Quicksilver is a light, fast and free Mac application that gives you the power to control your Mac with keystrokes alone.
Quicksilver allows you to find what you need quickly and easily, then act upon these objets as you see fit. All with your fingers on the keyboard. As an example, if you want to find an application hidden in the depths of your file system, simply activate Quicksilver with a keystroke, type a few letters of the application's name, then hit Return or Enter to launch it, or tab and type to find an action such as Quit, Trash, Email To..., Run at Login, Move
What's New
Version 65:
FIX: Honour 'jump to action' preference when grabbing objects using the 'Get Selection' service #643
FIX: Disable editing of tab names in Plugin Preference pane #644
QS is still much more powerful. Alfred is simple and does what most users need but it does not come close to the features QS offers to power users.
I use alfred, but still it can't "grab"/"send" files or text to alfred while QS and LB can. That is huge. Alfred can only work on one file, not multiple files, that is huge.
If your needs are simple, alfred is much nicer. If you need real power then go with QS.
Very complex preferences -- not for the average user to mess with. Didn't work after 1 day of use. Hot key would bring up window, but typing did absolutely nothing. Uninstalled after 1 day.
The developers have stated that a redesign of the preferences is coming soon. Be sure that the activation key doesn't conflict with another keyboard shortcut, such as those for Spotlight. Personally, I like CMD+Space for Quicksilver activation.
Spotlight, I hardly knew ye. Honestly, I'd disable Spotlight indexing entirely, but Mail.app searches depend on it! (I have everything but /Users excluded, actually...)
I use the terminal heavily, which probably helps as far as not needing Spotlight; I rarely use the Finder, preferring to use the terminal to move files and such for the most part. Combine that with Quicksilver, and hey, I can do almost everything from the keyboard! Yay!
I think my favorite feature (hard to pick, from the thousands...) is the use of triggers to run scripts. I have a few f-key cobos bound to launch various terminals/ssh sessions/etc through the magic of Quicksilver triggers.
For the average user, it's still a great launcher at the VERY least, and I'm guessing most users will get more than that out of it. Even on a pretty recent system with an SSD, I find results pop up faster and better with Quicksilver than with Spotlight... No, it doesn't index random documents as well as Spotlight does, but it's not meant to do that. The two co-exist just fine. :)
The one negative is that for various features, you do need a good bit of advanced configuration. But, hey, it does a ton of stuff even without any advanced config. I've had several friends who used to be primarily GUI-happy but now use Quicksilver at least to launch stuff...and there are far more advanced features than that available, even to the novice. The iTunes, Address Book, etc, plug-ins are all worthwhile.
Oh yeah, and it's free. For one of the very first things I install on any new Mac, I can't complain about that!
WOW!! This app is mind-blowing! It doesn’t replace the Finder, Spotlight, Address Book, etc, unlike some say. But it COMPLEMENTS them in a big way. I use Quicksilver in conjunction with dragging files to/from the Finder or other applications. A lot of people seem to be missing the drag/drop functionality in Quicksilver that makes it so handy among a hundred different other features that I discover more and more each day and it’s saving me minutes every day and hairs, too! Using the computer has never been this enjoyable, fast and easy. I’ve been downloading applications from MacUpdate for over 12 years and this is the first time I’ve created an account on her just to rate this app! That’s how good it is. Try it and I guarantee it’ll give you a bowel movement you can feel.
I have used this utility for years; even had purchased a copy of Launchbar, a fine application, but always have preferred QS. There's something about it's simplicity and functionality that makes it the choice for me. When I'm on another computer, it's the utility I miss the most, and even run it on this machine, my Lion Server. I highly recommend this to anyone using the Macintosh operating system. It's what I install first!
Great to see quicksilver finally being updated again. Easily the best launch utility ever and one of my top 5 favorite programs personally, maybe number one.
The options for this thing are limitless and I'm always finding new ways to use QS that I didn't even think were possible. Will make a donation as an appreciation for the service.
hmmm… when I untar version 58 I get an app with the "no" symbol over the icon and a message saying its not supported on this architecture when I try to run it. "This Architecture" is OS X 10.5.8 Intel.
I LOVE quicksilver and use it all the time - it has changed the way I use my computer (for the better, no question) but this version just will not work for me.
Up until recently I had been a very happy Quicksilver user. But, after updating to this latest version everything is borked. Quicksilver will no longer run for more than two seconds straight without crashing. I've deleted all the associated files and tried reinstalling to no avail. I tried going back to the old ß54 I'm very disappointed, not at the developers but at how this situation is turning out for me. Quicksilver has become an indispensable part of my routine, and this has really slowed me down.
Indeed. On Snow Leopard, b57 is a true bitch compared to how it runs on Leopard: list window size not remembered through reboots, triggers not working, plug-ins such as the super-handy Calculator hanging the app...
I'm sticking to it anyway, because I'm just so used to the nice bigger previews of the Bezel UI that I get sick each and every time I try to give similar applications a try...
But it's "hurts", really.
I'd shell a reasonable amount of cash out to have Quicksilver, the kind of "application launchers (extensively speaking)", back to its past glory.
For some reason, this build is much slower for me than the last official build (B54). The old build, why it has the obvious issues related to Snow Leopard, is lightning fast, but the new build is slow. There is a very noticeable delay to pop the window up and when I'm typing - I have to type my query and then wait at least a second or two before the text shows up. Any ideas why I'm having this issue? I seem to be the only one; performance was supposed to be improved in this build.
No, you're not the only one. b57 *is* slower, and quirky, but on 10.5.8 b54 is truly 'quicksilver' again. One more reason for me to hold off from 10.6 for now.
Double-modifier shortcut to activate interface no longer works. You now must have QS in front for double-modifier to work. Is there something I am missing?
I have discover Quicksilver caused the window-only screenshot key combination not functioning. (Hold down Command-Shift-4, click the once, then click the mouse key to take the screenshot.)
When Quicksilver activated, it would let the combination keys selected the whole screen area, instead of the particular selected open window. Disable Quicksilver would correct the problem and let the window-only screenshot functioning again.
Ditto that maclover. My QS frequently ceases responding to the keystroke activator and lies dormant. Only quitting and relaunching gets it going again. Hoping this problem gets resolved.
Please login or create a new MacUpdate Member account to use this feature
Watch Lists are available to MacUpdate Desktop Members Upgrade Now
Download and auto-install
using MacUpdate Desktop. Save
time moving folders and cleaning-up.
Quicksilver is a light, fast and free Mac application that gives you the power to control your Mac with keystrokes alone.
Quicksilver allows you to find what you need quickly and easily, then act upon these objets as you see fit. All with your fingers on the keyboard. As an example, if you want to find an application hidden in the depths of your file system, simply activate Quicksilver with a keystroke, type a few letters of the application's name, then hit Return or Enter to launch it, or tab and type to find an action such as Quit, Trash, Email To..., Run at Login, Move To..., Get Info, Reveal, the list goes on.
Quicksilver indexes and parses only selected parts of the contents of your hard drive in the Catalog, which means it locates and displays the items matching your search quickly. Quicksilver has a modular structure which means features for interaction with a whole host of of other applications (iTunes, 1Password, Safari, Microsoft Office) can be done after installing the relevant plugin.
Versions compatible with older OSes are available at http://qsapp.com/download.php
-2
+93
+5
+369
I use alfred, but still it can't "grab"/"send" files or text to alfred while QS and LB can. That is huge. Alfred can only work on one file, not multiple files, that is huge.
If your needs are simple, alfred is much nicer. If you need real power then go with QS.
+4
+24
+35
-2
+5
Macguruguy reviewed on 11 Feb 2012
-1
+24
+62
Psychos reviewed on 03 Feb 2012
I use the terminal heavily, which probably helps as far as not needing Spotlight; I rarely use the Finder, preferring to use the terminal to move files and such for the most part. Combine that with Quicksilver, and hey, I can do almost everything from the keyboard! Yay!
I think my favorite feature (hard to pick, from the thousands...) is the use of triggers to run scripts. I have a few f-key cobos bound to launch various terminals/ssh sessions/etc through the magic of Quicksilver triggers.
For the average user, it's still a great launcher at the VERY least, and I'm guessing most users will get more than that out of it. Even on a pretty recent system with an SSD, I find results pop up faster and better with Quicksilver than with Spotlight... No, it doesn't index random documents as well as Spotlight does, but it's not meant to do that. The two co-exist just fine. :)
The one negative is that for various features, you do need a good bit of advanced configuration. But, hey, it does a ton of stuff even without any advanced config. I've had several friends who used to be primarily GUI-happy but now use Quicksilver at least to launch stuff...and there are far more advanced features than that available, even to the novice. The iTunes, Address Book, etc, plug-ins are all worthwhile.
Oh yeah, and it's free. For one of the very first things I install on any new Mac, I can't complain about that!
+2
+8
+2
+70
Schmelding reviewed on 02 Feb 2012
+1
+14
Xe89 reviewed on 02 Feb 2012
http://www.theverge.com/2012/1/25/2731535/ubuntu-hud-12-04-menu
and I thought, I've used Quicksilver and the UI Access plugin since 2009, and already then the plugin was three years old I think...
+2
+2
Sigs reviewed on 09 Jan 2012
-1
+369
+1
+1
Phubai reviewed on 13 Dec 2011
+2
+62
Kzx72 reviewed on 11 Dec 2011
The options for this thing are limitless and I'm always finding new ways to use QS that I didn't even think were possible. Will make a donation as an appreciation for the service.
-18
+67
I believe the last PPC version of Quicksilver is B58.
+27
+48
I LOVE quicksilver and use it all the time - it has changed the way I use my computer (for the better, no question) but this version just will not work for me.
+2
+48
+1
+35
I hope this can be fixed quickly.
+1
+20
I'm sticking to it anyway, because I'm just so used to the nice bigger previews of the Bezel UI that I get sick each and every time I try to give similar applications a try...
But it's "hurts", really.
I'd shell a reasonable amount of cash out to have Quicksilver, the kind of "application launchers (extensively speaking)", back to its past glory.
+59
+19
+1
+1
+67
When Quicksilver activated, it would let the combination keys selected the whole screen area, instead of the particular selected open window. Disable Quicksilver would correct the problem and let the window-only screenshot functioning again.
+3
MBP/OSX.4.10
and make my computer fan become louder every time I use QS.
in some case it uses most of my RAM, then crashes.
Cataloging my Library folder is still not solved the problem.
So I throw it away.
+2
Widber rated on 17 Feb 2012
+2
OsloX rated on 17 Feb 2012
+1
Libin Pan rated on 06 Feb 2012
+13
Quiiick rated on 05 Feb 2012
+2
Widber rated on 02 Feb 2012
tillkruess rated on 06 Jan 2012
+27
Swordfish rated on 22 Nov 2011
+3
Aacuna4560 rated on 10 Nov 2011
+1
Libin Pan rated on 26 Oct 2011
+9
Fabien Conus rated on 24 Oct 2011