








(49)
Your rating: Now say why...



| Downloads:182,580 |
| Version Downloads:2,168 |
| Type:Utilities : Optimizers |
| License:Demo |
| Date:15 May 2012 |
| Platform:PPC / Intel |
| Price: $29.95 |
Overall (Version 2.x):![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Features:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ease of Use:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Value:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Stability:![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
+266
Nontroppo reviewed on 16 May 2012
Defragging has been rock solid and noticeably improves disk performance on my system partition (~6500 fragmented files). Not worth defragging too often but once every few months seems the right balance, especially if you work with files >20MB regularly...
-2
+1
Nedly reviewed on 16 May 2012
+1
+1
+1
-11
-28
Shk747 reviewed on 16 May 2012
NO i have enough from this sh..
+7
+123
-28
+3
+448
Coriolis Systems :: Report a Bug
https://secure.coriolis-systems.com/bugreport.php
+5
-2
You don't have to pay for this upgrade, just click on developers website, log in to your account and d'load it from there, just did it.
+214
+266
+96
Paid twice? As in version 1, then upgrade to Ver2? If so, there is no additional charge for this update. If you paid twice for the same version, then you need to contact the developer about combining your multiple customer records into 1 --- and arrange a refund.
+5
+721
Espiridion reviewed on 14 May 2012
I first reviewed it when I was using a G% PPC with 4 internal hard drives with multiple partitions each. Now I'm using it with a Mac Mini Server with 2 internal drives and 3 external ones. OS X 10.7.4
While trying to watch a video that I have on one of my external drives, the video would freeze and become jittery and unresponsive. I checked the drive's fragmentation and although it was low fragmentation was present. I ran iDefrag and immediately after finishing the defragmentation process the videos were watchable without any issues.
This has been the same experience I've had before, although usually I work with audio files.
The down side is that the full defragmentation process can take too long. This time it took over 30 hours. To be fair, IIRC the drive is 1 or 3 TB in size, and I was using the computer to work on other things while iDefrag was working.
+4
+73
You can select any (not opened, not blocked by system) file in the drag list and use the defrag file icon to defrag that files you want.
Then you get your most fragged file defragged within minutes, not hours. Of course some full defrag may be usefull to, but not as often you use manual file defrag - maybe 1 / year or 2 / year of full defrag are enough. But as always: The HD should have enough freespace , >= 20% or it will get defragged very fast again in usage.
+721
I do a full defrag of all my disks roughly 3 times a year.
+2
+2
Stonal199 reviewed on 06 Apr 2012
It took about nearly 3 hours. After that a popup-Window told me, the first new start would take a little bit longer, and it did. But now, after 3 new starts, the system seems to me ro be faster. Absolutely faster is the start of all my apps, unbelievably but true!
Great, thanks for it!!!
+3
+3
ratstack reviewed on 27 Mar 2012
+2
+12
Bucho reviewed on 19 Mar 2012
+12
+29
Mtin79 reviewed on 21 Dec 2011
-8
+26
Donmontalvo reviewed on 29 Oct 2011
That this can happen says a lot about the integrity (or lack of integrity) of the MacUpdate ranking system.
Is it the developer who is pulling up our profile in MacUpdate and hitting -1 on all our reviews? Is it a troll? Does it matter?
What matters is this placebo, snake oil "utility" is being exposed as a waste of money.
A fool and his or her money are soon parted.
Don
+2
+167
My rational guess is that your lame comments/reviews on this application gets voted down by actual happy users of the application, real people who, like me, has a need for this app, since harddisk drives actually DO GET FRAGMENTED, and OSX does not by itself defragment large files.
You fail understand that more space on your drive has nothing to do with this matter. You misinterpret the description, purpose and usefulness of the app. In my view, you are almost too dumb to exist.
-9
+26
"real people who, like me, has a need for this app"
Based on your grammar, I'm guessing you're from Ukraine (where this placebo application is developed).
I'm sure watching the pretty boxes moving around the screen can get quite addicting. Too bad the pretty boxes have little relevance to the physical layout of the data on the drive, or how your hard drive caches, reads and writes the data.
@Bumbleb wrote:
"more space on your drive has nothing to do with this matter"
I think Apple's KB article HT1375 addresses your perceived need quite effectively:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1375
@Bumbleb wrote:
"You obviously don' understand neither the purpose nor the workings of this application."
I really could care less what your application does or how it works. What's important is how Coriolis Systems is stealing from unsuspecting Mac users who fall for the hype.
So Bumbleb, while your personal insults only show you're growing frustrated, one can safely assume you're coming to terms with the fact that you wasted your money and are only starting to relize it, or that you are the vendor desperately trying to preserve the "need" for your utility. Much like a crack dealer has to ensure his customers continue to use his product.
Don Montalvo
+1
+1
There's criticizing an app, and there's absolutely trolling it to death. Seems to me like you're venting out all the day's frustration onto this one app. I'll take your advice, for the time being, though.
+1
+130
But the problem is this!! Many users fill up their hard disks. If you do this, fragmentation can be a REAL problem no matter what type of filesystem you use.
In this case, a third party defragger may really speed up your hard disks.
In http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1375, Apple stated:
"If your disks are almost full, and you often modify or create large files (such as editing video, but see the Tip below if you use iMovie and Mac OS X 10.3), there's a chance the disks could be fragmented. In this case, you might benefit from defragmentation, which can be performed with some third-party disk utilities. "
But in my view, the BEST way to defrag is to back up your hard disk, erase it and then restore the hard disk. This will ALWAYS provide the best results. Best of all it is FREE and often the FASTEST way to defrag.
+1
+1
+10
Best.
+53
-5
+26
-2
+53
-1
+24
-9
-28
direct update from beta does'nt work.
what goes on with this "company", is this userfriendly ?!
+8
+32
+1
+158
What I see is, someone who purchased iDefrag back in OS X Tiger can still run it (with all bug fixes) on Snow Leopard. That is something unheard of... Only Alsoft (makers of Disk Warrior) does a similar thing.
If you want pure 64bit application with improved algorithm and _additional, new features_, you pay $14. If you don't? Well, the "unfriendly" developer is decent enough to maintain 1.x version.
+3
+49
+2
+264
Because of this, I will no longer be using iDefrag. I'd rather have a fragmented disk and keep my old backups.
+264
+1
-328
-30
+37
You can find out what the maximum operating temperature for your drive is either by looking up the serial number (in Disk Utility or System Profiler) and sending it in to us, or by looking on the hard drive manufacturer's website.
Alternatively, and obviously at your own risk, you can disable the thermal monitoring feature in Preferences.
+33
+4
+158
Micromat clearly tells it in several places. You can't trust to a partition or a dedicated drive to run single software to run another advanced software.
We have a Beta version out that does and we hope to release it properly soon.
Abohren rated on 26 Feb 2012
Ron-Magness rated on 09 Jan 2012
+18
Endymion0000 rated on 15 Nov 2011
+1
Fr34ck rated on 30 Oct 2011
+53
NotUsed rated on 23 Oct 2011
Davidmc123 rated on 10 Sep 2011
+5
mam28 rated on 20 Jun 2011
no1cane rated on 18 Jun 2011
Eric Fabre rated on 28 Apr 2011
+3
Widber rated on 01 Apr 2011