








(1)
Your rating: Now say why...
Resolved security issues
Splunk version 4.2.3 addresses two vulnerabilities:
For additional details, refer to this page in the Splunk Security Portal.
Resolved issueshomePath.maxDataSizeMB in indexes.conf will usually freeze more buckets than is correct. (SPL-40220)
$SPLUNK_HOME/share/splunk/search_mrsparkle/templates/view/ , which makes it very difficult or impossible to package templates with apps. (SPL-34615) (Starting in 4.2.3, an app renders templates out of SoftWrap module does not work with the ShowSource module
splunk clean eventdata or splunk clean all doesn't remove the fsck check token, which results in mislearing error messages on startup about needing recovery. (SPL-37472)
perc* and median functions for stats/chart/timechart are off by 1 rank. For any dataset larger than a few hundred values, the error is negliable or non-existent (because the value at rank N and at rank N+1 are very likely to be the same or very close to being the same) (SPL-40331).

+2
+40
+17
Lylehm reviewed on 06 Jul 2010
A couple of points here based on previous reviews:
- Every report and graph I've generated so far, I've done in Safari 4 through 5 with no problems at all. Even so, if Splunk is what you need, you'll use whatever browser works.
- Uninstall instructions were located by clicking the 'help' link at the upper right of the Splunk web interface. A search of the online docs produced this:
http://www.splunk.com/base/Documentation/4.1.3/Installation/InstallonMacOS#Uninstall_Splunk
Installation was very simple. Within minutes, the syslog data from my Firewall was streaming into the Splunk server. I wanted to use the default syslog port. Splunk's documentation provided the necessary extra steps to allow use of the lower port numbers (launch splunk with sudo).
Anyone with a database mindset can easily craft a report and quickly locate and graph the desired log data. The interface offers several clues along the way as you work - very intuitive.
Anyone can install Splunk for free and try it out. After a period of time, you lose some of the enterprise features and Splunk switches to the free version which you can use indefinitely.
Bottom line, if you have syslog data to manage, you should try Splunk. There's nothing to lose, and so very much to gain. There's even an excellent online community that doesn't exclude free version users.
-2
+38
Macmend reviewed on 27 Apr 2009
Python based by the look of it and really for the geek user. I have spent a long time demythologising IT, I hate geek style stuff, packed with geek speak and terminal stuff when a simple gui would do.
It only works in firefox
If only spiceworks worked on mac
+16
+1
+406
-7
-25
Safari sucks. There are no plugins for it and you have no control over it.
FireFox can do just about anything.
It's a plus that it doesn't work with Safari!
Maybe it will help new users that don't know any better to discover FireFox.
+6
+406
+1
-28
You know you can use both...right?
/Mikael
+28
+1
+20
-3
-28
Splunk's mac customers is probably less than %1. Look at what they do and there reference customers. How many of those do you think run Mac OS X server...I would say very very few....
/Mikael
+20
-1
+20
-2
-28
/Mikael
+20
-1
-28
The browser and the web apps is nothing but the "emperors new clothes" for an old block mode terminal. Only in the last couple years have AJAX technology spiced it up a bit but the principles are still the same. Text strings back and forth over a stateless transport protocol (http).
/Mikael
+20
-1
-28
Now, go get yourself a job....
/Mikael
+20
+3
+28
I think what you are missing is that if Splunk were written in a standards-compliant way, it would work with Safari. I don't know of any deficiencies of Safari that would keep it from working with the kind of behavior we are looking for from Splunk. As I mentioned, I tend to use a lot of different browsers, and I use the one that I think will work best for a particular purpose. I do tend to use FireFox for web development because of the plugins that expand capabilities in that regard, but Safari is a fine browser, and many people will feel that it is the only one they need. If Splunk will not run with Safari, it is a valid comment to say that it is therefore a non-starter. Splunk may run fine on Linux and Windows, and on the Mac with FireFox, but this is MacUpdate, and the Mac users here have a legitimate concern if it doesn't function with the default Mac browser - the one with which, presumably, they are downloading Splunk. Telling people that they are silly for their software choices is a uniquely unhelpful means of persuasion.
+1
+406
-3
-28
I didn't say anyone was silly because of what software they were using. Then I would be silly too since Safari is my default browser...did you READ my comment? I thought the line of arguments was silly...
Why Splunk doesn't work with Safari is probably because it's heavy usage of AJAX technology and frankly, there aren't enough demand. It's simple, no development org have unlimited resources so you prioritize and if there isn't a business case...why waste resources? If/when enough of Splunks customers complain and they lose deals...there will be Safari support, I'm sure.
/Mikael
+1
+35