








(17)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:39,505 |
| Version Downloads:826 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Image Editing |
| License:Demo |
| Date:01 May 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $49.99 |
Overall (Version 3.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-2
+3
+3
+19
+1
+15
freiheit reviewed on 03 Dec 2011
+8
+51
lemon-kun reviewed on 16 Nov 2011
I think it depends how you use the app. For me, Pixelmator is great because I usually work on a 13" screen, so I don't have much screen estate. With Acorn, I am less flexible because of the big main tool palette, and every time I want to use a filter, another Window pops up showing me a preview of the effect, so I can't see the picture behind it (which changes in real time too). However, I have tried Acorn on an iMac, and wow, that is so cool.
The other special thing about Acorn is the very clean, tidy interface where all the tools are like in one toolbox, everything on its place. Some like that, some don't. I'm more of a chaotic guy when it comes to creativity, so I prefer the sometimes messy, cluttered but fluid interface of Pixelmator, but I have friends who like Acorns interface better.
Same with the effects. Unlike Pixelmator, Acorn has layer effects, so you can tweak the effects during your work, and adjust them at any time, non-destructive. There is also the nice (above mentioned) filter window, where you can combine as many filters as you like until you decide how you want it. You can also save that as layer styles. Cool stuff, but depends what kind of guy you are; for me, that ends in a never ending series of tweaking so I never settle on a solution – for me, the limited functionality in Pixelmator is better suited, where I have to decide for a filter and boom! it's there and I can't really change it later. I also like to merge layers and forget about it. This way I put more effort in working precisely, taking decisions.
Well, everyone is different, and there is lots of great functionality in Acorn. Don't believe those "Pixelmator is much better"-comments, that is non-sense. Before you decide for one or the other app, give both a fair chance, do some work with those, so you can find what app covers your workflow the best, what features you really need.
Sorry, it's a long review, but one more thing I have to mention: the developer is very, very responsive, and really nice and understanding, it's like a dream. If you have a good feature request, it will be heard and implemented as soon as possible. You won't see that with Pixelmator (which has albeit the larger community, more tutorials and stuff).
Anyway, have fun testing those apps!
+3
+449
I also liked this relatively recent review at Ars Technica:
The seed of something great: Acorn 3.1 reviewed
http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2011/10/the-seed-of-something-great-ars-reviews-acorn-31.ars
+1
+51
Also check out this blog, some very interesting stuff about Acorn, Pixelmator and Photoline:
http://loewald.com/blog/?tag=pixelmator
+449
+51
+2
+80
MacUpdate-Warren reviewed on 04 Nov 2011
-3
-33
+5
+192
Now I know a good portion of today's graphics are going to be portrayed and consumed on the internet, an RGB mode, but still a great bit of 4-color items are created everyday, including photo prints on the home inkjet printer.
Why is it such an obstacle for these programs to incorporate the CMYK mode?
+8
+19
-gus
+2
+74
+2
+82
+1
+129
It is sad to see such ignorance now widespread. We are really dumbing down everything because the vast majority of users just simply can't tell the difference.
-4
So RGB only is not a reason to knock this app.
+1
+192
In dealing with 30-40 packaging print vendors all over the world, I can tell you it is critical to get your CMYK values properly set. I'm not about to send RGB files that are not properly SWOP adjusted or using color mgt profiles for printer setups...the consequence would be variant packaging tones which is unacceptable.
+32
Gannet reviewed on 01 Jun 2011
• Layer styles are now scaled when you resize your image.
Thank you! :-)
I'm still finding the layer styles a little difficult to work with. I think if there was an easier way to enable/disable the layer style (maybe add more buttons to the bottom of the palette) and to delete an effect from the styles window (say, with the delete key or maybe cmd+delete) then it would be a great improvement.
+18
Filipp reviewed on 06 May 2011
+5
+11
BearTracks reviewed on 12 Apr 2011
Only suggestion I wish for would be the option to resize a selection, but I'm sure that can come in an update.
+2
+32
+75
+1
+32
+449
My impression after brief Acorn usage during the trial period:
The interface makes it easier for me (novice) to discover/use features that I've struggled with or overlooked in other interfaces. Seems to have a more gentle, encouraging learning curve than others. It's the most capable graphics editor "for the rest of us" (excuse the Apple-ish cliché) I've used.
Comments for it on the Mac App Store are some of the most helpful I've read there compared with the all-too-common blabber.
-3
-13
Acorn is good so it is Pixelmator! I don't know how you use Acorn, or for what kind of but when you have to use brushes to paint Spacing at 1% doesn't work very well when comparing with Pixelmator, it stills showing spaces in the paint!
-4
-1
I have downloaded it and in the get info it is only Intel, and has a crossout on the icon.
I want PPC support, thats the only reason why i bought it.
+3
+43
http://flyingmeat.com/acorn/docs-2.0/old%20versions%20of%20acorn.html
+12
Could be that v. 2.3 requires a better graphics card than my laptop possesses (Late 2007 13" MacBook 2.2 Ghz. core 2 duo), but down-grading to v. 2.2.1 brings the program back to normal operation.
+2
+107
All I can say is that I have the same machine, and the poor old GMA X3100 seems to be holding up alright.
+2
+12
+3
+6
Please correct that indication.
+1
+64
I registered this application as a possible "lighter" alternative to photoshop elements for simple editing and layer work. The problem is that the program on my Dual Core 2.3GHz G5 is incapable of pasting a photo on to a layer and then resize it to fill the work area. Photoshop Elements has the Place function, which this lacks, and can do this task in under a minute of work. Acorn goes in to spinning beach ball mode and never comes out.
I really like the looks of this application and registered it based on a few simple tasks, but if it cannot handle a few layers I will need to post another review.
+58
Thomas1977 rated on 14 Apr 2012
Ricardo_griffith_2008 rated on 05 Dec 2011
+4
Wevah rated on 03 Dec 2011
+12
Multimago rated on 30 Nov 2011
+12
STV70 rated on 04 Jul 2011
+47
Snake-One rated on 20 Jun 2011
SlashP rated on 02 Jun 2011
Computerquatsch rated on 16 Apr 2011
Kroxx rated on 13 Apr 2011
+3
Rollingflo rated on 13 Apr 2011