








(5)
Your rating: Now say why...




| Downloads:12,504 |
| Version Downloads:259 |
| Type:Business : Personal Info Managers |
| License:Commercial |
| Date:16 Mar 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $9.99 |
Overall (Version 2.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+153
Virgeist reviewed on 01 Mar 2011
+94
+60
Whatever the case may be, allow me to suggest that you take the time to read the three-part series entitled "2012: New Age Deception and Psychobabble". It is a matter-of-fact, sane examination of the 2012 hype. You can read it -- for free -- at the following URL:
http://www.endtimeprophecy.net/Articles/2012bab1.html
ENJOY!
+153
regards
-1
+60
How do you differentiate between that which is truly "religious crap" and that which is non-religious crap. Or do you consider anything -- and all things -- which has to do with religion and spiritual things as being "crap"? As a lifelong Christian, while even I recognize that there is a lot of "crap" going on in modern religion -- Christian and otherwise -- there is also a lot of truth to be found as well, if one is a wise, diligent seeker of the same; although it won't be found in the 2012 Mayan long calendar nonsense. :)
+153
Since you asked, my position on religion is as follows. From where I stand as an outsider, I don't think we can honestly say that one religion is more legitimate an another, since all beliefs are based on the same amount of empirical evidence — that is to say, none at all. This is why I am perplexed when you label the Mayan calendar stuff as nonsense while you seem certain of the validity of your own beliefs. Ultimately, the only quantifiable difference between the major religions (once again, from my perspective as an agnostic) is time, social acceptance and the number of followers.
Despite this admittedly cynical view, I am not opposed to the idea of a god in itself. It's just that it seems very unlikely that a god would be anying like what is described in the holy texts of major religions. I don't rule out the deist concept of a god that is merely energy, or the Spinoza approach that consists in considering the whole universe as god itself.
That said, I believe that organised religion is very useful, as it gives hope to people who would otherwise wither and die. Not everyone can take the red pill and face reality happily, so to speak. Religion serves a useful purpose as a tool to encourage positive behaviour and as psychological support, so I believe it should maintain a place in our society (assuming scientific progress is not slowed or halted as a result).
Anyway, I don't really want to engage in a heated debate on the matter, as this would be a disservice to the Chac developer to drive potential users away with controversy.
+60
+10
neimen reviewed on 01 Mar 2011
Chacnmcmayafan reviewed on 01 Dec 2010
Thanks for getting back to me. I hope I will get another mac someday. Since it won't be for a long time I asked the above questions. I hope I did not offend you. thanks again for your feedback. Linda
Best Regards.
+147
+92
And 2nd, I was using the apple maya calender widget.
http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/information/mayacalendar.html
And a second calendar from the learning lab of mayanmajix:
http://www.xzone.com.au/tzolkin/getcalendar.php
And those both were showing me the same date today, Example, in both was 3 Etz'nab today.
And this Chac Calendar is the onlyone showing 9 Eb being the Day today....
I still haven't find which is right, but till now, is 2 softwares(apple widget and xzone) against 1 (chac)
If you find out anything about which one is right, please let me know by commenting back :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mesoamerican_Long_Count_calendar
Reading this will explain why their theories are never allowed in the wiki pages about the Maya calendar. The bottom line is that they are new age spiritualists who have made up bizarre incorrect theories about the calendar and their writings are dis information.
Chac agrees with the Dashboard widgit but has lot more information.
-1
+220
There are actually two of those shows about the "Mayan Doomsday Prophesy" on the History Channel. They probably have set a dubious record by condensing more disinformation into one show than any other TV show in the history of television.
These shows are entertainment, amusing fiction but not science.
-2
+42
Prove it! I want to see the end of the world. When it's done, I'll sit down and watch some more TV...
+39
+1
JCT reviewed on 09 Sep 2007
Runs fine on my Intel Mac Mini.
+19
musubana reviewed on 09 Sep 2007
But five stars for the historical value and the great fun! :-)