








(7)
Your rating: Now say why...




(9)


| Downloads:12,577 |
| Version Downloads:130 |
| Type:Utilities : File Management |
| License:Shareware |
| Date:11 Feb 2012 |
| Platform:Intel |
| Price: $19.00 |
Overall (Version 3.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
-2
-115
Afcgbbob reviewed on 19 Oct 2011
+1
+20
+1
+53
And you claim to be a professional writer?!?!
DUDE! WTF!
-2
-115
-3
-115
+62
Thanks
-1
-115
+2
Doctordee reviewed on 14 Jan 2011
There's no check in the app, and no upgrade link on their website. I have a registered copy of v3.3.3, it's now at 3.3.9. I downloaded it and it says UnRegistered, with no way to enter my registration details. Seems my only option is to buy again at full price.
I'm damned if I want to pay the full price for a point.point release. TBH, I don't really want to pay anything extra for bug fixes and compatibility updates.
as always all upgrades are free and as always upgrades are downloaded from the same location you received in your registration email. Thank you
+1
-2
-115
Afcgbbob reviewed on 09 Nov 2010
Boo2 reviewed on 23 Oct 2010
I would only like them to add perhaps a video encoding converter to the existing features, but that's another story.
-1
+76
Gregm reviewed on 22 Oct 2010
Crashes on launch.
I downloaded it from MUD and again from the developers website. Same result.
Also, the website "links" for support are not links (tried Safari, Firefox and iCab)
+76
It appears my "links" remarks still stand --- which leaves me wondering about how Boo2 contacted the developer.
+8
Hi Guys, I used to be a professional reviewer for Mac Utilities and entertainment software and I found what some might might consider minor while other who have used Macs since the 128k Mac would consider a large gap. What you put together is a very well thought out program but, based on your conversion choices for text files indicates to me a certain lack of knowledge of Mac Word Processors. As I said I was writing articles from 1985 to about 2003 for many online and Print magazines and with the on set of OS X my older articles are impossible to open because they are in MacWrite Pro format. Back in OS 9 and 8.6 there was a program that basically did what your does and it did a fantastic job at it, I even used it while we could access classic mode. Your program comes close in the text area but sadly misses the mark. What I need is some thing that can convert MacWrite and MacWrite Pro docs into readable text. The last program to do that was Clarisworks 4.0 and maybe 5.0. I have gone to MacUpdate and VersionTracker and found what looked liked some possibilities but each failed. Yours has the foundation that just needs the right codex needed to do the job. To help you with this in my original email if you decide to pursue this improvement that will make many seasoned mac users applaud. So I hope all this does not fall on deaf ears but instead gives you a challenge to make the Swiss Army Knife we had before OS X. It is killing me that I cannot remember its name. I just wish I could afford to pay for it but I have been out of work for a very long time and bills have to come first over everything else. Please see if you can do the codex so I can get back my original articles that I wrote back in the 80s and early 90s. End of Line...
Good Luck
Robert Lewis
+5
+8
As a beta tester (yes I did plenty of that too). The initial code you wrote is good but not perfect. Text mode is readable but sloppy with a lot of unreadable misc. characters that require some great work to delete and do other formatting to get the doc back to near normal. Some of the original text is out of place and has been some how has been moved around. Why, I am not sure. The main body of the text is coherent and really does not need much adjustment.
Rich Text Format does a better job at the conversion. First there seems to be less unreadable misc. characters and more of the text is more in order but still not perfect. There is still parts is the doc that has been moved again but not as much. I applaud you for what you got done on you first attempt. I really did not expect to see the codex as it is in such a short time. I am also surprise you did not indicate this in the what's new area up top. I may not be a programmer, but, I do know a 5 star winner and awards this program will be getting if you continue to add codex for material that could be open only in Classic mode. There are sound file that fall under this problem as well. To help some more I am going to give you some more of my older articles and some sound files that I use to use on my Mac.
Like I said I was really floored when I dropped a close to over 20 year old file on it and it was able to recover almost all of my article. As I said it looked best in RTF but still needed a bit of time tweaking it to get what was close to its original look. I also suggested that it would be wild if they could get it to convert as a Word doc. Unlike many people who had their MacWrite stored on floppies I kept them on my first external 20 meg HD and they moved each time I evolved to my next Mac. I would love to put these gems together in a book that I would call the history of entertainment on theMac since I go back to 1984 to around 2005 (about the time of intel games only) When I was Contributing Editor and Writer for Inside MacGames I use to write a column called the Bottom Shelf where I reprinted my older articles. But I digress.
AC has a very bright future and is going in the write direction especially if they look into older program that people used but cannot be open in OS X. AC is on track to receive many accolades and awards if they keep going in this direction. End of Line
+19
Was that it? Something like Claris XTND?!?
+8
+19
When I set up an old G3 as a legacy device for earlier versions of MacOS, I'm going to have to track down a copy of that in my disc files.
-115
+2
+683
+6
The info above is incorrect.
+88
For all updates, please use the download link received in your email. Thank you
PS. couldn't find another way to post this message.
-326
please refer to the registration email for upgrades. As Usual all upgrades are always free, have been and will be.
-326
+3
Is the program able to distinguish between these two versions of Word? It would be a great boon to be able to convert all of my old 5.1 files to either the new format or RTF.
+25
Bleech_Jef rated on 29 Jan 2012
T1mm061 rated on 07 Jan 2012