








(15)
Your rating: Now say why...
Adds RAW image compatibility for the following cameras to Aperture 3 and iPhoto '11:







(16)


| Downloads:28,728 |
| Version Downloads:1,971 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Image Editing |
| License:Updater |
| Date:10 Nov 2011 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 3.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+26
Zaph reviewed on 10 Nov 2011
+202
However, you do have less expensive options than Aperture, Photoshop and Lightroom. IPhoto is, more or less, affordable (under $100). So is Photoshop Elements. Both do a decent job for the less demanding shutterbug.
-5
-4
+1
+202
For instance, Camera RAW 6.x is not compatible with Lightroom 2 or Photoshop CS 4. It only works with Lightroom 3 and Photoshop CS 5. Actually, Lightroom does not use the Adobe Camera RAW plugin. Camera RAW support is built into Lightroom - though it has a largely parallel feature set with Camera RAW; the two are developed in tandem.
Now that iLife has been broken up in the Mac App Store, iPhoto is an even better value; you can buy a standalone version for $14.99. Apple's Digital Camera RAW updates are free just as the Adobe Camera RAW updates are. And they have the same kind of version compatibility issues as Adobe Camera RAW.
-5
-4
+2
+202
I was not comparing iPhoto and Lightroom, merely suggesting iPhoto as a less expensive option for anyone who is a "less demanding shutterbug" - which probably includes most of the people who use less expensive or less capable digital cameras - or camera phones. Of course Lightroom is a superior application - but it's much more expensive, as well. I don't know why you are so down on iPhoto, but clearly, given you level of misunderstanding, you are not qualified to judge it.
-5
-4
There's plenty of apps that do lot more than iPhoto, take Google FREE Picasa for example, its faster, it can ever recognize RAW files that iPhoto CAN NOT!, and it has better features, yes it only misses the iPhoto eye candy.
+9
Mikofox reviewed on 16 Dec 2010
-3
+32
+5
+124
I have a DMX-FZ18K camera that for MANY Years was in the top Ten Best Selling Cameras at Amazon.com YET Apeture or iPhoto does NOT support it. Lightroom does and MANY Freeware RAW programs do. Come on Apple. Improve your RAW Camera Support.
+9
-1
+49
+13
Your analogy isn't really apt. A printer is a peripheral for a computer. For a photographer, the computer is the peripheral to the camera.
As a Nikon shooter, I would not complain if Canon lenses do not fit in my camera but I would certainly be po'd if a certain SD or CF card fit in a comparable Canon camera and not in my Nikon.
We buy these devices because we expect Apple to support them. This expectation came when they released Aperture and signaled the world "we are a major player in photography"
+326
Harristype reviewed on 16 Dec 2010
Runs great on my Intel iMac with Snow Leopard and my Nikon cameras.
-1
-1
Fracer reviewed on 11 Nov 2010
"Camera RAW Compatibility Update" requires Aperture3 and that’s intel-only.
+915
+3
+2
-7
-64
Steve Frawley reviewed on 03 Aug 2010
What a bunch of JERKS!
+326
-2
-64
At least they finally woke up.
+3
+205
+87
26cab40 reviewed on 02 Aug 2010
-3
+32
+4
+87
The fact they do not support Sigma is a failing, not a success.
Do you see ?
-5
+32
Excuse me, but you went to purchase a camera why didn't you investigate whether or not it is supported? when you purchase a printer - do you just randomly go out and purchase a printer and never checking compatibility? Stop complaining and start taking responsibility for your purchasing decisions - its up to you to make sure your hardware is compatible with Mac OS X and if the hardware vendor refuses to provide the specifications to Apple then it is hardly Apple's fault.
+5
+162
To answer the retarded question: Because Apple is not God.
+5
+162
+2
+289
And this didn't show up in my Software Update... nor did it want to "Update" once I D/Led it.
+2
+11
On my daughters Intel iMac it installs perfectly well.
I waited and waited for support for my Olympus E-620, only to have Apple pee in my coffee with the one update I can use. Apple works hard at pretending the G5 never existed or was last sold 4 years ago. Bah!
+41
When the second largest technology corporation in the country can't be bothered to provide driver updates, there is a serious problem.
-5
+5
+30
Josh C. rated on 16 Dec 2010
+56
Riseofchaos rated on 16 Dec 2010
+10
Canadianpj rated on 16 Dec 2010