








(5)
Your rating: Now say why...
Known Issues:
Known Issues:





(5)


| Downloads:22,868 |
| Version Downloads:1,665 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Audio |
| License:Shareware |
| Date:21 Dec 2011 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $69.00 |
Overall (Version 1.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+260
+1
+2
Achim2 reviewed on 01 Mar 2012
No more PPC/Tiger anymore?
-1
-1443
+1
-6
Foulger reviewed on 03 Apr 2010
+1
+13
Thank you for the feedback! You can currently sort your recordings by clicking on the column headers. The library is being rewritten for WireTap Studio 2.0 and will have a lot of great improvements in that next version. If you would like to be notified of future releases, you can join our mailing list at . Hope this helps :)
+130
Is it a single computer or a single user license?
P.S. Its main competitor, Audio Hijack Pro, offers a single user license which means you can install it on as many computers as you want as long as you are the only user.
There are some features in Wiretap Studio that are not in other products like Audio Hijack Pro. But if the license is too restrictive, it may not be worth it.
+29
+1
+6
Citizenvern reviewed on 20 Dec 2009
+2
+130
Wiretap Studio comes with an audio editor. So it is not fair to compare Wiretap Studio with Audio Hijack Pro since Audio Hijack Pro does not come with an audio editor.
In my view, it would be fairer to compare Wiretap Studio with the "Audio Hijack Pro and Fission" combination offered by Rogue Amoeba. And here is the cost comparison:
WireTap Studio -- $69
Audio Hijack Pro and Fission -- $50 (when bought together).
As for features, the features between WireTap Studio and the "Audio Hijack Pro and Fission" combo are nearly identical. But there are some differences.
Audio Hijack Pro and Fission support VST plugins. Wiretap does NOT appear to do so.
Wiretap Studio has this patent pending 'Live Preview" mode. Audio Hijack Pro and Fission do not.
And the UI's are different. It is a matter of personal preference which is better.
So if you try to compare apples with apples, I would say that that the Audio Hijack Pro and Fission combo is better value than Wiretap Studio. You will save almost $20.
+2
+107
My colleagues and I cannot believe the price of this app. even though Ambrosia is infamous for such pricing, but in this case they're made even more shameful and obvious by the lame justification they offered in the "What's New In This Version" section of their VersionTracker.com posting for Wiretap Studio, which unbelievably reads as follows: "These updates prepare our core Ambrosia productivity tools for the upcoming Mac OS X 10.5.7, as well as improve compatibility with Apple's latest hardware." Does any Mac developer ever release a new version of their software for that first BS reason? And do they ever release updates to fix a hardware incompatibility that NO ONE has complained about on any software review website since their last version was released? Clearly they just wanted to stop the bleeding that the recent release of Jack OS X and other FREE audio editors/recorders inflicted on their market share, and given their dishonorable past business practices, they had no compunction against releasing another pointless update and frivolously marketing WTS on those very same software review websites (which, as you'll see below, are key to their contemptible business plan). Gosh, Ambrosia didn't even claim to fix some of the previous version's bugs, or add one or two new capabilities to this latest version because they're waiting to do that in a future release without their potential customers constantly being reminded that there's new versions available for several FREE apps that do the very same things that WTS charges $69 for! Couldn't Ambrosia hide their unscrupulousness any better than that?
If you investigate the past of all FOUR VERSIONS of WireTap XXXXX, you'll discover that Ambrosia has a long history of greedy upgrade policies that piss off their existing customers, but that's how they keep adding new customers every year. And just to preempt the character assassination that I expect from Ambrosia after I write this expose, let me first explain that I have never met and I am in no way related to the makers of ANY of the apps mentioned here (other than my use of Jack instead of WireTap Anywhere because it's a great and FREE program), and I am NOT some disgruntled former Ambrosia employee or customer -- I have never bought any of their software because I caught on to their scummy software renaming scheme (explained in a minute) a couple of years ago when I first compared WireTap Pro against Jack and another great audio-input app called Audio Hijack (which charges $16 and $32 for the two versions of their WireTap competitor app).
You see, TODAY AMBROSIA SELLS THIS AUDIO RECORDING APP CALLED WireTap Studio, AND AN AUDIO-INPUT APP CALLED WireTap Anywhere, WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY CALLED WireTap Pro, WHICH ONLY SHORTLY BEFORE WAS CALLED SIMPLY WireTap! To help you fully understand Ambrosia's distracting, dishonest and entirely shameful marketing strategy, just surf over to MacUpdate.com (a company that does not cozy up to the software industry as shamefully as VersionTracker) and look at Ambrosia's posting about its WireTap Studio app (which has customer reviews and other types of feedback going back only to 2007, and which, to be honest, was an outstanding audio recording app -- not an audio-INPUT app like WTA -- when I tested it in 2008). Then check out Ambrosia's MacUpdate posting for WireTap Anywhere, the quality of which I cannot conscionably review here because when it was "originally released" (which really means RENAMED) in 2007, I refused to fully test it because of the unethical marketplace behavior that I describe here, and because I could afford to ignore WTA because of the availability of a truly outstanding and FREE alternative in the form of Jack OS X. When you look at WireTap Anywhere's MacUpdate posting you'll see that THE FEEDBACK GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO 2003 -- 4 years before Ambrosia's own website claims that WireTap Anywhere was first released. This is because WireTap Anywhere was not really a new product in 1997 but was just a RENAMED VERSION OF WireTap Pro, WHICH IN TURN WAS JUST A RENAMED VERSION OF WireTap. Part of Ambrosi's strategy has been that very time they changed the name of their main app Ambrosia used that new name to claim that it was "really a whole new version that was completely rewritten and has a totally new set of capabilities!" In this way they repeatedly justified CHARGING ALL THEIR OLDER (and therefore more professionally settled/rich) CUSTOMERS A SECOND SHAREWARE FEE (if the customer wanted to obtain the newest version), and it gave the company a NEW OPPORTUNITY TO MARKET THEIR "NEW" MAIN APP, and it gave them a new opportunity and (specious) justification to DUPE THE SOFTWARE UPDATE WEBSITES LIKE MacUpdate.com (which first fell for it, then didn't fall for it) AND VersionTracker.com (which originally and to this day turns a blind eye to it) INTO LETTING THEM START OVER WITH A CLEAN HISTORY OF USER FEEDBACK IN ORDER TO ERASE ALL THE OLD NEGATIVE FEEDBACK, AND TO HELP THEM GIVE POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS THE IMPRESSION THAT IT REALLY IS A NEW AND DIFFERENT APP (when all the old users but none of the new users know that, in fact, it is the same old app but with perhaps one more new capability, or maybe even just a different method of graphically organizing it). Non-critics of such disgusting business practices (like probably Ambrosia) call this "cross-grade" marketing, which is the production of several versions of one type of app that all have overlapping capabilities in order to justify a constant though confusing product upgrade cycle which enables the company to force some customers to pay repeatedly while still attracting a bevy of new customers every year. A lot of scumbag companies use this marketing "philosophy," though I'll let you decide which ones they are. Of course, for this to work, the company's apps have to be of sufficiently higher quality than their competition's apps or customers wouldn't put up with that sh!t and your company would slowly whither and die.
So, now you know.
+8
+47
+2
+2
I had WT Pro which I used almost daily. It was a neat little app although a tad pricey for what it did, but I bought it and used the heck out of it.
Then I reinstalled my OS to unjunk my iMac, I go to Ambrosia to see about getting WTP back and now it's 'Studio' and the price has gone to almost SEVENTY dollars!
I can't go back to 'Pro' it's gone and forgotten, so now I'm just left with a bad taste in my mouth. So much for Ambrosia. I don't care how good they think their stuff is, they're just plain greedy.
-1
You can still find WireTap Pro here:
http://ambrosia.cachefly.net/wiretap/essentials/WireTapPro.dmg
We recently updated it for the last time, but have not tested it against the 10.5.7 update to OS X.
Comparing WireTap Studio to WireTap Pro:
WireTap Studio is a full-fledged audio solution - it can record from a discrete application (WireTap Pro could only capture Mac audio generally) and an editor, as well as containing a nifty way to transfer audio to different places - email, servers, external devices, or even your iPhone. WireTap Pro has none of these features.
To be more specific with that first feature - when you click "Record" in WireTap Pro, we capture *every* sound coming through your Mac. So if you're recording an interview over Skype and your microphone, and new email arrives or someone IMs you, the sounds produced by those events will be right there in your recording.
WireTap Studio, on the other hand, will let you target a specific microphone and a specific application, letting you record with certainty that you'll only get what you want, and that's even BEFORE you use LivePreview, and the lossless editing we put in there.
+6
+2
I just need a quick and simple way to capture audio, I don't need a whole studio, and I dare say a large proportion of your potential customers don't either.
You may have thought it was very clever to replace (instead of add to) WTPro with a higher cost product with more features but you've just pushed a whole level of business away.
+1
+13
Ordinarily this wouldn't be much of an issue, as you would set something to "Tap" and let it record. If the levels don't coincide with the actual audio coming out of the speakers it's no big deal right? (Sarcasm)
Well I use, or rather would like to use, WireTap Studio to capture audio from my Police Scanner. Watching the level bar fluctuate and than waiting for actual audio to come out from the speakers is annoying. Sound Studio and Audio Hijack Pro both correctly function in this regard and for the life of me I can't figure out why the "Tool" meant for this job has a delay. I've run all three applications at the same time and the other two correctly output in line with the scanner's output.
This really bothers me because I prefer WireTap Studio to the afore mentioned applications. It drives me nuts when I switch cities on my scanner and I have to wait a few seconds to hear the tone associated with the switch.
I have a 2.8Ghz MacBook Pro with 4GB of Memory running 10.6.2 on a very fast SSD, there is no good reason for this to happen on my machine. Especially in light of the fact that every other tool I tried doesn't have this issue.
I'm tired of using audio editors or one of your direct competitors applications (ugly & clunky in comparison to WireTap) to listen/capture from my scanner, please Ambrosia fix your application!
+1
We offer video turtorials on both products on the Ambrosia Website. Also, both products have a trial period so you can try them both and learn the difference with a more hands on approach.
+1
JDar0 rated on 26 Jan 2012