








(2)
Your rating: Now say why...





(2)


| Downloads:8,754 |
| Version Downloads:5,223 |
| Type:Multimedia & Design : Video |
| License:Free |
| Date:03 Mar 2007 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price:Free |
Overall (Version 1.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+3
"/Library/Scripts/QuickTime Player"
then
2) Delete the following Receipt File:
"/Library/Receipts/QT Full Screen 1.2.1 Installer.pkg"
-2
Anonymous reviewed on 26 Aug 2005
Something that should have been a free feature of QT to start with imho.
Anonymous reviewed on 25 Aug 2005
Which brings me onto the next point. The developer has NOT ripped off anyone. His program is similar to 'QuikTime FS' because they're providing the same very simple service. his only crime then is doing something that's been done in a similar way before, so by that logic you should also be sending hate mail to the Windows Vista development team.
Maybe somebody else has copied some AppleScript code... ;-)
Chris (macparc.ch)
This is for all the brainless idiots who say this app is illegal.
Cheers,
Joe Weaver
QuikTime FS developer
Anonymous reviewed on 25 Aug 2005
Anonymous reviewed on 25 Aug 2005
Anonymous reviewed on 23 Aug 2005
You just abbreviated the first two words and elongated the last two and copied the program. The least you could have done was changed the name so it's not pretty much exactly like the other developers.
So i imagine the guy ignored the existence of the first.
And if he actually knew about it, what was his interest in copying it, as he gives it out for free ?
Plus the first is not (yet) compatible with Tiger.
I just wanted to underline that you should have asked a couple of questions to the develloper before accusing him of copying a program.
+322
This is evident because the parent post (original post) in this thread has the same IP address as that of a post in the QuikTime FS reviews which was made just after the accusational post.
http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/mac911/2005/08/fullscreen/index.php?lsrc=mac911blog