1
+915
+1
+32
In the future, if I have a choice between purchasing an app from the developer or the App store, I will buy directly from the developer. App store concept sounds great...and as with the iTunes store, the practical side of it just plains sucks.
+5
Malista reviewed on 31 Mar 2011
+1
+4
+11
+322
+406
Count me as someone who's not going to whine about not being able to run Leopard/Intel-only software on my PPC systems. It's not like the software I'm currently satisfied using has suddenly stopped working!
+51
+51
Now here is a developer who is taking full and complete advantage of the latest Apple tech, and they're still getting shot down! Well, the fanboys need to be careful what they wish for sometimes. Making a developer use the latest Apple tools and toys sometimes that means it's impractical to make the product backwards-compatible or cross-platform. If you want an app to be more practical in the world, sometimes you have to give up some of Apple's proprietary features.
+10
Is this anything like any of the Devon-Think apps?
richardmannich rated on 30 Jan 2012
Mezzogori rated on 05 Dec 2011
Mtkato rated on 29 Nov 2011
+1
DaymonJ rated on 20 Sep 2011
Finge rated on 10 Aug 2011
czhu rated on 22 Mar 2011
+2
Kgx rated on 17 Mar 2011
+10
scottwild.co rated on 16 Mar 2011
Msadeghi rated on 16 Mar 2011
Egustavo rated on 25 Jan 2011